HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » Has the security review e...

Fri May 13, 2016, 12:23 PM

Has the security review evolved into.an investigation?

We have been hearing for weeks about the security review but now the FBI says they have an investigation
Has the security review evolved?

40 replies, 1592 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 40 replies Author Time Post
Reply Has the security review evolved into.an investigation? (Original post)
SwampG8r May 2016 OP
onecaliberal May 2016 #1
FreakinDJ May 2016 #2
scscholar May 2016 #14
NWCorona May 2016 #16
scscholar May 2016 #19
NWCorona May 2016 #20
scscholar May 2016 #21
NWCorona May 2016 #22
scscholar May 2016 #23
NWCorona May 2016 #24
DesMoinesDem May 2016 #27
scscholar May 2016 #28
DesMoinesDem May 2016 #30
Joob May 2016 #18
panader0 May 2016 #39
scscholar May 2016 #40
BillZBubb May 2016 #3
timmymoff May 2016 #5
BillZBubb May 2016 #6
timmymoff May 2016 #7
pdsimdars May 2016 #35
grasswire May 2016 #10
AgerolanAmerican May 2016 #4
grasswire May 2016 #8
Worldly Traveler May 2016 #9
Jennylynn May 2016 #11
HereSince1628 May 2016 #33
pdsimdars May 2016 #36
Jennylynn May 2016 #38
BlueStateLib May 2016 #12
LexVegas May 2016 #13
SwampG8r May 2016 #15
Waiting For Everyman May 2016 #17
nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #25
highprincipleswork May 2016 #26
ViseGrip May 2016 #29
pdsimdars May 2016 #37
LineNew Reply .
mmonk May 2016 #31
FlatBaroque May 2016 #32
pdsimdars May 2016 #34

Response to SwampG8r (Original post)

Fri May 13, 2016, 12:25 PM

1. Federal Bureau of INVESTIGATION, it's implied in the name. It's always been an investigation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SwampG8r (Original post)

Fri May 13, 2016, 12:26 PM

2. It never was a "Security Review"

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Reply #2)

Fri May 13, 2016, 01:02 PM

14. Got proof of that?

 

All I've seen are third-hand quotes claiming Comey said that, but there has been no audio or video evidence released. It's a case of hearsay. It wouldn't be allowed in a court of law. Don't lose hope yet.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to scscholar (Reply #14)

Fri May 13, 2016, 01:29 PM

16. Find one case where the FBI did a security review. I'll wait.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NWCorona (Reply #16)

Fri May 13, 2016, 01:58 PM

19. Plus, HIllary isn't even the target!

 

I think its important to underscore that Secretary Clinton isnt even a target of this inquiry, investigation, whatever I word you want to use, Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D., Fla.) said.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to scscholar (Reply #19)

Fri May 13, 2016, 01:59 PM

20. Then who is?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NWCorona (Reply #20)

Fri May 13, 2016, 02:03 PM

21. I haven't heard DWS say yet.

 

Just did another search, and it doesn't look like she has publicly confirmed who yet.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to scscholar (Reply #21)

Fri May 13, 2016, 02:04 PM

22. I doubt that she ever would because it's obvious who is.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NWCorona (Reply #22)

Fri May 13, 2016, 02:09 PM

23. OK then so post your evidence of who you think the target is

 

And, I mean real evidence. Not that he-said that she-said that Comey whispered in a secret meeting sort of thing that people here take as fact.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to scscholar (Reply #23)

Fri May 13, 2016, 02:11 PM

24. It's Hillary and her staff. There isn't anybody else in the chain of custody.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to scscholar (Reply #19)

Fri May 13, 2016, 02:18 PM

27. Is this a joke? Why are you quoting DWS.

 

She is not in the FBI. She will say anything to cover for Hillary.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DesMoinesDem (Reply #27)

Fri May 13, 2016, 02:41 PM

28. So you think fourth-hand hearsay is more accurate...

 

than the head of the Party? No one has produced video or audio of this fourth-hand that Comey said that. He is biased but I don't think he is that biased.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to scscholar (Reply #28)

Fri May 13, 2016, 05:26 PM

30. Anything is more accurate than asking DWS.

 

She will say anything to cover for Hillary. She is an embarrassment.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to scscholar (Reply #14)

Fri May 13, 2016, 01:41 PM

18. Saw it live, but oddly enough can't find the feed of HIM saying it now.

I'll keep looking, it was on fox. No one's showing the actual Conference he had, wonder why.
Yep, wow this is actually MORE interesting. They had live feed, I watched it. I'll be looking still.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to scscholar (Reply #14)

Fri May 13, 2016, 09:30 PM

39. Scholar--educate yourself

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to panader0 (Reply #39)

Fri May 13, 2016, 09:34 PM

40. So you quote Faux Knews who is quoting someone who is quoting someone who is quoting Comey?

 

Why not just admit you have nothing?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SwampG8r (Original post)

Fri May 13, 2016, 12:29 PM

3. No, but Her Majesty has evolved into a criminal suspect

and target of the investigation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BillZBubb (Reply #3)

Fri May 13, 2016, 12:31 PM

5. Ahem

 

it's Her Corporate Majesty.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to timmymoff (Reply #5)

Fri May 13, 2016, 12:33 PM

6. A thousand pardons, I meant no affront to the Annointed One!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BillZBubb (Reply #6)

Fri May 13, 2016, 12:34 PM

7. No problem

 

she has many monikers, none of them should be liberal, progressive, or democrat.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to timmymoff (Reply #7)

Fri May 13, 2016, 08:10 PM

35. The both of you are in excellent form today!

 

For that, I thank you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BillZBubb (Reply #3)

Fri May 13, 2016, 12:37 PM

10. not so named officially yet.

but we all know it is so.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SwampG8r (Original post)

Fri May 13, 2016, 12:30 PM

4. The FBI investigates crimes

 

it doesn't do "security reviews"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SwampG8r (Original post)

Fri May 13, 2016, 12:36 PM

8. it was never a "security review"

The director said yesterday there is no such thing as a security review or security inquiry.

He slapped that right down.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SwampG8r (Original post)

Fri May 13, 2016, 12:37 PM

9. Big Surprise

Hillary lied. There never was a security review, the FBI does investigations, thus the name, Federal Bureau of Investigations.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SwampG8r (Original post)

Fri May 13, 2016, 12:39 PM

11. So yeah. Her Magesty lied.

Again

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jennylynn (Reply #11)

Fri May 13, 2016, 06:19 PM

33. It wasn't lying, it was dissembling, it's purpose was obfuscation

and the goal was to make people think something less ominous sounding than an investigation was happening.

Everything that was said sort of resembles the truth if you know what the meaning of is is.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jennylynn (Reply #11)

Fri May 13, 2016, 08:11 PM

36. Are you totally sure she didn't just 'mis-speak' AGAIN?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pdsimdars (Reply #36)

Fri May 13, 2016, 08:57 PM

38. Nope. She does seem to do that a lot

As well as lie.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SwampG8r (Original post)

Fri May 13, 2016, 12:41 PM

12. IC IG did not make a criminal referral - it was a security referral

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SwampG8r (Original post)

Fri May 13, 2016, 12:44 PM

13. Has your Berniebro anger evolved to bargaining? nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LexVegas (Reply #13)

Fri May 13, 2016, 01:23 PM

15. Sorry what? That made zero sense.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SwampG8r (Original post)

Fri May 13, 2016, 01:34 PM

17. She didn't have permission either, that's another big lie.

All of the excuses she has made about this are bullshit. Look you in the eye and lie to you bullshit.

The public will catch up and know all about this in due time. I don't think they're going to be happy about it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SwampG8r (Original post)

Fri May 13, 2016, 02:13 PM

25. It was referred as a review

 

Because the IGs do not have those kinds of powers. The FBI only does investigations, criminal investigations. I hope this clears this for you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SwampG8r (Original post)

Fri May 13, 2016, 02:16 PM

26. it hasn't "evolved". It is and always was a serious investigation, with only the candy coating by

 

those who would care not to know.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SwampG8r (Original post)

Fri May 13, 2016, 02:49 PM

29. It was NEVER a security review or inquiry as Hillary STATED! They clarified it's always

 

BEEN AN INVESTIGATION!

She keeps lying!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ViseGrip (Reply #29)

Fri May 13, 2016, 08:12 PM

37. Spinning like a top.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SwampG8r (Original post)

Fri May 13, 2016, 06:00 PM

31. .

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SwampG8r (Original post)

Fri May 13, 2016, 06:05 PM

32. The Federal Bureau of Security Reviews has bumped this up.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SwampG8r (Original post)

Fri May 13, 2016, 08:09 PM

34. No, the Hillary talking points to frame the issue have been shot down by the head of the FBI

 

It was NEVER a "security review". Didn't you pay attention when Comey spoke? He said the FBI does INVESTIGATIONS. They've been on this for a year or so. IT NEVER WAS A SECURITY REVIEW.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread