Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:40 AM

JaneyVee (19,877 posts)

Who's going to step up and apologize?

Personal responsibility is an admirable trait.

218 replies, 5817 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

218 replies	Author	Time	Post
Who's going to step up and apologize? (Original post)	JaneyVee	Apr 2016	OP
But it was TREASON.	auntpurl	Apr 2016	#1
I read that too - what does it say about a demographic that considers it treason when	DrDan	Apr 2016	#6
EVERYTHING IS A CONSPIRACY	auntpurl	Apr 2016	#9
All starting with Hillary's evil machinations,	Hortensis	Apr 2016	#71
It says they're clueless twits.	randome	Apr 2016	#10
Best response award!	Stuckinthebush	Apr 2016	#166
When your revolution takes place exclusively on Twitter, I guess a social media hiccup WOULD look	Squinch	Apr 2016	#20
This is an awesome comment...	SidDithers	Apr 2016	#26
Hey Einstien...	jack_krass	Apr 2016	#42
58 "DU-Recs" (and counting) is not "one or two DUers"	NurseJackie	Apr 2016	#64
Oh sure! Corporate cover-up for Shillary!!	Adrahil	Apr 2016	#60
That was mind boggling. Treason? WTF!	grossproffit	Apr 2016	#104
Crickets!	FSogol	Apr 2016	#2
You seem mad, Janey.	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#3
Mad? Im LOL'ing.	JaneyVee	Apr 2016	#13
Yes. Both my parents "laugh" like that when they're upset...	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#23
MORE CONSPIRACIES: JaneyVee laughed! WHAT DOES SHE MEAN BY THAT???????	Squinch	Apr 2016	#28
You DEFINITELY...	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#32
Now I am the one who reminds you of your parents, Buddy?	Squinch	Apr 2016	#38
No.	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#43
You might be projecting just a tad, there, friend!	Squinch	Apr 2016	#49
I'm not posting rofl's...	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#51
.	Squinch	Apr 2016	#52
Oh look...	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#55
Oh, my God, Buddy! You just keep giving, don't you?	Squinch	Apr 2016	#58
Look how furious you are.	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#61
You did, Buddy! You did!	Squinch	Apr 2016	#63
More rolling laughing faces...	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#65
Ha ha ha ha. Lol, This is getting cute. Some one turned me onto it. I was messing it all. Nt	seabeyond	Apr 2016	#111
There's a direct correlation between how many...	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#125
Prove it. Kinda like the Sanders campaign, say whatever and expect people to take it as fact.	seabeyond	Apr 2016	#126
I accept your surrender....	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#129
OMG... Sanders, is this you. Lol.	seabeyond	Apr 2016	#130
I accept your surrender as well...	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#131
Yup, happy people enjoying a win.	seabeyond	Apr 2016	#132
Surrender accepted...	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#133
Have you really been here since 2004? And I have never had the pleasure having conversation in all	seabeyond	Apr 2016	#135
Yes....	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#136
mmmmm. I am remembering Kerry supporters and thinking you are not all that correct.	seabeyond	Apr 2016	#137
I wasn't a Kerry supporter until the GE.	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#138
Kerry, Clinton, Obama... So, since you have no issues with Kerry that says it all.	seabeyond	Apr 2016	#153
Huh?	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#154
I do hope you are better at identifying others emotions in real life, than on the nets....	seabeyond	Apr 2016	#158
Dawn of the dead.	JTFrog	Apr 2016	#141
Long time posters certainly need to be on the lookout...	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#155
Yes, we all signed up ten to fifteen years ago just in hopes of getting the big dough from Clinton.	JTFrog	Apr 2016	#156
You seem angry.	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#157
JTFrog struck a nerve.	displacedtexan	Apr 2016	#169
Oh my. Ah ha. Woman....	seabeyond	Apr 2016	#159
Bernie math!	BainsBane	Apr 2016	#174
Our Buddy seems to have	wildeyed	Apr 2016	#181
He seems to still live with them.	Starry Messenger	Apr 2016	#191
Lol. Wait! Did I just lol?????	sufrommich	Apr 2016	#34
I see! I see! You are hissing and spitting with your laughter! I fear you!	Squinch	Apr 2016	#35
So mad...	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#45
Maybe if you post more guys rolling on the floor laughing...	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#50
I'm lmao not a bit angry	rbrnmw	Apr 2016	#82
Trying too hard...	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#84
I am now laughing so hard I'm crying. thanks!!!	rbrnmw	Apr 2016	#87
Isnt' he adorable?	Squinch	Apr 2016	#91
Precious. Truly. Nt	seabeyond	Apr 2016	#113
You're not actually laughing so hard you're crying...	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#92
Wait. Let me check. Yep. I am definitely laughing. Sorry!	randome	Apr 2016	#95
No...	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#103
Hey, against the rules calling a poster a liar. Ya know. ;)	seabeyond	Apr 2016	#114
Is he for real?	Agschmid	Apr 2016	#147
Are you this guy?	sufrommich	Apr 2016	#101
I see you're upset about being exposed...	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#105
OK	rbrnmw	Apr 2016	#117
Too funny, right? I love her laugh. Nt	seabeyond	Apr 2016	#112
me too	rbrnmw	Apr 2016	#119
We're not mad.	wildeyed	Apr 2016	#183
bwahahahaha	DemonGoddess	Apr 2016	#99
.	Squinch	Apr 2016	#102
Again with the rofl's...	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#106
This sub-thread should have DUers embarrassed; but, it won't.	1StrongBlackMan	Apr 2016	#145
My guess is that if you're laughing you're plotting.	George II	Apr 2016	#171
Squinch!	sheshe2	Apr 2016	#182
Back at ya! And happy day after the primary!	Squinch	Apr 2016	#189
Awe.... Give yourself some credit...	MrMickeysMom	Apr 2016	#27
Wait, what am I supposed to be mad about again?	JaneyVee	Apr 2016	#31
The treason, JaneyVee! Our treasonous infiltration of their social media has been FOILED AGAIN!!!	Squinch	Apr 2016	#40
If you were telling the truth in your op...	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#48
Seem to be mad? This shit is genuinely hilarious!	JaneyVee	Apr 2016	#56
You're not upset about the accusations?	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#59
Using your own logic...	JaneyVee	Apr 2016	#66
It's your thread, Janey...	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#67
I love when men tell me how Im supposed to feel.	JaneyVee	Apr 2016	#70
Oh awesome...	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#72
OMG... Lol, you pulled the Misandrist card. Ah ha.	seabeyond	Apr 2016	#115
Knows the definition of "misandrist" but not "mad"!	George II	Apr 2016	#122
He sounds horribly angry. Where does all that anger come from? Losing? Nt	seabeyond	Apr 2016	#123
.......	R B Garr	Apr 2016	#165
Misandry! Oh, noes!	BainsBane	Apr 2016	#176
And now it's obvious you're mad...	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#73
Yes, it's Janey's thread and, since she's asking for apologies . . .	Petrushka	Apr 2016	#211
This sub-thread is comedic gold. LOL.	1StrongBlackMan	Apr 2016	#146
Yup.	Agschmid	Apr 2016	#148
And I suspect, tomorrow will be even more entertaining.	1StrongBlackMan	Apr 2016	#150
You guys are so funny!	Squinch	Apr 2016	#24
Oh the timing when compared to the post I just made...	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#29
Good for you~	sheshe2	Apr 2016	#185
Uh oh. We are going to get another round, lol. See what you started!!!!	seabeyond	Apr 2016	#134
Do you remember the "creep shaming" thread a couple of years ago	Squinch	Apr 2016	#190
Mmm, I think the point of OP is Sanders peoples mad, tantrum last night and this morning. Ya think?	seabeyond	Apr 2016	#76
I'm a Bernie supporter....	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#78
Ya. Because this is all about you.	seabeyond	Apr 2016	#79
The title of the thread is...	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#81
No one expects a single damn thing from any Sanders supporters. You can stand down, now.	seabeyond	Apr 2016	#85
That apparently is incorrect...	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#89
A responsible person, you know a campaign of integrity would own their mistake.	seabeyond	Apr 2016	#90
Do you think...	Buddyblazon	Apr 2016	#97
No, I do not think you would apologize, nor do I think those making the false accusations will	seabeyond	Apr 2016	#100
Ahh playing "the woman is hysterical" card. Are we still living in the 1950s? Have you no shame? nt	ProudToBeLiberal	Apr 2016	#151
Sheeeeit, that flew right over my head. Ah ha. My bad. Nt	seabeyond	Apr 2016	#160
Link?	Downwinder	Apr 2016	#4
here you go	Buzz Clik	Apr 2016	#15
.	Dr Hobbitstein	Apr 2016	#21
What I expected.	Downwinder	Apr 2016	#25
Really? You expected that?	Buzz Clik	Apr 2016	#30
Well, seeing as how I am deaf I expected	Downwinder	Apr 2016	#37
..	Buzz Clik	Apr 2016	#39
Nooooo!!!!	wildeyed	Apr 2016	#184
So you're saying Facebook is part of the conspiracy!!!!	JoePhilly	Apr 2016	#5
OF COURSE! FACEBOOK IN THE TANK FOR SHILLARY!!!	Adrahil	Apr 2016	#62
Don't worry. When Clinton and Obama institute Sharia Law, you will have your answer.	randome	Apr 2016	#7
I remember when Obama was about to get elected the first time	auntpurl	Apr 2016	#12
It's the end of life as we know it! Again!	randome	Apr 2016	#19
Under Hillary it will only be Lifetime and OWN	rbrnmw	Apr 2016	#83
Wait. You mean the sputtering outrage was all for naught?...	SidDithers	Apr 2016	#8
It's kinda like that Vatican trip hubbub	hellofromreddit	Apr 2016	#16
Damn. No more outrage? No what will we talk about?	Buzz Clik	Apr 2016	#11
Exit polls are always a fun topic.	JaneyVee	Apr 2016	#14
There's some momentum building on wanting to see the source code of voting machines.	Buzz Clik	Apr 2016	#18
Kicked and recommended!	Firebrand Gary	Apr 2016	#17
They are the true webro's. Lots of complaining	boston bean	Apr 2016	#22
This message was self-deleted by its author	rjsquirrel	Apr 2016	#33
Ooops.....Cheeto fingers. nt	LexVegas	Apr 2016	#36
You win this. Everyone else should just go home now.	Squinch	Apr 2016	#47
....	rbrnmw	Apr 2016	#120
And a bit of	okasha	Apr 2016	#188
Another non scandal scandal.	Thinkingabout	Apr 2016	#41
Why let the truth get in the way of a good conspiracy?	Tarc	Apr 2016	#44
K&R	mcar	Apr 2016	#46
I hope they kept their receipts and can return all those crucifixes and nails.	betsuni	Apr 2016	#53
^^^^ Exactly this ^^^^ .... well said!! nt	Persondem	Apr 2016	#88
WHAM WHAM WHAM WHAM	auntpurl	Apr 2016	#118
That shit sold out months ago	Warren DeMontague	Apr 2016	#170
Why should I apologize for something I didn't say?	Madam Mossfern	Apr 2016	#54
why were Hillary's supporters celebrating it on twitter ?	azurnoir	Apr 2016	#57
I'm not sure what is this supposed to mean?	Dem2	Apr 2016	#69
Because some people are assholes.	Agschmid	Apr 2016	#149
At least one was taking responsibility, complete with his own screencap of the message from FB	Warren DeMontague	Apr 2016	#195
That would be one of the assholes.	Agschmid	Apr 2016	#197
No, one guy said that. Not "the sanders campaign". And he's not a facebook tech person, is he.	Warren DeMontague	Apr 2016	#199
Yes and that one guy is an asshole.	Agschmid	Apr 2016	#202
No, I mean one guy said "it was just a facebook glitch"	Warren DeMontague	Apr 2016	#204
My comments are based on what Sanders campaign said.	Agschmid	Apr 2016	#205
Perhaps we should see if that changes in light of new information.	Warren DeMontague	Apr 2016	#206
I'll wait for an update from the campaign and/or Facebook.	Agschmid	Apr 2016	#207
None. They pretend it's a conspiracy theory, as is The Great Coast-To-Coast	silvershadow	Apr 2016	#68
OMG... You mean Clinton wan't the evil so and so? Nah, it was her, betcha, she owns them.	seabeyond	Apr 2016	#74
So, now, Facebook is shilling for Hillary?	MineralMan	Apr 2016	#75
For sure, it has gotta being, a conspiracy I tell you. She has to own them, her corporate self. Nt	seabeyond	Apr 2016	#77
Not one person will apologize	Andy823	Apr 2016	#80
to you?	ibegurpard	Apr 2016	#86
Be my guest to be the first	Scootaloo	Apr 2016	#93
None of them will.	NCTraveler	Apr 2016	#94
The Bernie campaign has turned into an utter clown show	alcibiades_mystery	Apr 2016	#96
I saw no other groups complaining that they were shut down too. This is to cover up in my opinion.	bkkyosemite	Apr 2016	#98
Lol. Ok. n/t	JTFrog	Apr 2016	#142
Lex Vegas won the thread with the Cheeto Fingers, but you are a close second.	Squinch	Apr 2016	#163
well, now you have	Maru Kitteh	Apr 2016	#177
I find the paranoia extraordinary.	cwydro	Apr 2016	#107
Blemmings?	Sancho	Apr 2016	#108
What I would like to know is who is going to step up first and apologize for all the bat shit	William769	Apr 2016	#109
Bros4Hillary	azurnoir	Apr 2016	#168
^^ Exactly! ^^	Petrushka	Apr 2016	#212
Apologize for what?	whatchamacallit	Apr 2016	#110
Well look at that.	hrmjustin	Apr 2016	#116
K&R!	texstad79	Apr 2016	#121
Funny how fast that story dropped off the "Latest Breaking News" list on the DU Home Page!	George II	Apr 2016	#124
database error my ass	wendylaroux	Apr 2016	#127
Organize?	tonyt53	Apr 2016	#128
What? Bernie says the BERNIE BLACKOUT, TERRORISM wasn't real? UNDER THE BUS BERNIE	Maru Kitteh	Apr 2016	#139
Not while it's more fun to double down	ismnotwasm	Apr 2016	#140
K&R for visibility	lunamagica	Apr 2016	#143
Wow just read the thread claiming it was treason.	hrmjustin	Apr 2016	#144
Some are clinging to their conspiracy theory with ferocity, claiming TERRORISM	Maru Kitteh	Apr 2016	#175
Facebook always says it was a Facebook program error. Always.	bjo59	Apr 2016	#152
So, no one?	JaneyVee	Apr 2016	#161
How about you apologising?	PaulaFarrell	Apr 2016	#164
The pro-Hillary organization, Bros4Hillary, apologized today.	Luminous Animal	Apr 2016	#162
You do realize that's not the same thing as shutting down	BainsBane	Apr 2016	#178
Posting child porn on any site will get a FB shut down.	Luminous Animal	Apr 2016	#180
It is when you actually get a FB group shut down, Bains.	Warren DeMontague	Apr 2016	#192
Well, that's a stupid thing to do	BainsBane	Apr 2016	#196
Im sure hillary had lots of better things to do.	Warren DeMontague	Apr 2016	#198
Sanders spent 16 million on internet "message placement"	BainsBane	Apr 2016	#200
If brock's million is going against trump, someone should tell him.	Warren DeMontague	Apr 2016	#203
That may be because the level of disinformation	BainsBane	Apr 2016	#208
Now they're trying to say that this Bernie site was lying about Facebook??	R B Garr	Apr 2016	#167
Yeah, a couple of groups I belong to had the same issue.	zappaman	Apr 2016	#172
It's because Shillary hates film and music	BainsBane	Apr 2016	#179
Prior to the film and music groups being shut down, was there any porn posted . . .	Petrushka	Apr 2016	#213
Yeah kinda	zappaman	Apr 2016	#214
Did all of that take place within the same time-frame as the closing down of Bernie groups?	Petrushka	Apr 2016	#215
beats me	zappaman	Apr 2016	#216
Much the same here.	Petrushka	Apr 2016	#218
No one, ever. Imagined persecution is so much more titillating.	Hekate	Apr 2016	#173
I think expecting an apology is a lot ...	nolawarlock	Apr 2016	#186
Yup...removal of me was an error	laserhaas	Apr 2016	#187
It was Romney, I'm sure. nt	msanthrope	Apr 2016	#210
What the fuck kind of name is "Casey Champagne", anyway?	Warren DeMontague	Apr 2016	#193
Sounds like a stripper	dlwickham	Apr 2016	#194
You can.	Warren DeMontague	Apr 2016	#201
Have you apologized for linking to Stormfront?	QC	Apr 2016	#209
Is that why you keep calling on Hillary to apologize for her IWR vote?	closeupready	Apr 2016	#217

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:43 AM

auntpurl (4,311 posts)

1. But it was TREASON.

TREASON!

Reply to this post

Response to auntpurl (Reply #1)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:44 AM

DrDan (20,409 posts)

6. I read that too - what does it say about a demographic that considers it treason when

their social media has a hiccup

Reply to this post

Response to DrDan (Reply #6)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:45 AM

auntpurl (4,311 posts)

9. EVERYTHING IS A CONSPIRACY

THEY'RE ALL IN ON IT MAN.

Reply to this post

Response to auntpurl (Reply #9)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:23 AM

Hortensis (34,807 posts)

71. All starting with Hillary's evil machinations,

let's not forget that, and abetted by the evil Democratic Party too of course. I hear Charles Koch may be funding it also as part of a battle with Wall Street over the disposition of Hillary's lost soul.

Reply to this post

Response to DrDan (Reply #6)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:46 AM

randome (34,845 posts)

10. It says they're clueless twits.

[hr][font color="blue"][center]All things in moderation, including moderation.[/center][/font][hr]

Reply to this post

Response to randome (Reply #10)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 03:48 PM

Stuckinthebush (10,587 posts)

166. Best response award!

Exactly!

Reply to this post

Response to DrDan (Reply #6)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:49 AM

Squinch (28,034 posts)

20. When your revolution takes place exclusively on Twitter, I guess a social media hiccup WOULD look

like treason.

What I am loving is all the Bros getting all weepy that they are being cyber bullied. That is just too funny to take!

Reply to this post

Response to DrDan (Reply #6)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:51 AM

SidDithers (43,232 posts)

26. This is an awesome comment...

what does it say about a demographic that considers it treason when their social media has a hiccup

So perfect.

Sid

Reply to this post

Response to DrDan (Reply #6)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:59 AM

jack_krass (1,009 posts)

42. Hey Einstien...

One or two DUers is not a "demographic"

Reply to this post

Response to jack_krass (Reply #42)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:14 AM

NurseJackie (27,444 posts)

64. 58 "DU-Recs" (and counting) is not "one or two DUers"

And that's just one thread that I can see in GDP, lord only knows how many others there may be from individuals that I can't see, and in groups that I don't visit.

Wait until they get going! The fun's just getting started. We ain't seen nothin' yet!

Reply to this post

Response to auntpurl (Reply #1)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:11 AM

Adrahil (13,340 posts)

60. Oh sure! Corporate cover-up for Shillary!!

It's coming. You know it is.

Reply to this post

Response to auntpurl (Reply #1)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 09:03 AM

grossproffit (5,486 posts)

104. That was mind boggling. Treason? WTF!

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:43 AM

FSogol (40,384 posts)

2. Crickets!

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:44 AM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

3. You seem mad, Janey.

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #3)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:47 AM

JaneyVee (19,877 posts)

13. Mad? Im LOL'ing.

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Reply #13)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:50 AM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

23. Yes. Both my parents "laugh" like that when they're upset...

Kind of that passive aggressive "LOL!"ing.

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #23)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:51 AM

Squinch (28,034 posts)

28. MORE CONSPIRACIES: JaneyVee laughed! WHAT DOES SHE MEAN BY THAT???????

Reply to this post

Response to Squinch (Reply #28)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:53 AM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

32. You DEFINITELY...

seem mad, squinch. More than Janey at that.

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #32)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:57 AM

Squinch (28,034 posts)

38. Now I am the one who reminds you of your parents, Buddy?

Reply to this post

Response to Squinch (Reply #38)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:00 AM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

43. No.

My parents aren't nearly as passive aggressive as you. I don't really know anyone to compare your kind of angry passive aggressiveness to. Your anger level is higher that most that use PA as a way to express their anger.

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #43)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:03 AM

Squinch (28,034 posts)

49. You might be projecting just a tad, there, friend!

Reply to this post

Response to Squinch (Reply #49)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:04 AM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

51. I'm not posting rofl's...

to try and convince anyone I'm not mad.

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #51)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:06 AM

Squinch (28,034 posts)

52. .

Reply to this post

Response to Squinch (Reply #52)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:07 AM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

55. Oh look...

You're not mad x's 4.

The more rofl's you post the more obvious it becomes that you're upset.

Apparently, I've really upset you.

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #55)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:09 AM

Squinch (28,034 posts)

58. Oh, my God, Buddy! You just keep giving, don't you?

Reply to this post

Response to Squinch (Reply #58)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:11 AM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

61. Look how furious you are.

I did that to you, squinch. I...did that...to you.

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #61)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:12 AM

Squinch (28,034 posts)

63. You did, Buddy! You did!

Reply to this post

Response to Squinch (Reply #63)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:15 AM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

65. More rolling laughing faces...

You need to go take a deep breath. Maybe have some tea. Avoid the coffee though. With the hardcore laughing smiley work you're putting in to show us how "not upset" you are...I'm afraid you might have and anxiety attack if you feed yourself a stimulant like coffee.

Reply to this post

Response to Squinch (Reply #52)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:36 AM

seabeyond (110,159 posts)

111. Ha ha ha ha. Lol, This is getting cute. Some one turned me onto it. I was messing it all. Nt

Reply to this post

Response to seabeyond (Reply #111)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:17 AM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

125. There's a direct correlation between how many...

"Lols" "ha ha's" and smilies one posts and their anger.

I'm sorry I made you this furious. But I accept your surrender.

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #125)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:19 AM

seabeyond (110,159 posts)

126. Prove it. Kinda like the Sanders campaign, say whatever and expect people to take it as fact.

Reply to this post

Response to seabeyond (Reply #126)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:22 AM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

129. I accept your surrender....

angry guy.

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #129)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:24 AM

seabeyond (110,159 posts)

130. OMG... Sanders, is this you. Lol.

Reply to this post

Response to seabeyond (Reply #130)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:27 AM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

131. I accept your surrender as well...

People that lol and rofl easy are generally easily amused. I don't want this to appear as though I'm beating on a slow person.

So I politely accept your surrender.

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #131)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:32 AM

seabeyond (110,159 posts)

132. Yup, happy people enjoying a win.

Reply to this post

Response to seabeyond (Reply #132)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:34 AM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

133. Surrender accepted...

with your surrender, I promise not to embarrass you anymore.

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #133)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:35 AM

seabeyond (110,159 posts)

135. Have you really been here since 2004? And I have never had the pleasure having conversation in all

that time. Go figure.

Reply to this post

Response to seabeyond (Reply #135)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:42 AM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

136. Yes....

Back in the day when actual liberals and progressives hung out here. We didn't have any DLCers or Third Way democrats hanging out here back then.

How did a conservative democrat like you make it here so long?

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #136)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:44 AM

seabeyond (110,159 posts)

137. mmmmm. I am remembering Kerry supporters and thinking you are not all that correct.

Reply to this post

Response to seabeyond (Reply #137)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:47 AM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

138. I wasn't a Kerry supporter until the GE.

But I certainly don't recall him being a hawkish DLCer. Quite the opposite. Perhaps not a great candidate. But a good man. Certainly an exponentially better SOS than HRC.

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #138)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:38 PM

seabeyond (110,159 posts)

153. Kerry, Clinton, Obama... So, since you have no issues with Kerry that says it all.

Reply to this post

Response to seabeyond (Reply #153)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:40 PM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

154. Huh?

You seem angry again.

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #154)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 01:00 PM

seabeyond (110,159 posts)

158. I do hope you are better at identifying others emotions in real life, than on the nets....

Reply to this post

Response to seabeyond (Reply #135)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:52 AM

JTFrog (14,274 posts)

141. Dawn of the dead.

I've never seen so many zombies and sock puppets resurrected.

Reply to this post

Response to JTFrog (Reply #141)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:42 PM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

155. Long time posters certainly need to be on the lookout...

for fake angry posters. It sounds as though hillary spent a lot of money getting them into places where they could do a lot of damage.

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #155)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:45 PM

JTFrog (14,274 posts)

156. Yes, we all signed up ten to fifteen years ago just in hopes of getting the big dough from Clinton.

Good work Sherlock.

Reply to this post

Response to JTFrog (Reply #156)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:49 PM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

157. You seem angry.

The Sherlock comment...Not necessary, friend.

If I'm upsetting you, it's not my purpose. Perhaps some tea and some fresh air will calm you down a bit. It's a beautiful spring day.

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #157)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 04:18 PM

displacedtexan (15,277 posts)

169. JTFrog struck a nerve.

So alluding to Sherlock is worse than a backhanded remark about "slow persons?" Shameful.

Reply to this post

Response to JTFrog (Reply #156)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 01:01 PM

seabeyond (110,159 posts)

159. Oh my. Ah ha. Woman....

I never see you enough.

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #125)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 04:37 PM

BainsBane (43,781 posts)

174. Bernie math!

and now Bernie psychology!

Reply to this post

Response to Squinch (Reply #49)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:52 PM

wildeyed (11,240 posts)

181. Our Buddy seems to have

some mommy and daddy issues to work out. (insert passive-aggressive cackling and copious amounts of eye rolling here)

Reply to this post

Response to wildeyed (Reply #181)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 06:04 AM

Starry Messenger (32,309 posts)

191. He seems to still live with them.

Reply to this post

Response to Squinch (Reply #28)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:54 AM

sufrommich (22,871 posts)

34. Lol. Wait! Did I just lol?????

MY ANGER SURELY KNOWS NO BOUNDS!!!!!

Reply to this post

Response to sufrommich (Reply #34)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:55 AM

Squinch (28,034 posts)

35. I see! I see! You are hissing and spitting with your laughter! I fear you!

Reply to this post

Response to Squinch (Reply #35)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:00 AM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

45. So mad...

Reply to this post

Response to Squinch (Reply #35)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:03 AM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

50. Maybe if you post more guys rolling on the floor laughing...

you'll convince someone you're not mad.

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #50)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:38 AM

rbrnmw (7,160 posts)

82. I'm lmao not a bit angry

Reply to this post

Response to rbrnmw (Reply #82)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:42 AM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

84. Trying too hard...

Like all the obviously angry posters in this thread claiming they're not angry...and then posting over the top amounts of smilies and gifs. Yeah none of you are upset. You're all acting...unupset. Not a word. But seems to best describe the self description of the posters in this thread who are "not upset".

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #84)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:45 AM

rbrnmw (7,160 posts)

87. I am now laughing so hard I'm crying. thanks!!!

Reply to this post

Response to rbrnmw (Reply #87)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:52 AM

Squinch (28,034 posts)

91. Isnt' he adorable?

Reply to this post

Response to Squinch (Reply #91)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:38 AM

seabeyond (110,159 posts)

113. Precious. Truly. Nt

Reply to this post

Response to rbrnmw (Reply #87)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:53 AM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

92. You're not actually laughing so hard you're crying...

because nothing had been said that's actually that funny.

Just like other posters that use your strategy, everyone always knows they're not actually laughing at all. They're actually upset and think if they state they're "rofl" that people will believe they're actually "rofl"ing when they're not.

You're not "rofl" at all. You're upset and this is the only way you can deal with it...by announcing to everyone how hard you are "rofl"ing.

Nobody actually believes that, Duder. For you, it's more a daily affirmation than an actual truth.

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #92)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:57 AM

randome (34,845 posts)

95. Wait. Let me check. Yep. I am definitely laughing. Sorry!

[hr][font color="blue"][center]All things in moderation, including moderation.[/center][/font][hr]

Reply to this post

Response to randome (Reply #95)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 09:02 AM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

103. No...

You're lying...not laughing. There's nothing that funny about any of this unless you're a rock banging troglodyte that sorts glass for a living.

If that's you, then yes. I could see how this would be funny enough to make you "rofl".

Perhaps mildly amusing at best. And if you forced yourself to chuckle...for Christs sake recognize it as the forced laugh it is.

"I'm rofl!". No you're not. There has been nothing said that could induce you to rofl...unless you're really really dull.

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #103)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:38 AM

seabeyond (110,159 posts)

114. Hey, against the rules calling a poster a liar. Ya know. ;)

Reply to this post

Response to randome (Reply #95)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:15 PM

Agschmid (28,546 posts)

147. Is he for real?

Am I being punked?

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #92)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 09:01 AM

sufrommich (22,871 posts)

101. Are you this guy?

Reply to this post

Response to sufrommich (Reply #101)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 09:04 AM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

105. I see you're upset about being exposed...

Maybe you should close the computer for the day
and go enjoy some spring. This thread appears to have you worked up. :/

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #92)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:51 AM

rbrnmw (7,160 posts)

117. OK

*dissolves into uncontrollable laughter*

Reply to this post

Response to rbrnmw (Reply #82)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:37 AM

seabeyond (110,159 posts)

112. Too funny, right? I love her laugh. Nt

Reply to this post

Response to seabeyond (Reply #112)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:52 AM

rbrnmw (7,160 posts)

119. me too

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #50)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 09:14 PM

wildeyed (11,240 posts)

183. We're not mad.

We are having a GREAT night. Really.

Reply to this post

Response to Squinch (Reply #28)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 09:00 AM

DemonGoddess (4,640 posts)

99. bwahahahaha

MORE CONSPIRACIES: JaneyVee laughed! WHAT DOES SHE MEAN BY THAT???????

you KILL me Squinch!

Reply to this post

Response to DemonGoddess (Reply #99)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 09:01 AM

Squinch (28,034 posts)

102. .

Reply to this post

Response to DemonGoddess (Reply #99)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 09:07 AM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

106. Again with the rofl's...

Nobody actually thinks any of you are rofling. Just so you know. It's more funny that y'all think posting rofl's makes anyone think you're actually rofling.

It makes y'all look easily amused. Like Simple
Jack easily amused.

Reply to this post

Response to DemonGoddess (Reply #99)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:09 PM

1StrongBlackMan (31,849 posts)

145. This sub-thread should have DUers embarrassed; but, it won't.

Reply to this post

Response to Squinch (Reply #28)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 04:21 PM

George II (45,859 posts)

171. My guess is that if you're laughing you're plotting.

Reply to this post

Response to Squinch (Reply #28)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 09:14 PM

sheshe2 (60,132 posts)

182. Squinch!

Reply to this post

Response to sheshe2 (Reply #182)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 05:52 AM

Squinch (28,034 posts)

189. Back at ya! And happy day after the primary!

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Reply #13)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:51 AM

MrMickeysMom (20,453 posts)

27. Awe.... Give yourself some credit...

You ALWAYS LOL when you're mad!

Reply to this post

Response to MrMickeysMom (Reply #27)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:52 AM

JaneyVee (19,877 posts)

31. Wait, what am I supposed to be mad about again?

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Reply #31)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:58 AM

Squinch (28,034 posts)

40. The treason, JaneyVee! Our treasonous infiltration of their social media has been FOILED AGAIN!!!

Gnash those teeth, girl!

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Reply #31)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:02 AM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

48. If you were telling the truth in your op...

you seem to be mad about pro Clinton groups being accused of shutting down pro Bernie FB pages.

You just made the op...how could you forget so soon?

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #48)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:08 AM

JaneyVee (19,877 posts)

56. Seem to be mad? This shit is genuinely hilarious!

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Reply #56)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:10 AM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

59. You're not upset about the accusations?

You asked for an apology.

Yeah...janey...it's pretty obvious this upset you. You made a whole thread about it.

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #59)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:16 AM

JaneyVee (19,877 posts)

66. Using your own logic...

You must be super happy about the false accusations.

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Reply #66)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:17 AM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

67. It's your thread, Janey...

You made it. Asking for apologies.

Oh yeah...you're mad. That's why you made the thread.

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #67)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:20 AM

JaneyVee (19,877 posts)

70. I love when men tell me how Im supposed to feel.

What next, youre going to tell me to smile?

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Reply #70)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:24 AM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

72. Oh awesome...

Loses the argument...pulls the sexist card.

Well I'm here to tell you that kind of behavior is actually misandrisitic and it's time assholes that pull it be called out for that kind of behavior.

Win the argument on the merits of your argument. Not because you lost the argument so you threw a straw man out there.

You are a Misandrist. And it's as bad or worse than being a misogynist. You're hiding behind a fake claim because you can't win the argument.

That is cowardice.

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #72)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:40 AM

seabeyond (110,159 posts)

115. OMG... Lol, you pulled the Misandrist card. Ah ha.

Reply to this post

Response to seabeyond (Reply #115)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:09 AM

George II (45,859 posts)

122. Knows the definition of "misandrist" but not "mad"!

He must be angry about something!

Reply to this post

Response to George II (Reply #122)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:11 AM

seabeyond (110,159 posts)

123. He sounds horribly angry. Where does all that anger come from? Losing? Nt

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #72)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 03:47 PM

R B Garr (13,109 posts)

165. .......

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #72)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 04:42 PM

BainsBane (43,781 posts)

176. Misandry! Oh, noes!

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Reply #70)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:26 AM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

73. And now it's obvious you're mad...

Your original post is asking for an apology. Yeah...that's anger.

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #67)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:49 AM

Petrushka (3,706 posts)

211. Yes, it's Janey's thread and, since she's asking for apologies . . .

. . . would a mere attempt at apologizing be acceptable if it came from a Hillary group, viz:

http://www.bros4hillary.com/statement-from-b4h-leadership/

https://www.facebook.com/groups/bros4hillary/permalink/1740610886160594/

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Reply #13)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:11 PM

1StrongBlackMan (31,849 posts)

146. This sub-thread is comedic gold. LOL.

Reply to this post

Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #146)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:16 PM

Agschmid (28,546 posts)

148. Yup.

Reply to this post

Response to Agschmid (Reply #148)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:20 PM

1StrongBlackMan (31,849 posts)

150. And I suspect, tomorrow will be even more entertaining.

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #3)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:50 AM

Squinch (28,034 posts)

24. You guys are so funny!

Reply to this post

Response to Squinch (Reply #24)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:52 AM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

29. Oh the timing when compared to the post I just made...

about passive aggressive "LOL"ing. You nailed that perfectly.

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #29)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 09:20 PM

sheshe2 (60,132 posts)

185. Good for you~

Reply to this post

Response to Squinch (Reply #24)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:34 AM

seabeyond (110,159 posts)

134. Uh oh. We are going to get another round, lol. See what you started!!!!

Reply to this post

Response to seabeyond (Reply #134)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 05:59 AM

Squinch (28,034 posts)

190. Do you remember the "creep shaming" thread a couple of years ago

where everyone weighed in and everyone was completely hilarious? This is the most laughs I've gotten at DU since that one.

Happy day after the primary, my friend! We made it!

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #3)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:28 AM

seabeyond (110,159 posts)

76. Mmm, I think the point of OP is Sanders peoples mad, tantrum last night and this morning. Ya think?

Reply to this post

Response to seabeyond (Reply #76)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:30 AM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

78. I'm a Bernie supporter....

along with my 12 years here at DU. I made no such claim about the social media dust up/shut down.

Do I owe anyone an apology for the incident?

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #78)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:32 AM

seabeyond (110,159 posts)

79. Ya. Because this is all about you.

Reply to this post

Response to seabeyond (Reply #79)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:36 AM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

81. The title of the thread is...

"Who is going to step up and apologize?"

Since the question is directed to everyone out there in general...it's about me and all the other Bernie supporters.

So again...is Janey expecting me to apologize for someone else's behavior? I don't know. But she's expecting one of us random Bernie supporters to do so. Am I the one she's expecting it from? You? Who? Either way she's expecting one from someone. Do you know who?

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #81)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:42 AM

seabeyond (110,159 posts)

85. No one expects a single damn thing from any Sanders supporters. You can stand down, now.

Reply to this post

Response to seabeyond (Reply #85)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:47 AM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

89. That apparently is incorrect...

As Janey is looking for someone to apologize.

Again, who do you think owes Janey the apology?

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #89)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:51 AM

seabeyond (110,159 posts)

90. A responsible person, you know a campaign of integrity would own their mistake.

I cannot speak for JaneyVee, but I would suggest that not a single person on DU expect Sanders supporters to own or take responsibility for an error.

Reply to this post

Response to seabeyond (Reply #90)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:57 AM

Buddyblazon (3,014 posts)

97. Do you think...

That though I never made such a claim about the social media sites...that I should issue an apology for those that did? And though the campaign didn't either, do you think they should apologize for those supporters that did?

If apologys are now expected to be given out by people that had nothing to do with something...and you agree with this...are you now willing to apologize for the stuff that some Hillary supporters have said?

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #97)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 09:00 AM

seabeyond (110,159 posts)

100. No, I do not think you would apologize, nor do I think those making the false accusations will

apologize or own their mistake. I do not think Sanders supporters have it in them.

Reply to this post

Response to Buddyblazon (Reply #3)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:20 PM

ProudToBeLiberal (3,964 posts)

151. Ahh playing "the woman is hysterical" card. Are we still living in the 1950s? Have you no shame? nt

Reply to this post

Response to ProudToBeLiberal (Reply #151)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 01:02 PM

seabeyond (110,159 posts)

160. Sheeeeit, that flew right over my head. Ah ha. My bad. Nt

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:44 AM

Downwinder (12,869 posts)

4. Link?

Reply to this post

Response to Downwinder (Reply #4)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:48 AM

Buzz Clik (38,437 posts)

15. here you go

http://tinyurl.com/dymbb3a

Reply to this post

Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #15)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:50 AM

Dr Hobbitstein (6,568 posts)

21. .

Reply to this post

Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #15)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:50 AM

Downwinder (12,869 posts)

25. What I expected.

Reply to this post

Response to Downwinder (Reply #25)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:52 AM

Buzz Clik (38,437 posts)

30. Really? You expected that?

Whoa.

Cue the music from The Twilight Zone.

Reply to this post

Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #30)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:57 AM

Downwinder (12,869 posts)

37. Well, seeing as how I am deaf I expected

someone one to make fun of it.

Go back to pulling wings off flies.

Reply to this post

Response to Downwinder (Reply #37)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:58 AM

Buzz Clik (38,437 posts)

39. ..

Reply to this post

Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #15)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 09:20 PM

wildeyed (11,240 posts)

184. Nooooo!!!!

You DIDN'T just do that!

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:44 AM

JoePhilly (27,787 posts)

5. So you're saying Facebook is part of the conspiracy!!!!

I knew it!

Reply to this post

Response to JoePhilly (Reply #5)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:12 AM

Adrahil (13,340 posts)

62. OF COURSE! FACEBOOK IN THE TANK FOR SHILLARY!!!

it's obvious, right?

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:45 AM

randome (34,845 posts)

7. Don't worry. When Clinton and Obama institute Sharia Law, you will have your answer.

[hr][font color="blue"][center]All things in moderation, including moderation.[/center][/font][hr]

Reply to this post

Response to randome (Reply #7)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:46 AM

auntpurl (4,311 posts)

12. I remember when Obama was about to get elected the first time

Some RWer claimed the television networks would be shut down and all we'd get on TV was BET and porn.

Reply to this post

Response to auntpurl (Reply #12)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:49 AM

randome (34,845 posts)

19. It's the end of life as we know it! Again!

[hr][font color="blue"][center]All things in moderation, including moderation.[/center][/font][hr]

Reply to this post

Response to auntpurl (Reply #12)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:42 AM

rbrnmw (7,160 posts)

83. Under Hillary it will only be Lifetime and OWN

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:45 AM

SidDithers (43,232 posts)

8. Wait. You mean the sputtering outrage was all for naught?...

Shocked. Shocked I am.

Sid

Reply to this post

Response to SidDithers (Reply #8)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:48 AM

hellofromreddit (1,182 posts)

16. It's kinda like that Vatican trip hubbub

No apologies for that one either.

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:46 AM

Buzz Clik (38,437 posts)

11. Damn. No more outrage? No what will we talk about?

Reply to this post

Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #11)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:48 AM

JaneyVee (19,877 posts)

14. Exit polls are always a fun topic.

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Reply #14)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:49 AM

Buzz Clik (38,437 posts)

18. There's some momentum building on wanting to see the source code of voting machines.

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:48 AM

Firebrand Gary (4,797 posts)

17. Kicked and recommended!

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:50 AM

boston bean (32,487 posts)

22. They are the true webro's. Lots of complaining

and hammering away on a keyboard. But get little results! Oh and maybe show up for a rally or two.

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

rjsquirrel This message was self-deleted by its author.

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:57 AM

LexVegas (4,847 posts)

36. Ooops.....Cheeto fingers. nt

Reply to this post

Response to LexVegas (Reply #36)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:02 AM

Squinch (28,034 posts)

47. You win this. Everyone else should just go home now.

Reply to this post

Response to LexVegas (Reply #36)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:56 AM

rbrnmw (7,160 posts)

120. ....

but remember laughing isn't laughing it's really being pissed off or something

Reply to this post

Response to LexVegas (Reply #36)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:56 PM

okasha (11,573 posts)

188. And a bit of

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:59 AM

Thinkingabout (30,058 posts)

41. Another non scandal scandal.

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:00 AM

Tarc (9,081 posts)

44. Why let the truth get in the way of a good conspiracy?

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:02 AM

mcar (30,190 posts)

46. K&R

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:06 AM

betsuni (11,541 posts)

53. I hope they kept their receipts and can return all those crucifixes and nails.

Reply to this post

Response to betsuni (Reply #53)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:47 AM

Persondem (1,889 posts)

88. ^^^^ Exactly this ^^^^ .... well said!! nt

Reply to this post

Response to betsuni (Reply #53)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:51 AM

auntpurl (4,311 posts)

118. WHAM WHAM WHAM WHAM

Sorry. Very old DU joke.

Reply to this post

Response to betsuni (Reply #53)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 04:19 PM

Warren DeMontague (80,708 posts)

170. That shit sold out months ago

And i think i know which campaign bought most of it.

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:07 AM

Madam Mossfern (2,340 posts)

54. Why should I apologize for something I didn't say?

n/t

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:08 AM

azurnoir (45,850 posts)

57. why were Hillary's supporters celebrating it on twitter ?

Reply to this post

Response to azurnoir (Reply #57)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:18 AM

Dem2 (6,220 posts)

69. I'm not sure what is this supposed to mean?

Do you have some sort of facts or you just throwing this out here because you're trying to start trouble?

Reply to this post

Response to azurnoir (Reply #57)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:19 PM

Agschmid (28,546 posts)

149. Because some people are assholes.

Not you, not me.

But some people are and they post on the Internet.

They don't represent me as a Hillary supporter, and we shouldn't be painting with such a broad brush.

Reply to this post

Response to Agschmid (Reply #149)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:07 AM

Warren DeMontague (80,708 posts)

195. At least one was taking responsibility, complete with his own screencap of the message from FB

that he had successfully shut down a Sanders group.

So this assertion here that "Hillary supporters shutting down Sanders groups is bullshit" is itself bullshit.

Reply to this post

Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #195)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:11 AM

Agschmid (28,546 posts)

197. That would be one of the assholes.

Both sides have them.

But even the Sanders campaign said that wasn't what did it.

Reply to this post

Response to Agschmid (Reply #197)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:16 AM

Warren DeMontague (80,708 posts)

199. No, one guy said that. Not "the sanders campaign". And he's not a facebook tech person, is he.

And as such we're supposed to believe that facebook had a random group shutting down glitch at the exact same time this champagne guy was deliberately shutting down sanders groups on facebook AND at the exact same time members of those groups were complaining that their pages were suddenly spammed with objectionable (and facebook rule violating) material.

Maybe the "glitch" was that facebook doesnt normally shut down groups without checking the alerts first. But that doesnt mean the targeting wasnt deliberate.

Reply to this post

Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #199)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:20 AM

Agschmid (28,546 posts)

202. Yes and that one guy is an asshole.

There is no disagreement here between us....

Reply to this post

Response to Agschmid (Reply #202)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:22 AM

Warren DeMontague (80,708 posts)

204. No, I mean one guy said "it was just a facebook glitch"

The point is that one quote is being used to say "ha, crazy sanders conspracists thinking hillary people targeted their groups"

Well, thats what actually happened.

Reply to this post

Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #204)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:26 AM

Agschmid (28,546 posts)

205. My comments are based on what Sanders campaign said.

Aiden King made a statement on Slack, that's tge Sanders response so far.

Reply to this post

Response to Agschmid (Reply #205)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:30 AM

Warren DeMontague (80,708 posts)

206. Perhaps we should see if that changes in light of new information.

Seems to me there was more than just a glitch. The spamming and the alerting and the group targeting at the exact same time seems awfully coincidental. The glitch may have made it easier to get groups shut down.

Reply to this post

Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #206)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:31 AM

Agschmid (28,546 posts)

207. I'll wait for an update from the campaign and/or Facebook.

Thanks.

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:18 AM

silvershadow (10,336 posts)

68. None. They pretend it's a conspiracy theory, as is The Great Coast-To-Coast

Train Robbery.

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:27 AM

seabeyond (110,159 posts)

74. OMG... You mean Clinton wan't the evil so and so? Nah, it was her, betcha, she owns them.

Rollin eyes. It is pathetic.

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:27 AM

MineralMan (125,689 posts)

75. So, now, Facebook is shilling for Hillary?

That will be the next claim, I have no doubt.

Reply to this post

Response to MineralMan (Reply #75)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:29 AM

seabeyond (110,159 posts)

77. For sure, it has gotta being, a conspiracy I tell you. She has to own them, her corporate self. Nt

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:34 AM

Andy823 (10,329 posts)

80. Not one person will apologize

This is just like all the shit that posters accused President Obama of doing from the day he was elected, and it's pretty much the same nuts that are pushing this conspiracy theory, along with all the new trolls that have showed up in the last year or so.

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:44 AM

ibegurpard (15,201 posts)

86. to you?

Please hold your breath.

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:53 AM

Scootaloo (25,699 posts)

93. Be my guest to be the first

You've got a LOT to apologize for. You know. Like using a white supremacist hate site to attack a Jewish Democratic candidate?

Take off your hat, look at your feet, say something nice.

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:55 AM

NCTraveler (30,481 posts)

94. None of them will.

It was nothing more than a deceptive ploy by Weaver to separate LIV's from their money. Their shady pattern is crystal clear at this point.

You are asking two groups to apologize.

1) Those who don't know they are being used to ratfuck.
2) Those doing the ratfucking.

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:57 AM

alcibiades_mystery (36,437 posts)

96. The Bernie campaign has turned into an utter clown show

Embarrassing.

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:59 AM

bkkyosemite (5,792 posts)

98. I saw no other groups complaining that they were shut down too. This is to cover up in my opinion.

Reply to this post

Response to bkkyosemite (Reply #98)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:54 AM

JTFrog (14,274 posts)

142. Lol. Ok. n/t

Reply to this post

Response to bkkyosemite (Reply #98)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 02:48 PM

Squinch (28,034 posts)

163. Lex Vegas won the thread with the Cheeto Fingers, but you are a close second.

Reply to this post

Response to bkkyosemite (Reply #98)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 04:45 PM

Maru Kitteh (21,369 posts)

177. well, now you have

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1841079

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 09:37 AM

cwydro (34,639 posts)

107. I find the paranoia extraordinary.

As well as kind of sad.

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 09:43 AM

Sancho (7,667 posts)

108. Blemmings?

You can't apologize while drowning!

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:27 AM

William769 (49,146 posts)

109. What I would like to know is who is going to step up first and apologize for all the bat shit

Craziness conspiracy theories!

That's the question that needs to be asked.

Reply to this post

Response to William769 (Reply #109)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 04:07 PM

azurnoir (45,850 posts)

168. Bros4Hillary

Reply to this post

Response to azurnoir (Reply #168)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 08:12 AM

Petrushka (3,706 posts)

212. ^^ Exactly! ^^

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:33 AM

whatchamacallit (15,558 posts)

110. Apologize for what?

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:51 AM

hrmjustin (71,265 posts)

116. Well look at that.

It is a shame so many thought it was a conspiracy.

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:57 AM

texstad79 (115 posts)

121. K&R!

If I were you, I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for one though!

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:12 AM

George II (45,859 posts)

124. Funny how fast that story dropped off the "Latest Breaking News" list on the DU Home Page!

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:19 AM

wendylaroux (2,925 posts)

127. database error my ass

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:21 AM

tonyt53 (5,737 posts)

128. Organize?

Maybe you should have registered to vote as a Democrat. Bernie could just as well have run as a socialist, but no, he let another guy have that nomination. Yes, there is, and has always been, a socialist running for president.

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:50 AM

Maru Kitteh (21,369 posts)

139. What? Bernie says the BERNIE BLACKOUT, TERRORISM wasn't real? UNDER THE BUS BERNIE

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:51 AM

ismnotwasm (37,495 posts)

140. Not while it's more fun to double down

Not going to happen.

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:57 AM

lunamagica (9,967 posts)

143. K&R for visibility

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:59 AM

hrmjustin (71,265 posts)

144. Wow just read the thread claiming it was treason.

Reply to this post

Response to hrmjustin (Reply #144)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 04:40 PM

Maru Kitteh (21,369 posts)

175. Some are clinging to their conspiracy theory with ferocity, claiming TERRORISM

no less. It's seriously wackadoodle stuff.

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:26 PM

bjo59 (1,166 posts)

152. Facebook always says it was a Facebook program error. Always.

One example: I used to "belong" to a Facebook page called "Boycott BP." It was the only place I could find lots and lots of dependable information on the BP oil disaster in the gulf. The page disappeared twice after it reached close to 1 million followers. Each time Facebook said it was its own error and completely innocent. After the page was put back up twice (following outraged articles in the mainstream media), trolls appeared to post porn and the like. That is what finally killed that page.

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 02:00 PM

JaneyVee (19,877 posts)

161. So, no one?

Not surprising.

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Reply #161)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 03:05 PM

PaulaFarrell (1,236 posts)

164. How about you apologising?

http://www.bros4hillary.com/statement-from-b4h-leadership/

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 02:47 PM

Luminous Animal (27,310 posts)

162. The pro-Hillary organization, Bros4Hillary, apologized today.

Last night, a former member by the name of Casey Champagne decided to engage in harassing behavior toward Facebook groups of Bernie Sanders and posted about it in the B4H Facebook group. As stated above, this was not promoted or supported by the leadership of B4H, nor were we immediately aware of this conduct. We removed the offending posts and member as soon as possible. While our leadership team of administrators tries to catch every questionable post and comment, with over 7,000 members and on a 24-hour posting cycle, some fall through the cracks. We rely on members to “flag and report” harmful, offensive, or trolling behavior, and apologize to the groups that were affected. This member acted on his own authority, is not a part of our leadership team, and does not represent our ideals or our opinions.

http://www.bros4hillary.com/statement-from-b4h-leadership/

Reply to this post

Response to Luminous Animal (Reply #162)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 04:49 PM

BainsBane (43,781 posts)

178. You do realize that's not the same thing as shutting down

FB groups?

Reply to this post

Response to BainsBane (Reply #178)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 06:11 PM

Luminous Animal (27,310 posts)

180. Posting child porn on any site will get a FB shut down.

Which is what, among other things, Hillary supporters did.

Reply to this post

Response to BainsBane (Reply #178)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 06:45 AM

Warren DeMontague (80,708 posts)

192. It is when you actually get a FB group shut down, Bains.

"we removed the group you reported"

Reply to this post

Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #192)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:08 AM

BainsBane (43,781 posts)

196. Well, that's a stupid thing to do

I don't know why people waste their time with such nonsense.

If I'm not mistaken, however, the allegation was that HILLARY shut down a number of Sanders FB groups, when it turns out there was some sort of FB error.

Reply to this post

Response to BainsBane (Reply #196)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:13 AM

Warren DeMontague (80,708 posts)

198. Im sure hillary had lots of better things to do.

But we've spent many months going into great detail how the campaigns are supposed to be responsible for the shit their supporters pull, and here is a hillary supporter who apparently has SOME affiliation with brocks million dollar internet trolling initiative...

And he's bragging that he got a sanders group shut down, "coincidentally" at the exact same time when assorted sanders groups were complaining about suddenly being spammed with porn and then alerted on- and at the exact same time that we're assured- although not by facebook, actually- that these groups were shut down "by a random glitch".

Well, "casey champagne" seems to have fucked up by admitting to it publicly.

Reply to this post

Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #198)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:18 AM

BainsBane (43,781 posts)

200. Sanders spent 16 million on internet "message placement"

It's in his FEC filings. There was an ad from the firm he hired to hire people to post pro-Sanders stuff online. That was months ago.
Brock's efforts are clearly toward the General Election, and I'm not really interested in hearing how broken up people are that someone is spending money to defeat Trump. Sanders is finished. NY made that abundantly clear. Brock's announcement came after that.

As for the assholes, I have said several times that assholes come in all varieties. I bear no affinity with strangers across the net and feel no compulsion to defend them simply because they support Clinton.

Reply to this post

Response to BainsBane (Reply #200)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:21 AM

Warren DeMontague (80,708 posts)

203. If brock's million is going against trump, someone should tell him.

http://polimedia.press/2016/04/21/pro-clinton-group-correct-the-record-to-target-bernie-bros/

The pro-Clinton group Correct the Record said it plans to invest more than $1 million in an effort to beat back efforts online and in social media by supporters of Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders to anonymously attack Hillary Clinton and her campaign.

“In response to these attacks on supporters and superdelegates, Correct The Record is launching the Barrier Breakers 2016 digital task force,” the organization said. “While Hillary Clinton fights to break down barriers and bring America together, the Barrier Breakers 2016 digital task force will serve as a resource for supporters looking for positive content and push-back to share with their online progressive communities, as well as thanking prominent supporters and committed superdelegates on social media.”

Reply to this post

Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #203)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:33 AM

BainsBane (43,781 posts)

208. That may be because the level of disinformation

in such quarters is astronomical. The point, however, has to be to do so in order to advance her prospects in the GE because the fact is Bernie is finished. He would need 81.5% of the remaining delegates, and considering he has proven unable to reach 50% in most states, that isn't going to happen.

As for candidates' being responsible for their online posters: the issue with the Sanders campaign is that legions of Sanders supporters, including those on DU, have felt a compulsion to defend any charge against any Sanders supporter anywhere. Toward that end, they insulted Dolores Huerta, among many others. I had a friend from grad school who works on Mexican and Borderlands history tell me that Huerta's claims "never happened." And you can look at my transparency page for a hide on the subject here on DU. The people who insisted Huerta was a liar were not in that room, but they assumed those associated with Sanders had to be right simply because of their support for that candidate. Incidents like that have been repeated multiple times throughout this primary election cycle.

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 04:04 PM

R B Garr (13,109 posts)

167. Now they're trying to say that this Bernie site was lying about Facebook??

Apparently it took them all day to come up with a single Hillary(?) internet person to blame, and they don't realize they are calling the People for Bernie Sanders group liars.

One guy, Casey Champagne, took down all the Bernie internetZ on Facebook?!. Casey Champagne....?! Nice internet name, there.

Reminds me of Seymour Hair.

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 04:24 PM

zappaman (20,561 posts)

172. Yeah, a couple of groups I belong to had the same issue.

Film and music ones.
Shit happens.

Reply to this post

Response to zappaman (Reply #172)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 04:50 PM

BainsBane (43,781 posts)

179. It's because Shillary hates film and music

as much as Bernie. Everyone knows that.

Reply to this post

Response to zappaman (Reply #172)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 08:26 AM

Petrushka (3,706 posts)

213. Prior to the film and music groups being shut down, was there any porn posted . . .

. . . as reportedly happened on Bernie group sites?

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/277657-hillary-supporters-take-down-bernie-fb-pages-in-coordinated

Reply to this post

Response to Petrushka (Reply #213)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 10:15 AM

zappaman (20,561 posts)

214. Yeah kinda

One had one of those "you won't believe what she did next!" click bait posts, but that was the only one I actually saw although people were commenting in other groups about weird postings including spam.

Reply to this post

Response to zappaman (Reply #214)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 12:01 PM

Petrushka (3,706 posts)

215. Did all of that take place within the same time-frame as the closing down of Bernie groups?

"Curiouser and curiouser," she was still saying during her 80th trip around the sun . . . and in need of a nap.

Reply to this post

Response to Petrushka (Reply #215)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 12:20 PM

zappaman (20,561 posts)

216. beats me

I'm not on it enough to notice

Reply to this post

Response to zappaman (Reply #216)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 03:36 PM

Petrushka (3,706 posts)

218. Much the same here.

I usually arrive too late for the chaos of the day.

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 04:36 PM

Hekate (57,999 posts)

173. No one, ever. Imagined persecution is so much more titillating.

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 09:22 PM

nolawarlock (1,483 posts)

186. I think expecting an apology is a lot ...

... even if it is deserved.

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 09:36 PM

laserhaas (7,805 posts)

187. Yup...removal of me was an error

And my groups..was an error

Like Hillary server and taking money from Sachs

All just errors

Puuhhhhlllleeeeaaassseeee

Reply to this post

Response to laserhaas (Reply #187)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:42 AM

msanthrope (37,549 posts)

210. It was Romney, I'm sure. nt

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 06:59 AM

Warren DeMontague (80,708 posts)

193. What the fuck kind of name is "Casey Champagne", anyway?

Reply to this post

Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #193)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:03 AM

dlwickham (3,316 posts)

194. Sounds like a stripper

Or maybe a drag queen

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:19 AM

Warren DeMontague (80,708 posts)

201. You can.

Because here's a hillary supporter who admitted to alerting on one of the sanders groups and getting it shut down- right when this all was happening.

The quote in your op doesnt negate it, nor does it "prove" anything.

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:41 AM

QC (26,371 posts)

209. Have you apologized for linking to Stormfront?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=486255

Reply to this post

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 12:20 PM

closeupready (29,503 posts)

217. Is that why you keep calling on Hillary to apologize for her IWR vote?

No, didn't think you liked personal responsibility that much; only like it when it suits your interests.

Reply to this post

2016 Postmortem (Forum)