Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
Tue May 31, 2016, 10:12 AM May 2016

This is what happens when a candidate clinches a majority of pledged and overall delegates

They clinch the nomination and get declared the winner, period. Reality does not ask the loser to sign off. No one cares what the loser has to say at that point.

33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This is what happens when a candidate clinches a majority of pledged and overall delegates (Original Post) geek tragedy May 2016 OP
June 7 is #HillaryCelebrationDay riversedge May 2016 #1
Obama celebration day was November 4th because he had his eyes on the actual objective. Bluenorthwest May 2016 #2
Obama celebrated the night the media declared him the presumptive nominee as well Tarc May 2016 #12
This is what happens when a candidate clinches a majority of pledged and overall delegates DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #3
overall lol bkkyosemite May 2016 #26
the loser who has character that has class bows out beachbum bob May 2016 #4
A-friggin'-men! But, don't expect any such graceful, generous exit from the Berning One. Surya Gayatri May 2016 #7
This is when he really clinched the race: morningfog May 2016 #5
No, Hillary lost then she admitted she lost nt geek tragedy May 2016 #13
She knew she would have lost at the convention. morningfog May 2016 #14
Outside of the Bernie Bubble, it's over as of June 7. nt geek tragedy May 2016 #16
For all intents and purposes, yes. morningfog May 2016 #17
That's the hardcore Bernie supporter perspective. geek tragedy May 2016 #19
The hubris of Hillary and the blind trust in her is remarkable. morningfog May 2016 #22
She's got 99 problems, losing to Bernie Sanders ain't one nt geek tragedy May 2016 #23
No, Bernie is not one. The FBI damn sure is. morningfog May 2016 #24
it's baked into her approval numbers geek tragedy May 2016 #25
Her approval numbers have absolutely no bearing on criminal liability. morningfog May 2016 #27
President Obama might know something geek tragedy May 2016 #32
A few points to that. morningfog May 2016 #33
the bubble..yes just a bunch of bubble heads..........not so fast. bkkyosemite May 2016 #28
Hillary is no Obama hobbit709 May 2016 #6
She's not. But her delegate lead is much greater than his was in 2008. PeaceNikki May 2016 #8
Which means nothing in relation to her $pon$or$ hobbit709 May 2016 #9
Whatev. She's winning and will be the nominee. PeaceNikki May 2016 #10
Math is math, reality exists. nt geek tragedy May 2016 #11
What happens when the FBI recommends criminal indictment of that same candidate? frylock May 2016 #15
Give me a 24 business hours heads up on that, ok? nt msanthrope May 2016 #18
I'm not privy to that information. frylock May 2016 #20
In every contested primary since adoption of super delegates, the winner is announced including SDs Gothmog May 2016 #21
I recommend this comment rbrnmw May 2016 #29
And just what if......Bernie gets more pledged delegates than Hillary. We then have a bkkyosemite May 2016 #30
K & R Iliyah May 2016 #31
 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
2. Obama celebration day was November 4th because he had his eyes on the actual objective.
Tue May 31, 2016, 10:38 AM
May 2016

It was a great day when he won the WH. That's what matters. If she's nominee what that means is she and her ardent supporters have 'won' the right to great responsibility and lots of hard work.

Tarc

(10,472 posts)
12. Obama celebrated the night the media declared him the presumptive nominee as well
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:06 AM
May 2016

You don't look ahead to the next race before wrapping up the current one.

Btw, how's that # of hides comparison workin out for ya?

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
7. A-friggin'-men! But, don't expect any such graceful, generous exit from the Berning One.
Tue May 31, 2016, 10:54 AM
May 2016

He'll wait until he's completely berned into cinders, and blows away with the wind.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
5. This is when he really clinched the race:
Tue May 31, 2016, 10:43 AM
May 2016


When there were no longer any competitors. Hillary could have taken it to the convention, at which point anything could have happened. Although most likely, Obama would have won on the first any only vote.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
14. She knew she would have lost at the convention.
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:31 AM
May 2016

It made sense for her to drop out. There was no question as to how the convention vote would play out.

There are too many unknowns this year for it to be as certain.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
17. For all intents and purposes, yes.
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:42 AM
May 2016

But the criminal investigation shadow following HIllary, especially since the release of the damning State OIG report, her high unfavorables and poor polling vis a vis trumpy, support Bernie playing it out until official.

A lot can and will happen from June 7 to July 23.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
19. That's the hardcore Bernie supporter perspective.
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:45 AM
May 2016

To the rest of the world, he'll be King Canute trying to order back the sea.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
22. The hubris of Hillary and the blind trust in her is remarkable.
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:52 AM
May 2016

I just don't see how her supporters don't understand how very real her problem is.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
27. Her approval numbers have absolutely no bearing on criminal liability.
Tue May 31, 2016, 12:01 PM
May 2016

No matter how baked they are. If she is indicted (highly doubtful) or some from her inner circle are indicted (quite possible), she is good and well screwed and would have screwed the Democratic Party in the process.

Neither you nor anyone other than the FBI and DOJ on the case have any idea of the likelihood of indictment. There is simply no way to know until the results are made public.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
32. President Obama might know something
Tue May 31, 2016, 12:11 PM
May 2016
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/04/10/barack-obama-fox-news-sunday-hillary-clinton-donald-trump-ted-cruz-chris-wallace/82862338/

In his Fox News Sunday interview, his first on the program as president, Obama also suggested that over-classification may be at play, and that some of the emails traced to Clinton should not have had high classification.

While there is "top-secret" information that should not be shared, Obama said there is also material "being presented to the president or the secretary of State, that you might not want on the transom, or going out over the wire, but is basically stuff that you could get in open-source."

Obama also said, "I continue to believe that she has not jeopardized America’s national security."
 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
33. A few points to that.
Tue May 31, 2016, 12:34 PM
May 2016

Obama has said he hasn't been briefed on the FBI criminal investigation.

While he is most likely right that national security has not been jeopardized, that says nothing with respect to other criminal statute violations, for which there is at least some evidence. With what is in the public, it is not likely that anyone will be prosecuted for the security issue.

With what is in the public, I am less sure on the felony of destruction of federal records. And Obama said nothing on that.

And who knows what the FBI may have found in those destroyed emails. There could be any number of issues at play.

Gothmog

(144,944 posts)
21. In every contested primary since adoption of super delegates, the winner is announced including SDs
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:51 AM
May 2016

Great article on how in every primary contest since the creation of super delegates, the winner was declared the presumptive nominee based on the inclusion of super delegates. http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/5/29/1532358/-What-Does-It-Mean-to-Clinch-the-Nomination-When-Superdelegates-Are-Involved

?1464557557

After reading a number of impassioned defenses of why the Democratic presidential nomination should not be called next week on June 7th, I got curious. What’s the history here, since the superdelegates were added to the process? When a Democratic candidate hits the magic number of pledged delegates plus superdelegates, are they the nominee?

The answer: history says the first person to get to the magic number is the presumptive nominee, and says it unambiguously, even if the losers often disagree.

Here’s how it has gone since the superdelegates were added to the process.....

Summary

Anyway, I started this research 12 hours ago to answer a question for myself, so that as everyone on TV is spinning things this way and that on June 7th I have some context. What, if anything, have I learned?

First, most non-incumbent candidates have needed superdelegates to win, and the history of superdelegates has been that once a Democrat hits the magic number and becomes the nominee, superdelegates are more likely to flow to the nominee than from them.

Also, in the history of the superdelegates, they have always ended up supporting the decision of the pledged delegates, and their most important contribution has been to amplify leads of the pledged delegate winner so that they can be assured success on a first ballot, and avoid the sort of messy convention that harms a general campaign.

The major thing I’ve learned is that the press declares, and has always declared, the winner after they hit the magic number, and has done so in far more nebulous circumstances than this. Even in 1984, in which Hart won by a number of other metrics, in which the delegate count was the arbiter, and Mondale announced himself as the nominee, even with 38 percent of the popular vote to Hart’s 36 percent—even then, Hart may have claimed he still had a cunning plan, but no one begrudged Mondale the fact he was, for all intents and purposes, the nominee.

When you think about it, that simply has to happen. Things need to get done, and they need the nominee to do them. Except for Reagan in 1976, who chose a running mate after Gerald Ford was made the nominee, there aren’t a whole lot of non-nominee candidates going to the convention with their own vice president picked out. You get to do that because the numbers say you’re the nominee.

Meeting this number also allows the nominee to do the work of campaigning before the convention, establishing a message, building capacity on the ground, etc.

The press, for its part, has always understood this, from 1984 onward, and has named the nominee (or the “presumptive nominee”) the minute the candidate crosses the line with their combination of pledged and supers, and usually said something to the effect that they had “clinched” the nomination. They did that when Mondale had won far fewer states than Hart. They did that when Dukakis did not have 50 percent of the pledged delegates. They did that when Obama had not won the popular vote (yes, I know, Michigan—I hope we’re still not fighting this?).

This is a well researched article and confirms that the nomination process will be over on Tuesday June 7, 2016 when the results of the New Jersey primary are announced.

Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

bkkyosemite

(5,792 posts)
30. And just what if......Bernie gets more pledged delegates than Hillary. We then have a
Tue May 31, 2016, 12:04 PM
May 2016

fight on our hands. Because Supers should not exist.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»This is what happens when...