2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSanders Threatens Floor Fight at Dem Convention
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by LostOne4Ever (a host of the 2016 Postmortem forum).
Last edited Fri May 6, 2016, 03:23 PM - Edit history (1)
" Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders is threatening a floor fight over rules and platform planks at the party's summer convention if the Democratic National Committee stacks the committees with supporters of Hillary Clinton.
Sanders writes in a letter to Democratic National Committee chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz that the makeup of the standing committees should reflect the level of support that he and Clinton received in the primaries and caucuses.
He says many of his supporters have not been included and notes Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy will be in charge of the convention's platform committee and former Massachusetts Rep. Barney Frank will run the rules committee. He calls both "aggressive attack surrogates" for Clinton."
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/latest-trump-britain-off-eu-38924521
I have one comment Hillary supporters, tell her to go back to New York, Arkansas, Illinois. I am really tired of your whining bullshit. Maybe you can start another war, or better yet, why not join Henry Kissinger and the death squads, that is more your style.
on edit--
P.S.--The comment above was a paraphrase of the original post in Hillary Group which excoriated Bernie. I just changed the names. Credit where credit is due.
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)corkhead
(6,119 posts)of the preordained coronation
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)By preordained coronation, you mean the majority of Democratic voters?
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)Saying now that you're gonna start shit at the convention BEFORE all the states have voted (when you are CLEARLY not going to win), is dragging it out.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)breaking the corporate stranglehold on the party requires a more assertive stance.
floppyboo
(2,461 posts)I see only a completion of a democratic process. Where's the shit?
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)...representation at the Convention.
If the Hillary contingent's attitude is "We WON! Now STFU and give me my crown",
then say "Hello" to President Trump.
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)many of which Bernie won by landslides?
Yes?
So your 3 million more votes is worse than meaningless, it is misleading.
Are you aware that Trump got 11 MILLION votes in the Republican Primary?
Are you sure you want to be chasing voters AWAY from Hillary at this point?
Doesn't seem very smart to me.
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)And do you really think the caucuses voters who aren't counted would weight the popular vote to Bernie's favor?
Demsrule86
(68,552 posts)that caucus states combined don't have as many voters as Ohio or Pennsylvania.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)Yes - the crown awarded by Democrats - not the populace.
Demsrule86
(68,552 posts)He lost and should stop embarrassing himself.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)That is exactly the attitude I was talking about that alienate Bernie supporters, especially Independents and Millennials.
Good Luck trying to win the GE without them.
Demsrule86
(68,552 posts)If Bernie has a floor fight then screwel him. Bernie who?
rock
(13,218 posts)It's a free country. I only know of one other concession that takes them though.
senz
(11,945 posts)WE could decide the outcome for YOUR candidate.
MFM008
(19,805 posts)but you guys knock yourselves out.
cali
(114,904 posts)floppyboo
(2,461 posts)the whole thing reads (in case you didn't go to the link - and you have to scroll down a bit - after the part where Obama says (all candidates should be vetted) Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders is threatening a floor fight over rules and platform planks at the party's summer convention
And that's just a headline - not a quote.
I can see why you'd get all fired up though
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)Nor am I fired up. I find you all quite hilarious. Never seen so many "political junkies" who act like this is the first primary they've ever seen.
floppyboo
(2,461 posts)I'm only 55, so have only had the benefit of textbooks, which I read plenty of which earned me a uni degree and badge as political junkie 'the thing I do' for the last 35 years. So, stop it with the paternalistic 'good for you's' Damn, swore I wouldn't post shit like this, but you are needing a spanking!
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)floppyboo
(2,461 posts)You are not here for discussion, just to shit disturb. Good-bye. It wasn't really fun.
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)trueblue2007
(17,205 posts)WE DON'T NEED VIOLENCE.
rock
(13,218 posts)So BSoteric.
Kokonoe
(2,485 posts)And, yes Hillary has been rigging the election since she was robbed in 08.
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)I thought not.
senz
(11,945 posts)Check it out, Dr. Hobbitstein:
https://johnlaurits.com/2016/04/28/this-is-what-will-happen-at-the-democratic-convention/
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)I realize she's way ahead, but it's not over. It's not over.
You may not know this, but Bernie supporters do not want to see a corrupt, dishonest, bloodthirsty individual who lacks both conscience and judgment get into the White House.
Bernie Sanders is a decent, honest, intelligent person who shares our liberal democratic values and has shown exceptionally good judgment for decades.
If he cannot overcome a corrupt, destructive establishment, we want him to at least try. As far as I'm concerned, Bernie's movement is our last chance to take this country back for the people peacefully.
Your hashtag and video are the kind of cheap, insulting ridicule we have come to expect from the Hill campaign. I don't know how you can stand to be a part it. I would expect a loving father of an aspie daughter to be capable of greater sensitivity and kindness.
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)The supers will put her over, just as they put Obama over in '08. Neither of them had the amount (Hill was only down by 90.
And <self-censored> for bringing my daughter into this argument. She's aspie, NOT dellusional.
senz
(11,945 posts)Until then, she doesn't have and will not have the numbers.
I said nothing whatsoever about your daughter herself. I would not do that. I made a comment about you. I wrote:
How dare you twist my words around? I was referring to YOUR behavior. Don't hide behind her.
How low Hill supporters go. It amazes me every time. If your candidate weren't such a corrupt, greedy, dishonest, war-mongering miscreant, her supporters alone would be enough to decide my vote. It could be a moral IQ test.
Every single time.
Demsrule86
(68,552 posts)Supers can and no doubt will signal their intentions after California if not before. It is clear that Bernie will not be able to make any successful argument to the supers.
senz
(11,945 posts)There was no path for Hillary at that point. He had already announced it. She had no choice.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)this argument is getting sillier by the day
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)You brought her up to denigrate me, then accuse me of hiding behind her? Who the fuck do you think you are?
You disgust me.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)That was a low blow.
Sid
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)Fucking low, indeed.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)I have seen this stuff here.
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)A shame we have to wait to get community standards back, but I can see why Skinner thinks it has to happen after the BOBs are gone.
nolawarlock
(1,729 posts).... you are right about that.
However, while Hillary likely won't hit 2,383 and Bernie can't hit it, there's always the remote possibility he may erase the distance between them (what was it, 65% of all remaining delegates) to claim a simple majority. But how likely is it that he's going to get 65% of the remaining delegates? Neither candidate were going to hit 2,383 in 2008 either, especially with them being so close. Yeah, they only avoided a contested convention because Hillary dropped out, but the reality is, she's got the super delegates and the majority of them are never, ever going to switch to Bernie unless he has a significant simple majority over Hillary.
Your link is far more wishful thinking that it is math, hoping that tens of thousands of Bernie supporters gnashing their teeth and pulling their hair outside the convention are going to force the superdelegates' hands anymore than all the abuse the've heaped on the supers' social media pages. That sounds more like intimidation tactics than math but it's very unlikely to work in either case.
Demsrule86
(68,552 posts)And what has that to do with causing a floor fight at the convention?
nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)Which dragged out all that #Berniemath complete with link. Were you meaning to respond to that as well?
As for the floor fight, at this point this candidate is determined to pour out any dignity he has left. Why not go all the way? Lol
merrily
(45,251 posts)Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Shadowflash
(1,536 posts)Last I heard, neither candidate has reached the required amount of delegates to 'win'.
Therefore, by default, no one has 'lost'.
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)Super-delegates have NEVER flipped an election.
Bernie can stay in all he wants, but he has no path to the nomination.
corkhead
(6,119 posts)there's a first time for everything. What, no mention that Hillary had her reasons for staying in the race into June?
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/24796393/ns/politics-decision_08/t/clinton-regrets-rfk-assassination-remark/#.Vyza6iEtUWE
In 2016, you never know when there might be an indictment coming down the pike.
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)And she stayed in in '08 because she was VERY close in numbers, and popular vote. Bernie is WAY behind in comparison.
corkhead
(6,119 posts)Maybe the candidate should make that call, and he is, like Hillary did in 08. Back then I wasn't the least bit worried about her staying in, because I didn't think it mattered. I don't understand that if he is so far behind according to you why is it such a big deal that Bernie stay in if he has lost anyway?
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)http://www.politicususa.com/2016/05/05/email-scandal-crushed-fbi-finds-evidence-clinton-broke-law-private-email.html
corkhead
(6,119 posts)you aren't negligent.
You didn't answer my question. If he doesn't stand a chance, why are you so concerned about whether he stays in the race or not?
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Demsrule86
(68,552 posts)Standing in the way of winning the General. Bernie is a big disappointment; what a lousy way to end your career.
senz
(11,945 posts)Read your comment and then look at your ridiculous"love and kindness" tagline. That's the kind of "love and kindness" we could expect if your reprehensible candidate were to finagle her way into the presidency. For the good of the country, let's hope it never happens.
I think you need a in your sig line.
Faux pas
(14,667 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Having just discovered the rules and that bending these rules could get him the nomination, he wants to fight it out.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)This floor fight has nothing to do with the nomination.
scscholar
(2,902 posts)do affect the nomination.
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)floppyboo
(2,461 posts)but I have been a lurker for years. And Buzz Clik - you are so predictable in your ad hominem attacks. I'm sure you are super popular at the cool kids parties, and probably buy the beer.
oh wait, was that unfair of me? Damn right it was.
I joined this site for the insightful comments. Getting scarce now. But I have recently (as a newbie-ish) discovered 'hide'. Things will become more civil after some pruning. Good-bye and be well.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)followed immediately by
This kind of easily shredded buffoonery usually is the forte of right wing knuckledraggers.
Regardless, thanks for the laugh.
AgadorSparticus
(7,963 posts)Is a worthwhile skill..
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Your point?
Do you have one?
Do you have the spine to verbalize your point? Do you have the skills?
I'm sure you do. Let's hear it.
cali
(114,904 posts)Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)We support him because we want a voice in the political process.
How ironic that it takes an outsider to bring the Democratic Party back to the principles it used to proudly represent.
1. Freedom of speech
2. Freedom of worship
3. Freedom from want
4. Freedom from fear
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)is more Hillary's style. More the pity.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)money, time, effort, and vote.
Also what we get to do with our voices and opinions and so forth. If the Democratic Party chooses to abandon us, there will be some consequences. Neither I nor you know fully what.
Those are the f'ing terms.
And the smug and snide way that Hillary supporters dismiss those who are only fighting for what Democrats have traditionally wanted, in the face of this being either watered down or subverted, is amazing to me.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)SFnomad
(3,473 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)If the DNClinton blocks reform/platform issues from Sanders supporters, they'll be quite content to leave the party to the neocons and limousine liberals and form a real liberal party to the left. Sanders has shown corporate money not necessary.
CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)Time to close the yearbook.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)SFnomad
(3,473 posts)supports it as well. That's typically how these things go. Yes, the loser(s) get input, but they don't get to write the platform.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)There will be political repercussions for being this much of a sore loser.
Human101948
(3,457 posts)She will have her revenge.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)from the 90s.
I just mean politically, e.g. being stripped of committee seniority.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)They targeted several incumbent Dems who they didn't feel gave her enough support in 2008.
Human101948
(3,457 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)Here's another. Read it. http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/195188-hillarys-hit-list
cali
(114,904 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)The 2nd-place finisher gets some say in the platform and such, but this seems a bit silly to threaten a floor fight.
floppyboo
(2,461 posts)is like a kid with a skateboard with a free pass on an open road. Or, a drug addict "More please". In an age where they see themselves become inconsequential, they have to promise blood cause Trump gave them a good taste of it.
Don't buy the hype. Sanders will support Hillary. He will negotiate for some say in the platform. PERIOD.
senz
(11,945 posts)Certainly you've picked the right candidate for yourself.
But don't forget Hill's refusal to concede in 2008.
madaboutharry
(40,207 posts)what is colleagues in Congress and in the Senate have known about him all along. He is a JERK!
No wonder Barnie Frank can't stand him.
I also wonder how much of this is coming from Jane Sanders, the former autocratic, dictatorial, and micro-managing hostile workplace creating past President of Burlington College. She is a piece of work and no doubt has much influence over his campaign.
He must be thinking of retiring frrom the Senate at the end of his term, evidenced by his bridge burning behavior towards the Democratic party. Once he goes back to the Senate, he will be moved from the back bench to out in the hallway.
Human101948
(3,457 posts)Lost the House, lost the Senate, lost 900 seats in state legislatures.
Keep up the good work! Keep holding that center right incrementalist position. It's doing so well for us.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)'Maddie' won't even give her a dollar.
catnhatnh
(8,976 posts)BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
AzDar
(14,023 posts)That's a goddamned badge of honor!
bvar22
(39,909 posts)Like so many other things, Bernie was right about Barney too!
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Beowulf
(761 posts)This primary is simply the beginning of what likely will be a long struggle. Neoliberalism must be vanquished!
mmonk
(52,589 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)Fighting for democracy! Go Bernie! Show the kids how it's done!
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Democracy in action.
floppyboo
(2,461 posts)General Election polls (all voters) show the real # of Americans don't agree. Especially in swing states where it will matter most.
from RealClearPolitics. state Sanders Trump spread (Hillary spread)
National 56 40 16 (6)
Florida 50 42 8* (5)
New York 56.7 33.5 23.2 (21)
Penn 51.3 38 13.3 (8)
Ohio 46.3 42 4.3 (3)
Michigan 55 36 19* (10)
NCarolina 46 43 3* (2)
Virginia 49 36 13* (10)
NewHamp 58 31 27* (8)
WI 52 33 19* (11)
Iowa 49 40 9 (7)
*took the most recent instead of average, where averages do not reflect the last 3 months
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)of women and People of Color, in particular African Americans. Are these the increasingly marginalized people in the Democratic Party you are talking about?
If so, then it looks like the Bernie revolution might be about bringing back the party of Roosevelt, which was also the party of segregation.
But I'm sure you don't really want to dismiss Hillary's voters like this...
floppyboo
(2,461 posts)What I said was the democratic party is marginalizing themselves and then gave the example of courting Bush surrogate money. Where you see color and women is beyond me, but, hey, if that floats your boat, go for it! I personally don't see any examples of your vision in Sanders' platform. Yup, the demographics do speak, but they also speak for early voting states, before the message was getting out. Definite, indisputable change there too as the media's blackout is being overcome.
Sorry you feel so defensive. Wouldn't it be nice to live in the kind of world where that defense was less necessary? That's what we all want. We don't need people pitting eachother against eachother striving for the same shore.
floppyboo
(2,461 posts)are you saying AA and women are willing to sacrifice democratic values and support courting the right? I don't think you meant that, or you wouldn't be here, no?
I didn't mean that. Not at all. I meant there is a strong marginal wing of the democratic party that sees power in the GOP desperation, and has gone looking down that dangerous path.
Onlooker
(5,636 posts)He voted against it. Maybe he can get the Democratic Party to back him?
Human101948
(3,457 posts)Why have AMBER Alerts been ineffective? As a 2007 Pacific Standard article notes, most kidnapped children who eventually end up murdered are killed within three hours of their abduction. Yet AMBER Alerts are rarely issued within that critical window. It takes time for the authorities to get their act together, and by the time the alert goes out, it is often too late to make any difference.
In any event, those sorts of kidnappings are very rare. The vast majority of child abductions in this country are committed by relatives or acquaintancesestranged parents and such who usually mean the children no harm. Even though AMBER Alerts are only supposed to be issued in the most serious child-abduction cases, they are nevertheless used in domestic cases like thesecases where, Griffin argues, AMBER Alerts might actually serve to escalate an otherwise manageable situation. We looked at a parental abduction where the dad was located thanks to a citizen tip prompted by an AMBER Alert, Griffin told Pacific Standard. Law enforcement swooped in there. There was a big standoff, and the guy ultimately killed himself. We coded that case as AMBER Alert saved a kid from a dangerous situation. But for all we know, the AMBER Alert made it a dangerous situation.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/crime/2013/08/08/amber_alert_california_let_s_get_rid_of_the_amber_alert_system.html
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)Where is his track record?
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)asuhornets
(2,405 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Also, he was poor, raised by immigrants, et al., missed out on the Silver Spoon.
He's ALWAYS been on the People's Side. I know you won't read this, but perhaps others will.
When the People are ready, the Leader will appear.
http://www.biography.com/people/bernie-sanders
BootinUp
(47,141 posts)The media is moving on as a result of the real state of the race which is Hillary vs. Trump. Bernie will have less and less of an audience going forward, and those still paying attention will take him less and less seriously.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)There's an old saying, If you're not angry, you're not paying attention. Fits well here. And the pittances many of us give him is due to the fact that he doesn't rent himself out to the Corporate Pandering Class.
What do you call $300,000 tapping into the pocket book. Pocket change? Perhaps that explains your response. Good for you.
This is a class war. So, we'll not be dismissed by your hubris.
philly_bob
(2,419 posts)Check out the comments in the HC Group. They're absolutely outraged at the idea that Sanders' numerous strong and enthusiastic supporters -- the party's future -- want to have any say in the party platform.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1107126284
That's the problem with the the separate HC group on DU, which has banned dissenting voices (including mine). It's like an audio feedback loop -- it just gets louder. When the primary is over, I hope DU admins reconsider this approach.
And I hope Bernie stays in until the end so he can speak for many of us at the convention.
Human101948
(3,457 posts)Many like myself banned for inadvertently posting something seemingly innocuous, often without realizing that they had entered the Forbidden Zone.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)1980s the conventions were turned into planned coronations events that showed only unity. They were no longer the traditional conventions where numerous candidates were present and voted on. Where the problems of the party were worked out in front of the cameras. Where there were open demonstrations such as the ones in 68. The convention was a place were everyone got to have their say.
What Hillary and her supporters want is to continue this coronation show and sweep the problems under the rug and make all decisions behind closed doors with ONLY Hillary supporters present.
This is and never has been a form of democracy.
Go Bernie.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Start getting used to it
DookDook
(166 posts)As Frank Zappa said, 'the meek shall inherit nothing,' so at least we have Bernie Sanders standing up for us.
senz
(11,945 posts)Demsrule86
(68,552 posts)Now he is fighting Hillary just like Trump. Once the GOP had a nominee, there was no reason to go to California...he should concede.
MineralMan
(146,286 posts)he'll lose that floor fight, too. It's a waste of his and our time, unless he goes in with a pledged delegate majority. In that case, he'll end up as the nominee and become the head of the Democratic Party. If that's what you want, then campaigning for him in the remaining states is the way to get it.
The same majority of pledged delegates, along with the superdelegates, will prevent a floor fight by the second-place candidate from taking place. That's how it works, you see.
Turin_C3PO
(13,964 posts)it's fair for him to request that a certain amount of committee members are of his political persuasion. Ultimately of course it's the DNC's decision,but they should definitely consider it.
hack89
(39,171 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)... so no one should be surprised that he's going to have a tantrum through the entire process. It wouldn't shock me if they end up having to have security drag him out of the convention kicking and screaming. The man has no dignity left.
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)make it into the platform. Does not mean clinton will do anything with any of the issues, but would make me happy to have them included in the platform. She is such a control freak. She could put a stop to all this with a little inclusiveness.
Kokonoe
(2,485 posts)Without progressive support and against republicans its a...... well its her call.
She has assets to look after her beautiful foundation.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Not like the Trumps of the world, anyhow.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)Demsrule86
(68,552 posts)It is too little and too late....never forgive him and never support him in anything. I will continue as I do now ...turning off the television if he is on...not on much lately anyway.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)whatthehey
(3,660 posts)Doesn't necessarily, or even probably, have to control the chairs to do that.
HRC delegates with chair and 50-60% of members? no prob. 95%? Tad unfair, surely?
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)Demsrule86
(68,552 posts)Have your floor fight...you will only look foolish. To the victors go the spoils...you lost. The end.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)Too bad it would get me permabanned.
But I'm definitely thinking it.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)The Establishment does not unilaterally disarm. It has to be dragged in the right direction by popular demand.
The magnitude of Sanders' support ought to move the needle a bit, if voters stil count for something.
nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)That's pretty rude.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)to his announcement of a third party run.
If he can't get the nomination, he will make sure Trump wins and "brings the revolution".
I'm sure that was the plan all along.
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)If previous DLC Third Way types Gore and Kerry had more guts to fight we might not be in the mess in the first place.
Go Bernie
Gothmog
(145,129 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
Human101948
(3,457 posts)from Sid
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)Demsrule86
(68,552 posts)Bernie should know better.
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)And its fuckin awesome.
Demsrule86
(68,552 posts)is a fucking awesome move for the Bern.
aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)HRC fans Are merely inconvenienced by Bernie's campaign.
Zynx
(21,328 posts)This is why he'd be a terrible president. He doesn't understand how to make deals.
Human101948
(3,457 posts)the selection of the platform committee. Politics is also about using your strength and fighting for your position.
Demsrule86
(68,552 posts)He is ego driven I guess.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)The only ones whining seems to be those on the losing side. Hopefully, Sanders will be as gracious as Hillary was in 2008 and release his delegates at the convention so that Hillary can be nominated by acclamation, like Obama was in 2008.
MineralMan
(146,286 posts)KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)This is a concession of the nomination right here. If he's only threatening a floor fight over the platform, then he is conceding the nomination.
The Second Stone
(2,900 posts)and if Sanders doesn't like him, he doesn't have to vote for him. If he had wanted to control the convention, he should have secured more delegates and started making allies in the Democratic Party decades ago, like the rest of us.
Barney Frank is above the cheap shot personal attacks Sanders just launched.
trueblue2007
(17,205 posts)LostOne4Ever
(9,288 posts)[font style="font-family:'Georgia','Baskerville Old Face','Helvetica',fantasy;" size=4 color=crimson]It is the consensus of the Hosting forum at this time, that due to the edit of the OP, to LOCK this thread as Disruptive meta.[/font]
[div class="excerpt" style="background-color:#dcdcdc; padding-bottom:5px; border:1px solid #bfbfbf; border-bottom:none; border-radius:0.4615em 0.4615em 0em 0em; box-shadow:3px 3px 3px #999999;"]http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025307978[div class="excerpt" style="background-color:#f0f0f0; border:1px solid #bfbfbf; border-top:none; border-radius:0em 0em 0.4615em 0.4615em; box-shadow:3px 3px 3px #999999;"]DISRUPTIVE META-DISCUSSION
Threads complaining about Democratic Underground or its members; threads complaining about jury decisions, locked threads, suspensions, bannings, or the like; and threads intended to disrupt or negatively influence the normal workings of Democratic Underground and its community moderating system are not permitted.