Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
FlatBaroque | Apr 2016 | OP |
desmiller | Apr 2016 | #1 | |
FlatBaroque | Apr 2016 | #5 | |
msongs | Apr 2016 | #2 | |
Renew Deal | Apr 2016 | #3 | |
hrmjustin | Apr 2016 | #4 | |
yuiyoshida | Apr 2016 | #6 | |
randome | Apr 2016 | #7 | |
bkkyosemite | Apr 2016 | #8 |
Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:14 PM
desmiller (747 posts)
1. I have some serious beef with that type of bullshit.
Response to desmiller (Reply #1)
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:15 PM
FlatBaroque (3,160 posts)
5. 0% of the vote in, well I guess we can call it.
![]() |
Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:15 PM
msongs (66,168 posts)
2. polls are closed, evidence is overwhelming. like bernie in vermont sort of. easy to call nt
Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:15 PM
Renew Deal (81,378 posts)
3. Green Papers shows 62-33 delegates for Hillary
Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:15 PM
hrmjustin (71,265 posts)
4. No it is called projecting the winner.
Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:15 PM
yuiyoshida (41,187 posts)
6. California hasn't even voted yet and
People are saying its all over. Guess they don't want us to vote.
|
Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:16 PM
randome (34,845 posts)
7. The polls in all 5 states were closed so what difference did it make?
You know they can project a winner based on one or two tenths of a percent, right? Round that up or down and you have...let's see...carry the five...divide by two...ZERO!
[hr][font color="blue"][center]All things in moderation, including moderation.[/center][/font][hr] |
Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:18 PM
bkkyosemite (5,792 posts)