Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumPolitifact: Fact-checking Hillary Clinton's claim that her email practices were 'allowed'
Hillary Clinton is sticking to her defense that her use of a private email server while secretary of state was "allowed," despite a critical independent audit that found it really wasnt.
In a May 26 interview, ABC reporter Liz Kreutz asked Clinton about her decision to use a server located in her New York home instead of a government email, as well as the audit, which was conducted by the State Departments Office of the Inspector General.
"But this report said that you, quote, 'had an obligation to discuss' using your personal email and that you didnt," Kreutz said. "So how can you really say that it was allowed? Was it an error of judgment?"
Clinton replied: "Well it was allowed, and the rules have been clarified since I left about the practice. Having said that, I have said many times that it was a mistake, and if I could go back I would do it differently."
...
Regarding her decision to use a private email server, Clinton said, "It was allowed."
No one ever stopped Clinton from conducting work over her private email server exclusively. But thats not the same thing as it being allowed. Offices within the State Department told an independent inspector general that if she had asked, they would not have allowed it.
The report from the State Departments Office of the Inspector General shatters one of Clintons go-to phrases about her email practice. We rate her claim False.
In a May 26 interview, ABC reporter Liz Kreutz asked Clinton about her decision to use a server located in her New York home instead of a government email, as well as the audit, which was conducted by the State Departments Office of the Inspector General.
"But this report said that you, quote, 'had an obligation to discuss' using your personal email and that you didnt," Kreutz said. "So how can you really say that it was allowed? Was it an error of judgment?"
Clinton replied: "Well it was allowed, and the rules have been clarified since I left about the practice. Having said that, I have said many times that it was a mistake, and if I could go back I would do it differently."
...
Regarding her decision to use a private email server, Clinton said, "It was allowed."
No one ever stopped Clinton from conducting work over her private email server exclusively. But thats not the same thing as it being allowed. Offices within the State Department told an independent inspector general that if she had asked, they would not have allowed it.
The report from the State Departments Office of the Inspector General shatters one of Clintons go-to phrases about her email practice. We rate her claim False.
More @:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/may/31/hillary-clinton/fact-checking-hillary-clintons-claim-her-email-pra/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My Stuff » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My Stuff » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1877 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Politifact: Fact-checking Hillary Clinton's claim that her email practices were 'allowed' (Original Post)
JonLeibowitz
May 2016
OP
Press Virginia
(2,329 posts)1. Her story has now changed.
She's still pretending she was just using a Gmail account but now she has no idea what the rules were.
Seems legit
Land of Enchantment
(1,217 posts)2. And throw away the key!!!!!


highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)3. False.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)4. She would argue it all depends on the meaning of the word "allowed". She's really smart like that.