Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Human101948

(3,457 posts)
5. I see a lot of generalities, no details...
Mon May 9, 2016, 09:49 AM
May 2016

"Cut red tape"
"Expand access to capital"
"Boost public investment"

No details.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
7. Well, sure: the only candidate with any specifics at all dropped out after Iowa
Tue May 10, 2016, 08:21 AM
May 2016

I do miss that guy...

Sparkly

(24,149 posts)
8. There are links to more details and white papers throughout.
Tue May 10, 2016, 08:43 AM
May 2016

You'll also see "Issues" categories including Manufacturing, Labor, Workforce, Small Business, etc. etc.

 

Jitter65

(3,089 posts)
10. I love the 15% profit sharing for employees. As profits rise so will income for employees and not
Tue May 10, 2016, 08:53 AM
May 2016

be based on wages alone. This is a great plan!! She ought to put it more out in front. It does not cost companies a thing to initiate. The employees become stock holders and wealth is spread around.

RDANGELO

(3,433 posts)
2. Nothing about making changes to our trade policies.
Mon May 9, 2016, 08:19 AM
May 2016

Nothing about protecting American workers with our trade policies. Nothing about TTP , although she is right now publicly against it.

You can't make substantial gains in income inequality without making big changes in our trade policies.

We continue to run huge trade deficits , especially with China.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
3. The biggest one she's pushed has been a provision to make it more attractive for companies
Mon May 9, 2016, 08:20 AM
May 2016

to give equity to their employees. Great idea, and for that matter the only technically "socialist" part of anybody's platform...

 

Human101948

(3,457 posts)
6. Another "feel good" proposal with no teeth...
Mon May 9, 2016, 09:55 AM
May 2016

The only way you can get companies to give equity away is to ensure that the execs are able to enrich themselves tenfold in the process.

Just like the 401Ks were touted as a way for the average worker to manage their retirement funds and were actually most beneficial to top executives while freeing companies of any pension obligations--

High income employees receive the majority of the tax benefits of 401(k)s, according to a new Government Accountability Office report. The analysis found that 401(k) tax benefits accrue primarily to highly paid employees and do relatively little to help lower income workers save for retirement.

Only about half of the private sector workforce has access to any type of retirement benefits at work, with low income workers being the least likely to be offered the opportunity to participate.
http://money.usnews.com/money/blogs/planning-to-retire/2011/05/03/gao-401ks-primarily-benefit-the-wealthy

Result, most peons ended up with very little for their "golden years."
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Where is Hillary's detail...