2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie campaign hits a new low. Attacking Hillary by invoking the name
of Bill's former sex partner, Monica Lewinsky, is itself a form of bullying.
Hillary did nothing wrong. She was wronged by Bill and Monica.
(And calling Monica a name in a private email to a friend was a very mild response, as Lewinsky herself has noted.)
https://mobile.twitter.com/maryaliceparks/status/723994673468047360
MaryAlice Parks
MaryAlice Parks? @maryaliceparks
.@RosarioDawson intro'ing Sanders accuses Clinton camp/supporters of bullying: "Now Im with Monica Lewinsky with this. Bullying is bad"
Apr 23, 2016, 2:59:15 PM
B Calm
(28,762 posts)pnwmom
(108,976 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)I wish some people's delicate sensibilities were consistent
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)on a deeply personal level. Invoking her name is not at all comparable to Bill's joking remark.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)pnwmom
(108,976 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)snowy owl
(2,145 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)Equating Sanders positions with random gun violence.....Yeah that's offensive as hell.
And If Sanders ever said anything EVEN CLOSE to what Bill said...you people would have 30 OP's on DU about it, and David Brock would have set the Manufactured Outrage and Offended Machine at full tilt.
appalachiablue
(41,127 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)You don't understand the first thing about sexual harassment at work, something Hillary should have been fighting against. I guess she only fights against it when her dear hubby is not involved.
But she stood by her man, against Monica, and made Monica the bad guy. Bill has has all kinds of picadellos and Hillary has hushed up each one and made herself the victim, instead of the real victims.
You need to take a class in workplace harassment.
Jeesus...and you're a woman?
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)This is the same ridiculous attack that right wingnuts made, all the time. You people need to get a clue.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)There are laws that prohibit teachers from having sexual relationship with their students, even if the student is 18.
That is because there is an imbalance of power. And that power can be used to manipulate people.
Same with pastors and their parishoners; therapists and their patients. Whenever there is an imbalance of power, it is wrong for the person who is in a position of power to take advantage of that power in a sexual manner.
You don't think there was any power differential between the President of the United States, who was in his 50's--and Monica Lewinsky, an intern in her early 20's?
Blaming this all on her is SICK. Bill Clinton behaved like a predator.
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)I've been a Democrat my entire life. I voted for Bill Clinton twice, by the way.
This is not a Republican way of thinking. This is not a Democratic way of thinking. It's the way the majority of the country sees it.
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)thinking. And is a complete rewrite of history. What BC did was wrong, but it wasn't sexual harassment.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)SFnomad
(3,473 posts)SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)SFnomad
(3,473 posts)SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)A boss getting blow jobs from an intern.
That's sexual harassment.
The imbalance of power is there.
We're supposed to believe that there is an imbalance of power between a teacher and a student--but not the President of the United States and a 22 year old intern? Oh please.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)SFnomad
(3,473 posts)harassment, but it is statutory rape, if the student is under age. Monica was a legal age adult. This was NOT sexual harassment ... which also does not make what happened right.
treestar
(82,383 posts)It is only harassment if the underling is being threatened with losing their job AND more importantly, they would not otherwise want to do it
And we have to become adults at some point. What should the age of majority be raised to?
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)it also refers to "imbalance of power" as Susan just said, and it refers to taking advantage of someone who is lower on the power scale.
It is a normal thing for young people to get crushes on older people who have fame and/or power. It is the responsibility of the older person to not take advantage of that crush.
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)It was not sexual harassment, it was a consensual affair.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)And then my step father became my enemy and almost destroyed my life.
I know how it starts and how it ends up. It did not end up good for Lewinski, did it? It didn't end up good for Bill either. He was a married man and her boss, and a superstar to her. He was supposed to be mature enough and responsible enough to not allow this to happen. I know men think with their little heads too often, and in his case, it ruled him on occasion. That doesn't mean it was the right thing to do. Her consent did not make it the right thing to do.
maybe this will help explain it
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1825728
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)You will not get an argument from me that Bill should not have done it ... he shouldn't have.
But what happened was is NO WAY sexual harassment.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)You should do some reading up on it.
Many victims of sexual abuse grow up with serious depression because they blame themselves for what happened. Just like Monica did. And like me. I never told anyone until I was 18 and frigid. I finally went to a therapist. I have dealt with depression my whole life (on and off) because of it. I've not had a normal life, and am unable to have normal relationships with most men, because of it, yet I blamed myself because I loved my stepfather, until he turned on me when I stopped allowing him to touch me. He then turned to emotional abuse and taught me that I was ugly and stupid, and unfortunately, the last part of that stuck. I've always thought I was stupid, dull, slow. He destroyed my life, and then my Mother's life, when he left her for the little girl next door who grew up and married him. She loved him too, but she was 13 when he started having sex with her. Mom never knew. I was too scared to tell her.
You have no idea what that kind of guilt can do to a person. I think Monica is extremely brave to come out publicly now and fight against the bullying she had to put up with. It's not about her and Bill anymore. The bullying came from the public and the press (because they believed Bill's lies, and labelled her a whore).
And you all still want to do that.
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)Courts and employers generally use the definition of sexual harassment contained in the guidelines of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). This language has also formed the basis for most state laws prohibiting sexual harassment. The guidelines state:
Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature constitute sexual harassment when
1.submission to such conduct is made either explicitly or implicitly a term or condition of an individual's employment,
2.submission to or rejection of such conduct by an individual is used as the basis for employment decisions affecting such individuals, or
3.such conduct has the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with an individual's work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive working environment. (29 C.F.R. § 1604.11 [1980])
A key part of the definition is the use of the word unwelcome. Unwelcome or uninvited conduct or communication of a sexual nature is prohibited; welcome or invited actions or words are not unlawful. Sexual or romantic interaction between consenting people at work may be offensive to observers or may violate company policy, but it is not sexual harassment.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Legally, you are right, if it was consensual between two adults. But there is an age difference like there was with Clinton and Lewinski, and a huge power difference, as in this case, he was the most powerful man in the country, and she had a crush on him. She was immature, even though she was 20. He was old enough to know better.
It was morally reprehensible on his part to allow what happened with her to happen...even if it was consensual. He never should have encouraged it, and yet he did, or it never would have happened. Because if it had been forced on him, he would have said so. Because of the age difference and the fact that young people get crushes on superstars all the time, this kind of thing can happen, and it's not quite the same as two adults of the same age falling in love. And he was a huge superstar. You may never have had a crush on a superstar, and may not understand how vulnerable her age and her crush made her.
I think the harrassment part of this is when he lied to the press to say he never had sex with that woman. He put her in a very bad light by telling a lie about her and making her look like a grifter, not just a young woman who got in over her head. And of course, the whole thing of the press and public bullying her for something they weren't bullying him for. So many people defended him over this, and it was pretty reprehensible.
Bill showed his lack of judgement in his involvement with her, and then he treated her like dirt. Just to protect himself and his position of power. Hillary was very brave to stand up to public scrutiny the way she did, but then she will do anything for power and she'd had experience with this sort of infidelity of Bill's before. He was very much like a child
beedle
(1,235 posts)something that Bill was far more responsible for than any 20 year old infatuated intern. Yet the Clintons made sure the shame and bullying ended up landing on the scapegoat.
Once again Hillary supporters only support "women®" in so far as it meets their political agenda ... if supporting "women®" means they need to admit responsibility for something, then fuck you "women®".
Notice Dawson was talking about Bullying? Not sexism? But either way, Hillary supports quickly throw "Women®" overboard no matter if it is about sexism or bullying, just as long as it's in Hillary's interest.
treestar
(82,383 posts)An imbalance, especially when the older person is a celebrity?
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)You have no idea what you are talking about. The law is against you.
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Yes, he did, and it wasn't his first time. He has a history of it.
Young people are vulnerable to older people in places of fame and power, And Monica got a crush on her "boss", just like anyone can get a crush on a superstar. I used to have a crush on Paul McCartney. Why I didn't pick John, I'll never know...but I was crazy about him. If I'd met him in person, I don't know how I would have behaved. I would have been shamelessly fawning all over him. And he probably would have taken advantage of me and then hopped on a plane and flown away.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)I don't care who snaps their thong at a MARRIED man - if he does not have enough self-control to keep from putting his dick in her mouth that he is not a good man at all and definitely NOT a good husband. Period!!
dionysus
(26,467 posts)a scumbag thing to do... he should have had some self control. then we wouldn't have been talking about his shit for DECADES...
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Hell - he didn't have to go on TV and lie to every American that had voted for him.
He is a liar and immoral...what he did was between him and his wife UNTIL he lied to us...then it became our business and our Shame!
You are beyond right. A few frickin blow jobs and it has been the news since the 90's....
dionysus
(26,467 posts)I can't believe the deep, deep loyalty some people have to the Clintons. My first vote ever was for Bill. I voted for him twice, and would vote for him again if I had it to do over, but they are not the same people they were before they became filthy rich. Looking back, they were liars back then, too. Still, better than anybody the GOP has!
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)And he had the obligation, due to his supposed better judgment (you know, what we expect of the POTUS, not to mention an older person) to resist.
beedle
(1,235 posts)in order to be a true Hillary "feminist®" you must be willing to always blame the "woman®" ... unless you can blame Bernie Sanders.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)pnwmom
(108,976 posts)Hillary didn't owe her anything.
Madam Mossfern
(2,340 posts)SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)I was actually in the pro-impeachment camp at the time.
She was a young intern. I considered him in loco parentis.
Today, I think she is a very brave person.
snowy owl
(2,145 posts)Buzz cook
(2,471 posts)My I suggest "The Hunting of the President".
http://www.amazon.com/The-Hunting-President-Ten-Year-Campaign/dp/0312273193
Try to learn from history, not make it up as you go along.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)Hillary never publicly denounced her husband for entering into an incredibly inappropriate employer/employee sexual relationship, not once, but twice (Paula Jones), and probably more.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Bill is Hillary's husband and he is the one that betrayed her and she forgave him. Period end of sentence.
Monica Lewinsky had no relationship with Hillary and therefore no obligation to be anything to her at all. It was HER husband that had "sexual relations" with Monica...so if want to accuse someone of hurting Hillary trying accusing BILL.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)Both Monica and Bill hurt Hillary, and Monica was well aware of that.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Bill knew he was married and still he choose to put his penis in a place it did not belong.
WHY is that okay with you? Why is it bad for Monica to "know he was married" and still be involved and yet you give President Clinton a pass.
That is the question Bill Clinton supporters should ask themselves.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)We expect despicable attacks from the Rethugs but not other Dems.
Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)The so-called feminists defends a man in a power position, and puts all the blame on a femal 20s something intern.
Looks like Hillary and her supporters have something in common:
Flip-floppling!
beedle
(1,235 posts)For Hillary supporters there are women and there are "women®". The latter being things to be used as objects of their expression of faux outrage, or to be jettisoned if their maintenance interferes with political ambitions.
Anytime Hillary of one of her supporters mention any specific group, such as women, minorities, Blacks, Latinos, the poor, etc, just put a little ® at the end of the word and it will help you understand what fucking nonsense they are talking about.
Zen Democrat
(5,901 posts)It was over 20 years ago. Monica's life was ruined and she was vilified by media and political bullies. I think the sympathy Hillary received in the wake of Bill's Big Dog behavior softened her and made her popular for the first time ever. Without Monica Lewinsky, I doubt Hillary could have been elected in New York, Arkansas, Illinois, Pennsylvania or whatever other home states she claims.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)-none
(1,884 posts)We have things like the OP
kstewart33
(6,551 posts)Relationships with Fidel Castro. David Ortega. The Sandinistas. And much more.
The Republicans have them all and are salivating to use them if Bernie gets the nomination.
And I'd wager that those old speeches and videos will cost Bernie a whole lotta more votes than Hillary will lose over Monica who.
At least that's what the Republicans think.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)insightdeluxe
(32 posts)lewinsky is actually a big anti bullying advocate. everybody knows that. unless you like stained dresses.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Only in the Hilliverse is invoking Lewinski's name lower than the act itself.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts).....never mind.
It ain't worth it..........
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)And you need to knock this shit off.
You don't have the right to drag Bill into this. This is about Hillary (who protected Bill when he was bullying) and now she is bullying using Brock to bully Bernie.
She never stood up for Monica before and she is not standing up for Bernie now.
Hillary is OK with bullying to get her way.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,183 posts).
Woo Hoo! for Third-wave Feminism there!
If I recall correctly, this wasn't the first venture away from home for that big dog.
.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)So I'm taking her word for it.
But in any case, it wasn't anything wrong that Hillary did, and it is despicable to use it against her.
TheBlackAdder
(28,183 posts).
I can't believe the stuff I read here at times, and how people spin crap to their wishes.
Each year, for the past 15 years or so, employees in many companies must take classes on this type of "sex partner" relationship between management and subordinate. How the use and abuse of title and power is used similarly to a child sex predator.
Note: If she defines that relationship as anything but "consensual," then it redefines it as sexual predatory or rape.
.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,183 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)radical noodle
(8,000 posts)even if employer/employee. Women are allowed to have consensual sex with their bosses if they want unless there's a company policy against it... in which case you might be fired. You act as though a woman doesn't have sense enough to know the difference.
Trust me on this one, it's entirely possible to have consensual sex with a boss or manager... some affairs go on for years.
However, anyone having sex with a subordinate takes a risk on being charged with sexual harassment if the relationship sours OR if they require the sex to keep their job, get raises, or get any other job related advancement.
TheBlackAdder
(28,183 posts).
It's not illegal, it's written into most HR policies at the state and private levels due to Title VII liabilities.
Sure, back when WJC did it, it was seen as just sleazy. But, HR in most companies and states have barred direct report relationships. If one were to start, someone would either have to move, which opens up lawsuits as to whose job gets lost (mostly the woman). It also opens up suits that an abuse of power occurred, after the relationship breaks off.
The loss of a Security Clearance is what most Federal Employees would undergo:
http://www.state.gov/m/ds/clearances/60321.htm
Sexual Behavior
12. The Concern. Sexual behavior that involves a criminal offense, indicates a personality or emotional disorder, reflects lack of judgment or discretion, or which may subject the individual to undue influence or coercion, exploitation, or duress can raise questions about an individual's reliability, trustworthiness and ability to protect classified information. No adverse inference concerning the standards in the Guideline may be raised solely on the basis of the sexual orientation of the individual.
13. Conditions that could raise a security concern and may be disqualifying include:
(a) sexual behavior of a criminal nature, whether or not the individual has been prosecuted;
(b) a pattern of compulsive, self-destructive, or high-risk sexual behavior that the person is unable to stop or that may be symptomatic of a personality disorder;
(c) sexual behavior that causes an individual to be vulnerable to coercion, exploitation, or duress;
(d) sexual behavior of a public nature and/or that which reflects lack of discretion or judgment.
.
radical noodle
(8,000 posts)I disagree with the idea that consensual sex is impossible if the woman is involved with her superior or that it's illegal in some way.
I'm not an advocate, but I know too many women who fell in love and some even eventually married their bosses. It happens. This is why I think generalizing the Bill/Monica thing is wrong. No one can know for sure what happened but them. I'm sure even Hillary does not know for sure.
I also disagree with the rather strange idea that because Hillary is a feminist she should have taken Monica's side.
TheBlackAdder
(28,183 posts)radical noodle
(8,000 posts)Women (or men) don't need to be saved from themselves. But you're very right... power IS seductive and all you have to do is look at powerful people and their lives... including many presidents.
TheBlackAdder
(28,183 posts).
The fact it was an inappropriate and adulterous act on Federal property shows a lack of control, which should have jeopardized his security clearance, like most other government employees would have been subjected to.
Sexual predators coerce people all the time, without their knowledge. That's what makes them successful at it.
If they were two casual acquaintances, that might be different, but a direct report is another. And if I remember correctly, he kind of told her to do it, and the thing with a cigar, that she both balked at. But history is being rewritten by apologists.
.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)This happened to our next door neighbor. She fell in love with my stepfather. He was having sex with her. He eventually broke up with my Mom and married her.
Yes it happens, and she did fall in love with him, but he also abused her because she was too young to be able to understand the situation and what was happening to her and how he was manipulating her.
He was sexually abusing me when I was 12, and at the same time he was sexually abusing her when she was 13 (it was consensual).
They ended up married, and in your eyes that makes it OK?
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Not in the same universe at all.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)I'm trying to explain that a victim can really not know they are a victim, if they are in love or have a crush on someone who has manipulated them.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)the same. You can't compare an adults ability to consent to a 12 and 13 year olds.
radical noodle
(8,000 posts)(sorry) but a 13 year old girl with your stepfather was statutory rape, pure and simple. A 13 year old girl is not mature enough to make decisions like that, even though she may wish to engage in sexual behavior. We were talking about adult women, not children, and I don't think there's any comparison unless you're implying that grown women are children when it comes to sex (and I have no reason to think that's the case).
I'm not saying anything is okay simply because they got married. Men and women sometimes cheat on their spouses. Am I a fan of this? Not at all. But I also don't like the idea that women have to be protected from their own decisions about sexual relationships. We all make bad choices, many of them involve poor choices in partners. Any intelligent woman who gets involved with a married man knows the pitfalls.
Each case must be weighed on its own because there are too many variables, but for the most part I think people should mind their own business and not think they're in any position to judge.
I am sure that my own life experiences probably color my opinion when it comes to this particular subject as do yours. And I'm really sorry for the abuse you suffered. I hope things are okay with you.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)this was a very young adult and this was not just any "married man". That is the point you all seem to be glossing over. She had a crush (crushes happen a lot when we are young...not as much as we get older) on a superstar. And if you didn't think Bill was a superstar, you weren't paying attention.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)or some other way answering for what he did.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)He had other excesses too and was overweight and his heart gave out in his early 50's.
but thank you Steve.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Of sexual harassment, the law is not limited on who is in whatever position.
It is not smart to continue to bring up this RW talking point and it may be the article of women's sexual fantasies of being raped will be a great talking point. I am more concerned about someone having these thoughts of rape than I am of two consenting adults.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Sure, my boss took advantage of me, but I will always remain firm on this point: it was a consensual relationship. Any abuse came in the aftermath, when I was made a scapegoat in order to protect his powerful position. . . . The special prosecutors minions, the political operatives on both sides of the aisle, and the media were able to brand me. And that brand stuck, in part because it was imbued with power.
And the aftermath was not consensual...he used her and abused her and threw her under the bus.
Bosses are supposed to know better than the have an affair with an employee who has a crush on them. He was her boss, he was older than her, he was a married man, and he was the President of the United States of America. And you want to make him the victim and her the perpetrator?
Some feminist you are.
TheBlackAdder
(28,183 posts).
Refer to Reply Post #11 and my retort Reply Post #12
.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Second post today I have to just say you have this nailed...
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)who engaged in sex act with her husband.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)for screwing subordinate employees. He earned the name Dawg.
No more Bushes, No more Clintons!
840high
(17,196 posts)from home.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,183 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,183 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,183 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)You derailed.
TheBlackAdder
(28,183 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)Did Rosario say anything about Bill's affair? Did she use Bill's affair to attack Hillary?
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)wasn't talking about anti-bullying. The issue was irrelevant.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Rosario was talking about anti-bullying.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)You can't handle the fact that maybe he has a right to accuse Hillary of bulllying. Remember Brock? That is what he does. That is why she hired him.
Get over it.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)OP's M.O. is to drop big stinky turds of fake outrage all over the forum. It's a Hillarian trait.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Leaving aside the absurdity of the "sanders wrote rape porn" crowd preaching idnignantly about this for a moment...
Are people supposed to pretend she doesnt exist? She's right, Bullying is bad.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)"Leaving aside the absurdity of the "sanders wrote rape porn" crowd preaching idnignantly about this for a moment..."
You're a fucking gold, man.
vintx
(1,748 posts)and then get out the smelling salts now that they're getting hit back.
They are NOT going to enjoy the GE, should she get the nod.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)By owning her public shaming and taking it to the people.
She's finally gotten strong enough to come out of the shadows and lead a movement against public bullying.
Shame on you for shitting all over her.
Shame.
Rosario Dawson is simply spotlighting the despicable nature of the Clintons and how they've disposed of Bills inconvenient affairs.
Its not as though the Republicans are going to just have amnesia about this.
Monica Lewinsky re-surfaced last year independent of Hillary's campaign and deserves every last bit of support anyone throws her way.
840high
(17,196 posts)the best in life.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)against Hillary Clinton.
Hillary isn't responsible for the actions of either Bill or Monica. They're the ones who share the blame.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Hillary's attempts to denigrate her very real rape accusation are public record.
Dare we dredge up Paula Jones, Gennifer Flowers, Kathleen Willey, etc...
Hillarys response was to denigrate these women's claims. That's despicable and I'm utterly unwilling to endure trying to defend Bill with his misogyny and her apparent approval.
No true feminist should be minimizing this harm and it's absolutely a campaign topic.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)But whatever happened with any of these women was NOT Hillary's fault.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)And has never taken a dime for her story.
Shame on you for denigrating her rape.
Shame.
Hillarys entirely responsible for the coordinated attacks on these women. She's orchestrated and participated in most of them (if not all).
Read their accounts and weep.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)she allied with Rethugs and changed her story.
I found her interview not credible.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Your disgusting parsing of seual assault victims' testimony because it suits your candidate is noted
Personlly, I don't want them to ever get near the White House again.
I never want to have a conversation about the meaning of "is" again.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)not her TV spot years later, arranged by a Rethug pal.
creeksneakers2
(7,473 posts)Because I never heard of Hillary saying anything about any of those women. They keep claiming she did here but nobody can give me a link on it. I think its a lie. If its "public record" then lets see the "public record."
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Because it was consensual when it started (it often is)?
I mean seriously, because young people having a crush on a super famous person is very much like the crush little girls have on the family pedophile who abuses them.
so, do you blame them too?
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)and she was 24 when she stupidly decided to share with Linda Tripp, the person who secretly taped their conversations.
Monica herself, even today as a middle aged woman, strongly objects to the idea that the sex wasn't consensual.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Especially since she was like Bill's 4th or 5th victim (that we know of).
dflprincess
(28,075 posts)Demsrule86
(68,552 posts)She was the other woman...an adult who chose to have sex with a married man...and you all suck for even discussing it..won't help your sorry candidate...he has lost...deal with it. And all this crap makes me dislike him more...I am at the point if I see his hypocritical face I turn off the TV. It happened 30 years ago...people.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Do you even know what sexual harassment in the workplace is?
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)Suppose I fall for my boss? I Have to get another job? Is it rape?
Seeinghope
(786 posts)Everything that we know and keep hearing and seeing of Hillary Clinton makes us dislike her even more. Only we have a couple of decade for all of these things to have built up. So if you wonder why our tone can be so over the top at times, consider that so many of us have watched Hillary Clinton do much worse things than Bernie Sanders bringing up Monica Lewinsky for decades and many of those things cost people there lives.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)Nothing to see here move along...
seriously do you need this explained to you VERY SLOWLY?
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)stump, campaigning for Hillary.
Now, obviously that deal wasn't HRC's fault, and I defended Bill Clinton during that whole mess... but he shouldn't have got up there and wagged the finger at the country with "I DID NOT..."
For him to get up in front of a crowd and AGAIN wag that same finger in defense of the drug war, in defense of the policies which have people serving 10 year prison sentences for growing pot to ease their chemo nausea... sorry, but you forfeit some of the right to be a sanctimonious jerk when you fall down so publicly due to your own fuckup.
And he's campaigning for her. His administration is part of HER resume, as she is presenting it.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)hellofromreddit
(1,182 posts)For anyone not familiar with the term or the caliber of people using it, I refer you to: https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/search?q=cuck&restrict_sr=on&sort=relevance&t=all
Not safe for work.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)It's actually quite apropos in this situation, because Brock and Hillary have been bullying. It's her style and it's his job.
Baobab
(4,667 posts)Bill wasnt Hillary, I know. But there is no denying that the country paid a high price for the dysfunctional last few years of the Clinton Administration.
We should remember that, suppose Hillary does something equally stupid, the country could be deprived of any kind of decent leadership for years while we wait for her term to end.
Demsrule86
(68,552 posts)help elect a Republican in the fall...you are on dangerous ground here.
840high
(17,196 posts)with a crooked candidate I will not vote for.
Baobab
(4,667 posts)nt
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Or perhaps you have a severe comprehension problem.
Demsrule86
(68,552 posts)He needs to get out and soon...or he will be finished.
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)This is patty cake compared to what Trump is going to say about her and Bill.
Gothmog
(145,129 posts)This attack will hurt sanders
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)hell. the people who introduce you can say anything, whatcha gonna do?
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)JI7
(89,247 posts)she is a supporter who says things .
but it's not like it's officially from Sander's campaign.
Unicorn
(424 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Simply rise above. It does underscore how he sees women and their roles.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Post #84 could be written to you as well.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)not discussing and being lectured on feminism by either you or Prism.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Defending Hillary seems to have really messed you up if you are saying that Lewinsky was not a victim of sexual harassment.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)pnwmom
(108,976 posts)their relations were consensual.
What she objected to was their treatment of her after Linda Trump exposed her.
Prism
(5,815 posts)And this is how I know all logic and critical thinking has gone off the rails.
So a powerless subordinate, in a relationship with the most powerful man in the world, is an object being used to bully.
Bully.
Do you know what that word even means?
And then that 23 year old was dragged to hell and back, with Clinton surrogates basically painting her as a deranged stalker.
And she's the bully.
I bet you call yourself a feminist. It's funny how all the tenets of that ideology are immediately set aside in order to defend the Clintons.
They must be super special.
Blaukraut
(5,693 posts)Lesson learned.
MichiganVote
(21,086 posts)runaway hero
(835 posts)It's politics.
frustrated_lefty
(2,774 posts)It's a valid issue and it's a criticism that WOULD come up in a general election.
Bill boinking Monica is irrelevant. The manner in which Hillary demeaned so many accusers is the point. She shows crappy judgment in both her personal and professional life.
vintx
(1,748 posts)Which one of them called her trailer trash?
I can't remember.
snowy owl
(2,145 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)riversedge
(70,186 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)There is plenty of reason to bring him and his history into the calculation. Think the opposition disagrees?
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)likes him a lot more than Rethugs do.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)Or gone to meet their maker.
"It's a new world,.Golda!"
BeyondGeography
(39,369 posts)I will keep my powder dry.
Vinca
(50,261 posts)Back in the day Hillary called them "bimbo eruptions." I think that's what we'll be experiencing for the next 6 months.
Demnorth
(68 posts)Now how to introduce something to blast Clinton?: Clinton supporters are bullying Sanders supporters....who's been speaking out against bullying? Monica Lewinsky...connection to The Clintons....yes!
I saw the clip, and it even fell flat with the audience. Sanders sidestepped the question of taking responsibility, with Jake Tapper. Sanders shouldn't have spokespeople like this, the surrogate Dawson's negative comments after Dr. Song intro'd him using the comment about "corporate Democratic whores".
Disappointing for him that he has such negative spokespeople, when his promise is all positive.
beedle
(1,235 posts)It's always the "woman's®" fault ..... unless of course there's a way to lay all the blame on Bernie Sanders.
In this case you've managed to do both it seems.
You've made Hillary proud.
Autumn
(45,056 posts)shitload of smelling salts should she win the nomination, I plan on buying a lot of popcorn myself.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)Autumn
(45,056 posts)support all women where some of you only support Hillary.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)And so is anyone who condones her slimy attack.
Autumn
(45,056 posts)Rosario was saying. Like I said, stock up on smelling salts if Monica's name make you uncomfortable, it will be inserted a lot.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)They should listen to her, not invoke her name against Hillary.
Autumn
(45,056 posts)kstewart33
(6,551 posts)Are fair game.
Cue the videos!
riversedge
(70,186 posts)beedle
(1,235 posts)was it Bill's former sex partner Monica, or Monica's former sex partner Bill?
And when someone talks about Monica being bullied, why should Clinton supporters bullying be seen as somehow bullying Hillary?
If Hillary thinks that politically speaking Bill is too close to her and any mention of his ex sex partner is meant as a bully tactic toward her, then she should do what she always does when someone, some group, or something might cause her campaign harm ... jettison Bill like she just did with her staunch anti-gun rhetoric.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)Monica was the woman who decided to enter into a sexual relationship with Bill (not caring about the fact that he was married or that they would be hurting his wife) and then blabbed about her exploits with Linda Tripp, who secretly recorded their chats and turned them over to the Rethugs.
Democrats who invoke Monica's name to attack Hillary are as bad as the Rethugs who do so.
Gothmog
(145,129 posts)This is a really sad line of attack