2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIs There Anyone Here Who Still Thinks Bernie Can Win the Nomination?
And if so, please explain the path?
Laffy Kat
(16,373 posts)tgards79
(1,415 posts)...what is the path? I mean, how will/can it happen? Are you just wishing or is there some logic behind the wishing?
Laffy Kat
(16,373 posts)But speculating about how Bernie could win it would also be speculating how Hillary could lose it and I don't want to go there. Who in a million years thought tRump would make it this far, EVER? It's been such a wild ride already. Yes, I do believe anything could happen. Kumbaya, ya'll.
dchill
(38,442 posts)CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)Bernie just opened a campaign office in California!
Karma13612
(4,541 posts)Bernie is in it to win it!
And he can win it!
Orsino
(37,428 posts)But Sanders is pursuing much more than just the nomination. He is competing for hearts and minds among the Democratic elite and supporters, and to influence the direction the party takes at the convention and beyond. he's trying to help save America.
A candidate who is only fighting for the nomination isn't thinking big enough, and the same goes for us. I am in this to help us acquire the tools we need for progressive change, and that agenda isn't dependent on any one candidate or any one election.
Think bigger. Much is at stake.
Califonz
(465 posts)tgards79
(1,415 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Indict. Not going to happen.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)Dem2
(8,166 posts)Errr, don't to meth, I meant mathematically possible. (the typo was unintentional, but too funny to correct.)
tgards79
(1,415 posts)Far more likely than an FBI indictment.
U made me laugh.
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)It's the math that matters...
dchill
(38,442 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)... that any numbers showing HRC in the lead is corporate math.
I never actually understood "corporate math" - but I think it has to do with pretending that real math doesn't exist.
Dem2
(8,166 posts)It's true cuz I read it on the DU. Either that or the poster was doing meth.
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)... 538 is like part of The Establishment, man.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Response to tgards79 (Original post)
Post removed
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)I will be so happy when you folks are tossed out of here for helping republicans.
griffi94
(3,733 posts)Like you I can't wait til she's the presumable nominee
so this place can go back to being a place for Democrats.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)griffi94
(3,733 posts)Target of more witch hunts than any family in the last 50 years.
nothing ever came from any of them.
That's all i'm saying
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)of how Bernie was going to gain 100 delegates from KY, OR and IN.
Sid
lmbradford
(517 posts)I also am not going to waste my time with you....ignoring.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)called out on by others in a number of threads?
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Because even though some think in absolutes, the door isn't closed.
NY was a blow but the delegate swing for Hillary's wasn't that bad. NY also had that terrible voter registration deadline. Where all of the primaries next week. The deadline was a month ago or less.
We are back to waiting on another Tuesday to pass lol.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)Trump will certainly bring up both
Tarc
(10,472 posts)That's really the essence of Bernie's problem is that he has to make significant delegate gains while preventing her from getting much of any, which at this point is a virtual impossibility when all primaries and caucuses are proportional.
Math.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)None of us can foretell the future.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)I'd be scared shitless to view my own future.
What if I turn out to be the little old lady that screams at kids to get off of her lawn?
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)More like "get out of my flower beds, you little hellions."
Aerows
(39,961 posts)it's fine, but you will need to do it away from my tomato plants.
And my cucumbers and my eggplant.
I like to dance but messing up my vegetable crop would be wrong.
Hey, on a side note, what fertilizer do you use? I'm having serious trouble with aphids, too.
TheFarseer
(9,317 posts)Or some new scandal. I don't think Bernie will win but I think he owes it to his supporters and contributors to stay in and let them vote for him if they wish. I would highly suggest he be positive and just promote him self or go after republicans.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)said he won't do that ...he will continue his attacks and his attempt to overturn the vote. Next week should be so miserable for him that he may just give up...hope so.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)Good plan.
TheFarseer
(9,317 posts)or a go after the Republicans strategy. If he wanted to take the gloves off and really go after her, he should have done that already. Now it's too late. And believe me, I was crushed when he didn't win NY. I wanted him to win as much as anyone!
brush
(53,741 posts)Yesterday David Plouffe gently suggested that Bernie needs to really sit down and re-access the continue appeal for funds from his supporters because to continue that while knowing there is no path to getting the nomination is fraud.
You can't take money for something you know is not going to happen.
berniepdx420
(1,784 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)and I think Bernie treads his own path and thank heavens for that.
reddread
(6,896 posts)pedantry pedestrian.
the only one that needs to be nervous is hillary.
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)And always have been. Partly because it has been a very rigged process.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)He lost. His only path is to buy off delegates how funny is that.
Csainvestor
(388 posts)I expect him to win the majority of the contests that are left. I expect him to win at least 3 landslides as well.
KY OR Puerto RICO and IN should let Bernie cut massivley into hills lead. Then he will finish the rest of the west.
This will come down to CA.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)And the more he loses ...the less people will vote for him...by the way Kentucky is a Southern state so he can't count it .
questionseverything
(9,645 posts)brush
(53,741 posts)it's that Sanders doesn't do well with minorities.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)would have imagined, a year ago. I don't think either Bernie or Hillary will go to the convention with enough pledged delegates to clinch the nomination. The superdelegates won't vote for another three months. If Hillary were confident of retaining their support, Brock wouldn't be laying money out for internet psy ops.
Whether or not he can win, I want Bernie to take as many pledged delegates to the convention as possible. I'm not done, nor do I expect to be, any time soon.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)He won't win and he just make us more likely to lose every day he stays in.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)apnu
(8,749 posts)Not in pledged delegates or popular vote accross the whole party.
But he has dragged Hillary to the left, doninated and defined the topics and subjects of this contest, and energized a lot of voters who, otherwise, would be sitting this one out.
All of that is amazing, I hope he keeps going we need his fire and the youth he's brought to the party. We need more loud and bold left/liberal/progressive statements and policies. America has always been at its best when led from liberal principals.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)would likely shift back as soon as he left the race. She doesn't energize people in the way Bernie does, nor do I have any reason to believe she supports his positions. The primary schedule and debate schedule were constructed in a way to favor Hilary and she started the process with the highest possible name recognition and yet is still struggling against an opponent many dismissed as a fringe candidate a year ago. She's ahead because she's had more advantages, not because she's the stronger candidate. We're going to be in trouble in November if she's nominated.
apnu
(8,749 posts)Hillary hasn't struggled with Democrats, and their allies, look at the union endorements. Bernie has not gone after Democrats, he's staging a tea-party-like insurgency on the Democratic Party. He went after young voters and other progressives and left-of-liberal people. They were his only options to be successful at all. Which is brilliant tactics on Bernie's part.
Hillary is hardly struggling in the party. She struggles with progressives and whit youth, but she's very strong with women and PoCs.
I'm not denying that DWS hasn't stacked the deck for Hillary and has been hamfisted doing so, she has. But we have to decide if we want to let that stand or change the party. That's on us, not Bernie.
As for the GE, I think all of the Republican choices are DOA come November. The Democrats could run a ficus plant and a brick and they'd win. The Republicans are that bad and toxic right now. Republicans I know are not energized at all by Trump or Cruz.
Trump's people are the rapidly diminishing Tea Baggers and other marginalized conservatives. Like the Klan and Neo-Nazis. He is not stirring anybody in the RNC or lifelong Republicans that don't wear sheets.
Cruz excites only the religious right. Another diminishing voting block who is threatening to fully break away from the party.
The Republicans are such a mess now, this election is a gift to any Democrat.
griffi94
(3,733 posts)answered the first half of your question
and that they mostly all skipped over the second half where you asked
how.
Haha
Bernie is done.
The people who are hoping for an 11th hour scandal will be disappointed.
I don't even think a scandal or an indictment could save Bernie now.
He's already much too far down.
And after Tuesday he'll be even farther down.
His momentum is gone.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)no threat there, the wtf is she doing?
griffi94
(3,733 posts)That's why she's winning.
Stuckinthebush
(10,836 posts)Dumb move for someone who needs the party members to vote for him.
He's toast. No probable path to victory
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)as well as the establishment will succeed as usual.
That is, however, coming to the GE, a question,
since the republicans are even better at it and
have a longer experience in that regard.
The party does not care, if Kasich or Ryan wins.
GOAL: Keep the status quo at any expense.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Preserving the corporate goose that lays the golden eggs is the main goal of the establishment. It's about self enrichment.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)If he can take the lead in the national poll average. he will have proven that Hillary is no longer the frontrunner in the minds of the American people.
No modern Democratic nominee has ever gone into the convention losing in the national polls, and if Bernie can take that lead in the next couple of weeks, it will affect the outcome of every contest going forward.
Hillary is broke, and getting "broker"......desperately searching for rich donors.
So, Yes he can.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)I mean math. Everybody knows you can't get 250 more than the opponent out of 1400. Right? I mean, math or something like that.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)Or more actually, as I think Clinton's lead is a little greater than 250. She could easily lead by 300+ after April 26, at which point there will be 1016 available delegates. Meaning Sanders would need to win approximately 65% of those 1016.
So, yeah, math.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)And no, the irony is not lost on me. But Bernie would be the stronger candidate in the GE. Hillary is electoral poison. When we're outside the bounds of primary rules, she'll be slaughtered.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)Stuckinthebush
(10,836 posts)And a silly path it is.
So the guy who never was a party member and who constantly attacks the party is planning on turning hundreds of party leaders away from a strong party member because of his glorious radiance?
Delusional.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)Ass.
Following the straight and narrow path...
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)SHRED
(28,136 posts)Garrett78
(10,721 posts)And with a lead of 300+ pledged delegates (2175 to 1875, for instance), getting to 2383 is a mere formality. As I said more than a month ago, after April 26 Sanders needs to consider the potential repercussions of remaining in a race that he absolutely will not win. His campaign was always a message campaign (a message worth expressing, mind you), and it was never realistic for him to become the nominee. As much as his message needs to be expressed, it's time to look at the big picture. Hopefully the Sanders campaign will spark a movement to bring about systemic changes, but he will never become POTUS.
Stuckinthebush
(10,836 posts)Pledged and unpledged will put her way over the top
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)But, anything is possible. It's been a great race; nothing would surprise me at this point. I believe Hillary will win the nomination, and that's cool; I support democracy. But, it should be an entertaining next couple of weeks.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Besides, I loath Clinton and what she stands for - so given that SHE has a snowball's chance in Hell of winning a majority with only pledged delegates, I keep hoping for sanity in the Democratic Party, and superdelegates switching sides, away from "Our Lady of Inevitabilty" to be annointed by another round of 2014 style "Who Else Are Ya Gonna Vote For, you ponywanting hellbound slutty duped complacent sexist racist millennial?"
mmonk
(52,589 posts)Fred Drum
(293 posts)if so, please explain
without refering to brain-dead repugs
peacebird
(14,195 posts)Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)Stuckinthebush
(10,836 posts)It's clear that many more Dems like her over him
Sky Masterson
(5,240 posts)At the convention.
If Bernie has a majority of delegates he will win.
If Hillary flames out he will win.
If not then he will lose.
So I wish people would STFU about it.
If Hillary can't handle an old Jewish socialist then Trump is gonna dismantle her.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)We're all still waiting for that answer which never comes?
All you can do is divert, deflect and obfuscate. What's your answer?????
Fred Drum
(293 posts)rich, generous democrats, who support the rich
did you see the new survivor, its very good
DrDan
(20,411 posts)That Guy 888
(1,214 posts)Response to tgards79 (Original post)
CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)Garrett78
(10,721 posts)Clinton will be a heavy favorite to reach 270+ electoral college votes.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)seem pretty convinced.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)are pretending she has.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)Practically speaking, Clinton wrapped up the nomination on March 15th. After the April 26th primaries are complete, Sanders will likely need 65% (or more) of the remaining delegates in order to win a majority of the pledged delegates. It's fair to say that won't happen.
merrily
(45,251 posts)That is what the Clinton campaign, the msm and some DUers don't seem to understand.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1280109865
Inasmuch as it is irelevant to me, I don't bother my head obessing about it. I just keep donating and volunteering.
Further Hillary remained in the race in 2008 long after her winning the primary was mathematically IMPOSSIBLE. Not merely unlikely, but impossible. Also well after the Republican candidate was clear. So, I find all this panicky perseveration over when Sanders will drop out as hypocritical as Hillary's campaign has always seemed to me.
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)Right now, the least unlikely scenario is medical - if Clinton is hit by a bus or accidentally catches fire, Sanders will win.
But it's not likely.
k8conant
(3,030 posts)The Good Lord willing and the creek don't rise!
Seriously, tgards79, why do you need us to explain the path(s) again?
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)There are a number of delegate calculators available that are easy to use. But if anyone has used one to demonstrate a realistic path to 2026 for Sanders, I missed it. The only attempt I've seen was dubbed the "Bern Path" and it was not realistic (for instance, it had Sanders winning NY and PA and NJ and CA by anywhere from 8-16 points).
Saying "he can win" is different than demonstrating with delegate math.
Stuckinthebush
(10,836 posts)That includes impossible landslides and ignores the role of super delegates.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)dr60omg
(283 posts)There are a myriad of moving parts and variables. Including but notwithstanding what will happen with the missing voters in NY (Arizona sadly will keep voters disenfranchised)
There is California and if you have been in California recently well everywhere there are Berne signs, Bernie bumper stickers and Bernie art
California has gotten very progressive
There is the cumulative effect of protesting her (the most recent was in Pennsylvania one of her many home states, I believe Pennsylvania was where she learned to shoot her gun back in her Annie Oakley days of 2008).
There are also ongoing investigations
There are also ongoing corruption scandals
And if he does not get the nomination we are not putting our tails between our legs and going home but we will not be sheepdogged into voting for Clinton.
In other words it goes in the ballot box or onto the streets ... people are fighting for their very right to be and become and she is not someone who has engendered Sanders supporters trust
I am old. I first worked for Senator McGovern when I could not yet vote in high school. I was a YD President but I also know the Democratic party moved way too far to the right for me and after Jimmy Carter lost to Ronnie Raygun I stopped voting for President because the whole system from the local level on up was corrupt and I do not support a rotten infrastructure. I never voted for a Clinton
When GWB became President I held my nose and voted for Kerry who was a heck of a lot more progressive and a much better secretary of state than HRH I worked and donated for President Obama both in 2008 and 2012 although admittedly 2008 seemed to be awash in possibility which once Arne Duncan was appointed Secretary of Ed I realized was illusory ...
Bernie Sanders is the first candidate for the general who brings me profound joy who shares so many of my own views.
BTW Clinton people ought to think about the math (seriously and not the corrupt incorrect delegate math y'all are being fed like so much pablum). Even if she is the democrats candidate for president there is a large percentage of democrats who won't vote or can't just hold their nose and vote.
There is also the largest group of voters in the US now: the Independents who she will not win (as demonstrated in primaries where Independents could vote) ...
Why would I vote for a neoconservative hawk who also happens to be a neoliberal corporate tool? That is not the Democratic party I know
I think since people are literally fighting for their lives they will be taking to the streets and no not like baby-boomer sort of days ... not when the center does not hold.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)An administration consists of much more than a single individual and the way in which it governs is largely a product of happenings outside of its control. The members of an administration don't create systems so much as operate within them (granted, how some operate certainly differs from how others operate, so I'm not suggesting that it doesn't matter who becomes POTUS). This is one reason why it's a bit too simplistic to compare politicians from different eras by suggesting that so-and-so from today is to the 'right' of so-and-so from yesterday.
I see no reason to believe a Clinton Administration would operate much differently than the Obama Administration has (or a Kerry or Gore Administration would have), external and unforeseen factors notwithstanding. Differently than the Bush Admin or a Trump Admin? Absolutely, though probably not as differently as some imagine (one pretty glaring difference would be who they'd nominate for the Supreme Court).
US culture is extremely individualistic and oriented toward the Cult of Personality, which has distorted perceptions of how much power and influence individual actors have.
One of the 99
(2,280 posts)But Bernie needs to stay in the race until the end. He is bringing up very important issues that would otherwise be ignored.
TrueDemVA
(250 posts)Just asking the question is condescending. It's okay that you support Hillary, but until everyone has voted, why all the concern with his supporters still supporting him.
Many of them will never support Hillary, especially with her supporters being so critical of the individuals that support Bernie.
rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)Can't win at least without a major late surprise.
It's obvious. Such a funny question.