Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 08:45 AM Jun 2016

Clinton Might Not Be the Nominee

Since I read somewhere that OPs on the front page of GDP indicate whether or not it's "over:"

There is now more than a theoretical chance that Hillary Clinton may not be the Democratic nominee for president.

How could that happen, given that her nomination has been considered a sure thing by virtually everyone in the media and in the party itself? Consider the possibilities.

The inevitability behind Mrs. Clinton’s nomination will be in large measure eviscerated if she loses the June 7 California primary to Bernie Sanders. That could well happen.


Sanders supporters, if there has ever been a call to action, this is it.


With Mrs. Clinton reportedly soon to be interviewed by the FBI, suggesting that the investigation is winding up, a definitive ruling by the attorney general could be issued before the July 25 Democratic convention in Philadelphia. Given the inspector general’s report, a clean bill of health from the Justice Department is unlikely.

Finally, with Mrs. Clinton’s negative rating nearly as high as Donald Trump’s, and with voters not trusting her by a ratio of 4 to 1, Democrats face an unnerving possibility. Only a month or two ago, they were relishing the prospect of a chaotic Republican convention, with a floor fight and antiestablishment rebellion in the air. Now the messy, disastrous convention could be their own.


http://www.wsj.com/articles/clinton-might-not-be-the-nominee-1464733898
104 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clinton Might Not Be the Nominee (Original Post) LWolf Jun 2016 OP
As a Sanders supporter, I am content to let it all play out. Matt_in_STL Jun 2016 #1
Hillary needs to do what is right madokie Jun 2016 #14
Agreed 100% Matt_in_STL Jun 2016 #15
True madokie Jun 2016 #17
"She'll rue the day she is elected if by chance she happens to be." DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #87
.that^ 840high Jun 2016 #79
I think millions of votes and hundreds of delegates... NCTraveler Jun 2016 #2
Only Bernie's count. grossproffit Jun 2016 #4
.... LexVegas Jun 2016 #3
How many identical threads spewing this Hail Mary theory do we need on DU ? Trust Buster Jun 2016 #5
At least as many as we need telling us that it's "over." nt LWolf Jun 2016 #6
The threads announcing "It's over" are not Hail Mary theories. It's a fact.....LOL BIG DIFFERENCE Trust Buster Jun 2016 #10
Wow. When your bubble bursts, it's gonna hurt! dchill Jun 2016 #67
gonna hurt again - a painful repeat of Tuesday night DrDan Jun 2016 #84
not feeling the pain yet. Amimnoch Jun 2016 #99
So don't read them. 840high Jun 2016 #80
I can bide my time until June 16.........LOL Trust Buster Jun 2016 #81
June 7 MohRokTah Jun 2016 #7
Skinner says the rules about not being assholes will kick back in -- IdaBriggs Jun 2016 #25
thank goddess! this place has become toxic since they changed all the rules Viva_La_Revolution Jun 2016 #63
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #8
"... voters not trusting her by a ratio of 4 to 1 ..." Her supporters have a reply for this fact .. Scuba Jun 2016 #9
Yes, they must trust Sanders even less. That's why Hillary received more votes than him. Trust Buster Jun 2016 #12
She received more votes because she's a celebrity, got more media coverage.... Smarmie Doofus Jun 2016 #20
Yeah, that must be it.......LOL....they're just not as wise as college kids....LOL Trust Buster Jun 2016 #23
millennial bashing? really? You guys couldn't care aless about the future if you tried. eom Betty Karlson Jun 2016 #31
I was responding to post #20. Go read it. That poster defined Hillary supporters with the Trust Buster Jun 2016 #36
No, the "broadest of brushes" would be something like.... Smarmie Doofus Jun 2016 #40
Youth lack wisdom. I didn't just invent that idea myself. And, post #20 WAS CHARACTERIZING Trust Buster Jun 2016 #44
Repeating a debunked argument doesn't somehow validate it. eom Betty Karlson Jun 2016 #49
You debunked nothing. Post #20 painted Hillary supporters with a broad brush. Trust Buster Jun 2016 #52
Now who is cherry-picking? It's Smarmie Doofus who debunked your nonsense. Betty Karlson Jun 2016 #60
Pointing out that the young lack a depth of wisdom is pointing out a fact of human nature. Trust Buster Jun 2016 #62
again: repeating the same argument over and over again doesn't make it any more convincing. Betty Karlson Jun 2016 #70
it all depends on how much shit life has thrown at them. i know many middle aged Viva_La_Revolution Jun 2016 #64
No. Millennial-bashing is wrong, even in context. Betty Karlson Jun 2016 #41
I stand behind my opinion that youth lack a depth of experience and wisdom. Trust Buster Jun 2016 #46
"Oooh those young whippersnappers, what do they know?" Betty Karlson Jun 2016 #48
You ignore the realities of human nature. Trust Buster Jun 2016 #51
The reality is that 2/3 of millennials is completely done with 20th century politics. Betty Karlson Jun 2016 #59
The majority of registered Democrats do not agree with your opinion. That's called democracy. Trust Buster Jun 2016 #61
The majority of registered Democrats account for about 15 % of all registered voters. Betty Karlson Jun 2016 #69
In a Democratic primary we call that a majority. A majority your candidate failed to earn Trust Buster Jun 2016 #71
I thought your side was thinking about the GE these days? Betty Karlson Jun 2016 #73
I'd just like to say that you're discussing the results of the Dem Primary justiceischeap Jun 2016 #89
Agreed. n/t Different Drummer Jun 2016 #72
That is going to be LWolf Jun 2016 #18
That group looks like the ones thinking Hillary will not win the nomination next week. upaloopa Jun 2016 #27
This isn't about her winning next week, it's about the FBI investigation pinebox Jun 2016 #28
Sure, if you believe what a Fox News analyst, and NewsMax columnist... SidDithers Jun 2016 #11
I saw a Breitbart version on this on reddit just now Dem2 Jun 2016 #13
The right wing has enough information for endless discouragement. gordianot Jun 2016 #22
Ahh, I see we have built in justification to ally with the enemy Dem2 Jun 2016 #32
There would be no need to fool you when you're already there. gordianot Jun 2016 #35
I don't despise either candidate, I like them both. Dem2 Jun 2016 #38
I do have a problem when you needlessly make yourself vulnerable to right wing attacks. gordianot Jun 2016 #50
Patronizing your opponents has worked so well for you and your associates so so far. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #88
Whether something works or does not does not really matter. gordianot Jun 2016 #93
Trump has made me forget, at least for the moment, how bad his GOP predecessors were. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #94
Trump is vicious he means his insults without remorse. gordianot Jun 2016 #97
I like Hillary's chances in a street fight. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #98
Street fight is right. gordianot Jun 2016 #100
I know Trump's net worth is exaggerated ,likely by a lot, but I doubt the Clintons are richer. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #101
Hillary's speaking fees total are around 21 million. gordianot Jun 2016 #102
I hit the wrong link. gordianot Jun 2016 #104
You have a very poor understanding of the situation. The gullible people believe Hillary. BillZBubb Jun 2016 #33
Spin and spin Dem2 Jun 2016 #37
Project much? You know Hillary has been constantly lying about the server, correct? BillZBubb Jun 2016 #39
I lied about deleting emails after leaving my last job. Dem2 Jun 2016 #66
I know they repost Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #75
WU Dem2 Jun 2016 #76
There are at least 22 emails they have identified that were at the TOP level of the Top Secret pdsimdars Jun 2016 #16
This entire mess is the fault of the Democratic Party. gordianot Jun 2016 #19
Why is this happening now??? I just got my pro-Clinton lobotomy! reformist2 Jun 2016 #21
We are about to be thrown out to fend for ourselves on the mean streets. gordianot Jun 2016 #24
That wsj article is a joke. lol. BootinUp Jun 2016 #26
Hillary's lawyer, Kendall, just ran a "she doesn't have to testify" claim up the flagpole. BillZBubb Jun 2016 #29
You don't "testify" with the FBI justiceischeap Jun 2016 #91
K&R for (uncomfortable) truth Betty Karlson Jun 2016 #30
Re: call to action... Bernie supporters *outside* Cali who want to help him w/Cali, pm me! JudyM Jun 2016 #34
We can only hope Bernie is the nominee. nt valerief Jun 2016 #42
The Wall Street Journal is so popular here today oberliner Jun 2016 #43
Rupert Murdock has shown himself to be quite WhiteTara Jun 2016 #55
Seriously? The only way the loser can gain a win, and look at those jumping on board. seabeyond Jun 2016 #45
You wish...Hillary beat Bernie's ass anyway you look at it workinclasszero Jun 2016 #47
But you left out the line where the vote would have changed if somebody hadn't cheated tonyt53 Jun 2016 #53
+1 this needs to be posted every time they came up with their pretzel logic. #FeelTheMath lunamagica Jun 2016 #57
Everytime till the 15th when the board turns democratic once more workinclasszero Jun 2016 #58
That day can't come fast enough Stuckinthebush Jun 2016 #85
And the sun might not come up and we might all WhiteTara Jun 2016 #54
She might be the nominee by hook or by crook, but all the polling data, NorthCarolina Jun 2016 #56
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #65
Hey I might win the lottery too!! workinclasszero Jun 2016 #68
We know the DNC nominee will not be the candidate with fewer delegates, Thinkingabout Jun 2016 #74
Rip off that Bandaid, Mrs. C Danika Jun 2016 #77
She needs to stop lying. Immediately. 840high Jun 2016 #82
Seven more days and then DU's Fifth Column will belong to the ash heap of internet history. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #90
Why did this have to all come out now? democrattotheend Jun 2016 #78
#threadfail Derdog Jun 2016 #83
#brockemployeefail Trajan Jun 2016 #103
Schoen's already insipid screed was written before Clinton walloped Sanders in the Golden State DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #86
It's a valid point, but it's useless to chatter about. Just let it play out. Vinca Jun 2016 #92
So good of the Wall Street Journal to be looking out for Democrats! oberliner Jun 2016 #95
Oops. nt. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #96
 

Matt_in_STL

(1,446 posts)
1. As a Sanders supporter, I am content to let it all play out.
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 08:50 AM
Jun 2016

Nothing we do is going to change the minds of the players in this and, if anything, too many people go about it the wrong way and antagonize the situation. I'd like to see the FBI complete their investigation and present what they have. While I don't think there will be an indictment at all, I am betting the investigation itself is going to be pretty damning (as was the State IG report) and just provide the Republicans with an incredible amount of ammo. Her failure to interview with the FBI will already be fodder for weeks.

I am good with letting the process play out and if the superdelegates feel that Hillary is too damaged by the reports and scandals, they'll make a move. If they decide to keep her after all that, the outcome of the election is on them.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
14. Hillary needs to do what is right
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 09:04 AM
Jun 2016

but as her history will show she very seldom does that. She needs to back away and go count her ill gotten riches in private. Leave the rest of the world alone.
It would be ok if she had a cogent vision for leading the USA but all she has is an unhealthy thirst for being the first woman president, period.

I remember years ago when I used to chase after the ole big mouth bass. As soon as I had one hooked you could just cut my line as I was finished. I'd done what I had set out to do which was to entice the fish to bite my presentation. Getting it into the boat just to release it wasn't any part of the thrill for me. Well thats how I see the pResidency for Hillary. She just wants the tittle and has no idea as to what to do with it once she gets it. The last person we need as President today is a Hillary Rodham Clinton. We gawdamn sure don't need slick willie back any where near the reigns of power. Contrary to what I used to think he was not a good President, in fact it was he who furthered the administration of st Ronnie more so than bush1.

 

Matt_in_STL

(1,446 posts)
15. Agreed 100%
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 09:09 AM
Jun 2016

As we can see, Hillary won't provide information in very valid investigations into national security conducted by the State IG and the FBI. This just shows that she will do what she wants and better not be questioned about it. Her foreign policy is more of the same on that front. She'll do what she wants and everyone just better accept it.

At this point, the superdelegates are going to do what they are going to do, and Bernie supporters won't be able to sway them if they are in the Clinton camp. If they choose to stick with her, knowing the baggage and scandal she carries now, that's their decision. They, and they alone, will hold responsibility for any negative consequences of that decision.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
17. True
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 09:14 AM
Jun 2016

trouble is they, (SD',) will ride off into the sunset with their ill gotten riches along with the rest of the war mongers and thieves. Never to look back to see the carnage left in their path.
My hope is there are enough of the SD's who give a shit to make sure this all doesn't happen

Hillary will never be President, its as simple as that.


ETA:
She'll rue the day she is elected if by chance she happens to be.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
87. "She'll rue the day she is elected if by chance she happens to be."
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 07:36 AM
Jun 2016

She is one of the most emotionally strong public figures I have ever seen. What doesn't kill her only makes her stronger. She reminds me of my mom. My old man was an amateur boxer, veteran, and stevedore. But when it came to emotional strength and courage my mom was a rock.

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
5. How many identical threads spewing this Hail Mary theory do we need on DU ?
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 08:53 AM
Jun 2016

Is this what desperation looks like ?

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
10. The threads announcing "It's over" are not Hail Mary theories. It's a fact.....LOL BIG DIFFERENCE
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 08:58 AM
Jun 2016
 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
25. Skinner says the rules about not being assholes will kick back in --
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 09:48 AM
Jun 2016

Last edited Wed Jun 1, 2016, 10:52 AM - Edit history (1)

I'm looking forward to seeing how some people handle that requirement.

Viva_La_Revolution

(28,791 posts)
63. thank goddess! this place has become toxic since they changed all the rules
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 12:14 PM
Jun 2016

And the alert attacks got worse.

I wonder tho, when they hit that button does everyone with too many hides get reblocked?
Does the slate get wiped clean and we all start over?
I've had 3 hides in the past 90 days, but only deserved 1.. what happens to those who have been alert stalked and by the old quota would be banned?

Response to LWolf (Original post)

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
9. "... voters not trusting her by a ratio of 4 to 1 ..." Her supporters have a reply for this fact ..
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 08:58 AM
Jun 2016
 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
12. Yes, they must trust Sanders even less. That's why Hillary received more votes than him.
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 09:00 AM
Jun 2016

Any more questions with obvious answers ?

 

Smarmie Doofus

(14,498 posts)
20. She received more votes because she's a celebrity, got more media coverage....
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 09:24 AM
Jun 2016

.... and a lot of people want to see a woman president.

Period.

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
36. I was responding to post #20. Go read it. That poster defined Hillary supporters with the
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 10:24 AM
Jun 2016

broadest of brushes. Damn right I responded in kind. Read all posts. Don't just cherry pick.

 

Smarmie Doofus

(14,498 posts)
40. No, the "broadest of brushes" would be something like....
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 10:49 AM
Jun 2016

.... "because she's not Jewish". Which describes the motivation of a segment ( I think relatively small; but nonetheless very *real* chunk of Clinton's portion of the DEM primary electorate. As well as on this board. "Hymietown" anti-Semites,essentially)

But I stand by the big factors I identified in #20: celebrity/ media coverage/ gender. I'd add: unyielding support from the national party apparatus. ( A double edge sword there, however. I.E. That cuts both ways.)

And, hey... you should TALK to some millennials before you jump to conclusions about how "wise" they are.

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
44. Youth lack wisdom. I didn't just invent that idea myself. And, post #20 WAS CHARACTERIZING
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 10:52 AM
Jun 2016

Hillary supporters with a broad brush.

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
52. You debunked nothing. Post #20 painted Hillary supporters with a broad brush.
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 11:00 AM
Jun 2016

Pointing out that Sanders has targeted college campuses is a fact.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
60. Now who is cherry-picking? It's Smarmie Doofus who debunked your nonsense.
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 12:02 PM
Jun 2016

And no matter how many times you accuse post # 20 of a broad-brush, your own even broader brush still stands: you were millennial-bashing. It's attitudes like yours that will imperil the future of the Democratic Party.

Viva_La_Revolution

(28,791 posts)
64. it all depends on how much shit life has thrown at them. i know many middle aged
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 12:19 PM
Jun 2016

without a bit of 'wisdom' and a few kids who have more than me.

But please, continue to label people as you wish.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
41. No. Millennial-bashing is wrong, even in context.
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 10:51 AM
Jun 2016

If you feel that someone is sinking to new lows, don't sink to their level. If you do sink to that level, expect to be called out on it.

It's attitudes like yours which may doom the Democratic ticket in November. You don't get to take broad-brushed swipes at a whole generation and still receive their votes. If everyone under 35 feels like you have abondoned them, no amount of "I was just respondng in kind" will bring back their volunteer work, their votes, or their party memebreship.

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
46. I stand behind my opinion that youth lack a depth of experience and wisdom.
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 10:54 AM
Jun 2016

That's always been the case. Nature demands it.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
48. "Oooh those young whippersnappers, what do they know?"
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 10:56 AM
Jun 2016

Persisting in your folly is not an argument - it's an arrogance.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
59. The reality is that 2/3 of millennials is completely done with 20th century politics.
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 11:59 AM
Jun 2016

Who are ignoring that reality? Clinton should not be nominated. Doing so imperils the GE and the future of the Democratic Party. The Superdelegates should do their bloody jobs and prevent the disaster that feels entitled to happen.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
69. The majority of registered Democrats account for about 15 % of all registered voters.
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 01:01 PM
Jun 2016

In a democracy, we call that a very small minority.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
73. I thought your side was thinking about the GE these days?
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 03:21 PM
Jun 2016

Color me surprised at the level of short-term thinking.

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
89. I'd just like to say that you're discussing the results of the Dem Primary
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 07:48 AM
Jun 2016

So the majority of voters in the Dem Primary do, in fact, matter.

As far as your concern for millennials goes, I've seen more than a few posts in DU indicating that Hillary only has elderly and retired supporters. I'm happy to hear mid-40s is now considered elderly among millennials.

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
11. Sure, if you believe what a Fox News analyst, and NewsMax columnist...
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 08:59 AM
Jun 2016

writing in the Wall Street Journal, has to say.



Sid

Dem2

(8,166 posts)
13. I saw a Breitbart version on this on reddit just now
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 09:04 AM
Jun 2016

I see what the right is doing - feeding stories that gullible "progressives" will repost in hopes of discouraging Hillary supporters as much as possible. They're evil geniuses and those carrying out their plans are dreamers.

gordianot

(15,232 posts)
22. The right wing has enough information for endless discouragement.
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 09:26 AM
Jun 2016

Democrats handed them the ammunition out of sheer arrogance and greed.

Dem2

(8,166 posts)
38. I don't despise either candidate, I like them both.
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 10:41 AM
Jun 2016

Keep tying yourself into that Gordian Knot to justify these right-wing attacks.

gordianot

(15,232 posts)
50. I do have a problem when you needlessly make yourself vulnerable to right wing attacks.
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 10:58 AM
Jun 2016

Then have the audacity to complain about right wing attacks.

gordianot

(15,232 posts)
93. Whether something works or does not does not really matter.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 09:22 AM
Jun 2016

Your or my opinions do not matter. We are all being taken for a ride. I am going to win my free lunch from a (now longer term) Hillary supporter she is going to be the nominee no matter what and will stay in the race no matter what happens.

The funniest part is even I am going to vote for Hillary. Democratic since birth is a good description of me. In my 63 years there are 2 Democrats I despise one was Warren Hearnes guess the other one(s)? The online DU version of Hillary supporters are fascinating where the real life versions are far more rational. The ability of Democrats to alienate other life long is something I would never have predicted. Donald Trump who may be the worst politician to ever stand for high office is predictable in a Republican sort of way. Keep up the rationalization of Bernie Brothers, entitled millennials, BoB's, and now my favorite nothing burgers. When it comes right down to it I do not care who is the Democratic nominee I am along for the ride.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
94. Trump has made me forget, at least for the moment, how bad his GOP predecessors were.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 09:26 AM
Jun 2016

At least they had the respect, for the most part, to save their bigotry for private consumption.

gordianot

(15,232 posts)
97. Trump is vicious he means his insults without remorse.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 09:41 AM
Jun 2016

Once he gets off the "Mexican Judge" his goal will be the destruction and prosecution of Hillary Clinton win or lose. Fascism via the Republican Party has come to America.

gordianot

(15,232 posts)
100. Street fight is right.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 09:55 AM
Jun 2016

Trump is going broke, the real financial assets of the Clinton's are greater than Trump. This is a real fight.

gordianot

(15,232 posts)
102. Hillary's speaking fees total are around 21 million.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 10:08 AM
Jun 2016

Says nothing about investments etc..

Trump has more assets but billions in loans. He is basically a care taker self promoter who does not make that much. Someone likes him or he would have been out in the street years ago. I have always wondered about the Russian mob bet he does get along with Putin.

gordianot

(15,232 posts)
104. I hit the wrong link.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 10:16 AM
Jun 2016

In real fungible ready cash assets Clintons probably are wealthier. Watch Trump go after Clinton wealth and ability to make money but the old glass house analogy applies.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
33. You have a very poor understanding of the situation. The gullible people believe Hillary.
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 10:08 AM
Jun 2016

The right isn't feeding stories that the left doesn't already know about. In some cases the right is behind the curve.

Hillary supporters should be discouraged BY HILLARY. She's lied to you and let you down, but still you blindly march in step.

Dem2

(8,166 posts)
37. Spin and spin
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 10:39 AM
Jun 2016

It's become obvious to all that this is excuse making for a very simple motivation - promote MY candidate at ANY cost.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
39. Project much? You know Hillary has been constantly lying about the server, correct?
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 10:46 AM
Jun 2016

You obviously aren't stupid, so you know that. If someone lies to you about such things, is it not reasonable to suspect they may be lying about other things?

Now, allow yourself to consider that there are facts that support a belief that she has been lying about other things just as vigorously.

I have a long list of reasons why I could never support Hillary, but at the moment the potential of an FBI recommendation for her indictment is at the top of the list. How could it not be?

That's not spin, it's reality.

Dem2

(8,166 posts)
66. I lied about deleting emails after leaving my last job.
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 12:22 PM
Jun 2016

Put me in cuffs, sir.

Bernie doesn't give a crap about her emails. I don't give a crap about the emails. This is why I like Bernie.

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
16. There are at least 22 emails they have identified that were at the TOP level of the Top Secret
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 09:13 AM
Jun 2016

How did they get on her private, in home, non government, non secure server?
You can't just email them because if you tried to email classification to a non government address it sets off an alert.
That information had to be taken off of the secure government server and put onto Hillary's non government server.
And people think this is really no big deal? Ask someone in the intelligence community.

gordianot

(15,232 posts)
19. This entire mess is the fault of the Democratic Party.
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 09:21 AM
Jun 2016

The DNC was bought and paid for. Money is obviously flowing well and the for sale sign needs to be taken down for the Democratic Party. Money just sucked all of the ambition of the Democratic Party. Thank you Citizens United and Supreme Court.

gordianot

(15,232 posts)
24. We are about to be thrown out to fend for ourselves on the mean streets.
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 09:30 AM
Jun 2016

The paper work needs to be completed before you get kicked out.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
29. Hillary's lawyer, Kendall, just ran a "she doesn't have to testify" claim up the flagpole.
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 10:02 AM
Jun 2016

If she refuses to testify to the FBI, she should be rejected by the Super Delegates. It's that simple. They should make that clear to her in private.

They don't have to support Bernie, but they should not back Hillary. Refusal to testify will be as bad for her and the party as a recommendation for indictment. If the Super Delegates back her then, the results will be on them.

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
91. You don't "testify" with the FBI
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 07:51 AM
Jun 2016

you're interviewed. Places you do testify are before Congress or a committee, in court or at church but not the FBI.

JudyM

(29,182 posts)
34. Re: call to action... Bernie supporters *outside* Cali who want to help him w/Cali, pm me!
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 10:19 AM
Jun 2016

I'm working with the campaign and anyone who is willing to commit 5 or more hours from your home, on your own schedule, you can be very effective in helping him by joining this team.

Rallying time!



 

tonyt53

(5,737 posts)
53. But you left out the line where the vote would have changed if somebody hadn't cheated
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 11:01 AM
Jun 2016

Bernie-ites are certain of it!

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
56. She might be the nominee by hook or by crook, but all the polling data,
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 11:04 AM
Jun 2016

and probably even the magic 8 ball, predict that Hillary will never be 45.

Response to LWolf (Original post)

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
74. We know the DNC nominee will not be the candidate with fewer delegates,
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 05:34 PM
Jun 2016

The candidate with fewer delegates is Sanders. Problem solved.

Danika

(4 posts)
77. Rip off that Bandaid, Mrs. C
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 06:18 PM
Jun 2016

I believe that in the end, this election cycle will be one for the history books. I would not want to be in Mrs. Clinton's shoes right now. IMO, she needs to hold a media/news conference and rip off that bandaid. Her delay is feeding the declining voter confidence.

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
78. Why did this have to all come out now?
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 06:39 PM
Jun 2016

Why not six months ago, when the majority of Democratic voters still had a meaningful choice?

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
86. Schoen's already insipid screed was written before Clinton walloped Sanders in the Golden State
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 07:34 AM
Jun 2016

You like apples?

Out of the ten most populous states in the Union Clinton beat Sanders in nine of them, eight of them by double digits!*


How do you like them apples?


You still like apples?

Hillary Clinton's nearly 4,000, 000* vote lead was built on the votes, labor, and support of people of color and women over forty. The Vermont independent isn't wresting the nomination from them. We won't let him.


How do you like them apples?


*estimates from memory.

Vinca

(50,236 posts)
92. It's a valid point, but it's useless to chatter about. Just let it play out.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 07:53 AM
Jun 2016

Anything can happen, but roiling the waters in the interim is a waste of time and energy.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
95. So good of the Wall Street Journal to be looking out for Democrats!
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 09:26 AM
Jun 2016

It's amazing how people these right-wing sources are among some folks here as long as they criticize Hillary.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Clinton Might Not Be the ...