2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumVoting the lesser of two evils is blackmail
To compromise my own standards is "settling", especially when you know the tendencies of that candidate is dark and troubling.
Settling is to invite more of the same in the future.
I believe the only way to kick a bad habit is to go cold turkey toward what you know is acceptable, swallow your fear and stand up with your own voice
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)larkrake
(1,674 posts)Jackilope
(819 posts)We are given an illusion of choice.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)nolabels
(13,133 posts)CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)MSNBC To the deniers... Watch THIS Video... It is not comforting to think that she may well be the Democratic Nominee...
Hillary really betrayed Andrea Mitchell... The entire context of this report was of a solemn nature... A Funeral so to speak...
Andrea Mitchell "I do not see this report as ...ANYTHING BUT... DEVASTATING!"
Chuck Todd "After this I don't think that she could get confirmed for Attorney General!"
Lots of FIBBING by Hillary here.. for more than a year!
annavictorious
(934 posts)when Nobel Peace prize winner, environmental activist Al Gore was the lesser of two evils.
http://dailyhowler.blogspot.com/2015/06/supplemental-was-gore-lesser-of-two.html
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)larkrake
(1,674 posts)schenanigans or corp influence over supremes
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)are the posts that piously say we can't expect perfection, or that no one candidate will ever align 100% with our specific beliefs.
Both of those willfully overlook the fact that the lesser evil is still evil. And I'm not going to vote for someone I consider an evil candidate. Period.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)Metric System
(6,048 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)...said no one, ever.
Bye, Felicia...
larkrake
(1,674 posts)my eyes are wide open. I see America is in a rut, and recognize tunnelvision , fear and apathy. I will vote for a smart woman when we find one.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Demsrule86
(68,542 posts)If Trump gets in, and packs the court ...you have no future. I would imagine Ryan's budget goes through since they have the entire government...bye bye social security, medicare, and Medicaid...you would literally help starve babies. Roe V Wade gone...Obamacare gone...LGBT probably criminalized...so vote your conscience or have your tantrum...the choice is yours.
Arkansas Granny
(31,514 posts)Shadowflash
(1,536 posts)The GOP nominated a turd that not even THEY like, let alone anybody else, yet HRC is BARELY breaking even with him in the polls. HRC should be thanking her lucky stars that they nominated such a clown this cycle to run against her. Had they nominated anybody who had a modicum of sense, she would be losing, big time.
But, sure, go ahead and blame the Sanders supporters if she loses.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)burn down,the faster we get the glorious left wing revolution that's surely coming through the chaos.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)larkrake
(1,674 posts)Mike__M
(1,052 posts)I know of a political party full of folks who would buy it.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)I am not confident in Hilarys supreme picks. I know they will be corporate and hawkish. Since you think in increments of doom, I can safely say no matter which one is elected, we are doomed. The only difference is one is subtle, the other a bull in a china shop.
"Innocent" decisions without foresight brought us NAFTA and the prison system, the banking system and our degrading infrastructure- all unintended results from Bills attempts at globalization.
I cannot vote for the same. I dont let fear blind me- I have a passport if things go bad. All three candidates will cause a rough patch, change does that, so stick to the lesser of the 3 traumas that will be afflicting this nation.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)Translation: "I have privilege, and I am not afraid or ashamed to use it. Plenty of countries will be happy to have me."
you really think congress ia going to listen to this conman?
Translation: "I am willing to ignore the facts shown during the W. administration to feed my ego and protect my PRIVILEDGE. The old ladies that will starve, eh, you are just the fuel for the glorious revolution."
larkrake
(1,674 posts)In my opinion, Congress is full of people who are following a well planned long term overthrow of democracy to line their own pockets or live well until God strikes us all down for loose morals. They are not going to let a ricochet rabbit like Trump form any policy that does not feed their own. Neither will they let Hillary undo what they have done so far.
In fact, have we not seen for 8 yrs that they spurn the office of President at their will to keep things flowing their way. Trump will not be followed, empowered or trusted by either party. He is not a republican , he is neither party, he isn't a sane person. He is clinically ill.
We all have the privilege to leave. It costs $100 for a passport and jobs are readily available elsewhere, just not here.
Those who choose to stay will have to engage in a Revolution. It is beyond the point of no return.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)Gee...do you happen to have a list of countries and jobs willing to take in the old ladies, children and poor of America?
larkrake
(1,674 posts)if Trump wins, there will be refugee americans, count on it. I am almost 70 and I get good job offers every week from asia and europe. Our grannies and gramps are grandfathered in to benefits. When america stops offering opportunities to graduates, why should they stay here? Many many nations want our youth to grow their businesses, and clearly the Partys and Congress prefer wars to job creation.
Mz Pip
(27,436 posts)MFM008
(19,804 posts)Then Sanders and his supporters can feel smugly satisfied during the Trump years where he destroys America and possibly the world. Go Ideological purity.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)Feathery Scout
(218 posts)Everyone is free to privately vote (or not) as they wish.
I see no compromise or blackmail forced upon anyone.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)Feathery Scout
(218 posts)larkrake
(1,674 posts)But with the internet, I think that oversight can be fought
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)This is a country,not a cult.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)Partys are cults. the Republicans being the most hard line cult in our history. We are looking down the barrel of becoming Multinational Corporations of the World with no country whatsoever.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)It's easier for them to get you to do it again next time. After all, you already did it once. Can't un-pop the balloon, right?
larkrake
(1,674 posts)and everybody else is doing it. God forbid she have principles.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)opiate69
(10,129 posts)If you're still claiming that Bernie supporters threw chairs, despite that claim having been thoroughly debunked, you are a "goddamn moron". (Bonus moron points for having a college education, yet still not having enough mastery of the English language to know it actually should be "god-damned)
Tavarious Jackson
(1,595 posts)Bernie is dark and troubling.. The recent fraud investigation into his wife, his super pac fiasco with the AIDS Activists, FEC violations, Campaign money of Bernie's going to Chuck Todd's wife.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)other investigations. My op is about personal ethics, not either candidate.
Response to Tavarious Jackson (Reply #16)
TM99 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)"Evil, when we are in its power, is not felt as evil, but as a necessity, even a duty." - Simone Weil
larkrake
(1,674 posts)our election system needs to be totally revamped
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)If BoB folks allow Trump the presidency out election system will be totally revamped!!
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)It's simply the reality of coalition politics, which is inevitable in a democracy. In many European systems, people get to vote their conscience, but afterwards the parties have to form coalitions in order to make up the majority. In the US winner-takes-all system only two coalitions are possible. The Democratic party will never please everybody in its coalition, but it is the only realistic option to get some progressive changes, since the other coalition is so retrogressive.
Nobody in a democracy gets everything they want. It's a system of give and take. It's just DEMOCRACY.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)Other countries dont restrict to two candidates hanging from two parties. More often than not, there are a dozen names on the ballot. They get on the ballot by getting enough sigs on a petition nationally, not state by state or region by region. Our system impedes other parties unfairly, assuring a two party system. I wish we could all vote our consciences, but we end up with really bad choices
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)As anyone can clearly see, the free exchange of ideas as in these other countries leads to a much more Liberal Society, and * that's * the * rub.
How many Congressmen and Senators would spend millions in campaign dollars to win a job that only nets 6 figures and resets every 2 or 6 years? None. They don't (with few exceptions) aspire to these positions because they seek to do public service. They seek wealth and connections, and fuck the undesirables and super predators.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)farleftlib
(2,125 posts)Any mention of opening it up so that people could actually vote for the candidate of their
choice and not just against an opponent whose stances are completely antithetical to their
own personal ethics, and the congress critters howl that we have the best possible system.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)Basically we have the best Government that money CAN buy.
farleftlib
(2,125 posts)larkrake
(1,674 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)larkrake
(1,674 posts)emulatorloo
(44,112 posts)So the voter has to decide which candidate is the closest to his or her views.
It is a figure of speech about the pragmatic choices a voter has to make.
For me in the primary Bernie is closer to my views than HRC
In the GE, we are stuck with a system where only two parties are viable, we will get a choice between a Democrat or a Republican.
So in the GE, either Bernie are Hillary are closer to my views than Trump.
That's the calculus I will make. If Trump is elected, a lot of progress we've made will be erased.
Of course you should vote for whoever you want.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)this choice because we are stuck. Anyone can create their own party, but you have to get on 50 state ballots. That is ridiculous- it takes alot of money to do that. We never hear from some brilliant candidates. No, we just get billionaires who enter the race on a whim or an ego trip.
emulatorloo
(44,112 posts)Get some wins on the city council. Then the county, then the state. Then congress. And so on.
It is possible but a lot of work.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)Peacetrain
(22,875 posts)and if you buy that load of horse hockey.. then you will buy anythig
larkrake
(1,674 posts)ingest saturated fat.
Sunburn or frostbite, your body rejects both
What are you talking about?
gollygee
(22,336 posts)It isn't even anything new. This is how is has always been,and how it will always be. If you think you can expect your perfect candidate to be an option in every election, your deluded. That isn't how it works. Everyone just picks the best option of those available.
One time we have a candidate who is as progressive as we are, and we all forget how politics is and always has been.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)We only have two people who have any likelihood of winning. That's how it works in the US, and it isn't going to change between now and November. There is no way, with only two choices, you're going to find a candidate who is perfect for most people. Everyone will always just pick the one who is better for them out of the two.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)I chose someone I could respect and still do, and in the GE that year there wasnt a lesser of two evils to vote for, there was good vs evil, same in '12. This time, is radically different. Neither is palatable. We are stuck. This will become commonplace if we allow it
gollygee
(22,336 posts)Things can stay basically the same, or we can have a President Trump.
shanti
(21,675 posts)AFAIC, we're screwed either way. Things will NOT stay the same with hillary. how can it? she's part of the problem.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)She's part of the general "people in charge." The people who have been in charge, at least behind the scenes, forever. She will do things the same way they've been done because she's part of that group.
I would have loved to have had Bernie get the nomination (because I think either of them could beat Trump easily - why not get the most progressive person in when we have a chance) but Hillary is not anywhere as bad as Trump. Trump would be worse than GWB was, and that was horrible.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)Once you say you're going to settle for second, that's what happens to you in life.
--- John F. Kennedy
Read more at: https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/j/johnfkenn166598.html
gollygee
(22,336 posts)I think that's pretty delusional.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)We're talking Bernie or Bust at this point - which means not voting for Clinton in a Clinton vs. Trump election.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)from either nominee
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)There is Trump on one side and Bernie Hillary on the other. .
That too complicated?
gollygee
(22,336 posts)Did you read the OP?
However it seems pretty obvious to anyone not harboring delusions that it'll be Trump and Clinton in the general, which is why this is such an issue on DU.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)Response to larkrake (Reply #96)
gollygee This message was self-deleted by its author.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)larkrake
(1,674 posts)larkrake
(1,674 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)Vote for this candidate or else.
As an American, I do not enjoy feeling jerked around by power seekers.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Gothmog
(145,107 posts)In the real world, one has to accept reality
larkrake
(1,674 posts)Babel_17
(5,400 posts)Though this isn't polite company, so no problem.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)lovemydog
(11,833 posts)It's been this way throughout history. No candidate in any election is perfect in every way. You choose to make your voice heard, or not.
Hope you're enjoying a good holiday weekend.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)attended a great art show and hiked mountain trails- not one word of politics spoken, just rushing streams, loud cheerful birds, sweet grass, a few trout and a little rain. It was wonderful, thanx. Hope you escaped to happiness too
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)The Rockies are gorgeous this time of year. I love all the streams, birds, fish & crisp mountain air.
Yes, I'm having a wonderful weekend too. Last night went to a couple of gatherings. This eve, a bbq, tomorrow some friends doing an outdoor concert / bbq and then a big basketball playoff game on tv!
Keep escaping to happiness. Nature is where it's at!
larkrake
(1,674 posts)I'd love me some BBQ, maybe tomorrow
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)larkrake
(1,674 posts)TwilightZone
(25,456 posts)This incessant drumbeat of "stop telling me what to do" from a bunch of people acting like elementary school kids on a playground has become exceedingly tiresome.
Do whatever you want to do. Just stop acting like you're some kind of victim.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)Unfortunately, elections always reveal the millions of victims in great distress but few vote for them, do they.
Demsrule86
(68,542 posts)watch liberal progress dating back to Roosevelt destroyed...and think I helped.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)laserhaas
(7,805 posts)😎
oberliner
(58,724 posts)From his interview with Chuck Todd today.
Well, the responsibility that I accept in a very, very serious way is to do everything that I can to make sure that Donald Trump will not become elected president of the United States. Donald Trump, for a dozen different reasons, would be a disaster as president. I will do everything that I can to make sure that does not happen.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)Dem2
(8,168 posts)Not sure I care who you vote for, but since you're sharing your opinion, you must be posting for a reason. What are you advocating for?
larkrake
(1,674 posts)quaker bill
(8,224 posts)Same act, different way of looking at it. I never have a problem voting against the greater evil, and do not feel I settled for anything.
I have been voting in every election at every level for a very long time. The times I had a chance to vote for "good" could be counted on one hand, and leave some fingers to spare.
Not participating does not get "good" nominated, it only gets your opinion ignored.
Flying Squirrel
(3,041 posts)But the problem becomes, if a certain threshold is reached where massive numbers refuse to vote for either candidate, the legitimacy of the winner (either one) is jeapordized. Which puts the legitimacy of the entire system in jeapordy. Which is what will happen this time around if two people with historically high negatives face off this November. How fast thesituation devolves from there is anyone's guess, but it will devolve.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)one person, one vote, no conventions, no caucuses, just state final tallies on a dozen candidates or more to primary nationally. I'd rather have 5 options than two unsavory choices
The system is not legitimate The partys are power brokers in league with corporate media. It is just too obvious to ignore and not democratic
quaker bill
(8,224 posts)a person's failure to participate does not delegitimize the system. The winner will still be sworn in.
Any notion that the system has not already devolved should be dispelled by the Donald getting a nomination. He has said and then contradicted himself on things that would end political careers in any system that was not near fully devolved.
If he wins, riots in the streets are likely, if he loses, pretty much the same result. The only question is which crowd starts them.
Sitting at home on election day will not change this result, voting 3rd party will not change it either. You get to pick who the chief law enforcement officer is, and that person will enforce the law in the streets when push comes to shove. This is why voting against the greater of two evils always makes sense.
Flying Squirrel
(3,041 posts)I can't vote for "Not Donald Trump" and have my vote subtracted from Trump's votes. I have to positively vote for someone. If I positively vote for any third party candidate, you (and/or others) would say that I'm supporting Trump by withholding my vote from Hillary.
Perhaps there should be a "None of the above" option, hold the election earlier, and if the "None" option wins, the parties have to start from scratch and nominate new candidates. I don't expect that to happen ever, though. But I will not accept the fallacy that I must positively vote for the lesser evil in order to vote against the greater evil. I can and will withhold my vote or vote for a third party, or write in a candidate, if I cannot stomach the idea of positively voting for the lesser evil because it is too evil.
quaker bill
(8,224 posts)I am no Hillary fan and would not waste my time speaking to you in that regard. I am only stating what I see the actual options are. I was one of the people working for Al Gore in FL when we came in 537 short.
I found living day to day with GWB for the next 8 years deeply depressing. I believe I will find 4 years of Trump to be a worse experience.
I have in all honesty nearly always voted against the greater of two evils. Perhaps you are young and idealistic and think it will someday be different, as I did once.
You can sit it out, or vote 3rd party, or otherwise waste your time anyway you want. I for one, helped organize the Green Party of FL, that is right, the party that put Nader on the FL ballot in 2000.
What I have learned over decades of trying is that my vote is not sacred, not even vaguely sacred. It costs me nothing and takes 15 minutes out of my day once a year or so. Using it pragmatically to attempt to cause others and myself less pain is worth the 15 minute investment.
Don't get me wrong, this stuff is serious, deadly serious. If Trump wins, he will have the keys to 10,000 nuclear weapons for 4 years. He will be in command of the most powerful military on the planet. That is serious. While given free choice, Hillary would not be my pick, not even close, she is at least an adult with no massive psychological defects apparent. She just might listen when we protest.
Flying Squirrel
(3,041 posts)Last edited Tue May 31, 2016, 12:30 AM - Edit history (1)
I was once younger and more idealistic - yet even though I disliked Gore, I participated in the "Nader Trader" thing and voted for him in my state which was projected to be close (the margin turned out to be 5.58%) in exchange for someone else voting Nader in a red state to try and get him the magical 5% he wanted (can't even remember why). I also voted for Obama despite some misgivings about his being too willing to "reach across the aisle". I even voted for him a second time when my misgivings had been mostly confirmed. I simply cannot vote for someone when the mere idea makes me sick to my stomach, no matter how bad the alternative is. Before this primary began, even as late as January, I didn't have that sick feeling and my position hadn't hardened. She did that, and her surrogates who were clearly doing what she wanted, and the media, and her supporters at local and state levels who were willing to do what they did. I'm 48 and I'm done with the lesser of two evils. It's not about being idealistic per se, it's about being fed up to here. ^^^^ My life is more than halfway over in all likelihood, and my patience with the Democratic Party has reached its limit.
quaker bill
(8,224 posts)I was there in the late 80's and early 90's
I was protesting first strike nukes and the Contra war during Reagan, and "welfare reform" under Clinton. That is when, I and a few friends read into the Green Party and decided Florida needed one.
It was fun for a bit, they ran candidates for local offices in liberal enclaves and started winning. We parted company over Nader in 2000.
I am no Hillary fan. That said, I am pretty sure she will spend 4 years "looking into" the real problems as they slowly but surely get worse. Trump will act to make these problems worse, full speed ahead, while believing he is fixing things. I cannot ignore the difference, even if I need to wash my hands after voting.
XRubicon
(2,212 posts)Say you are driving a car on the highway going 55 mph. All of a sudden traffic stops. You are traveling too fast to stop because you were distracted by listening to music that made you feel superior to everyone. On your left is a women with a baby in a stroller, on your right is a cliff. In front of you is the stopped cars.
Which way do you steer? or is it all the same?