Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Susan Sarandon argues flipping 300 delegates is just as likely as no indictment before the (Original Post) bettyellen Jun 2016 OP
Why does anyone pay any attention to actors, MineralMan Jun 2016 #1
Some actors become incredibly well informed ... DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #8
Hillary does, especially when turning to them for ~$353,000 fundraisers for the money laundering JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #9
Money laundering, what? I hadn't heard that one before! What else, drug dealing? YouDig Jun 2016 #12
She drowned some puppies too - I'm sure of it. tonyt53 Jun 2016 #14
See post #20. This is well-known in the political press. JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #21
Some call it Pay to Play ... for future positive consideration. libdem4life Jun 2016 #15
Take it up with Politico and rest of the press (and take your head out of the sand too i guess) JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #20
1/2 of Brad & Janet 6chars Jun 2016 #31
SS certainly frequents GD-P trumad Jun 2016 #2
Saw that CorkySt.Clair Jun 2016 #3
Sarandon embarrasses herself and sanders campaign beachbumbob Jun 2016 #4
Literally taking about them as equally plausible.... While also bettyellen Jun 2016 #7
Sanders camp embarrasses itself-all by itself. Susus S is the icing. riversedge Jun 2016 #29
nice surrogate, bernie nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #5
Possible, barely, but likely? Orsino Jun 2016 #6
Why the hell would people that Bernie demonizes swing to support him en masse? qdouble Jun 2016 #10
#bernerlogic CorkySt.Clair Jun 2016 #18
The fact that Sarandon wants to overturn the will of the Democratic Primary voters shows she hrmjustin Jun 2016 #11
Super Delegates are designed to back the winning horse Skink Jun 2016 #17
And for the most part they are going with the first place finisher. hrmjustin Jun 2016 #19
HRC is destroying the party. Skink Jun 2016 #24
How dare Hillary get more votes and votes than Sanders! hrmjustin Jun 2016 #26
Sanders is the losing horse. He's losing quite badly nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #30
romantic=delusional? dlwickham Jun 2016 #13
Indeed Stuckinthebush Jun 2016 #33
Susan Sarandon has done the Time Warp one too many times ... SFnomad Jun 2016 #16
Have you seen this? grasswire Jun 2016 #22
That "not pledged" part is scary scscholar Jun 2016 #27
she said it grasswire Jun 2016 #28
Naderite millionaire says something. nt onehandle Jun 2016 #23
They are going to need a lot more than 300. Renew Deal Jun 2016 #25
Well we all know what happened to her ... barrow-wight Jun 2016 #32
Wasn't it enough that she helped elect Bush Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #34

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
8. Some actors become incredibly well informed ...
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 04:47 PM
Jun 2016

I was a grad student during Paul Newman's anti-nuclear weapon activism and he was incredibly well informed.

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
9. Hillary does, especially when turning to them for ~$353,000 fundraisers for the money laundering
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 04:48 PM
Jun 2016

Politico has done some excellent reporting in this area; perhaps you can read their articles.

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
20. Take it up with Politico and rest of the press (and take your head out of the sand too i guess)
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 05:05 PM
Jun 2016
Clinton fundraising leaves little for state parties

The Democratic front-runner says she's raising big checks to help state committees, but they've gotten to keep only 1 percent of the $60 million raised.

Some fundraisers who work for state parties predict that the arrangement could actually hurt participating state parties. They worry that participating states that aren’t presidential battlegrounds and lack competitive Senate races could see very little return investment from the DNC or Clinton’s campaign, and are essentially acting as money laundering conduits for them. And for party committees in contested states, there’s another risk: They might find themselves unable to accept cash from rich donors whose checks to the victory fund counted toward their $10,000 donation limit to the state party in question — even if that party never got to spend the cash because it was transferred to the DNC.

Sources working with the Hillary Victory Fund said the committee is sensitive to these concerns and that state parties were asked to submit names of donors they wanted to save for themselves.


More: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/clinton-fundraising-leaves-little-for-state-parties-222670
 

beachbumbob

(9,263 posts)
4. Sarandon embarrasses herself and sanders campaign
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 04:44 PM
Jun 2016

Luckily only a few day left when it's over for sanders and back to Vermont

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
7. Literally taking about them as equally plausible.... While also
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 04:46 PM
Jun 2016

Last edited Thu Jun 2, 2016, 06:13 PM - Edit history (1)

Ripping the SDs as corrupt of course. Derp.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
6. Possible, barely, but likely?
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 04:46 PM
Jun 2016

Romantic is a kind term.

The thing that seems mostly likely to cause such a mass flipping is not something I think we should desire, and would be terrible for the party.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
11. The fact that Sarandon wants to overturn the will of the Democratic Primary voters shows she
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 04:49 PM
Jun 2016

really doesn't believe in democracy.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
19. And for the most part they are going with the first place finisher.
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 05:05 PM
Jun 2016

To nominate the second place finisher is a way to destroy the party.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
22. Have you seen this?
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 05:08 PM
Jun 2016

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- For the second time in three days, Sen. Hillary Clinton told reporters that the pledged delegates awarded based on vote totals in their state are not bound to abide by election results.

Sen. Hillary Clinton lags behind Sen. Barack Obama in the popular vote and in pledged delegates.

It's an idea that has been floated by her or a campaign surrogate nearly half a dozen times this month.

Sen. Barack Obama leads Clinton among all Democratic delegates, 1,622 to 1,485, in the latest CNN count. Among pledged delegates, Obama leads Clinton 1,413 to 1,242.

"Every delegate with very few exceptions is free to make up his or her mind however they choose," Clinton told Time's Mark Halperin in an interview published Wednesday.
"We talk a lot about so-called pledged delegates, but every delegate is expected to exercise independent judgment," she said.

Clinton's remarks echoed her Monday comments to the editorial board of the Philadelphia Daily News.

"And also remember that pledged delegates in most states are not pledged," she said Monday. "You know there is no requirement that anybody vote for anybody. They're just like superdelegates."

Clinton also made similar comments in a Newsweek interview published two weeks ago.

Demsrule86

(68,440 posts)
34. Wasn't it enough that she helped elect Bush
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 09:52 PM
Jun 2016

Seriously, no revolution materialized but you helped kill thousands of people in America alone...go act , it is what you do...elections are not your strong suit.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Susan Sarandon argues fli...