Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 09:48 PM Apr 2016

Bernie campaign hits a new low. Attacking Hillary by invoking the name

of Bill's former sex partner, Monica Lewinsky, is itself a form of bullying.

Hillary did nothing wrong. She was wronged by Bill and Monica.

(And calling Monica a name in a private email to a friend was a very mild response, as Lewinsky herself has noted.)

https://mobile.twitter.com/maryaliceparks/status/723994673468047360

MaryAlice Parks
MaryAlice Parks? @maryaliceparks

.@RosarioDawson intro'ing Sanders accuses Clinton camp/supporters of bullying: "Now I’m with Monica Lewinsky with this. Bullying is bad"

Apr 23, 2016, 2:59:15 PM

189 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie campaign hits a new low. Attacking Hillary by invoking the name (Original Post) pnwmom Apr 2016 OP
and look who brought it to DU. B Calm Apr 2016 #1
Right. We shouldn't bring anything to DU that might spoil Bernie-so-pure's image. n/t pnwmom Apr 2016 #6
How about her husband joking about Sanders supporters wanting to shoot people Armstead Apr 2016 #10
What individual's feelings were hurt by that? Lewinsky is a person who hurt Hillary pnwmom Apr 2016 #18
if Bill jokes about me wanting to shoot people then I am not amused Rosa Luxemburg Apr 2016 #19
He didn't. n/t pnwmom Apr 2016 #20
The Hell He Didn't Armstead Apr 2016 #24
HRC blind loyalty. Leslie Stahl on Maher said "Clinton...biggest hawk" of all candidates inc. GOP snowy owl Apr 2016 #153
My feelings were hurt....Well, not really but I was highly offended on many levels Armstead Apr 2016 #21
+10 appalachiablue Apr 2016 #86
You think Monaca wasn't a victim? passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #30
Sexual harassment? ML snapper her thong at President Clinton and pursued him!! SFnomad Apr 2016 #40
Excuse me, but this is incredibly sexist and ignorant CoffeeCat Apr 2016 #56
Nice to see you rewriting history like a Republican n/t SFnomad Apr 2016 #59
Nice to see you sticking your head in the sand like an ostrich CoffeeCat Apr 2016 #63
To be calling what happened between BC and ML "sexual harassment" is certainly Republican way of SFnomad Apr 2016 #68
Imbalance of power. nt SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #76
She pursued him, multiple times - not sexual harassment n/t SFnomad Apr 2016 #81
And someone supposedly smart enough to be POTUS couldn't deal? nt SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #85
He should have ... he didn't. That was his fault. That doesn't make it sexual harassment. n/t SFnomad Apr 2016 #89
Ooooookaaaaaaay. nt SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #96
It was sexual harassment CoffeeCat Apr 2016 #78
^THIS^ SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #87
If something happens between a teacher and a student (and the student pursued) that is not sexual SFnomad Apr 2016 #91
Baloney. treestar Apr 2016 #139
that term does not always mean someone was harrassed passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #123
The longer this goes on, the more the BS cheerleaders sound like Republicans SFnomad Apr 2016 #126
I was sexually abused and manipulated by someone I adored passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #129
Monica was NOT sexually abused or manipulated, jesus christ SFnomad Apr 2016 #132
I'm sorry, but it's obvious you know nothing about sexual abuse/harrassment passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #134
FFS, I have done some reading up on it ... you are wrong SFnomad Apr 2016 #135
I said it might not be harrassment, but that doesn't mean it's not wrong passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #148
No, she was bullied for "ruining the reputation" of Bill beedle Apr 2016 #158
So younger against the many marriages out there with such treestar Apr 2016 #140
Nice to see you rewriting history like a Hillary fan passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #72
No, the law is not ... you people make crap up all the time n/t SFnomad Apr 2016 #93
Thank you. SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #77
'Bill Clinton behaved like a predator' passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #122
You are wrong... Silver_Witch Apr 2016 #61
+1 i cant believe people are defending his behavior... even though he didn't break the law, it was dionysus Apr 2016 #174
Or he could have just told the truth! Silver_Witch Apr 2016 #180
i can't believe the hyperbole. "bernie has sunk to new lows.." the clintons are professional liars. dionysus Apr 2016 #188
Oh dear god. SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #82
The moral of the story beedle Apr 2016 #168
Thank you that was perfect!! Silver_Witch Apr 2016 #60
She wasn't Hillary's victim. SHE hurt Hillary, not the other way around. pnwmom Apr 2016 #64
No, Madam Mossfern Apr 2016 #124
Yep. SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #73
She was old enough to know better. Clintons and victims. Tiring. snowy owl Apr 2016 #115
just how ignorant are you? Buzz cook Apr 2016 #117
That would be Bill Clinton whose sexual exploits were the problem. JimDandy Apr 2016 #32
Lewinsky did not hurt Hillary - BILL DID! Silver_Witch Apr 2016 #57
Monica knew he was married and chose to get involved with him anyway. pnwmom Apr 2016 #143
And your point? Silver_Witch Apr 2016 #172
Hillary had NOTHING to do with it and Dems shouldn't be invoking Monica's name to attack Hillary. pnwmom Apr 2016 #173
right! Bohemianwriter Apr 2016 #120
Ahh I see your confusion beedle Apr 2016 #164
Her had her feelings hurt? Poor, poor Hillary. Zen Democrat Apr 2016 #128
But you defend Bill? It was that girl monica? Poor hill! Voice for Peace Apr 2016 #142
They can't use or stick to the issues that concern this country, so... -none Apr 2016 #97
Okay then. Time to dust off the videos starring Bernie and his Communist and Marxist friends. kstewart33 Apr 2016 #176
+1. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #189
nothing to see here insightdeluxe Apr 2016 #2
Bill brought the country to a new low whatchamacallit Apr 2016 #3
Using Lewinsky's name to attack Bill's WIFE is a very low blow for Bernie-so-pure to approve of. n/t pnwmom Apr 2016 #4
Uh, TheCowsCameHome Apr 2016 #8
Except, this has absolutely nothing to do with bill and only to do with Bullying. passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #88
This is the look of losing Iliyah Apr 2016 #5
Yep. Sad way to exit. Hoyt Apr 2016 #7
Final throes. NurseJackie Apr 2016 #17
Exactly. A loser. Nt seabeyond Apr 2016 #83
Did I just read that an "employer - subordinate sex act" being described as "former sex partner"? TheBlackAdder Apr 2016 #9
Lewinsky even today insists that she approached him and it was completely consensual. pnwmom Apr 2016 #11
Regardless of what she says, it's so wrong that many states now have laws against it. TheBlackAdder Apr 2016 #12
The point is the Bernie campaign is using Lewinsky to attack Hillary. That's despicable. n/t pnwmom Apr 2016 #14
That's valid, to a degree. But, one of WJC's contributions to society are these new HR policies. nt TheBlackAdder Apr 2016 #15
The point is that they are using her as an example of bullying, not of sexual harrassment. passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #33
Consensual sex is not illegal (except perhaps in the military) radical noodle Apr 2016 #48
But it's not consensual when someone holds a position of power over another. (Illegal wrong word) TheBlackAdder Apr 2016 #70
I don't disagree with that but radical noodle Apr 2016 #99
Woman or man: Power can be seductive, apply tacit pressure which can affect decision making. nt TheBlackAdder Apr 2016 #101
Agreed... but it's their decision to make if they're adults unless being coerced radical noodle Apr 2016 #104
Coercion is a subjective term. TheBlackAdder Apr 2016 #106
I'm going to try to explain why it is wrong passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #127
Did you just compare a 12 and 13 year old's ability to consent to a 22 year old's? stevenleser Apr 2016 #146
I'm not comparing ages. passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #149
You may not intend to but as soon as you list the ages it's the dominating factor. It's not remotely stevenleser Apr 2016 #150
Your stepfather sounds like an ass radical noodle Apr 2016 #152
Thank you. I survived. passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #154
BTW, I am very sorry for what you experienced and I hope your stepfather ended up in prison stevenleser Apr 2016 #160
He never went to prison, but he did die fairly young passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #165
Yes, since Lewinsky did the approaching then perhaps she is guilty Thinkingabout Apr 2016 #161
Just because it's consensual does not mean it wasn't innapropriate. passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #31
Did you post on the wrong post? TheBlackAdder Apr 2016 #41
Okay - I think you are the wisest person here!!! Silver_Witch Apr 2016 #69
This has NOTHING to do with Hillary. She had no obligation to champion the woman pnwmom Apr 2016 #119
Yes, no feminist pedestal for Hillary on this. Disgusting that she never even denounced Bill JimDandy Apr 2016 #39
Not the first or LAST venture 840high Apr 2016 #50
Did I just read another attempt to derail the discussion? Yup.nt stevenleser Apr 2016 #145
If so, you possess limited critical thinking skills. Opinions, yes. Skills, questionable. TheBlackAdder Apr 2016 #157
Nope. I know a derail when I see it. nt stevenleser Apr 2016 #159
Yep, you're practicing in the art right now. TheBlackAdder Apr 2016 #162
Nope, Pointing out a derail is not derailing. nt stevenleser Apr 2016 #163
Classic obfuscation, that's all. A specialty of yours. TheBlackAdder Apr 2016 #166
If you think so, you don't know what obfuscation means. My point is very straightfoward. stevenleser Apr 2016 #167
In your mind it does. That's all that matters. This is going nowhere since you must win. TheBlackAdder Apr 2016 #169
Lewinsky has been a huge anti-bullying advocate. morningfog Apr 2016 #13
Naming Lewinsky in that intro was only done to hurt Hillary. Sanders pnwmom Apr 2016 #16
So your answer to my questions is "no." morningfog Apr 2016 #29
That is just bullshit. passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #35
Yes. Manufactured poutrage is bullshit. HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #42
Yes, I'm getting to know this MO all too often passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #43
"Invoking the name" - is she a demon? Warren DeMontague Apr 2016 #22
Ha ha ha! You are SO GOOD! Bonobo Apr 2016 #27
No kidding, they routinely trot out that essay vintx Apr 2016 #113
Monica Lewinsky has inserted herself into the campaign riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #23
I wish this beautiful woman 840high Apr 2016 #51
Rosario Dawson is the one dragging Monica into this campaign and using her as a weapon pnwmom Apr 2016 #55
Juanita Broadrrick puts paid to that lie riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #62
Juanita is a Republican tool. I don't believe anything she says. Monica is a more honest person. pnwmom Apr 2016 #67
Then you've never watched her interviews. She's 100% credible riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #74
She swore under penalty of perjury that he didn't rape her. Then, years later, pnwmom Apr 2016 #79
You obviously didn't watch her. riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #90
She gave her testimony under oath. That's the testimony I believe, pnwmom Apr 2016 #116
Do you have a link? creeksneakers2 Apr 2016 #121
Do you also put blame on children who have been sexually abused passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #133
Monica wasn't a child. She was a 22 year old college graduate when it began pnwmom Apr 2016 #136
Calling a victim a "narcissistic loony" is not a nice thing. Bonobo Apr 2016 #25
One might even call it sexist. nt dflprincess Apr 2016 #38
She was not a victim Demsrule86 Apr 2016 #46
OMG, she was just 22 years old and he was her boss and the President of the US. Bonobo Apr 2016 #47
^THIS^ SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #92
Should the age of majority be raised? treestar Apr 2016 #138
Now you kind of know how Bernie Sanders supporters feel Seeinghope Apr 2016 #58
yeah they were just two adults, equal in power relations and age, having an affair! m-lekktor Apr 2016 #75
Only in a parallel universe can the cuckquean not be the wronged and innocent party. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #26
Monical Lewinsky is a part of the historical record, and Hillary's husband has been out there on the Warren DeMontague Apr 2016 #34
The *what*??? nt SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #94
It's the female version of a cuckold. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #95
Ummmnkay.... nt SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #98
"cuck" hellofromreddit Apr 2016 #131
They are not talking about Bill, but instead Monica's new campaign against bullying. passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #28
fact is, Bill did something extremely stupid Baobab Apr 2016 #36
Not as high as we will pay if you Bernie groupies Demsrule86 Apr 2016 #45
The dangerous ground starts 840high Apr 2016 #53
And Hillary is? Baobab Apr 2016 #105
You're pro-bullying? That figures. HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #37
I suppose Bernie smiled and nodded Demsrule86 Apr 2016 #44
A form of bullying....give me a fucking break....this is politics at a VERY high level.... Joe the Revelator Apr 2016 #49
Sanders is not going to be the nominee Gothmog Apr 2016 #52
well that is about a stupid as when we were told that women who don't vote for women are all going hollysmom Apr 2016 #54
Sanders has lost all control of his camp. Nt NCTraveler Apr 2016 #65
i wouldn't really consider Rosario Dawson as Bernie's official Campaign . JI7 Apr 2016 #66
I fail to see the problem. Monica is right, bullying is bad. This was used in correct context. Unicorn Apr 2016 #71
Sanders has nothing to gain but let people see the contemptable man he is. Clinton of course will seabeyond Apr 2016 #80
And THAT underscores how YOU see them apparently. Bonobo Apr 2016 #100
84 has nothing to do with Sanders being an ass using it as a weapon against Hillary. I am certinaly seabeyond Apr 2016 #107
Sounds like someone needs to straighten you out. Bonobo Apr 2016 #108
Maybe you ought to re read my two posts instead of making shit up. seabeyond Apr 2016 #110
Monica herself says she was not the victim of sexual harassment, that she initiated it and pnwmom Apr 2016 #118
"A form of bullying" Prism Apr 2016 #84
I knew it was inevitable. I just thought that only the Republicans would stoop that low. Blaukraut Apr 2016 #102
Yup. Agree. Pathetic. MichiganVote Apr 2016 #109
How is this bad? runaway hero Apr 2016 #103
Grow Up. frustrated_lefty Apr 2016 #111
Butbutbut... he did NOT have sex, with that woman! vintx Apr 2016 #112
Why pay attention to this stuff? Non-starter. snowy owl Apr 2016 #114
Is she tough? Or not so tough? cherokeeprogressive Apr 2016 #125
As severe despiration sets in, we can expect new lows from Bernie surrogates. riversedge Apr 2016 #130
Nailed it. Drop the mic, done. nt stevenleser Apr 2016 #147
Bill comes w the wife Voice for Peace Apr 2016 #137
Bill's popularity was at his highest AFTER his impeachment. The general population pnwmom Apr 2016 #141
Probably most of them are in old age homes. Voice for Peace Apr 2016 #144
Bernie has some hotheaded surrogates, but until he goes there personally BeyondGeography Apr 2016 #151
Better get used to it. Vinca Apr 2016 #155
6 degrees of separation. Demnorth Apr 2016 #156
Spoken like a true Hillary feminist® beedle Apr 2016 #170
The republicans will bring up all of his former sex partners. Suggest you get used to it and buy a Autumn Apr 2016 #171
At least you're admitting these people are behaving as badly as the Rethugs. Thanks. nt pnwmom Apr 2016 #177
You should try listening to what she said. I fully support what she said about Monica but then I Autumn Apr 2016 #178
She just looked for a way to insert Monica's name into her intro. What a nasty person. pnwmom Apr 2016 #179
Monica speaks out against bullying and Monica's stand on bullying fit what Autumn Apr 2016 #182
Monica is speaking out on bullying, of the kind that Bernie supporters are experts in. pnwmom Apr 2016 #186
Stings does it that she was brought up and will be brought up again? Autumn Apr 2016 #187
Well if that's how the game is playing, then Bernie's past Communist and Marxist relationships... kstewart33 Apr 2016 #175
Dawson embarrasses herself as well as the Sanders campaign by bringing this up riversedge Apr 2016 #181
Sorry, I always get confused on this relationship beedle Apr 2016 #183
Rosario has chosen to invoke the name of Monica in order to attack Hillary Clinton. pnwmom Apr 2016 #185
The Sanders campaign is losing and so are getting nasty Gothmog Apr 2016 #184
 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
10. How about her husband joking about Sanders supporters wanting to shoot people
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 10:11 PM
Apr 2016

I wish some people's delicate sensibilities were consistent

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
18. What individual's feelings were hurt by that? Lewinsky is a person who hurt Hillary
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 10:22 PM
Apr 2016

on a deeply personal level. Invoking her name is not at all comparable to Bill's joking remark.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
21. My feelings were hurt....Well, not really but I was highly offended on many levels
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 10:28 PM
Apr 2016

Equating Sanders positions with random gun violence.....Yeah that's offensive as hell.

And If Sanders ever said anything EVEN CLOSE to what Bill said...you people would have 30 OP's on DU about it, and David Brock would have set the Manufactured Outrage and Offended Machine at full tilt.


passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
30. You think Monaca wasn't a victim?
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 10:39 PM
Apr 2016

You don't understand the first thing about sexual harassment at work, something Hillary should have been fighting against. I guess she only fights against it when her dear hubby is not involved.

But she stood by her man, against Monica, and made Monica the bad guy. Bill has has all kinds of picadellos and Hillary has hushed up each one and made herself the victim, instead of the real victims.

You need to take a class in workplace harassment.

Jeesus...and you're a woman?

 

SFnomad

(3,473 posts)
40. Sexual harassment? ML snapper her thong at President Clinton and pursued him!!
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 11:10 PM
Apr 2016

This is the same ridiculous attack that right wingnuts made, all the time. You people need to get a clue.

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
56. Excuse me, but this is incredibly sexist and ignorant
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 12:02 AM
Apr 2016

There are laws that prohibit teachers from having sexual relationship with their students, even if the student is 18.

That is because there is an imbalance of power. And that power can be used to manipulate people.

Same with pastors and their parishoners; therapists and their patients. Whenever there is an imbalance of power, it is wrong for the person who is in a position of power to take advantage of that power in a sexual manner.

You don't think there was any power differential between the President of the United States, who was in his 50's--and Monica Lewinsky, an intern in her early 20's?

Blaming this all on her is SICK. Bill Clinton behaved like a predator.

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
63. Nice to see you sticking your head in the sand like an ostrich
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 12:07 AM
Apr 2016

I've been a Democrat my entire life. I voted for Bill Clinton twice, by the way.

This is not a Republican way of thinking. This is not a Democratic way of thinking. It's the way the majority of the country sees it.

 

SFnomad

(3,473 posts)
68. To be calling what happened between BC and ML "sexual harassment" is certainly Republican way of
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 12:10 AM
Apr 2016

thinking. And is a complete rewrite of history. What BC did was wrong, but it wasn't sexual harassment.

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
78. It was sexual harassment
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 12:17 AM
Apr 2016

A boss getting blow jobs from an intern.

That's sexual harassment.

The imbalance of power is there.

We're supposed to believe that there is an imbalance of power between a teacher and a student--but not the President of the United States and a 22 year old intern? Oh please.

 

SFnomad

(3,473 posts)
91. If something happens between a teacher and a student (and the student pursued) that is not sexual
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 12:27 AM
Apr 2016

harassment, but it is statutory rape, if the student is under age. Monica was a legal age adult. This was NOT sexual harassment ... which also does not make what happened right.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
139. Baloney.
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 07:25 PM
Apr 2016

It is only harassment if the underling is being threatened with losing their job AND more importantly, they would not otherwise want to do it

And we have to become adults at some point. What should the age of majority be raised to?

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
123. that term does not always mean someone was harrassed
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 06:28 PM
Apr 2016

it also refers to "imbalance of power" as Susan just said, and it refers to taking advantage of someone who is lower on the power scale.

It is a normal thing for young people to get crushes on older people who have fame and/or power. It is the responsibility of the older person to not take advantage of that crush.

 

SFnomad

(3,473 posts)
126. The longer this goes on, the more the BS cheerleaders sound like Republicans
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 06:44 PM
Apr 2016

It was not sexual harassment, it was a consensual affair.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
129. I was sexually abused and manipulated by someone I adored
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 06:56 PM
Apr 2016

And then my step father became my enemy and almost destroyed my life.

I know how it starts and how it ends up. It did not end up good for Lewinski, did it? It didn't end up good for Bill either. He was a married man and her boss, and a superstar to her. He was supposed to be mature enough and responsible enough to not allow this to happen. I know men think with their little heads too often, and in his case, it ruled him on occasion. That doesn't mean it was the right thing to do. Her consent did not make it the right thing to do.

maybe this will help explain it
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1825728

 

SFnomad

(3,473 posts)
132. Monica was NOT sexually abused or manipulated, jesus christ
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 07:04 PM
Apr 2016

You will not get an argument from me that Bill should not have done it ... he shouldn't have.

But what happened was is NO WAY sexual harassment.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
134. I'm sorry, but it's obvious you know nothing about sexual abuse/harrassment
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 07:11 PM
Apr 2016

You should do some reading up on it.

Many victims of sexual abuse grow up with serious depression because they blame themselves for what happened. Just like Monica did. And like me. I never told anyone until I was 18 and frigid. I finally went to a therapist. I have dealt with depression my whole life (on and off) because of it. I've not had a normal life, and am unable to have normal relationships with most men, because of it, yet I blamed myself because I loved my stepfather, until he turned on me when I stopped allowing him to touch me. He then turned to emotional abuse and taught me that I was ugly and stupid, and unfortunately, the last part of that stuck. I've always thought I was stupid, dull, slow. He destroyed my life, and then my Mother's life, when he left her for the little girl next door who grew up and married him. She loved him too, but she was 13 when he started having sex with her. Mom never knew. I was too scared to tell her.

You have no idea what that kind of guilt can do to a person. I think Monica is extremely brave to come out publicly now and fight against the bullying she had to put up with. It's not about her and Bill anymore. The bullying came from the public and the press (because they believed Bill's lies, and labelled her a whore).

And you all still want to do that.


 

SFnomad

(3,473 posts)
135. FFS, I have done some reading up on it ... you are wrong
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 07:13 PM
Apr 2016
Courts and employers generally use the definition of sexual harassment contained in the guidelines of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). This language has also formed the basis for most state laws prohibiting sexual harassment. The guidelines state:

Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature constitute sexual harassment when
1.submission to such conduct is made either explicitly or implicitly a term or condition of an individual's employment,
2.submission to or rejection of such conduct by an individual is used as the basis for employment decisions affecting such individuals, or
3.such conduct has the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with an individual's work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive working environment. (29 C.F.R. § 1604.11 [1980])

A key part of the definition is the use of the word unwelcome. Unwelcome or uninvited conduct or communication of a sexual nature is prohibited; welcome or invited actions or words are not unlawful. Sexual or romantic interaction between consenting people at work may be offensive to observers or may violate company policy, but it is not sexual harassment.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
148. I said it might not be harrassment, but that doesn't mean it's not wrong
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 07:40 PM
Apr 2016

Legally, you are right, if it was consensual between two adults. But there is an age difference like there was with Clinton and Lewinski, and a huge power difference, as in this case, he was the most powerful man in the country, and she had a crush on him. She was immature, even though she was 20. He was old enough to know better.

It was morally reprehensible on his part to allow what happened with her to happen...even if it was consensual. He never should have encouraged it, and yet he did, or it never would have happened. Because if it had been forced on him, he would have said so. Because of the age difference and the fact that young people get crushes on superstars all the time, this kind of thing can happen, and it's not quite the same as two adults of the same age falling in love. And he was a huge superstar. You may never have had a crush on a superstar, and may not understand how vulnerable her age and her crush made her.

I think the harrassment part of this is when he lied to the press to say he never had sex with that woman. He put her in a very bad light by telling a lie about her and making her look like a grifter, not just a young woman who got in over her head. And of course, the whole thing of the press and public bullying her for something they weren't bullying him for. So many people defended him over this, and it was pretty reprehensible.

Bill showed his lack of judgement in his involvement with her, and then he treated her like dirt. Just to protect himself and his position of power. Hillary was very brave to stand up to public scrutiny the way she did, but then she will do anything for power and she'd had experience with this sort of infidelity of Bill's before. He was very much like a child

 

beedle

(1,235 posts)
158. No, she was bullied for "ruining the reputation" of Bill
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 08:05 PM
Apr 2016

something that Bill was far more responsible for than any 20 year old infatuated intern. Yet the Clintons made sure the shame and bullying ended up landing on the scapegoat.

Once again Hillary supporters only support "women®" in so far as it meets their political agenda ... if supporting "women®" means they need to admit responsibility for something, then fuck you "women®".

Notice Dawson was talking about Bullying? Not sexism? But either way, Hillary supports quickly throw "Women®" overboard no matter if it is about sexism or bullying, just as long as it's in Hillary's interest.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
140. So younger against the many marriages out there with such
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 07:26 PM
Apr 2016

An imbalance, especially when the older person is a celebrity?

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
72. Nice to see you rewriting history like a Hillary fan
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 12:13 AM
Apr 2016

You have no idea what you are talking about. The law is against you.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
122. 'Bill Clinton behaved like a predator'
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 06:11 PM
Apr 2016

Yes, he did, and it wasn't his first time. He has a history of it.

Young people are vulnerable to older people in places of fame and power, And Monica got a crush on her "boss", just like anyone can get a crush on a superstar. I used to have a crush on Paul McCartney. Why I didn't pick John, I'll never know...but I was crazy about him. If I'd met him in person, I don't know how I would have behaved. I would have been shamelessly fawning all over him. And he probably would have taken advantage of me and then hopped on a plane and flown away.

 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
61. You are wrong...
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 12:07 AM
Apr 2016

I don't care who snaps their thong at a MARRIED man - if he does not have enough self-control to keep from putting his dick in her mouth that he is not a good man at all and definitely NOT a good husband. Period!!

dionysus

(26,467 posts)
174. +1 i cant believe people are defending his behavior... even though he didn't break the law, it was
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 08:41 PM
Apr 2016

a scumbag thing to do... he should have had some self control. then we wouldn't have been talking about his shit for DECADES...

 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
180. Or he could have just told the truth!
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 09:07 PM
Apr 2016

Hell - he didn't have to go on TV and lie to every American that had voted for him.

He is a liar and immoral...what he did was between him and his wife UNTIL he lied to us...then it became our business and our Shame!

You are beyond right. A few frickin blow jobs and it has been the news since the 90's....

dionysus

(26,467 posts)
188. i can't believe the hyperbole. "bernie has sunk to new lows.." the clintons are professional liars.
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 01:34 AM
Apr 2016

I can't believe the deep, deep loyalty some people have to the Clintons. My first vote ever was for Bill. I voted for him twice, and would vote for him again if I had it to do over, but they are not the same people they were before they became filthy rich. Looking back, they were liars back then, too. Still, better than anybody the GOP has!

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
82. Oh dear god.
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 12:20 AM
Apr 2016

And he had the obligation, due to his supposed better judgment (you know, what we expect of the POTUS, not to mention an older person) to resist.

 

beedle

(1,235 posts)
168. The moral of the story
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 08:16 PM
Apr 2016

in order to be a true Hillary "feminist®" you must be willing to always blame the "woman®" ... unless you can blame Bernie Sanders.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
64. She wasn't Hillary's victim. SHE hurt Hillary, not the other way around.
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 12:09 AM
Apr 2016

Hillary didn't owe her anything.

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
73. Yep.
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 12:13 AM
Apr 2016

I was actually in the pro-impeachment camp at the time.

She was a young intern. I considered him in loco parentis.

Today, I think she is a very brave person.

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
32. That would be Bill Clinton whose sexual exploits were the problem.
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 10:48 PM
Apr 2016

Hillary never publicly denounced her husband for entering into an incredibly inappropriate employer/employee sexual relationship, not once, but twice (Paula Jones), and probably more.

 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
57. Lewinsky did not hurt Hillary - BILL DID!
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 12:02 AM
Apr 2016

Bill is Hillary's husband and he is the one that betrayed her and she forgave him. Period end of sentence.

Monica Lewinsky had no relationship with Hillary and therefore no obligation to be anything to her at all. It was HER husband that had "sexual relations" with Monica...so if want to accuse someone of hurting Hillary trying accusing BILL.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
143. Monica knew he was married and chose to get involved with him anyway.
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 07:30 PM
Apr 2016

Both Monica and Bill hurt Hillary, and Monica was well aware of that.

 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
172. And your point?
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 08:28 PM
Apr 2016

Bill knew he was married and still he choose to put his penis in a place it did not belong.

WHY is that okay with you? Why is it bad for Monica to "know he was married" and still be involved and yet you give President Clinton a pass.

That is the question Bill Clinton supporters should ask themselves.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
173. Hillary had NOTHING to do with it and Dems shouldn't be invoking Monica's name to attack Hillary.
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 08:32 PM
Apr 2016

We expect despicable attacks from the Rethugs but not other Dems.

 

Bohemianwriter

(978 posts)
120. right!
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 03:14 AM
Apr 2016

The so-called feminists defends a man in a power position, and puts all the blame on a femal 20s something intern.

Looks like Hillary and her supporters have something in common:

Flip-floppling!

 

beedle

(1,235 posts)
164. Ahh I see your confusion
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 08:11 PM
Apr 2016

For Hillary supporters there are women and there are "women®". The latter being things to be used as objects of their expression of faux outrage, or to be jettisoned if their maintenance interferes with political ambitions.

Anytime Hillary of one of her supporters mention any specific group, such as women, minorities, Blacks, Latinos, the poor, etc, just put a little ® at the end of the word and it will help you understand what fucking nonsense they are talking about.

Zen Democrat

(5,901 posts)
128. Her had her feelings hurt? Poor, poor Hillary.
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 06:51 PM
Apr 2016

It was over 20 years ago. Monica's life was ruined and she was vilified by media and political bullies. I think the sympathy Hillary received in the wake of Bill's Big Dog behavior softened her and made her popular for the first time ever. Without Monica Lewinsky, I doubt Hillary could have been elected in New York, Arkansas, Illinois, Pennsylvania or whatever other home states she claims.

-none

(1,884 posts)
97. They can't use or stick to the issues that concern this country, so...
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 12:31 AM
Apr 2016

We have things like the OP

kstewart33

(6,551 posts)
176. Okay then. Time to dust off the videos starring Bernie and his Communist and Marxist friends.
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 08:52 PM
Apr 2016

Relationships with Fidel Castro. David Ortega. The Sandinistas. And much more.

The Republicans have them all and are salivating to use them if Bernie gets the nomination.

And I'd wager that those old speeches and videos will cost Bernie a whole lotta more votes than Hillary will lose over Monica who.

At least that's what the Republicans think.

 

insightdeluxe

(32 posts)
2. nothing to see here
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 09:51 PM
Apr 2016

lewinsky is actually a big anti bullying advocate. everybody knows that. unless you like stained dresses.

whatchamacallit

(15,558 posts)
3. Bill brought the country to a new low
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 09:54 PM
Apr 2016

Only in the Hilliverse is invoking Lewinski's name lower than the act itself.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
4. Using Lewinsky's name to attack Bill's WIFE is a very low blow for Bernie-so-pure to approve of. n/t
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 09:56 PM
Apr 2016

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
88. Except, this has absolutely nothing to do with bill and only to do with Bullying.
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 12:24 AM
Apr 2016

And you need to knock this shit off.

You don't have the right to drag Bill into this. This is about Hillary (who protected Bill when he was bullying) and now she is bullying using Brock to bully Bernie.

She never stood up for Monica before and she is not standing up for Bernie now.

Hillary is OK with bullying to get her way.

TheBlackAdder

(28,183 posts)
9. Did I just read that an "employer - subordinate sex act" being described as "former sex partner"?
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 10:10 PM
Apr 2016

.


Woo Hoo! for Third-wave Feminism there!


If I recall correctly, this wasn't the first venture away from home for that big dog.


.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
11. Lewinsky even today insists that she approached him and it was completely consensual.
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 10:12 PM
Apr 2016

So I'm taking her word for it.

But in any case, it wasn't anything wrong that Hillary did, and it is despicable to use it against her.

TheBlackAdder

(28,183 posts)
12. Regardless of what she says, it's so wrong that many states now have laws against it.
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 10:13 PM
Apr 2016

.


I can't believe the stuff I read here at times, and how people spin crap to their wishes.

Each year, for the past 15 years or so, employees in many companies must take classes on this type of "sex partner" relationship between management and subordinate. How the use and abuse of title and power is used similarly to a child sex predator.


Note: If she defines that relationship as anything but "consensual," then it redefines it as sexual predatory or rape.


.

radical noodle

(8,000 posts)
48. Consensual sex is not illegal (except perhaps in the military)
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 11:40 PM
Apr 2016

even if employer/employee. Women are allowed to have consensual sex with their bosses if they want unless there's a company policy against it... in which case you might be fired. You act as though a woman doesn't have sense enough to know the difference.

Trust me on this one, it's entirely possible to have consensual sex with a boss or manager... some affairs go on for years.

However, anyone having sex with a subordinate takes a risk on being charged with sexual harassment if the relationship sours OR if they require the sex to keep their job, get raises, or get any other job related advancement.

TheBlackAdder

(28,183 posts)
70. But it's not consensual when someone holds a position of power over another. (Illegal wrong word)
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 12:12 AM
Apr 2016

.


It's not illegal, it's written into most HR policies at the state and private levels due to Title VII liabilities.


Sure, back when WJC did it, it was seen as just sleazy. But, HR in most companies and states have barred direct report relationships. If one were to start, someone would either have to move, which opens up lawsuits as to whose job gets lost (mostly the woman). It also opens up suits that an abuse of power occurred, after the relationship breaks off.


The loss of a Security Clearance is what most Federal Employees would undergo:

http://www.state.gov/m/ds/clearances/60321.htm

Guideline D:
Sexual Behavior

12. The Concern. Sexual behavior that involves a criminal offense, indicates a personality or emotional disorder, reflects lack of judgment or discretion, or which may subject the individual to undue influence or coercion, exploitation, or duress can raise questions about an individual's reliability, trustworthiness and ability to protect classified information. No adverse inference concerning the standards in the Guideline may be raised solely on the basis of the sexual orientation of the individual.

13. Conditions that could raise a security concern and may be disqualifying include:

(a) sexual behavior of a criminal nature, whether or not the individual has been prosecuted;

(b) a pattern of compulsive, self-destructive, or high-risk sexual behavior that the person is unable to stop or that may be symptomatic of a personality disorder;

(c) sexual behavior that causes an individual to be vulnerable to coercion, exploitation, or duress;

(d) sexual behavior of a public nature and/or that which reflects lack of discretion or judgment.



.

radical noodle

(8,000 posts)
99. I don't disagree with that but
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 12:34 AM
Apr 2016

I disagree with the idea that consensual sex is impossible if the woman is involved with her superior or that it's illegal in some way.

I'm not an advocate, but I know too many women who fell in love and some even eventually married their bosses. It happens. This is why I think generalizing the Bill/Monica thing is wrong. No one can know for sure what happened but them. I'm sure even Hillary does not know for sure.

I also disagree with the rather strange idea that because Hillary is a feminist she should have taken Monica's side.

radical noodle

(8,000 posts)
104. Agreed... but it's their decision to make if they're adults unless being coerced
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 12:50 AM
Apr 2016

Women (or men) don't need to be saved from themselves. But you're very right... power IS seductive and all you have to do is look at powerful people and their lives... including many presidents.

TheBlackAdder

(28,183 posts)
106. Coercion is a subjective term.
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 12:59 AM
Apr 2016

.


The fact it was an inappropriate and adulterous act on Federal property shows a lack of control, which should have jeopardized his security clearance, like most other government employees would have been subjected to.


Sexual predators coerce people all the time, without their knowledge. That's what makes them successful at it.

If they were two casual acquaintances, that might be different, but a direct report is another. And if I remember correctly, he kind of told her to do it, and the thing with a cigar, that she both balked at. But history is being rewritten by apologists.


.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
127. I'm going to try to explain why it is wrong
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 06:48 PM
Apr 2016
I know too many women who fell in love and some even eventually married their bosses. It happens.


This happened to our next door neighbor. She fell in love with my stepfather. He was having sex with her. He eventually broke up with my Mom and married her.

Yes it happens, and she did fall in love with him, but he also abused her because she was too young to be able to understand the situation and what was happening to her and how he was manipulating her.

He was sexually abusing me when I was 12, and at the same time he was sexually abusing her when she was 13 (it was consensual).

They ended up married, and in your eyes that makes it OK?
 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
146. Did you just compare a 12 and 13 year old's ability to consent to a 22 year old's?
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 07:34 PM
Apr 2016

Not in the same universe at all.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
149. I'm not comparing ages.
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 07:41 PM
Apr 2016

I'm trying to explain that a victim can really not know they are a victim, if they are in love or have a crush on someone who has manipulated them.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
150. You may not intend to but as soon as you list the ages it's the dominating factor. It's not remotely
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 07:43 PM
Apr 2016

the same. You can't compare an adults ability to consent to a 12 and 13 year olds.

radical noodle

(8,000 posts)
152. Your stepfather sounds like an ass
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 07:52 PM
Apr 2016

(sorry) but a 13 year old girl with your stepfather was statutory rape, pure and simple. A 13 year old girl is not mature enough to make decisions like that, even though she may wish to engage in sexual behavior. We were talking about adult women, not children, and I don't think there's any comparison unless you're implying that grown women are children when it comes to sex (and I have no reason to think that's the case).

I'm not saying anything is okay simply because they got married. Men and women sometimes cheat on their spouses. Am I a fan of this? Not at all. But I also don't like the idea that women have to be protected from their own decisions about sexual relationships. We all make bad choices, many of them involve poor choices in partners. Any intelligent woman who gets involved with a married man knows the pitfalls.

Each case must be weighed on its own because there are too many variables, but for the most part I think people should mind their own business and not think they're in any position to judge.

I am sure that my own life experiences probably color my opinion when it comes to this particular subject as do yours. And I'm really sorry for the abuse you suffered. I hope things are okay with you.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
154. Thank you. I survived.
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 07:56 PM
Apr 2016
Any intelligent woman who gets involved with a married man knows the pitfalls.


this was a very young adult and this was not just any "married man". That is the point you all seem to be glossing over. She had a crush (crushes happen a lot when we are young...not as much as we get older) on a superstar. And if you didn't think Bill was a superstar, you weren't paying attention.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
160. BTW, I am very sorry for what you experienced and I hope your stepfather ended up in prison
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 08:07 PM
Apr 2016

or some other way answering for what he did.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
165. He never went to prison, but he did die fairly young
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 08:11 PM
Apr 2016

He had other excesses too and was overweight and his heart gave out in his early 50's.

but thank you Steve.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
161. Yes, since Lewinsky did the approaching then perhaps she is guilty
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 08:09 PM
Apr 2016

Of sexual harassment, the law is not limited on who is in whatever position.

It is not smart to continue to bring up this RW talking point and it may be the article of women's sexual fantasies of being raped will be a great talking point. I am more concerned about someone having these thoughts of rape than I am of two consenting adults.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
31. Just because it's consensual does not mean it wasn't innapropriate.
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 10:47 PM
Apr 2016
“Sure, my boss took advantage of me, but I will always remain firm on this point: it was a consensual relationship. Any ‘abuse’ came in the aftermath, when I was made a scapegoat in order to protect his powerful position. . . . The special prosecutor’s minions, the political operatives on both sides of the aisle, and the media were able to brand me. And that brand stuck, in part because it was imbued with power.”


And the aftermath was not consensual...he used her and abused her and threw her under the bus.

Bosses are supposed to know better than the have an affair with an employee who has a crush on them. He was her boss, he was older than her, he was a married man, and he was the President of the United States of America. And you want to make him the victim and her the perpetrator?

Some feminist you are.
 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
69. Okay - I think you are the wisest person here!!!
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 12:12 AM
Apr 2016

Second post today I have to just say you have this nailed...

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
119. This has NOTHING to do with Hillary. She had no obligation to champion the woman
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 03:11 AM
Apr 2016

who engaged in sex act with her husband.

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
39. Yes, no feminist pedestal for Hillary on this. Disgusting that she never even denounced Bill
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 11:09 PM
Apr 2016

for screwing subordinate employees. He earned the name Dawg.

No more Bushes, No more Clintons!

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
167. If you think so, you don't know what obfuscation means. My point is very straightfoward.
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 08:15 PM
Apr 2016

You derailed.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
13. Lewinsky has been a huge anti-bullying advocate.
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 10:17 PM
Apr 2016

Did Rosario say anything about Bill's affair? Did she use Bill's affair to attack Hillary?

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
16. Naming Lewinsky in that intro was only done to hurt Hillary. Sanders
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 10:19 PM
Apr 2016

wasn't talking about anti-bullying. The issue was irrelevant.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
35. That is just bullshit.
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 10:50 PM
Apr 2016

You can't handle the fact that maybe he has a right to accuse Hillary of bulllying. Remember Brock? That is what he does. That is why she hired him.

Get over it.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
42. Yes. Manufactured poutrage is bullshit.
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 11:12 PM
Apr 2016

OP's M.O. is to drop big stinky turds of fake outrage all over the forum. It's a Hillarian trait.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
22. "Invoking the name" - is she a demon?
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 10:28 PM
Apr 2016

Leaving aside the absurdity of the "sanders wrote rape porn" crowd preaching idnignantly about this for a moment...

Are people supposed to pretend she doesnt exist? She's right, Bullying is bad.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
27. Ha ha ha! You are SO GOOD!
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 10:31 PM
Apr 2016

"Leaving aside the absurdity of the "sanders wrote rape porn" crowd preaching idnignantly about this for a moment..."

You're a fucking gold, man.

 

vintx

(1,748 posts)
113. No kidding, they routinely trot out that essay
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 02:27 AM
Apr 2016

and then get out the smelling salts now that they're getting hit back.

They are NOT going to enjoy the GE, should she get the nod.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
23. Monica Lewinsky has inserted herself into the campaign
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 10:29 PM
Apr 2016

By owning her public shaming and taking it to the people. 

She's finally gotten strong enough to come out of the shadows and lead a movement against public bullying. 

Shame on you for shitting all over her. 

Shame. 

Rosario Dawson is simply spotlighting the despicable nature of the Clintons and how they've disposed of Bills inconvenient affairs. 

Its not as though the Republicans are going to just have amnesia about this. 

Monica Lewinsky re-surfaced last year independent of Hillary's campaign and deserves every last bit of support anyone throws her way. 


pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
55. Rosario Dawson is the one dragging Monica into this campaign and using her as a weapon
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 11:53 PM
Apr 2016

against Hillary Clinton.

Hillary isn't responsible for the actions of either Bill or Monica. They're the ones who share the blame.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
62. Juanita Broadrrick puts paid to that lie
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 12:07 AM
Apr 2016

Hillary's attempts to denigrate her very real rape accusation are public record.

Dare we dredge up Paula Jones, Gennifer Flowers, Kathleen Willey, etc...

Hillary’s response was to denigrate these women's claims. That's despicable and I'm utterly unwilling to endure trying to defend Bill with his misogyny and her apparent approval.

No true feminist should be minimizing this harm and it's absolutely a campaign topic.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
67. Juanita is a Republican tool. I don't believe anything she says. Monica is a more honest person.
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 12:10 AM
Apr 2016

But whatever happened with any of these women was NOT Hillary's fault.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
74. Then you've never watched her interviews. She's 100% credible
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 12:15 AM
Apr 2016

And has never taken a dime for her story.

Shame on you for denigrating her rape.

Shame.

Hillary’s entirely responsible for the coordinated attacks on these women. She's orchestrated and participated in most of them (if not all).

Read their accounts and weep.


pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
79. She swore under penalty of perjury that he didn't rape her. Then, years later,
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 12:18 AM
Apr 2016

she allied with Rethugs and changed her story.

I found her interview not credible.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
90. You obviously didn't watch her.
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 12:26 AM
Apr 2016


Your disgusting parsing of seual assault victims' testimony because it suits your candidate is noted
Personlly, I don't want them to ever get near the White House again.

I never want to have a conversation about the meaning of "is" again.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
116. She gave her testimony under oath. That's the testimony I believe,
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 02:39 AM
Apr 2016

not her TV spot years later, arranged by a Rethug pal.

creeksneakers2

(7,473 posts)
121. Do you have a link?
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 03:26 AM
Apr 2016

Because I never heard of Hillary saying anything about any of those women. They keep claiming she did here but nobody can give me a link on it. I think its a lie. If its "public record" then lets see the "public record."

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
133. Do you also put blame on children who have been sexually abused
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 07:08 PM
Apr 2016

Because it was consensual when it started (it often is)?

I mean seriously, because young people having a crush on a super famous person is very much like the crush little girls have on the family pedophile who abuses them.

so, do you blame them too?

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
136. Monica wasn't a child. She was a 22 year old college graduate when it began
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 07:20 PM
Apr 2016

and she was 24 when she stupidly decided to share with Linda Tripp, the person who secretly taped their conversations.

Monica herself, even today as a middle aged woman, strongly objects to the idea that the sex wasn't consensual.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
25. Calling a victim a "narcissistic loony" is not a nice thing.
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 10:30 PM
Apr 2016

Especially since she was like Bill's 4th or 5th victim (that we know of).

Demsrule86

(68,552 posts)
46. She was not a victim
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 11:26 PM
Apr 2016

She was the other woman...an adult who chose to have sex with a married man...and you all suck for even discussing it..won't help your sorry candidate...he has lost...deal with it. And all this crap makes me dislike him more...I am at the point if I see his hypocritical face I turn off the TV. It happened 30 years ago...people.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
47. OMG, she was just 22 years old and he was her boss and the President of the US.
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 11:36 PM
Apr 2016

Do you even know what sexual harassment in the workplace is?

treestar

(82,383 posts)
138. Should the age of majority be raised?
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 07:22 PM
Apr 2016

Suppose I fall for my boss? I Have to get another job? Is it rape?

 

Seeinghope

(786 posts)
58. Now you kind of know how Bernie Sanders supporters feel
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 12:02 AM
Apr 2016

Everything that we know and keep hearing and seeing of Hillary Clinton makes us dislike her even more. Only we have a couple of decade for all of these things to have built up. So if you wonder why our tone can be so over the top at times, consider that so many of us have watched Hillary Clinton do much worse things than Bernie Sanders bringing up Monica Lewinsky for decades and many of those things cost people there lives.

m-lekktor

(3,675 posts)
75. yeah they were just two adults, equal in power relations and age, having an affair!
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 12:15 AM
Apr 2016

Nothing to see here move along...

seriously do you need this explained to you VERY SLOWLY?

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
34. Monical Lewinsky is a part of the historical record, and Hillary's husband has been out there on the
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 10:50 PM
Apr 2016

stump, campaigning for Hillary.

Now, obviously that deal wasn't HRC's fault, and I defended Bill Clinton during that whole mess... but he shouldn't have got up there and wagged the finger at the country with "I DID NOT..."

For him to get up in front of a crowd and AGAIN wag that same finger in defense of the drug war, in defense of the policies which have people serving 10 year prison sentences for growing pot to ease their chemo nausea... sorry, but you forfeit some of the right to be a sanctimonious jerk when you fall down so publicly due to your own fuckup.

And he's campaigning for her. His administration is part of HER resume, as she is presenting it.


passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
28. They are not talking about Bill, but instead Monica's new campaign against bullying.
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 10:33 PM
Apr 2016

It's actually quite apropos in this situation, because Brock and Hillary have been bullying. It's her style and it's his job.

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
36. fact is, Bill did something extremely stupid
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 11:06 PM
Apr 2016

Bill wasnt Hillary, I know. But there is no denying that the country paid a high price for the dysfunctional last few years of the Clinton Administration.


We should remember that, suppose Hillary does something equally stupid, the country could be deprived of any kind of decent leadership for years while we wait for her term to end.

Demsrule86

(68,552 posts)
45. Not as high as we will pay if you Bernie groupies
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 11:24 PM
Apr 2016

help elect a Republican in the fall...you are on dangerous ground here.

 

Joe the Revelator

(14,915 posts)
49. A form of bullying....give me a fucking break....this is politics at a VERY high level....
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 11:41 PM
Apr 2016

This is patty cake compared to what Trump is going to say about her and Bill.

hollysmom

(5,946 posts)
54. well that is about a stupid as when we were told that women who don't vote for women are all going
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 11:53 PM
Apr 2016

hell. the people who introduce you can say anything, whatcha gonna do?

JI7

(89,247 posts)
66. i wouldn't really consider Rosario Dawson as Bernie's official Campaign .
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 12:09 AM
Apr 2016

she is a supporter who says things .

but it's not like it's officially from Sander's campaign.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
80. Sanders has nothing to gain but let people see the contemptable man he is. Clinton of course will
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 12:19 AM
Apr 2016

Simply rise above. It does underscore how he sees women and their roles.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
107. 84 has nothing to do with Sanders being an ass using it as a weapon against Hillary. I am certinaly
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 01:02 AM
Apr 2016

not discussing and being lectured on feminism by either you or Prism.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
108. Sounds like someone needs to straighten you out.
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 01:06 AM
Apr 2016

Defending Hillary seems to have really messed you up if you are saying that Lewinsky was not a victim of sexual harassment.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
118. Monica herself says she was not the victim of sexual harassment, that she initiated it and
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 03:09 AM
Apr 2016

their relations were consensual.

What she objected to was their treatment of her after Linda Trump exposed her.

 

Prism

(5,815 posts)
84. "A form of bullying"
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 12:22 AM
Apr 2016

And this is how I know all logic and critical thinking has gone off the rails.

So a powerless subordinate, in a relationship with the most powerful man in the world, is an object being used to bully.

Bully.

Do you know what that word even means?

And then that 23 year old was dragged to hell and back, with Clinton surrogates basically painting her as a deranged stalker.

And she's the bully.

I bet you call yourself a feminist. It's funny how all the tenets of that ideology are immediately set aside in order to defend the Clintons.

They must be super special.

Blaukraut

(5,693 posts)
102. I knew it was inevitable. I just thought that only the Republicans would stoop that low.
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 12:38 AM
Apr 2016

Lesson learned.

frustrated_lefty

(2,774 posts)
111. Grow Up.
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 02:23 AM
Apr 2016

It's a valid issue and it's a criticism that WOULD come up in a general election.

Bill boinking Monica is irrelevant. The manner in which Hillary demeaned so many accusers is the point. She shows crappy judgment in both her personal and professional life.

 

vintx

(1,748 posts)
112. Butbutbut... he did NOT have sex, with that woman!
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 02:24 AM
Apr 2016

Which one of them called her trailer trash?

I can't remember.

 

Voice for Peace

(13,141 posts)
137. Bill comes w the wife
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 07:22 PM
Apr 2016

There is plenty of reason to bring him and his history into the calculation. Think the opposition disagrees?

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
141. Bill's popularity was at his highest AFTER his impeachment. The general population
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 07:28 PM
Apr 2016

likes him a lot more than Rethugs do.

 

Voice for Peace

(13,141 posts)
144. Probably most of them are in old age homes.
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 07:31 PM
Apr 2016

Or gone to meet their maker.
"It's a new world,.Golda!"

Vinca

(50,261 posts)
155. Better get used to it.
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 07:59 PM
Apr 2016

Back in the day Hillary called them "bimbo eruptions." I think that's what we'll be experiencing for the next 6 months.

Demnorth

(68 posts)
156. 6 degrees of separation.
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 08:03 PM
Apr 2016

Now how to introduce something to blast Clinton?: Clinton supporters are bullying Sanders supporters....who's been speaking out against bullying? Monica Lewinsky...connection to The Clintons....yes!

I saw the clip, and it even fell flat with the audience. Sanders sidestepped the question of taking responsibility, with Jake Tapper. Sanders shouldn't have spokespeople like this, the surrogate Dawson's negative comments after Dr. Song intro'd him using the comment about "corporate Democratic whores".

Disappointing for him that he has such negative spokespeople, when his promise is all positive.

 

beedle

(1,235 posts)
170. Spoken like a true Hillary feminist®
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 08:19 PM
Apr 2016

It's always the "woman's®" fault ..... unless of course there's a way to lay all the blame on Bernie Sanders.

In this case you've managed to do both it seems.

You've made Hillary proud.

Autumn

(45,056 posts)
171. The republicans will bring up all of his former sex partners. Suggest you get used to it and buy a
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 08:22 PM
Apr 2016

shitload of smelling salts should she win the nomination, I plan on buying a lot of popcorn myself.

Autumn

(45,056 posts)
178. You should try listening to what she said. I fully support what she said about Monica but then I
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 08:55 PM
Apr 2016

support all women where some of you only support Hillary.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
179. She just looked for a way to insert Monica's name into her intro. What a nasty person.
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 09:06 PM
Apr 2016

And so is anyone who condones her slimy attack.

Autumn

(45,056 posts)
182. Monica speaks out against bullying and Monica's stand on bullying fit what
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 09:18 PM
Apr 2016

Rosario was saying. Like I said, stock up on smelling salts if Monica's name make you uncomfortable, it will be inserted a lot.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
186. Monica is speaking out on bullying, of the kind that Bernie supporters are experts in.
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 10:23 PM
Apr 2016

They should listen to her, not invoke her name against Hillary.

kstewart33

(6,551 posts)
175. Well if that's how the game is playing, then Bernie's past Communist and Marxist relationships...
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 08:46 PM
Apr 2016

Are fair game.

Cue the videos!

 

beedle

(1,235 posts)
183. Sorry, I always get confused on this relationship
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 09:30 PM
Apr 2016

was it Bill's former sex partner Monica, or Monica's former sex partner Bill?

And when someone talks about Monica being bullied, why should Clinton supporters bullying be seen as somehow bullying Hillary?

If Hillary thinks that politically speaking Bill is too close to her and any mention of his ex sex partner is meant as a bully tactic toward her, then she should do what she always does when someone, some group, or something might cause her campaign harm ... jettison Bill like she just did with her staunch anti-gun rhetoric.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
185. Rosario has chosen to invoke the name of Monica in order to attack Hillary Clinton.
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 10:22 PM
Apr 2016

Monica was the woman who decided to enter into a sexual relationship with Bill (not caring about the fact that he was married or that they would be hurting his wife) and then blabbed about her exploits with Linda Tripp, who secretly recorded their chats and turned them over to the Rethugs.

Democrats who invoke Monica's name to attack Hillary are as bad as the Rethugs who do so.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie campaign hits a ne...