Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Is Chris Matthews Calling the Primary for Hillary before Polls Close on June 7? (Original Post) Gregorian Jun 2016 OP
Why Is Chris Matthews Calling the Primary for Hillary before Polls Close on June 7? DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #1
Because Puerto Rico and then New Jersey will give her enough delegates to put her over 2382 Gomez163 Jun 2016 #8
Because she's won the nomination? kstewart33 Jun 2016 #16
We are well aware Clinton has won the primary. We don't need Matthews to tell us. nt. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #2
I think it's awesome that Team Hillary has perfected the time machine. lagomorph777 Jun 2016 #4
No need for a time machine. Reality is where we are at. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #6
Absolutely pandr32 Jun 2016 #11
Because he is about to pop...and knows there is a lot of questions out there...biting at the bit. bkkyosemite Jun 2016 #3
Because he secretly knows she really hasn't nt firebrand80 Jun 2016 #5
because the sanders crowd does not believe in free speech and matthews does? nt msongs Jun 2016 #7
Because Tweety is bought and paid for. His wife's LibDemAlways Jun 2016 #9
He is doing his job pandr32 Jun 2016 #12
You are joining 146 other Hillary shills on ignore. Bye... LibDemAlways Jun 2016 #13
An unfortunate way for dealing with the truth. kstewart33 Jun 2016 #18
Please ignore me as well, enjoy your echo chamber. Agschmid Jun 2016 #23
Because she will have over 2383 delegates...and it's not beachbumbob Jun 2016 #10
Tweety is always on the side of big money and the 'establishment'. A real ass-licker! dmosh42 Jun 2016 #14
Everyone who doesn't support Bernie is a member of the 'establishment.' kstewart33 Jun 2016 #17
Your "everyone" doesn't get a share of kickbacks from lobbyists, etc. like the 'establishment', so.. dmosh42 Jun 2016 #21
Because that is how it has been done in every other contested Democratic primary Gothmog Jun 2016 #15
You mean the Chris Matthews that voted for Bush Jr. in 2000? Probably because he gets his nice fat bjo59 Jun 2016 #19
Because even though he is usually a moron, he passed 3rd grade math tritsofme Jun 2016 #20
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #22

kstewart33

(6,551 posts)
16. Because she's won the nomination?
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 03:09 PM
Jun 2016

That's not small potatoes, you know.

The most pledged delegates, the most popular vote. Never in their history have super delegates declared the runner-up to be the nominee in this situation.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
4. I think it's awesome that Team Hillary has perfected the time machine.
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 02:51 PM
Jun 2016

Can you please post a schematic for the flux capacitor?

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
6. No need for a time machine. Reality is where we are at.
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 02:53 PM
Jun 2016

If you think this takes a time machine I don't know how to help you.

pandr32

(11,578 posts)
11. Absolutely
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 02:55 PM
Jun 2016

Bernie has been mathematically ruled out for some time now--though he isn't acknowledging his defeat publicly.

LibDemAlways

(15,139 posts)
9. Because Tweety is bought and paid for. His wife's
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 02:54 PM
Jun 2016

Congressional campaign, while it lasted, had ties to Clinton. He's also an idiot who admitted voting for Bush. No core principles and slimy as shit. No wonder he's lasted at MSRNC as long as he has.

pandr32

(11,578 posts)
12. He is doing his job
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 02:59 PM
Jun 2016

...and reporting what is as obvious as the nose on his face. Who cares who is wife is or how he voted...geesh. Hillary Clinton has already won because Sanders is mathematically ruled out--can't win. It is over.

kstewart33

(6,551 posts)
18. An unfortunate way for dealing with the truth.
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 03:11 PM
Jun 2016

Put me on ignore too cause I'm telling you the truth: Hill wins in 5 days.

 

beachbumbob

(9,263 posts)
10. Because she will have over 2383 delegates...and it's not
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 02:55 PM
Jun 2016

Just msnbc....every news organization will proclaim Hillary the victory....this happens EVERY primary season....

kstewart33

(6,551 posts)
17. Everyone who doesn't support Bernie is a member of the 'establishment.'
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 03:10 PM
Jun 2016

Well, count me in I guess. I'm voting for Hillary!

dmosh42

(2,217 posts)
21. Your "everyone" doesn't get a share of kickbacks from lobbyists, etc. like the 'establishment', so..
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 06:27 AM
Jun 2016

I would just say they are the "manipulated" ones!

Gothmog

(145,126 posts)
15. Because that is how it has been done in every other contested Democratic primary
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 03:06 PM
Jun 2016

You are ignoring history and want special rules just for Sanders. In every primary contest since the creation of super delegates, the winner was declared the presumptive nominee based on the inclusion of super delegates. That fact that this is not favorable to Sandes does not matter http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/5/29/1532358/-What-Does-It-Mean-to-Clinch-the-Nomination-When-Superdelegates-Are-Involved

?1464557557

After reading a number of impassioned defenses of why the Democratic presidential nomination should not be called next week on June 7th, I got curious. What’s the history here, since the superdelegates were added to the process? When a Democratic candidate hits the magic number of pledged delegates plus superdelegates, are they the nominee?

The answer: history says the first person to get to the magic number is the presumptive nominee, and says it unambiguously, even if the losers often disagree.

Here’s how it has gone since the superdelegates were added to the process.....

Summary

Anyway, I started this research 12 hours ago to answer a question for myself, so that as everyone on TV is spinning things this way and that on June 7th I have some context. What, if anything, have I learned?

First, most non-incumbent candidates have needed superdelegates to win, and the history of superdelegates has been that once a Democrat hits the magic number and becomes the nominee, superdelegates are more likely to flow to the nominee than from them.

Also, in the history of the superdelegates, they have always ended up supporting the decision of the pledged delegates, and their most important contribution has been to amplify leads of the pledged delegate winner so that they can be assured success on a first ballot, and avoid the sort of messy convention that harms a general campaign.

The major thing I’ve learned is that the press declares, and has always declared, the winner after they hit the magic number, and has done so in far more nebulous circumstances than this. Even in 1984, in which Hart won by a number of other metrics, in which the delegate count was the arbiter, and Mondale announced himself as the nominee, even with 38 percent of the popular vote to Hart’s 36 percent—even then, Hart may have claimed he still had a cunning plan, but no one begrudged Mondale the fact he was, for all intents and purposes, the nominee.

When you think about it, that simply has to happen. Things need to get done, and they need the nominee to do them. Except for Reagan in 1976, who chose a running mate after Gerald Ford was made the nominee, there aren’t a whole lot of non-nominee candidates going to the convention with their own vice president picked out. You get to do that because the numbers say you’re the nominee.

Meeting this number also allows the nominee to do the work of campaigning before the convention, establishing a message, building capacity on the ground, etc.

The press, for its part, has always understood this, from 1984 onward, and has named the nominee (or the “presumptive nominee”) the minute the candidate crosses the line with their combination of pledged and supers, and usually said something to the effect that they had “clinched” the nomination. They did that when Mondale had won far fewer states than Hart. They did that when Dukakis did not have 50 percent of the pledged delegates. They did that when Obama had not won the popular vote (yes, I know, Michigan—I hope we’re still not fighting this?).

This is a well researched article and confirms that the nomination process will be over on Tuesday June 7, 2016 when the results of the New Jersey primary are announced.

bjo59

(1,166 posts)
19. You mean the Chris Matthews that voted for Bush Jr. in 2000? Probably because he gets his nice fat
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 03:40 PM
Jun 2016

paycheck from an employer that is owned by Comcast.

tritsofme

(17,376 posts)
20. Because even though he is usually a moron, he passed 3rd grade math
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 04:01 PM
Jun 2016

And is not wallowing is deep pathetic denial.

Response to Gregorian (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why Is Chris Matthews Cal...