Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
Tue May 31, 2016, 10:17 AM May 2016

ENOUGH! MY *PATRIOTISM* TRUMPS PARTY LOYALTY!!!

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by LostOne4Ever (a host of the 2016 Postmortem forum).

And yes, I am using ALL CAPS in that subject line, because I have SERIOUSLY had ENOUGH of the snide obnoxious comments coming from certain members of this board who don't want to have any SUBSTANTIVE discussions about HILLARY CLINTON'S JUDGMENT!!!

I am currently a Bernie supporter, but for three decades I have voted for Democratic presidential candidates. I am not stupid. I know Trump is a disaster-waiting-to-happen...

And Hillary Clinton's EPIC BAD DECISION MAKING scares me as much as Donald Trump!!!

She supported the Iraq War, and didn't hold the REPUBLICAN administration accountable for LYING us into it (despite that duty as "loyal opposition in a two party system&quot . She was on the wrong side of marriage equality. The policies she advocated and implemented while Secretary of State created more chaos and death world wide than doing nothing, and that doesn't include planetary environmental concerns created with her promoting "fracking" as a global export.

But it is the "email and private server" situation that has me saying ABSO-FUCKING-LUTELY NO!!! because it demonstrates the CORROSIVE EFFECT her personal beliefs and management style would have on the government transparency necessary for democracy in this country:

Per the spin, Hillary Clinton valued her PRIVACY and (maybe?) CONVENIENCE more than not only POSSIBLE dangers to NATIONAL SECURITY, but also FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT LAWS.

PRIVACY and CONVENIENCE: Those are not the actions of a person I am willing to make "Commander In Chief" of people who have agreed to put their LIVES IN DANGER in service to this country.

IGNORING RULES and COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS: Those are not the actions of a person I am willing to put in charge of the NSA, CIA, FBI and DOJ, where ETHICS AND INTEGRITY are absolute requirements.

THREATENING and IGNORING THOSE WHO SPEAK "TRUTH TO POWER": Those are not the actions of a person I am willing to put in charge of ANYBODY. When subject matter experts are ignored or people FEAR coming forward as whistleblowers or when protections like "Inspector General" positions are intentionally left vacant or when people who catch government officials in wrongdoing either end up in jail or have to flee the country, I want those issues FIXED, and I don't mean by silencing the reports - I mean FIXED so that the next people in line don't decide not to report problems.

LYING: Life is too short to spend time parsing the words of someone whose words can't be trusted. The willingness to sacrifice the loyalty of supporters because of a fear of TRANSPARENCY while avoiding PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY and obfuscating on issues is completely unacceptable. Every Hillary supporter on this board who believed her when she said she was "following the rules" and "everybody else had private servers" is owed an apology from her because believing her lies made them look like idiots.

SERVICE TO OTHERS: This is a Representative Democracy. The people we elect are there in service to others. The "Federal Records Act" and "FOIA" are intended to provide institutional knowledge and historical information. There is no question Hillary Clinton, for unknown personal reasons, was working to make sure the records she and her staff created were not part of that public record. That is a Red Flag they are doing something wrong. Obviously, one needs to double check "ignorance and stupidity" are not involved, but after that, "judgment, ethics and behavior" follow, and FAIL in those categories is written all over this episode.

The State Department is NOT a "PRIVATE BUSINESS" - it is a government department intended to benefit the entire country, and "we the people" are the owners. Every citizen in this country has a right to know what is going on there both currently and historically, with obvious caveats for diplomacy and national security temporarily in place. The same concerns apply to the office of President. Knowledge is Power, and Power in this country belongs to the People.

I am a Democrat, but I am a PATRIOTIC AMERICAN FIRST. I will ALWAYS put the NEEDS of my country over the WANTS of my party, and if "my party" wants me to do anything differently, I will bolt out of the room so fast, it will make your head spin, and then I will take any treasonous bastard who tries to enable such corruption of Democratic principles down as well.

We are currently in "Primary Season" and those of us raising these LEGITIMATE CONCERNS about whether or not ANY CANDIDATE should be allowed the HONOR AND PRIVILEGE of leading this country are doing our PATRIOTIC DUTY AS CITIZENS. It is my privilege to vote, my responsibility to be informed, and my duty to use good judgment.

Hillary or Bernie or Trump or Other: I am not going to support a candidate for President who can't be trusted to safeguard and protect the lives, rights and freedoms of our citizens, our country, and the principles of our democracy.

I am a Democrat. That is what Democrats DO.

And anybody who says differently can go perform inappropriate anatomical acts on themselves.

87 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
ENOUGH! MY *PATRIOTISM* TRUMPS PARTY LOYALTY!!! (Original Post) IdaBriggs May 2016 OP
You go first. You deserve it. tonyt53 May 2016 #1
Thanks, tonyt SCantiGOP May 2016 #53
Trump might randomly trigger wars. Hillary has described the wars she would start. lagomorph777 May 2016 #2
Agreed! IdaBriggs May 2016 #16
Very good OP. bkkyosemite May 2016 #3
Thank you. IdaBriggs May 2016 #17
Give 'em Hell Ida. Wish I wrote half as eloquently as you. EndElectoral May 2016 #4
Thank you. I feel very passionate about this topic. IdaBriggs May 2016 #21
I agree completely J_J_ May 2016 #34
Thank you for your support! IdaBriggs May 2016 #37
You first CorkySt.Clair May 2016 #5
Good rant. Fuck 'em if they don't like it. n/t leeroysphitz May 2016 #6
Thank you! IdaBriggs May 2016 #22
Yes, enough! Dem2 May 2016 #7
The inmates really are running the asylum. barrow-wight May 2016 #72
I didn"t see any rage in the OP. KPN May 2016 #77
Patriotism and Partisanship Are Two Different Things. MineralMan May 2016 #8
You are right that the two are different. alfie May 2016 #20
^== This. And this is why I added "Other" to the list. IdaBriggs May 2016 #23
You're welcome. eom alfie May 2016 #27
Patriotism can mean rejecting a candidate The Velveteen Ocelot May 2016 #38
Exactly! KPN May 2016 #79
Well said! n/t tokenlib May 2016 #9
Thank you. IdaBriggs May 2016 #24
Way to go, IdaBriggs! Octafish May 2016 #10
Thank you! IdaBriggs May 2016 #25
I didn't fight for my Country, I fought for corporations. I don't want that to happen to anyone else Joob May 2016 #11
Preach. I'm honestly glad I'm getting boarded... VulgarPoet May 2016 #14
Thank you, favored poet! IdaBriggs May 2016 #33
Thank you for your service, and your support. IdaBriggs May 2016 #26
BRAVO!!!!!! Faux pas May 2016 #12
Thank you! IdaBriggs May 2016 #28
/offers cupa hot chocolate & hug. "There, there, everything is going to be ok" Sunlei May 2016 #13
Thank you and I will take it! IdaBriggs May 2016 #29
X10000000 onecaliberal May 2016 #15
Thank you! IdaBriggs May 2016 #31
Righteous! Bravo and so very true Arazi May 2016 #18
Thank you! IdaBriggs May 2016 #32
Funny you should mention Trump, with your massive amounts of bold, CAPS and Italics Sheepshank May 2016 #19
Way to address the issue. bvf May 2016 #47
I didn't see any issues Sheepshank May 2016 #56
If you couldn't "read the post" bvf May 2016 #59
I simply felt like commenting on the writing style: CAPS, bold, italics in over abundance. Sheepshank May 2016 #76
... VulgarPoet May 2016 #54
^^^^ THIS!!! barrow-wight May 2016 #73
Then vote for Trump if you prefer him. Stop making it sound like someone is stopping you from Trust Buster May 2016 #30
... VulgarPoet May 2016 #55
Patriotism and the Sanders/Anti-War Narrative Garrett78 May 2016 #35
Thank you for sharing these links. IdaBriggs May 2016 #42
Actually, who cares what you do? The_Casual_Observer May 2016 #36
Well, let's start with people who bother to reply. Lizzie Poppet May 2016 #44
principles, not party or person amborin May 2016 #39
Agreed! But I *expect* Democratic candidates to align with Democratic values. IdaBriggs May 2016 #43
. PeaceNikki May 2016 #40
Perfect. bvf May 2016 #41
It can if you like. Orsino May 2016 #45
Righteous rant I'm sure the swarm will descend upon like locusts nc4bo May 2016 #46
+1,000,001 dchill May 2016 #52
It's really disappointing to see blind partisanship take over vintx May 2016 #62
Good points IDA Mbrow May 2016 #48
If you sit out the fall because your man didn't win, you're a statistical insignificance Tarc May 2016 #49
Yes, Gore felt the same way about Nader voters. EndElectoral May 2016 #50
Nader was a 3rd-party candidate, which Bernie will not be Tarc May 2016 #51
... VulgarPoet May 2016 #57
K to the R Ferd Berfel May 2016 #58
Thank you. A LOT of Dems do not like/trust her. vintx May 2016 #60
"In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place" -Gandhi Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #61
Well in this case the conscience of the majority is in the right place Lodestar May 2016 #78
Where is the loyalty? loyalsister May 2016 #63
Oh baloney. How many hyper-formatted manifestos did you type up when Snowden and Manning ucrdem May 2016 #64
So why aren't Petraeus or Clinton heroes? VulgarPoet May 2016 #67
Maybe they are? Ask the OP. ucrdem May 2016 #68
The verb in your headline sentence is certainly an accurate one. Nonhlanhla May 2016 #65
Exactly. People can't pretend that we're not a 2 party system or... themaguffin May 2016 #80
SO DOES MINE!!!!!!!!!! NCTraveler May 2016 #66
I could not agree with you more! Waiting For Everyman May 2016 #69
I know that her actions have crossed my line merbex May 2016 #70
Your righteous indignation is unconvincing. barrow-wight May 2016 #71
Agreed, the tantrums and condescension gets old. themaguffin May 2016 #81
Join the ever-growing ranks of "down-ballot Democrats" who support the down-ballot candidates but Attorney in Texas May 2016 #74
What a waste of a rant. randome May 2016 #75
Is this a Poe's Law thing? nt Tommy_Carcetti May 2016 #82
Get 'em in while you still can...nt SidDithers May 2016 #83
I am a party loyalist. Setting aside patriotism, nominating Clinton is self-destructive to the party lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #84
Absolutely. K&R dana_b May 2016 #85
Brava. K&R AtomicKitten May 2016 #86
LOCKING THREAD AS DISRUPTIVE META LostOne4Ever May 2016 #87
 

tonyt53

(5,737 posts)
1. You go first. You deserve it.
Tue May 31, 2016, 10:19 AM
May 2016

SCantiGOP

(13,862 posts)
53. Thanks, tonyt
Tue May 31, 2016, 01:55 PM
May 2016

You beat me to it.
I have had this person on Ignore for a long time, but that doesn't stop the frequent (as in, constant) long-winded diatribes from showing up.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
2. Trump might randomly trigger wars. Hillary has described the wars she would start.
Tue May 31, 2016, 10:20 AM
May 2016

I would prefer NO wars, thank you very much.

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
16. Agreed!
Tue May 31, 2016, 10:58 AM
May 2016

bkkyosemite

(5,792 posts)
3. Very good OP.
Tue May 31, 2016, 10:21 AM
May 2016
 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
17. Thank you.
Tue May 31, 2016, 10:59 AM
May 2016

EndElectoral

(4,213 posts)
4. Give 'em Hell Ida. Wish I wrote half as eloquently as you.
Tue May 31, 2016, 10:22 AM
May 2016
 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
21. Thank you. I feel very passionate about this topic.
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:02 AM
May 2016

Memorial Day being yesterday was a definite reminder of the value our veterans have offered.

Even the POSSIBILITY of endangering national security should have triggered better behavior.

She has shamed us all.

 

J_J_

(1,213 posts)
34. I agree completely
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:17 AM
May 2016

Thank you for writing this.

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
37. Thank you for your support!
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:22 AM
May 2016
 

CorkySt.Clair

(1,507 posts)
5. You first
Tue May 31, 2016, 10:23 AM
May 2016

Only a dolt wouldn't be able to see the difference.

 

leeroysphitz

(10,462 posts)
6. Good rant. Fuck 'em if they don't like it. n/t
Tue May 31, 2016, 10:24 AM
May 2016
 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
22. Thank you!
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:03 AM
May 2016

And agreed!

Dem2

(8,166 posts)
7. Yes, enough!
Tue May 31, 2016, 10:25 AM
May 2016

These rant posts are leaning over the edge of what's reasonable discourse and into some sort of rage syndrome.

barrow-wight

(744 posts)
72. The inmates really are running the asylum.
Tue May 31, 2016, 02:56 PM
May 2016

KPN

(15,633 posts)
77. I didn"t see any rage in the OP.
Tue May 31, 2016, 03:04 PM
May 2016

MineralMan

(146,241 posts)
8. Patriotism and Partisanship Are Two Different Things.
Tue May 31, 2016, 10:25 AM
May 2016

One's political party or political affiliations have next to nothing to do with patriotism. Conflating the two things is simply wrong.

I'm sorry to see you equating patriotism with support for a particular candidate. Please think more about that.

alfie

(522 posts)
20. You are right that the two are different.
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:02 AM
May 2016

You are wrong to think Ida is talking about her support of a particular candidate. She is talking about why she is NOT supporting two particular candidates.

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
23. ^== This. And this is why I added "Other" to the list.
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:09 AM
May 2016

I do not believe Bernie Sanders is the only honest, trustworthy Democrat in the country, but he is the only one currently running for President.

Thank you for clarifying the point for MineralMan.

alfie

(522 posts)
27. You're welcome. eom
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:11 AM
May 2016

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,520 posts)
38. Patriotism can mean rejecting a candidate
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:23 AM
May 2016

who you sincerely believe could cause damage to your country. Partisanship is slamming a candidate you don't like for essentially petty reasons - say, because they visited the Pope or appeared to have groped a model's butt. Patriotism is advocating for a candidate you genuinely believe will benefit your country while advocating against one who you believe will harm it. There is no conflation.

KPN

(15,633 posts)
79. Exactly!
Tue May 31, 2016, 03:06 PM
May 2016

tokenlib

(4,186 posts)
9. Well said! n/t
Tue May 31, 2016, 10:26 AM
May 2016
 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
24. Thank you.
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:09 AM
May 2016

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
10. Way to go, IdaBriggs!
Tue May 31, 2016, 10:26 AM
May 2016

Democrats speak their mind -- and let others speak theirs.

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
25. Thank you!
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:10 AM
May 2016

Joob

(1,065 posts)
11. I didn't fight for my Country, I fought for corporations. I don't want that to happen to anyone else
Tue May 31, 2016, 10:27 AM
May 2016

And I will fight corporations putting their money in our politics through the election, past the election, until it is no longer a threat.


K & R


VulgarPoet

(2,872 posts)
14. Preach. I'm honestly glad I'm getting boarded...
Tue May 31, 2016, 10:41 AM
May 2016

I didn't come in to fight for the toolbag corporations that run this country. For anyone who doesn't like it? Fuck'em.

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
33. Thank you, favored poet!
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:17 AM
May 2016
 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
26. Thank you for your service, and your support.
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:11 AM
May 2016

Faux pas

(14,636 posts)
12. BRAVO!!!!!!
Tue May 31, 2016, 10:33 AM
May 2016
 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
28. Thank you!
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:12 AM
May 2016

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
13. /offers cupa hot chocolate & hug. "There, there, everything is going to be ok"
Tue May 31, 2016, 10:36 AM
May 2016
 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
29. Thank you and I will take it!
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:14 AM
May 2016

onecaliberal

(32,736 posts)
15. X10000000
Tue May 31, 2016, 10:42 AM
May 2016
 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
31. Thank you!
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:14 AM
May 2016

Arazi

(6,829 posts)
18. Righteous! Bravo and so very true
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:00 AM
May 2016


Agree with you 100%
 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
32. Thank you!
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:14 AM
May 2016
 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
19. Funny you should mention Trump, with your massive amounts of bold, CAPS and Italics
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:02 AM
May 2016

I can't stand to even look at your NARRATIVE, it looks like one the those extremist nut case religious or propaganda pamphlets where EVERYTHING IS SO IMPORTANT that 50% of the narrative needs to have attention bestowed upon it.

 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
47. Way to address the issue.
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:39 AM
May 2016

Criticize the typography, reinforce the OP's point.

Since you want to go there, though, "italics" wasn't a proper noun, last time I checked.

Funny you should mention Trump, with your massive amounts of bold, CAPS and Italics
 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
56. I didn't see any issues
Tue May 31, 2016, 02:21 PM
May 2016

As I'd already mentioned, I couldn't read the post.

...as if BSers always read every post and post on message? Don't make me laugh!!

 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
59. If you couldn't "read the post"
Tue May 31, 2016, 02:24 PM
May 2016

then why are you even in the thread?

I have a guess, and it's a beaut.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
76. I simply felt like commenting on the writing style: CAPS, bold, italics in over abundance.
Tue May 31, 2016, 03:01 PM
May 2016

I'm wondering if you are so persistent with the typo Nazis that have Bernie avatars?

VulgarPoet

(2,872 posts)
54. ...
Tue May 31, 2016, 02:15 PM
May 2016

barrow-wight

(744 posts)
73. ^^^^ THIS!!!
Tue May 31, 2016, 02:58 PM
May 2016

Totally THIS!!!!!!!!!!

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
30. Then vote for Trump if you prefer him. Stop making it sound like someone is stopping you from
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:14 AM
May 2016

voting for the candidate that you prefer.

VulgarPoet

(2,872 posts)
55. ...
Tue May 31, 2016, 02:17 PM
May 2016

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
35. Patriotism and the Sanders/Anti-War Narrative
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:19 AM
May 2016

I encourage everyone to read what Robert Jensen wrote about the concept of "patriotism" in his book Citizens of the Empire. That chapter used to be available online, but it no longer is unfortunately. For now, you can read this: http://www.counterpunch.org/2001/11/12/goodbye-to-patriotism/.

As for Sanders and the notion that he's soooo much better than Clinton when it comes to foreign policy:

http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/bernie-sanders-troubling-history-supporting-us-military-violence-abroad

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2016/04/27/kill-a27.html

http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/02/16/blood-traces-bernies-iraq-war-hypocrisy/

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
42. Thank you for sharing these links.
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:31 AM
May 2016

I will click through them later.

 

The_Casual_Observer

(27,742 posts)
36. Actually, who cares what you do?
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:21 AM
May 2016
 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
44. Well, let's start with people who bother to reply.
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:33 AM
May 2016

Derp...

amborin

(16,631 posts)
39. principles, not party or person
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:25 AM
May 2016
 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
43. Agreed! But I *expect* Democratic candidates to align with Democratic values.
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:32 AM
May 2016

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
40. .
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:26 AM
May 2016
 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
41. Perfect.
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:29 AM
May 2016
And anybody who says differently can go perform inappropriate anatomical acts on themselves.


They've been doing that for a while now. It would be funny to see, except that American lives hang in the balance. Nothing to laugh about there at all.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
45. It can if you like.
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:34 AM
May 2016

Not everyone is going to conflate patrotism with a particular party's or candidate's platform.

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
46. Righteous rant I'm sure the swarm will descend upon like locusts
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:39 AM
May 2016

But god dammit Democrats, true blue Democrats used to despise pols who do the very things you highlighted in your post

What the everloving hell happened to the Democratic party? !

If this were a Republican, we would be united against him or her.

Just wow at how things change!

dchill

(38,418 posts)
52. +1,000,001
Tue May 31, 2016, 12:48 PM
May 2016
 

vintx

(1,748 posts)
62. It's really disappointing to see blind partisanship take over
Tue May 31, 2016, 02:34 PM
May 2016

Like you said, this stuff wasn't up for discussion before. Anyone defending it would be ridden off the site and branded a freeper.

Mbrow

(1,090 posts)
48. Good points IDA
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:47 AM
May 2016

So many take offense that you are against their candidate that they never look at why you are. I've always said HRC would be so much better then tRump, But that Bernie is better then HRC because.... and they never look any further then the because. Any possible scandal aside, just the things she has spoken for and done, well you know this already. Thanks for the post.

Tarc

(10,472 posts)
49. If you sit out the fall because your man didn't win, you're a statistical insignificance
Tue May 31, 2016, 12:34 PM
May 2016

That's all there is to it.

EndElectoral

(4,213 posts)
50. Yes, Gore felt the same way about Nader voters.
Tue May 31, 2016, 12:36 PM
May 2016

Tarc

(10,472 posts)
51. Nader was a 3rd-party candidate, which Bernie will not be
Tue May 31, 2016, 12:42 PM
May 2016

VulgarPoet

(2,872 posts)
57. ...
Tue May 31, 2016, 02:22 PM
May 2016

Ferd Berfel

(3,687 posts)
58. K to the R
Tue May 31, 2016, 02:23 PM
May 2016


 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
61. "In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place" -Gandhi
Tue May 31, 2016, 02:29 PM
May 2016

Lodestar

(2,388 posts)
78. Well in this case the conscience of the majority is in the right place
Tue May 31, 2016, 03:05 PM
May 2016

with Bernie.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
63. Where is the loyalty?
Tue May 31, 2016, 02:39 PM
May 2016

To us, I mean.
A candidate who claims to want to serve as president can't bother to follow rules? Most people don't run for office if they have baggage that might compromise their potential to win. Part of the idea being, they have a responsibility to maximize their chances of winning so that they can advocate for the people they claim to care about.
I have been hearing that Hillary will fight for me. Yet, she went out of her way to acquire baggage that compromises her opportunityability to do so.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
64. Oh baloney. How many hyper-formatted manifestos did you type up when Snowden and Manning
Tue May 31, 2016, 02:47 PM
May 2016

were making an international laughingstock of US cyber-security? Oh that's right, none, because they were heroes.

VulgarPoet

(2,872 posts)
67. So why aren't Petraeus or Clinton heroes?
Tue May 31, 2016, 02:48 PM
May 2016

At least they(Manning and Snowden) did something with the knowledge that we have committed atrocities against other nations, and have been spying on ourselves, rather than futz around for biography fodder or try to evade FOIA.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
68. Maybe they are? Ask the OP.
Tue May 31, 2016, 02:49 PM
May 2016

But my point is that national security doesn't mean zip when libertarian culture heroes are trashing it. It's only when someone the OP doesn't like commits some minor infraction that the "patriotism" reflex kicks in.

Nonhlanhla

(2,074 posts)
65. The verb in your headline sentence is certainly an accurate one.
Tue May 31, 2016, 02:48 PM
May 2016

Because it will be Hillary or Trump. And there is no way of escaping your responsibility in this matter. Vote for one or the other, and you might help the person you vote for win. Refuse to vote, write in Bernie, or vote third party, and you've STILL helped to choose between Hillary and Trump. There are no sidelines. It's an illusion. There is just responsibility to help elect soemone who isn't batshit crazy. Your call.

themaguffin

(3,816 posts)
80. Exactly. People can't pretend that we're not a 2 party system or...
Tue May 31, 2016, 03:07 PM
May 2016

try to change months before an election.... or think that Bernie can wave a magic wand.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
66. SO DOES MINE!!!!!!!!!!
Tue May 31, 2016, 02:48 PM
May 2016

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
69. I could not agree with you more!
Tue May 31, 2016, 02:53 PM
May 2016

Thank you! for saying it so well! That is exactly it.

Everything in your post is all deal-breakingly bad, but endrunning and voiding the FOIA, intentionally, is a level of scorn for the law, especially one which exists to protect democracy itself, that is simply jaw-dropping in its arrogance.

And then to have the NERVE to run for President after doing all of that? Oh, HELL no! That, in itself, seals that case shut.

merbex

(3,123 posts)
70. I know that her actions have crossed my line
Tue May 31, 2016, 02:53 PM
May 2016

You eloquently expressed my feelings and attitude to a T.

Thank you

barrow-wight

(744 posts)
71. Your righteous indignation is unconvincing.
Tue May 31, 2016, 02:54 PM
May 2016

Hillary got more votes and your candidate lost. It's just that simple. You can choose to obsess over her minor differences with Bernie but that will just help Trump win. And if you think she would turn this country in the same direction, well, I don't know what to say to you because you sound too intelligent not to know that that Trump will be far worse an so many issues.

themaguffin

(3,816 posts)
81. Agreed, the tantrums and condescension gets old.
Tue May 31, 2016, 03:12 PM
May 2016

Bernie and Hillary have a lot more in common and well have an interest in supporting progressive policy and stopping
regressive policy and Trump... and the GOP in general.

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
74. Join the ever-growing ranks of "down-ballot Democrats" who support the down-ballot candidates but
Tue May 31, 2016, 02:59 PM
May 2016

who can no longer support the DNC or any candidates who would push the party away from FDR's vision for the party.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
75. What a waste of a rant.
Tue May 31, 2016, 03:01 PM
May 2016

You should get the names and addresses of the 3 million voters who have put Clinton in the lead and then direct your anger there. Because you know something? We had nothing to do with that.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,128 posts)
82. Is this a Poe's Law thing? nt
Tue May 31, 2016, 03:13 PM
May 2016

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
83. Get 'em in while you still can...nt
Tue May 31, 2016, 03:14 PM
May 2016

Sid

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
84. I am a party loyalist. Setting aside patriotism, nominating Clinton is self-destructive to the party
Tue May 31, 2016, 03:15 PM
May 2016

dana_b

(11,546 posts)
85. Absolutely. K&R
Tue May 31, 2016, 03:24 PM
May 2016

Many of us have said similar things and been derided, had posts hidden, threatened to be banned. But so what? It's a forum and we should be able to speak the truth. When the truth is that the party and some candidates are not living up to the what we thought the party stood for, then we have to speak up.
This forum is just the start. Out on the street and in the campaigns is where the real work happens and there are still people who try to "ban" us there, in the real world.

 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
86. Brava. K&R
Tue May 31, 2016, 03:25 PM
May 2016

LostOne4Ever

(9,283 posts)
87. LOCKING THREAD AS DISRUPTIVE META
Tue May 31, 2016, 04:05 PM
May 2016

[font style="font-family:'Georgia','Baskerville Old Face','Helvetica',fantasy;" size=4 color=crimson]It is the consensus of the Hosting forum at this time to LOCK this thread as Disruptive meta.[/font]

[div class="excerpt" style="background-color:#dcdcdc; padding-bottom:5px; border:1px solid #bfbfbf; border-bottom:none; border-radius:0.4615em 0.4615em 0em 0em; box-shadow:3px 3px 3px #999999;"]http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025307978[div class="excerpt" style="background-color:#f0f0f0; border:1px solid #bfbfbf; border-top:none; border-radius:0em 0em 0.4615em 0.4615em; box-shadow:3px 3px 3px #999999;"]DISRUPTIVE META-DISCUSSION


Threads complaining about Democratic Underground or its members; threads complaining about jury decisions, locked threads, suspensions, bannings, or the like; and threads intended to disrupt or negatively influence the normal workings of Democratic Underground and its community moderating system are not permitted.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»ENOUGH! MY *PATRIOTISM* T...