2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forummetroins
(2,550 posts)It's a play on wheel of fortune. Meaning Hillary is leading by delegates and Bernie is extremely far behind because his team chose a bad path in the beginning.
She's also leading in votes.
pacalo
(24,721 posts)CobaltBlue
(1,122 posts)Response to 99th_Monkey (Original post)
TM99 This message was self-deleted by its author.
emsimon33
(3,128 posts)It is a bad day for the country when the two candidates being touted as the two who will be running for president are held in such a poor light by the voters. The time may be right for a third party.
KPN
(15,635 posts)Too bad, eh?
emsimon33
(3,128 posts)If Jill Stein plays are cards right and identifies who will be in her cabinet (a strong cabinet), etc., she could be the first woman president of the U.S. given the two parties' offerings. Not the best outcome but the DNC needs to stop all the shenanigans.
KPN
(15,635 posts)She could certainly end up with 10-20% of votes though.
emsimon33
(3,128 posts)People are tired of the status quo, tired of being told they have to do X/fear X. tired of having a choice between two people they do not like or trust.
But not enough people are awake at this point imo.
potone
(1,701 posts)Most people have never heard of her, and will not take a risk on someone they don't know at all. Part of the problem Bernie had was that in the beginning most people didn't know him, and the media ignored him. It took months of campaigning for him to get his message out. Even if she came up with a war chest somehow, there is just not enough time.
I also cannot support anyone who has so little experience that is relevant to the job. We need someone who not only has ideals that we can agree with, but also knows how to work with Congress.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)She'll probably improve on the 0.33% she got last time, by picking up a small minority of the Sanders voters. Still, it's unlikely that she'll get the 5% necessary for federal matching funds.
The big minor-party winner from this nominating process will be Gary Johnson (or whoever else wins the Libertarian nomination). Some Republicans will figure that, for all their disagreements with libertarianism on some issues, Trump is a clown and they could never vote for a Clinton. Quite a few of last cycle's Romney voters will vote Libertarian as the best way to adhere to their small-government philosophy. Johnson (who got about 1% last time) has a much better chance than Stein of hitting the 5% threshold.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)And frankly, if it were a three way race between Hillary, Trump and Bernie, I'd say Bernie would take it, and probably very easily.
This election is the "outsider" election. Hillary is decidedly not an outsider and represents business as usual, the establishment and has high unlikeability and untrustworthy numbers. Plus she took so much money from corporations with her SuperPac and also won't release her transcripts for the speeches she made millions doing.
Trump is and outsider but he is a wild card. He's crass, disgusting, a bigot, a misogynist, has no diplomatic skills, in short, he's a nightmare.
Bernie is an outsider and he is in line with the current rising tide of progessivism and fight for equalitys. He appeals to independents because of his no-nonsense can do attitude, his willingness to speak truth to power and his tenacity and steadfastness in his fight for equality for ALL people.
Considering that independents outnumber Republicans and Democrats these days, and that members of both parties would vote for Bernie if he ran as an independent/third party candidate being that they truly dislike their party's front runners, I truly think he would win.
.
brooklynite
(94,299 posts)KPN
(15,635 posts)until after they've been appointed ... that has been true for my entire 65 year life.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)In 2000, Al Gore won the popular vote-- that is, more individual American voters wanted him to be President.
jamese777
(546 posts)at primary election polling stations and caucuses. Hillary Clinton has more than 12 million votes and Donald Trump has more than 10 million.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)See Adams County, Illinois; Brooklyn, New York; New Bedford, Massachusetts; and Phoenix, Arizona for a few examples.
pacalo
(24,721 posts)There are two so-called "fringe" candidates in this race -- one Republican & one Democrat.
Both candidates are wildly popular because of the fact they are on the "fringe" -- neither is a part of the establishment's political business-as-usual shenanigans, yet Hillary is at the top of the establishment that is being rejected in record numbers.
Both candidates get an astoundingly huge number of attendees at their rallies. I don't see people lining up to hear/see Hillary; in fact, where are the pictures of her audiences?
Both candidates have followers who are enthusiastic & highly energized. Hillary doesn't have that level of excitement.
What Hillary does have is the means to create a public perception of success.
(To my fellow Bernie supporters, don't believe the hype. Think.)
StayFrosty
(237 posts)She's leading Sanders by significant margins
Is he an ineffective candidate?
Maybe he hasn't been subjected to decades of smear campaigns from the right?
pacalo
(24,721 posts)StayFrosty
(237 posts)Who is leading in delegate count and the popular vote?
Hint: it's not Sanders
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)Traditional Democrats strongly prefer Clinton, yes, but nobody else does.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)Bernie has bigger crowds, more indifidual donors, raises more money, etc. Only when they go to the polls, hmmmm. . . . somehow . . . . . .
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Need I go on?
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)Clinton 2,209 delegates to Sanders 1,460
Clinton 12,561,272 votes to Sanders 9,446,660
How could Sanders win the General when he isn't even close to wining the Primaries?
Tiggeroshii
(11,088 posts)In the primaries
StayFrosty
(237 posts)Try another talking point
Tiggeroshii
(11,088 posts)There is a reason he is beating trump by double digits where Clinton barely squeaks by. More states doesn't mean more delegates.
StayFrosty
(237 posts)Sanders favorability plummets when people actually sit down and read about his agenda.
Obama won in 2012 by 4% points, Clinton's current polling advantage over Trump is the largest one since 1996 when Bill Clinton led Bob Dole by 17 points.
Try another talking point
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)there are people that refuse to register as a Democrat ... that is the ONLY reason they can't vote in the primaries. But that doesn't mean they aren't ALLOWED to vote in those primaries.
CobaltBlue
(1,122 posts)SFnomad
(3,473 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)Wednesdays
(17,306 posts)Romney's 47 percent.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)unlikeable as she. Something tells me Mittens will be the nominee then Trump will run 3rd Party, and the sea will open even wider for Hillary.
Tarc
(10,472 posts)ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)Tarc
(10,472 posts)Sorry, bro.
The NY Times Tracker has it at +290, so off by one was good enough.
ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Someone else PMed me for a link for this, but I just stole it off someone's Facebook
post, and I doubt I can still go back into my FB feed history far enough to recover
it, and I even it I could I don't think there was anything other than the sources
cited on the graphic, i.e. "NYT, CBS and Huffington Post".
I'll try to find something more specific, but I'm not hopeful that I'll find much. Again,
sorry about no link.
rock
(13,218 posts)The odd woman out? If that's too subtle for you, color all the women' names green. Draw your own conclusion.
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)The people didn't show up for him.
LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)You're welcome!