Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Was the Indiana primary rigged? (Original Post) realmirage May 2016 OP
Nope, smooth sailing nt firebrand80 May 2016 #1
Make your case. What's you theory, evidence, etc.? morningfog May 2016 #2
Exit polls are what the Bernie crowd always presents as evidence. JaneyVee May 2016 #7
Since when is evidence required? baldguy May 2016 #8
LOL! When Sanders wins it's fair. When he loses, it's cheating. KittyWampus May 2016 #15
THe OP is flame bait. That's my point. morningfog May 2016 #18
I used to get smacked by my Dad for using this poster's theory... cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #20
It was an open primary, so they could not doctor the voting lists to prevent people from voting. -none May 2016 #3
There was voter suppression. Biaviians May 2016 #4
Just as it's always been. You'll have to take that up with the state... not the party. NurseJackie May 2016 #22
Thank you for the input! I'm concerned about ALL voters. Biaviians May 2016 #27
But Chicago area and SW Indiana were able to vote until 7PM LiberalFighter May 2016 #37
Proof? liberalnarb May 2016 #5
It is interesting how DU never accuses an election of being rigged when Bernie wins. LonePirate May 2016 #6
That would be because anyone with the power to rig an election is a Hillary supporter. liberalnarb May 2016 #9
Then explain AZ where Repubs control everything. Are they Clinton supporters? LonePirate May 2016 #10
The repugs and the Clinton supporters are definitely the powerful ones. liberalnarb May 2016 #12
A sufficient number of them are CobaltBlue May 2016 #32
Right. So Obama had superDUPER power in 2008! KittyWampus May 2016 #16
Nope, same Hillary team now as then. liberalnarb May 2016 #31
Ah, so same Clinton team but Obama FOILED their dastardly plans... KittyWampus May 2016 #35
Touche grossproffit May 2016 #11
I say the following regardless which side is claiming elections are rigged BootinUp May 2016 #13
Of course not. Didn't you see the winner? WhiteTara May 2016 #14
"Tit for tat" = "I got nothin' and I'm simply stirring shit." cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #17
But SANDERS won, so there are no "rigged", "conspiracy", "fraud" claims. Go figure. George II May 2016 #19
They only polled dems and indy's and repubs could vote for whomever. ViseGrip May 2016 #21
Clinton has won more open primaries than Sanders. ContinentalOp May 2016 #28
Bernie won, so obviously fair!!!! Adrahil May 2016 #23
Logic is not your strong suit GreatGazoo May 2016 #24
Childish & pointless snark Amaril May 2016 #25
The only way Hillary could have won PeoViejo May 2016 #26
The strong denials of BS supporters is convincing me it was rigged realmirage May 2016 #29
GOP rigged it to extend election nt. Trenzalore May 2016 #30
Absolutely. You convinced me realmirage May 2016 #34
Amazing that, right? But, Sanders won, so crickets. I personally feel it is because open and 22% of seabeyond May 2016 #33
Exit polling was off by 5.9%. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #36
 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
8. Since when is evidence required?
Thu May 5, 2016, 09:38 AM
May 2016

None of the CTs involving Clinton have needed any to be endlessly repeated & accepted by Bernie fans.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
20. I used to get smacked by my Dad for using this poster's theory...
Thu May 5, 2016, 10:20 AM
May 2016

"But Daaaad... she (she being my Sister) did it first!"

Smack!

-none

(1,884 posts)
3. It was an open primary, so they could not doctor the voting lists to prevent people from voting.
Thu May 5, 2016, 09:23 AM
May 2016

So no, it was not rigged.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
22. Just as it's always been. You'll have to take that up with the state... not the party.
Thu May 5, 2016, 10:31 AM
May 2016

Longer voting hours would have been nice. The polls closed at 6 for ALL voters, not just Bernie voters. At least they have early voting that a LOT of people participated in. Electing Democrats in down-ballot races will be a good first step in helping to gain strength in state politics and decision making.

 

liberalnarb

(4,532 posts)
5. Proof?
Thu May 5, 2016, 09:34 AM
May 2016

Evidence is something usually involved in these kinds of things. Your OP seems to be lacking any.

LonePirate

(13,415 posts)
6. It is interesting how DU never accuses an election of being rigged when Bernie wins.
Thu May 5, 2016, 09:35 AM
May 2016

Yet if he loses, the chorus of "the election is rigged" claims is deafening.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
35. Ah, so same Clinton team but Obama FOILED their dastardly plans...
Fri May 6, 2016, 01:12 AM
May 2016

It's all connected, man. Illuminati, aliens, the "Clinton Machine"

BootinUp

(47,139 posts)
13. I say the following regardless which side is claiming elections are rigged
Thu May 5, 2016, 10:04 AM
May 2016

Do you have a serious proposal to improve the election process or are you just making noise?


If its the latter then:

STOP IT

STOP IT

STOP IT

Its bad for our democracy.

WhiteTara

(29,701 posts)
14. Of course not. Didn't you see the winner?
Thu May 5, 2016, 10:13 AM
May 2016

Only if he is the loser is it rigged. Although he is suing the state because one polling place opened late.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
17. "Tit for tat" = "I got nothin' and I'm simply stirring shit."
Thu May 5, 2016, 10:17 AM
May 2016

Stirring shit that's already been stirred a hundred times before.

How do you get the shit off of your spoon?

 

ViseGrip

(3,133 posts)
21. They only polled dems and indy's and repubs could vote for whomever.
Thu May 5, 2016, 10:30 AM
May 2016

Why do you only poll one party, when three parties can vote for your party candidate? This is why he wins in open primaries. Indy's go to Bernie, overwhelmingly. Some repubs. So if they are allowed to vote in the dem primary, why wouldn't you poll them????


They try to deflate Bernie, 'he's always losing'. Then you get a result like IN.

It's just party shenanigans. You can't manipulate a vote when three parties are voting in both primaries. So it's interesting Hillary win, where it's just dems voting, and all the caging, etc. So if it's the republicans who are doing the cheating as Hillary supporters say in NY, then it must be her, they want to run against.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
23. Bernie won, so obviously fair!!!!
Thu May 5, 2016, 10:39 AM
May 2016


Of course, I think 95% of the "FRAUD!" claims are delusional bullshit. The other 5% are part of Republican efforts to suppress Democratic votes in general.

GreatGazoo

(3,937 posts)
24. Logic is not your strong suit
Thu May 5, 2016, 10:46 AM
May 2016

If A then B does not mean if C then B.

Indiana shows what happens when there are no purges of Sanders voters

 

PeoViejo

(2,178 posts)
26. The only way Hillary could have won
Thu May 5, 2016, 11:29 AM
May 2016

would have been to flip enough votes to give Bernie a negative number of votes.

 

realmirage

(2,117 posts)
29. The strong denials of BS supporters is convincing me it was rigged
Thu May 5, 2016, 05:40 PM
May 2016

It must have been rigged, how could the polls have been wrong?

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
33. Amazing that, right? But, Sanders won, so crickets. I personally feel it is because open and 22% of
Thu May 5, 2016, 07:11 PM
May 2016

other than Democrats voted. But hey.... I guess we are entitled to yell.... Sanders stole. The way it works, just vlatant false accusations if Clinton wins.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Was the Indiana primary r...