2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhy is it fair for taxpayers to fund and the state to run party nominations and exclude Indies?
Independents pay their taxes just like Democrats and Republicans. Why is it fair that an independent's taxpayer money is going to fund the nomination elections and the state is running them, but independents cannot exercise their right to vote?
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)That's not how it works.
awake
(3,226 posts)GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)School Board members are elected and people may vote on those positions regardless if they have children or not.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)And the state will cover your primary.
Of course in that case, Bernie would have to run as an Independent or some other 3rd party.
brush
(53,771 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)It's easier to imagine oneself as above the fray and not get one's hair mussed with the messy business of politics. Hopefully, this election will serve as a wake-up call for many: commit to something or be ignored.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Birds are territorial creatures.
The lyrics to the songbird's melodious trill go something like this:
"Stay out of my territory or I'll PECK YOUR GODDAMNED EYES OUT!"[/center][/font][hr]
Svafa
(594 posts)Sure, independents can in general favor a particular candidate during an election cycle, but there is no independent platform. I am an independent because I am too far to the left of the Democratic party. My father, a moderate Republican, is also an independent. Though we're both independents, there is not a whole lot we actually agree on. It's a group that can't really be unified into one single party.
SDJay
(1,089 posts)to have taxpayers subsidize religions that pay no income or property taxes. It's not actually fair, but it is what it is. I don't like it either but it's not going to change.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)SDJay
(1,089 posts)is sorta screwy IMO. You've got a mixed bag - open/closed primaries, caucuses, conventions and all sorts of wonky, weird things that are done to nominate someone.
If it was up to me, you'd have open primaries across the country and all of them would be held on the same day.
That'll never happen, though - the for-profit media gets to spew nonsense for months about the daily minutiae of a campaign and empty dump trucks of advertising money into their coffers.
Sadly, elections have become their own for-profit industry. That to me is the real root cause of all of this.
As such, I don't think it's going to change. Too much money to lose.
rock
(13,218 posts)They have to obey rules.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)rock
(13,218 posts)Any system of law has criminals.
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)If the parties claim to be "private" then they
should pay for this themselves. That means
closed caucuses.
dcbuckeye
(79 posts)Indies voluntarily put themselves in this situation when they declared themselves as Indies. Not like this is a new thing or the rules changed mid-stream.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Promote third parties elsewhere.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Codeine
(25,586 posts)I pay for other people's kids to go to school and I'm not whining.
GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)You get to vote on School board elections regardless if you have children, and similarly you get to vote on property taxes regardless if you have children or even own property.