2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie Sanders raising money off of false hopes - why aren't we SCREAMING about this?
Saw this in the Hillary Group and it reminded me to
to send a few more bucks to Bernie.
Thanks all!
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)it's not their money or their fucking business.
CanadaexPat
(496 posts)and then demand Clinton pay it in return for his endorsement if she wins. It worked for her.
djean111
(14,255 posts)keep it flowing, if she is the nominee. Not one penny from me, that's for sure.
demwing
(16,916 posts)And as far as I can tell, Hillary supporters ARE screaming...
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Another 27 for Bernie though
snort
(2,334 posts)Anyone who would give money to somebody worth 150 million is an idiot and part of the problem.
Baobab
(4,667 posts)nt
liberal from boston
(856 posts)Local news had a panel discussion on Presidential Primaries & Hillary surrogates pushing Bernie to quit -- consensus was Hillary wanted Sanders Campaign donations & list of his donations.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Response to CanadaexPat (Reply #2)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)liberal from boston
(856 posts)Also paid overtime for local police protection.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)yup lying and stealing from those that can least afford it.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)We are intelligent and want the right candidate and we will fight to the end. Got it!
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)tritsofme
(18,117 posts)I'm sure he really appreciates it!
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)that loves to fund their corporate majesty?
tritsofme
(18,117 posts)It's hard to be mad when you are laughing!
Tad needs just a tad bit more, keep it coming!
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)Did you scream about that then? I didn't. It didn't bother me one bit, as a 2008 Obama supporter.
I'm STILL donating to Bernie Sanders monthly even though I am fully aware of his chances (or lack there of). Its a thing of principle.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)In that, Sanders is exactly like Clinton.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)She was within 130 pledged delegates when she suspended her campaign and was MUCH closer than Bernie has ever been in this race. Why lie?
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)of delegates. She was closer to Obama, but, like Sanders, she could never catch up.
She learned from that loss in 2008 and ran a campaign with that in mind. At no point since mid-March has her win in the primary ever been in doubt. There was no way anything short of a catastrophe that could change the outcome.
Excellent article from 538 "Clinton Is Following Obamas Path To The Nomination"
And rather than throw around that accusation of lying, you might just ask why I think the way I do. I support Clinton.
The fact is the Democratic Primary system with its proportional dispensation of delegates makes it damn near impossible to beat a candidate with even a small lead in delegates in a 2 person race. If there had been 3 or 4 Candidate through March and into April, anyone could have won it. Once Clinton put away those wins in the South, the primary hasn't been in doubt.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)and at the time the superdelegates hadn't committed so it was an entirely different situation. Entirely different. And she still suspended after the last primary (as I suspect Bernie will WANT to do - whether he does is up for grabs). I don't think it was obvious until MUCH later that Hillary didn't have a path.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Maybe you should spend less time reading the Hillary group and more time supporting your candidate.
OP's like this are a total waste.
Response to Agschmid (Reply #8)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Find a DMD OP where I call out the Sanders group... You can't.
I don't do it.
I don't participate in the bullshit around here, but I will certainly call people on their shit, as I've done with you.
Pot meet kettle.
Response to Agschmid (Reply #34)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Ever try that?
Response to Agschmid (Reply #40)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)but it isn't coming out of my account. If his supporters want to continue spending their hard earned money that is on them. I don't get it but I don't have to. At this point it is a game of trickle up economics they are playing with no return.
I don't get the obsession over groups here.
ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)that's my business, and the business of others who feel the same. I'll continue donating to him as long as he's a candidate. Hillary Clinton will never get a penny from me, under any circumstances.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)but its not my money. It's better than sending it to Trump.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)To "retire his modest debt" or whatever. I don't really care. Do you?
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)hope is all they have thanks to politicians for the 1% like Hillary.
riversedge
(72,306 posts)Continue on.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)she was Sec of State she could not raise funds so that was done for her, funds were raised on her behalf and other people's money was used to pay for her all the way to the last day campaign push. It was millions of dollars.
So when your own candidate has that sort of history, as do most in politics it's really just the way of the world right now, your specific objections to Bernie seem biased and not politically. Dog whistle city.
Txbluedog
(1,128 posts)Maybe Bernie supporters here on DU have the money to spare, but I work with loads of college kids who are giving money away in the false hope that Bernie still can win. And that's why it is nothing more than grifting to me by the Sanders campaign. If he wants to be truthful that he has no feasible path to the nomination and then ask for donation to keep his "movement" alive that's one thing, but to give false hope to utterly naive people is another and extremely unacceptable
Human101948
(3,457 posts)They are proving that politicians do not have to be the lapdogs of the billionaires and corporations so they can run for office while promising voters that they will change things when they only end up serving those billionaires and corporations.
Study: US is an oligarchy, not a democracy
Multivariate analysis indicates that economic elites and organised groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on US government policy, while average citizens and mass-based interest groups have little or no independent influence.
In English: the wealthy few move policy, while the average American has little power.
http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Response to Txbluedog (Reply #17)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
The semester just ended and we had a rash of students who started coming in saying they could'nt complete their course work because they were too busy worrying about and stressing/volunteering for the Sanders campaign
Response to Txbluedog (Reply #44)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
djean111
(14,255 posts)Interesting. You obviously cannot even dictate to a few students, yet you think you are having any effect, besides entertainment value, here at DU? That's either a bit unbelievable, or a bit delusional.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)I have no issue with Bernie, or anyone else, raising money. If you want to give, give. If you don't, don't.
snort
(2,334 posts)A reasonable response. I'm not sure how to deal.
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)Human101948
(3,457 posts)Especially since you seem to be royalty. Maybe a GoFundMe campaign?
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)It wasn't me that I was referring to.
enid602
(8,904 posts)Maybe they'll offer a big prize for the lasr donor.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)We need our greens!
Thank you!
This has been a Public Service Announcement.
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)support him with time and energy and money.
They are just anxious because it's not truly over.
It's kind of disgusting, really, to drip their anxiety all over the place into other people's business.
If you want to be helpful, use your time and energy to find ways to include the Bernie voters into your agenda, your convention, and your Party in case Hillary does win. That would be the smart thing to do.
Oh, I know, you are going to win the general election on your own. Wow, I've had so much experience in life with "winners" who can't get along with others enough to get valuable things done. Could this become just one other exercise like that?
Personally, I think so. But if you think screaming at us, trying to prevent us from doing what we want, defiling our candidate, using gestapo tactics to run conventions contrary to Robert's Rule of Order are productive, I guess I can't stop you.
But we could have a Progressive juggernaut this year, if only the two sides would band together. Unfortunately, the price of our admission is for Hillary and the other powers that be to prove they are legitimately Progressive. And either they can't or won't commit.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)SpareribSP
(325 posts)The message is more important. Even if he loses, showing that a large population support his ideals is important. It'll make it easier to have progressive candidates in the future. I'm not being duped, and I'm sure that's the common case.
Please tell me to feel the math, I'll go donate again
GreatGazoo
(3,951 posts)Martin Eden
(13,292 posts)Mnpaul
(3,655 posts)Bernie's speeches are driving the conversation in this election. At least two Republicans(Trump and Stuart Mills) are speaking out against unfair trade deals. And that right there is worth the money.