Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
59 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Among those who have already voted in CA, Clinton leads 58%-41% in NBC/WSJ/Marist poll (Original Post) workinclasszero Jun 2016 OP
And Bernie's lawsuit just tanked. ucrdem Jun 2016 #1
Met Bill and Hillary Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #2
They got a lot done in those first 2 years. ucrdem Jun 2016 #3
Bill Clinton and Obama had a friendly congress for two years. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #13
Bernie didn't have a lawsuit. Why do you lie? It is mind boggling to me. Why? Do you lie to your Luminous Animal Jun 2016 #16
Okay the lawsuit-on-behalf-of-Bernie-that-Bernie-didn't-want-to-comment-on-but-stood-to-gain-from. ucrdem Jun 2016 #17
When was he asked to comment on it? Luminous Animal Jun 2016 #18
Did he comment on it somewhere? ucrdem Jun 2016 #19
Why should he? It has nothing to do with his campaign. Nothing. Luminous Animal Jun 2016 #20
. ucrdem Jun 2016 #21
I do find it interesting that you think he might have had something to gain. Why do you believe that? Luminous Animal Jun 2016 #23
Ask NBC ucrdem Jun 2016 #26
So yes. You, NBC and the judge are willing to suppress voting. Got it. Luminous Animal Jun 2016 #38
Baloney. Have you even looked at your voter pamphlet yet? ucrdem Jun 2016 #40
Sanders wanting to change the rules mid-game (AGAIN!) LoverOfLiberty Jun 2016 #55
Every day it's a new lie around here. jillan Jun 2016 #28
And yet people still believe that Bernie is taking it all the way to the convention. LonePirate Jun 2016 #43
Thank you. That poster consistently lies about Bernie. Doesn't matter if it's about JimDandy Jun 2016 #50
The judge sounded pissed they even pulled that stunt workinclasszero Jun 2016 #25
That was my reaction too. ucrdem Jun 2016 #35
What lawsuit of Bernies just tanked? Link? JimDandy Jun 2016 #49
Hillary's "ghost voters" and absentee ballot abuse. AtomicKitten Jun 2016 #4
Your second link would indicate massive fraud in Oregon. MohRokTah Jun 2016 #7
So now folks are advocating Republican voter suppression laws? onenote Jun 2016 #8
So you think Oregon and Hawaii were fraudulent? That's what your link said. bettyellen Jun 2016 #15
I live in California and voted for Clinton absentee so woooooooo! tandem5 Jun 2016 #45
whoohooo - pop the cork - pour the champagne ciaobaby Jun 2016 #5
When I phone banked on Saturday most voters I reached had already voted by mail. ucrdem Jun 2016 #6
From the Marist Poll: ciaobaby Jun 2016 #11
I called cell and landlines both. ucrdem Jun 2016 #12
If you were calling on behalf of the Hillary campaign, you may have been calling JDPriestly Jun 2016 #51
That is what I found also. I am in Northern California. Also, those who were still_one Jun 2016 #30
Mine too. ucrdem Jun 2016 #39
I hope our results are representative state wide. Thanks still_one Jun 2016 #41
Hey no worries. Hillary wins the nod in NJ before the Cali polls close workinclasszero Jun 2016 #27
The exit poll conspiracy theories will run strong next week nt. Trenzalore Jun 2016 #9
but there was massive cheating in EVERY primary and caucus even where Bernie won!!! nt msongs Jun 2016 #14
There will be no exit polls from Cali. Try to keep up. jillan Jun 2016 #29
Actually a voting group Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #34
Exit poll conspiracies can exist without any exit polls. LonePirate Jun 2016 #44
If Sanders loses.. workinclasszero Jun 2016 #31
according to those polled, new voters disagree Viva_La_Revolution Jun 2016 #10
Early votes skew toward Hillary because those are the organized and responsible people, but anotherproletariat Jun 2016 #22
It is more than early voters. At least in my call banking, voters who were registered still_one Jun 2016 #36
LMAO!!! basselope Jun 2016 #24
No wonder he wanted the ballots tossed out Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #32
You got it! workinclasszero Jun 2016 #33
I think it won't be a big win for anyone. still_one Jun 2016 #37
meaningless; her main demographic is the one that votes early: white, affluent, older amborin Jun 2016 #42
Quit bringing facts into this. bvf Jun 2016 #52
Bernie always does better with later voters jfern Jun 2016 #46
Like me. We are older and we vote in every election. upaloopa Jun 2016 #47
Really??!! WOW! Number23 Jun 2016 #48
Actually, it's practically useless: JimDandy Jun 2016 #53
You can scream that a 17% lead with actual VOTERS not screamers at a rally is "practically useless" Number23 Jun 2016 #58
If it is a large turnout, Bernie wins! It's a rare day when California has the chance of selecting B Calm Jun 2016 #54
Kick oasis Jun 2016 #56
That's a very good sign for a Hillary win. DCBob Jun 2016 #57
wow..that is awesome!! Peacetrain Jun 2016 #59

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
1. And Bernie's lawsuit just tanked.
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 09:32 PM
Jun 2016

Looks like Cali is still Clinton country.



p.s. first met Bill at an outdoor rally in San Diego back in '92.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
3. They got a lot done in those first 2 years.
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 09:49 PM
Jun 2016

So did Obama. Then the honeymoon was over. I wonder if Hillary will get two weeks.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
16. Bernie didn't have a lawsuit. Why do you lie? It is mind boggling to me. Why? Do you lie to your
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 11:58 PM
Jun 2016

friends? Your family?

I've never understood liars.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
17. Okay the lawsuit-on-behalf-of-Bernie-that-Bernie-didn't-want-to-comment-on-but-stood-to-gain-from.
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 12:04 AM
Jun 2016

Happy now?

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
26. Ask NBC
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 12:18 AM
Jun 2016
A federal judge rejected on Wednesday a lawsuit by Bernie Sanders supporters who argued elections officials in California were confusing and robbing unaffiliated voters of the chance to vote in the state's June 7 Democratic presidential primary.


http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/San-Francisco-Bernie-Sanders-Voters-Sue-Claim-California-Primary-Voting-is-Too-Confusing-381514681.html

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
40. Baloney. Have you even looked at your voter pamphlet yet?
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 12:28 AM
Jun 2016

Here's what Padilla says in the article:

Padilla said the lawsuit was frivolous, as did the other two registrar offices. "We don't think there is any merit to the allegations," San Francisco City Attorney spokesman Matt Dorsey said before the ruling. Both counties provided documentation that they have extensively promoted "crossover voting" online, by snail mail postcards and other means. Both registrars also testified they train their workers and cover "cross-over voting in detail."

LonePirate

(13,414 posts)
43. And yet people still believe that Bernie is taking it all the way to the convention.
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 12:51 AM
Jun 2016

Anybody with any common sense knows that is not going to happen.

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
50. Thank you. That poster consistently lies about Bernie. Doesn't matter if it's about
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 03:02 AM
Jun 2016

the location of a Bernie rally, number or people at a Bernie rally, or who the plaintiff is in a lawsuit.

It doesn't help to alert either. Alerts on posts containing known lies often get rejected by juries, with the inevitable juror comment being to "argue the point in the thread". It's tiring to keep combating all the blatant lies that get posted. So there is no disincentive to stop the practice. Win at all cost...

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
35. That was my reaction too.
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 12:23 AM
Jun 2016

I really don't get the impression California is feeling the Bern in a good way.

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
49. What lawsuit of Bernies just tanked? Link?
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 02:46 AM
Jun 2016

Seniors consistently make up the majority of Permanent mail-in Ballot voters in any state and those are a large part of Clinton's demographics. Seniors also are the first ones to mail their ballots back in, so it makes sense they would comprise a higher percent of the respondents in a poll taken this early in the voting process. (May 4th-16th).

Were Bill's rallies even smaller than Hillary's are?

ETA--Hilarious: This poll was an OPT-IN Internet panel online survey!

Just checked the survey-Question 4: Yup, 64.5% of those voting for Hillary in that poll were 45 or older!! (44.28% were age 45-64; 20.5% were 65 or older.)

And to top that off, 91% of those surveyed in the CA Dem Primary part of that poll were Democrats, and only 9% were NPP (Independents) voters! Those percentages are not even in line with the percentages of registered Democrats and registered NPP voters in CA, the only 2 types of registered voters who are allowed to vote in the CA Democratic Primary: As of April 8, 2016, Democrats comprised 64.6% of those total voters and NPP voters comprised 35.4% of the total.

This poll is almost useless due to those problems with it.

 

ciaobaby

(1,000 posts)
5. whoohooo - pop the cork - pour the champagne
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 09:52 PM
Jun 2016

You do know this means nothing right ?
Unless, this is the early start to the campaign to keep CA voters from voting cause its "all over" ????

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
6. When I phone banked on Saturday most voters I reached had already voted by mail.
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 09:56 PM
Jun 2016

The list was California registered Dems.

 

ciaobaby

(1,000 posts)
11. From the Marist Poll:
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 10:17 PM
Jun 2016

The largest percent for Hillary, of those who voted early, were women (54/41) and over 45 (63/33)

Also, of the independents in the early voters, 68% were for Sanders.

You may have been calling land lines which would explain your result.

It's best to wait to celebrate till all votes are in - don't cha think ?

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
12. I called cell and landlines both.
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 10:20 PM
Jun 2016

Sometimes there were two, sometimes just one, but they were all identified. If there were two or more numbers, I started with the one marked "preferred" and worked down. I got through to someone on about 1 in 10 calls.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
51. If you were calling on behalf of the Hillary campaign, you may have been calling
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 04:10 AM
Jun 2016

pre-selected Hillary voters.

I have been canvassing and hardly finding any Hillary voters. It may depend on the area.

A lot of early absentee voters will be Hillary voters because they are probably older voters.

still_one

(92,116 posts)
30. That is what I found also. I am in Northern California. Also, those who were
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 12:20 AM
Jun 2016

registered Democrats from the last election, in my banking were overwhelmingly going for Hillary

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
39. Mine too.
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 12:27 AM
Jun 2016

I reached exactly one Bernie voter (I think) in 3 hours. Yeah I think they were registered Dems who'd voted in the last election. I left the lists there but I'm pretty sure that what they said on the bottom.

LonePirate

(13,414 posts)
44. Exit poll conspiracies can exist without any exit polls.
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 12:55 AM
Jun 2016

Such as the media being in the tank for Hillary as the reason they canceled the exit polls - to make it easier to rig the results in her favor.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
31. If Sanders loses..
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 12:21 AM
Jun 2016

It will be because of some grand conspiracy no doubt.

Ain't it always the same when Sanders loses? SMH

Viva_La_Revolution

(28,791 posts)
10. according to those polled, new voters disagree
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 10:00 PM
Jun 2016

"Meanwhile, Sanders leads among first-time participants (72 percent to 28 percent), independents (68 percent to 26 percent), those younger than 45 (66 percent to 30 percent), men (54 percent to 43 percent) and Latinos (49 percent to 46 percent)."

 

anotherproletariat

(1,446 posts)
22. Early votes skew toward Hillary because those are the organized and responsible people, but
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 12:14 AM
Jun 2016

I'm still hopeful that she'll pull it out on Tuesday!

still_one

(92,116 posts)
36. It is more than early voters. At least in my call banking, voters who were registered
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 12:24 AM
Jun 2016

Democrats as of the last election were going big time for Hillary, so I think it will come down to existing registered Democrats verses the newly registered, and I think the spread will be within 10 points.

Demsrule86

(68,539 posts)
32. No wonder he wanted the ballots tossed out
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 12:21 AM
Jun 2016

Oh well, I hope he loses so big he finally has to quit and give us some peace in order to start the General.

jfern

(5,204 posts)
46. Bernie always does better with later voters
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 01:12 AM
Jun 2016

And I expect him to landslide the provisional voters who will be counted last.

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
53. Actually, it's practically useless:
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 07:15 AM
Jun 2016

Seniors consistently make up the majority of Permanent mail-in Ballot voters in any state and those are a large part of Clinton's demographics. Seniors also are the first ones to mail their ballots back in, so it makes sense they would comprise a higher percent of the respondents in a poll taken this early in the voting process. (May 4th-16th).

And this is hilarious: This poll was taken from an online survey of an OPT-IN Internet panel! In other words, self-selected respondents.

Calculations from survey Question 4 show that 64.5% of those voting for Hillary in that poll were age 45 or older!! (44.28% were age 45-64; 20.5% were 65 or older.)

And to top that off, 91% of those surveyed in the CA Dem Primary part of that poll were Democrats, and only 9% were NPP (Independents) voters! Those percentages are not even in line with the percentages of registered Democrats and registered NPP voters in CA, the only 2 types of registered voters who are allowed to vote in the CA Democratic Primary: As of April 8, 2016, Democrats comprised 64.6% of those total voters and NPP voters comprised 35.4% of the total.

This poll is almost useless due to those problems with it.

But you hold on to your hopes, now, ya hear.


Number23

(24,544 posts)
58. You can scream that a 17% lead with actual VOTERS not screamers at a rally is "practically useless"
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 09:11 PM
Jun 2016

all day long and for as as long as you like.

It has no bearing on reality, is a complete waste of your time, and makes you look incredibly desperate and truth adverse. And we wouldn't want that, now would we??

 

B Calm

(28,762 posts)
54. If it is a large turnout, Bernie wins! It's a rare day when California has the chance of selecting
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 07:20 AM
Jun 2016

the nominee. That said, I look for a huge turnout.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Among those who have alre...