Tue May 31, 2016, 05:48 PM
hootinholler (26,449 posts)
RandomThoughts on the pending indictment
I keep hearing that Hillary won't be charged over the server, you better believe it. Well, technically, this is true. It's not the server, but the content of the emails that were to be hidden and the acts they document. I could lay it out, but I believe that she will face an indictment. She may be able to plea bargain it down, but she will be charged.
If you've gone to the library, girl, and looked it up then you know its true. You would also know it could all have been avoided if *anyone* on her staff would have had the bright idea of a mail forwarding filter. That would have satisfied both the records act and allowed a FOIA request to be fulfilled and none of the personal (oh yeah I'm pretty sure that included a bunch of foundation stuff) emails would have been disclosed. Of course the damned thing would have still be hanging on the intertubes ready to be plucked like a honeysuckle blossom by any kid playing hopscotch with their NYC skip. But really would manny governments like to have a unfettered access to the communications traffic of the US Secretary of State? Walt star at that for a while and think about the implications. Heads should roll like some pab-subgenus attacked. The road was long and I am owed beer and travel money.
|
58 replies, 6791 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
hootinholler | May 2016 | OP |
brush | May 2016 | #1 | |
hootinholler | May 2016 | #24 | |
merrily | May 2016 | #2 | |
hootinholler | May 2016 | #4 | |
merrily | May 2016 | #5 | |
hootinholler | May 2016 | #6 | |
merrily | May 2016 | #8 | |
Ned_Devine | May 2016 | #3 | |
BillZBubb | May 2016 | #31 | |
Ned_Devine | May 2016 | #32 | |
CorporatistNation | Jun 2016 | #35 | |
Autumn | May 2016 | #7 | |
Matariki | May 2016 | #9 | |
hootinholler | May 2016 | #15 | |
Matariki | Jun 2016 | #39 | |
Bill USA | May 2016 | #10 | |
TBF | May 2016 | #11 | |
merrily | Jun 2016 | #49 | |
riderinthestorm | May 2016 | #12 | |
bettyellen | Jun 2016 | #53 | |
NV Whino | May 2016 | #13 | |
uponit7771 | May 2016 | #14 | |
Cooley Hurd | May 2016 | #16 | |
LiberalArkie | May 2016 | #17 | |
cliffordu | May 2016 | #18 | |
merrily | Jun 2016 | #55 | |
SidDithers | May 2016 | #19 | |
LoverOfLiberty | May 2016 | #20 | |
MissB | May 2016 | #21 | |
hootinholler | May 2016 | #23 | |
merrily | Jun 2016 | #50 | |
Dem2 | May 2016 | #22 | |
Hydra | May 2016 | #25 | |
dchill | May 2016 | #26 | |
drray23 | May 2016 | #27 | |
AgingAmerican | May 2016 | #28 | |
grasswire | May 2016 | #29 | |
grasswire | May 2016 | #30 | |
JonLeibowitz | Jun 2016 | #34 | |
dorkzilla | May 2016 | #33 | |
workinclasszero | Jun 2016 | #36 | |
SwampG8r | Jun 2016 | #37 | |
onyourleft | Jun 2016 | #38 | |
nadinbrzezinski | Jun 2016 | #40 | |
840high | Jun 2016 | #41 | |
passiveporcupine | Jun 2016 | #42 | |
Fumesucker | Jun 2016 | #43 | |
AtomicKitten | Jun 2016 | #47 | |
Warren DeMontague | Jun 2016 | #44 | |
Scuba | Jun 2016 | #45 | |
corkhead | Jun 2016 | #46 | |
JTFrog | Jun 2016 | #48 | |
suffragette | Jun 2016 | #51 | |
libdem4life | Jun 2016 | #52 | |
trudyco | Jun 2016 | #58 | |
MuseRider | Jun 2016 | #54 | |
hootinholler | Jun 2016 | #56 | |
Orsino | Jun 2016 | #57 |
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Tue May 31, 2016, 05:53 PM
brush (50,017 posts)
1. Are you an attorney or just play one on the internet?
Last edited Tue May 31, 2016, 08:50 PM - Edit history (1) |
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Tue May 31, 2016, 05:54 PM
merrily (45,251 posts)
2. LOL! Genius, pure genius. Kudos, hootinholler, kudos!
![]() |
Response to merrily (Reply #2)
Tue May 31, 2016, 06:06 PM
hootinholler (26,449 posts)
4. No Dancing Bananas?
The bow line is pretty cool though.
I was wondering if anyone would pick up on it. |
Response to hootinholler (Reply #4)
Tue May 31, 2016, 06:13 PM
merrily (45,251 posts)
5. I am not a dancing banana type.
These are more my style of happy dance smilies.
![]() ![]() But, your post was so brilliant it took my breath away. I had none left for dancing anyway. So many embedded Easter eggs! |
Response to merrily (Reply #5)
Tue May 31, 2016, 06:28 PM
hootinholler (26,449 posts)
6. I was confused
Not sure why I thought you liked the bananas.
I think I hear a great whooshing sound, which makes it funner. |
Response to hootinholler (Reply #6)
Tue May 31, 2016, 06:37 PM
merrily (45,251 posts)
8. Mary loves them. People tend to conflate us.
We even call each other Marily--except when we disagree. Then one of us says, "We're not Marily on that." Mary came up with it. Or did I? Hard to tell.
I probably scared people off. Now, they're afraid to post on the thread until they figure out what I thought was so funny. Maybe you should bold key portions. |
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Tue May 31, 2016, 05:57 PM
Ned_Devine (3,146 posts)
3. It was the topic of the first hour of Dianne Rehm today, so the story has legs
Jonathan Turley was one of the panelists and one of Hillary's supporters was as well. The supporter was throwing out very weak defenses that Turley was able to shoot down in nano seconds.
|
Response to Ned_Devine (Reply #3)
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:20 PM
BillZBubb (10,650 posts)
31. I don't know who that Hillary bot was, but she was really weak.
I got a laugh out of her trying to spin the Hillary is untrustworthy comment. Turley demolished her on the grounds for indictment.
|
Response to BillZBubb (Reply #31)
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:39 PM
Ned_Devine (3,146 posts)
32. Im so glad someone else was listening to it
I'm driving in my car this morning listening and thinking "This lady's comments might work on the message boards but not against a constitutional law professor!"
|
Response to BillZBubb (Reply #31)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 12:16 AM
CorporatistNation (2,546 posts)
35. A Shame I Missed It! But THIS Was On Way Early And I Would Hate To Have Anyone Miss This!
Last week...
e.g., MSNBC To the deniers... Watch THIS Video... It is not comforting to think that she may well be the Democratic Nominee... Hillary really betrayed Andrea Mitchell... The entire context of this report was of a solemn nature... A Funeral so to speak... Andrea Mitchell "I do not see this report as ...ANYTHING BUT... DEVASTATING!" Chuck Todd "After this I don't think that she could get confirmed for Attorney General!" Lots of FIBBING by Hillary here.. for more than a year! |
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Tue May 31, 2016, 06:34 PM
Autumn (43,421 posts)
7. Brilliant and Hillaryous
![]() |
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Tue May 31, 2016, 06:56 PM
Matariki (18,775 posts)
9. Are you casting asparagus?
what a hoot!
![]() |
Response to Matariki (Reply #9)
Tue May 31, 2016, 08:08 PM
hootinholler (26,449 posts)
15. It's funner
As the whooshes increase
![]() |
Response to hootinholler (Reply #15)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 12:35 AM
Matariki (18,775 posts)
39. you even managed
to go to the library, girl
![]() |
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Tue May 31, 2016, 07:26 PM
Bill USA (6,436 posts)
10. recommended
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Tue May 31, 2016, 07:37 PM
TBF (31,869 posts)
11. Call Congress right fucking now.
![]() |
Response to TBF (Reply #11)
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 02:46 PM
merrily (45,251 posts)
49. Another legendary post.
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Tue May 31, 2016, 07:42 PM
riderinthestorm (23,272 posts)
12. Just get on the radio lady but beware gray warriors, duct tape, ducks and kudzu!
![]() Great thread!! |
Response to riderinthestorm (Reply #12)
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 03:09 PM
bettyellen (47,209 posts)
53. My friends Gray Warrior and Swag were not TSed for being rat-fuckers and they both are behind HRC...
In fact they got sick of that shit here. So they don't deserve to be lumped in with the RFing hall of fame listed in the OP. They are both still members here.
|
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Tue May 31, 2016, 07:43 PM
NV Whino (20,886 posts)
13. 😄
![]() |
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Tue May 31, 2016, 07:44 PM
uponit7771 (89,618 posts)
14. Even if she is she doesn't quit, wins against tRump and HDS victims stop posting on forums? tia
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Tue May 31, 2016, 08:08 PM
Cooley Hurd (26,877 posts)
16. WS: "Ban me right now, Skinner!"
Skinner: "Okay."
Poof... ![]() ![]() Great post!!! ![]() |
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Tue May 31, 2016, 08:15 PM
LiberalArkie (15,329 posts)
17. K&R Very Good
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Tue May 31, 2016, 08:25 PM
cliffordu (30,994 posts)
18. Bwahahahahahahaha.
Dammit, I wish Skp-py was here to read that. Better a cut n'paste email.
|
Response to cliffordu (Reply #18)
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 03:15 PM
merrily (45,251 posts)
55. Banned people can still read/lurk here, no? They just cannot log in
(and therefore check out hidden posts) or post, right?
Dunno. I've never been banned from a board. |
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Tue May 31, 2016, 08:27 PM
SidDithers (44,228 posts)
19. Jason Leopold lives!!...nt
Sid
|
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Tue May 31, 2016, 08:32 PM
LoverOfLiberty (1,438 posts)
20. Repeat after me
Your dream of instilling Bernie will not happen. There will be no indictment.
|
Response to LoverOfLiberty (Reply #20)
Tue May 31, 2016, 09:25 PM
MissB (15,706 posts)
21. Whoosh
Sorry, maybe you haven't been around DU long enough to pick up the utter spoof in that last paragraph. It's damned funny
![]() On edit: I totally missed both the title name and the library one. Pure genius. |
Response to MissB (Reply #21)
Tue May 31, 2016, 09:38 PM
hootinholler (26,449 posts)
23. There are more n/t
Response to hootinholler (Reply #23)
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 02:50 PM
merrily (45,251 posts)
50. Manny more! And don't even bug me about the L0onies or you'll give me the willies.
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Tue May 31, 2016, 09:31 PM
Dem2 (8,164 posts)
22. Will that random list grow?
Only time will tell...
|
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:00 PM
Hydra (14,459 posts)
25. *lmao*
I forgot about him! I'll need to read up. I remember when someone stole his act and he stopped by to comment on it.
|
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:11 PM
drray23 (7,378 posts)
27. ask yourself this
If Cheney, Rumsfeld and Bush were not indicted , what are the odds Hillary will . Answer: zero.
Several countries have issued arrest warrants against them. They can not even travel abroad. This non-scandal about Hillary's email server is small potatoes compared to these war criminals. |
Response to drray23 (Reply #27)
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:13 PM
AgingAmerican (12,958 posts)
28. They weren't actively seeking their partys nomination
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:16 PM
grasswire (50,130 posts)
29. LOLOL thanks
I miss that guy.
I hope he is well, wherever he is. |
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:19 PM
grasswire (50,130 posts)
30. you forgot "and many experiences"
Ja?
|
Response to grasswire (Reply #30)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 12:11 AM
JonLeibowitz (6,282 posts)
34. They got in "manny governments", which was good!
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:42 PM
dorkzilla (5,141 posts)
33. Effin' brilliant
And I laughed harder when I went to re-read it and got the title.
Whoosh, indeed! |
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 12:16 AM
workinclasszero (28,270 posts)
36. Cant wait for my impending winning of the powerball jackpot too
Any day now...any day now...any day now...any day now...any day now...any day now...any day now...any day now...any day now...any day now...any day now...any day now...any day now...any day now...any day now...any day now...any day now...any day now...any day now...any day now...any day now...any day now...any day now...any day now...any day now...any day now...any day now...any day now...any day now...any day now...any day now..........
|
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 12:18 AM
SwampG8r (10,287 posts)
37. Thanks.for that blast from the past i.loved that dude
Hope.he still.abides
|
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 12:19 AM
onyourleft (726 posts)
38. Nicely...
...done.
![]() |
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 12:37 AM
nadinbrzezinski (154,021 posts)
40. That was good
On edit, many of the young 'uns are having a collective WHOOSHHHHH.. no wonder really.
|
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 12:44 AM
840high (17,196 posts)
41. lol - brilliant.
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 01:50 AM
passiveporcupine (8,175 posts)
42. I laffed
and I'm one of the newer kids. Too Manny good lines in there.
I'm just going to Skip off to bed now, and hope I have some Random dreams tonight. ![]() |
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 04:31 AM
Fumesucker (45,851 posts)
43. You gotta have an operation mind to do the crime
Lo and behold, I think Zoccolo may have returned, it's turtles all the way down with that one.
|
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 04:45 AM
Warren DeMontague (80,708 posts)
44. You really went into the swamp with that one
You dirty rat!
![]() |
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 07:17 AM
Scuba (53,475 posts)
45. Woo. Me, I'm with Science.
Excellent thread. I got lots of the inside jokes but I'm sure I missed some.
|
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 02:30 PM
corkhead (6,119 posts)
46. Looking for the classic associated photo I stumbled across this nugget on the interwebs:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024209527
I am due beer money and many experiences. RIP Random Thoughts ![]() |
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 03:02 PM
suffragette (12,232 posts)
51. The whooshes are as loud as the bombs hitting the moon.
Your Op is an instant classic!
![]() |
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 03:04 PM
libdem4life (13,877 posts)
52. The Internet Gladiators herein didn't get that first paragraph.
That's the story right there. It's not about the emails being scrubbed now as it is about what is being found on them, which is to a normal mind, why they were hidden/deleted. It's just the opening chapter now.
I'm wondering if anyone else knows how the super duper secret home server was discovered? I "heard" it somehow came out of the Benghazi hearings. But naw, couldn't be because She Won. (Trey Gowdy big Yuck, however) I'm serious...how was this information gleaned? Oh, and no smart one-liners. This is actual information. There is an answer. Just wonder if anyone here Knows? |
Response to libdem4life (Reply #52)
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 07:18 PM
trudyco (1,258 posts)
58. I thought it was guccifer /nt
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 03:12 PM
MuseRider (33,846 posts)
54. Never one to be able
to write this way I send my chuckles, grins and thanks for the amusement.
![]() |
Response to MuseRider (Reply #54)
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 04:22 PM
hootinholler (26,449 posts)
56. Sincerely...
Applause from you is a breath of fresh air in this GD P um, well whatever it is.
![]() |
Response to hootinholler (Original post)
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:28 PM
Orsino (37,428 posts)
57. How many business hours?
I need to get it to the bank on time.
|