Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Meteor Man

(385 posts)
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 11:25 AM Jun 2016

Why Berniacs Won't Quit

The Democratic Convention is July 25th-28th. Nobody will be the Democratic nominee until delegates cast their vote and an announcement is made about the results of the vote.

Them's the rules. That's how our Democratic primary system works.

Chris Matthews can call the primary for Hillary on June 7th, but Chris Matthews opinion is not recognized by the Democratic party. Obama, Harry Reid, Barbara Boxer, Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden can call the primary for Hillary on June 7th, but Hillary will still not be the Democratic nominee.

Them's the rules.

60 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Berniacs Won't Quit (Original Post) Meteor Man Jun 2016 OP
Thems the rules.... says the side wanting them to be changed in the middle of the campaign. CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #1
If changing the rules is within the rules, I see no problem with it. AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #7
But they aren't tonyt53 Jun 2016 #26
Good. So Sanders supporters will stop citing polls, right? onenote Jun 2016 #2
Not exactly Meteor Man Jun 2016 #4
Just as there are no rules against stating who you presume to be the nominee. brooklynite Jun 2016 #9
Yep. Meteor Man Jun 2016 #10
Bookmarked for future enjoyment. brooklynite Jun 2016 #20
I can't tell if Meteor Man is delusional or just a troll. tarheelsunc Jun 2016 #59
Super delegates will declare who they are voting for way before the convention... qdouble Jun 2016 #3
Declaring a vote Meteor Man Jun 2016 #5
Everyone understands that the official delegate vote is at the convention.... qdouble Jun 2016 #6
Bernie wins nearly every remaining primary Meteor Man Jun 2016 #11
You're still not saying why would they wait until the convention to suddenly declare that they will qdouble Jun 2016 #12
because Bernie's momentum will be their stated reason.. grasswire Jun 2016 #13
If he were to win California, they can declare that they will vote for Bernie right then and there.. qdouble Jun 2016 #15
and without his newly acquired, formerly dropped out, libdem4life Jun 2016 #16
There is no momentum at the end of a primary Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #49
ridiculous nt grasswire Jun 2016 #54
True Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #60
Because they are not stupid Meteor Man Jun 2016 #18
The convention only Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #50
Nearly every remaining Primary...NJ? NM? PR? DC? brooklynite Jun 2016 #21
Nobody said it would be easy Meteor Man Jun 2016 #25
A 1.5 victory doesn't do him any good Trenzalore Jun 2016 #36
It's not just "not easy", it's not possible. -nt- Lord Magus Jun 2016 #46
You apparently don't understand who the supers are and why they were created onenote Jun 2016 #23
Thanks for your guarantee Meteor Man Jun 2016 #28
i can guarantee that when its raining outside its raining onenote Jun 2016 #29
Non resposive comments Meteor Man Jun 2016 #31
My original post was anything but non-responsive. You're just hiding from it. onenote Jun 2016 #32
What you been smoking? Meteor Man Jun 2016 #33
The first comment negated your entire premise Trenzalore Jun 2016 #37
Invalid premise Meteor Man Jun 2016 #39
The Super Delegates being party insiders Trenzalore Jun 2016 #40
Biden. Yeah right. Meteor Man Jun 2016 #41
Actually based on facts. onenote Jun 2016 #42
Missing a few branches on your logic tree Meteor Man Jun 2016 #44
You, like the Emperor have no clothes. onenote Jun 2016 #45
I'm The New Emperor! Meteor Man Jun 2016 #47
What how many remaining primaries are there? Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #48
Responding to a poll isn't a vote. onenote Jun 2016 #17
The FEDERAL BUREAU of INVESTIGATION. Optimism Jun 2016 #24
No, she is NOT under criminal investigation, so don't keep repeating it. tonyt53 Jun 2016 #27
So the FBI is investigating her emails because they're investigating someone else? Waiting For Everyman Jun 2016 #35
Guess you missed this? 2cannan Jun 2016 #38
When did this investigation begin? onenote Jun 2016 #30
Sounds a lot more like a sore loser. n/t Lil Missy Jun 2016 #8
... she whined. n/t bvf Jun 2016 #19
Dead Enders gonna dead end. nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #14
As opposed to shills gonna shill. Octafish Jun 2016 #22
"presumptive nominee" is enough for a candidate to move to GE posture DrDan Jun 2016 #34
Forturnately, presumptive nominee means NOTHING. The convention decides the real nominee. BillZBubb Jun 2016 #52
sorry - it's over DrDan Jun 2016 #53
Saw the same in 2008 ...the difference this time...sanders lacks class beachbumbob Jun 2016 #43
The difference this time Meteor Man Jun 2016 #57
When We Stand Together No Citizen Need Settle For The Lessor Of Two Corporate Evils - Go Bernie Go cantbeserious Jun 2016 #51
YES! grasswire Jun 2016 #55
She won't be official until the first ballot beachbumbob Jun 2016 #56
Pretty much the same thing Meteor Man Jun 2016 #58

onenote

(42,694 posts)
2. Good. So Sanders supporters will stop citing polls, right?
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 11:29 AM
Jun 2016

After all, no one gets elected until the voters vote.

Them's the rules.

Meteor Man

(385 posts)
4. Not exactly
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 11:36 AM
Jun 2016

Citing polls isn't very persuasive around here, however there are no rules against citing polls.

brooklynite

(94,502 posts)
9. Just as there are no rules against stating who you presume to be the nominee.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 11:43 AM
Jun 2016

If you HONESTLY feel that Bernie will end up as the nominee, feel free to join in.

Meteor Man

(385 posts)
10. Yep.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 11:51 AM
Jun 2016

I honestly believe Bernie will win California and most of the remaining states. Delegates will realize Hillary is in a tail spin. Bernie will be chosen to lead the party to the White House.

tarheelsunc

(2,117 posts)
59. I can't tell if Meteor Man is delusional or just a troll.
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:20 PM
Jun 2016

Probably both, given the way BSers as a whole have gone off the deep end.

qdouble

(891 posts)
3. Super delegates will declare who they are voting for way before the convention...
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 11:35 AM
Jun 2016

No amount of flailing is going to change their votes.

"You guys are all corrupt, corporate shills.... vote for me even though I lost the popular vote and have less pledged delegates!" ... let's see how that will play out.

qdouble

(891 posts)
6. Everyone understands that the official delegate vote is at the convention....
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 11:41 AM
Jun 2016

sane people also understand that the presumptive nominee will be clear way before that. You haven't made one convincing argument as to why anyone should expect that the majority of super delegates will vote differently from who they are declaring they will vote for.

Meteor Man

(385 posts)
11. Bernie wins nearly every remaining primary
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 11:52 AM
Jun 2016

The delegates realize Hillary is in a tail spin and turn to Bernie to rescue the party from certain disaster.

qdouble

(891 posts)
12. You're still not saying why would they wait until the convention to suddenly declare that they will
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 11:56 AM
Jun 2016

vote for Bernie? If they want to switch to Bernie, they can announce it any day. Why do you believe that they will all magically hold back on stating that they plan to switch until the convention?

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
13. because Bernie's momentum will be their stated reason..
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 12:06 PM
Jun 2016

..and that won't be as explicitly evident until he wins CA

qdouble

(891 posts)
15. If he were to win California, they can declare that they will vote for Bernie right then and there..
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 12:12 PM
Jun 2016

Super delegates can state who they are voting for right then and there... they don't need to wait until the convention.

The problem is that you guys are trying to make it seems as if SD keep who they intend to vote for a secret or that they are fickle, when there is nothing to show that.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
16. and without his newly acquired, formerly dropped out,
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 12:13 PM
Jun 2016

disgusted or first time voters...they can't win. I'm sure most of the long-term Dems will hold their nose...or not...but even polls can't make that count.

There is a LONG TIME in political time with a time-bomb at the FBI ticking...until even the GE.

I really came to like and respect Obama. But he's, yet again, forced into the Clinton Whirlwind.

Demsrule86

(68,552 posts)
49. There is no momentum at the end of a primary
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:00 PM
Jun 2016

She will be the nominee before California comes in...may even tonight in Peurto Rico goes well and he is not viable. It is over ...California doesn't even matter. Time to turn towards the General. Bernie only looks foolish now.

Demsrule86

(68,552 posts)
60. True
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:26 AM
Jun 2016

By the time California comes in, she will have been declared the presumptive nominee. So while a loss in California would be embarrassing in a way...it won't change the outcome. And of course, Obama lost the last primaries as well including Ohio and PA. There is no momentum...no super delegate will flip. In fact, CNN is reporting a growing number of super are ready to commit to Hillary... but she asked them to wait until Tuesday...wants to in Jersey first. She would already be the presumptive nominee had they moved yesterday.

Meteor Man

(385 posts)
18. Because they are not stupid
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 12:17 PM
Jun 2016

Magic has nothing to do with it. Now if Bernie pulls off a complete sweep (not likely) there could be a deluge of early announcements.

Since my crystal ball is in the shop for repairs, I am relying on my Magic 8 Ball to predict the future. I can say with complete confidence that the most persuasive answer to how the convention ends is "Wait and see."

Demsrule86

(68,552 posts)
50. The convention only
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:02 PM
Jun 2016

makes the presumptive nominee the nominee ...without the word presumptive...no one will switch to Bernie...I am sure the Democrats despise him...I know I do... I can only imagine how the supers feel after he attacked them non-stop.

Meteor Man

(385 posts)
25. Nobody said it would be easy
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 12:43 PM
Jun 2016
Sanders has defied the polls before, winning in Michigan and Indiana despite polls showing Clinton leading comfortably. However, the larger upset of the two, Michigan, was a 1.5-point victory over Clinton’s 21.4-point polling lead. This 22.9-point victory against the spread is the largest win against the polling spread in Presidential primary history, but Sanders would need to nearly double it to get to a 67-33 win from his 9.7-point polling deficit in California, with New Jersey an even wider 17-point gap.


http://heavy.com/news/2016/05/bernie-sanders-nomination-chances-odds-polls-california-new-jersey-delegates-unpledged-pledged-superdelegates/

Trenzalore

(2,331 posts)
36. A 1.5 victory doesn't do him any good
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 03:35 PM
Jun 2016

In order to make an argument to overturn the will of the people of the states that voted previously it would need to be massive and significantly cut into her lead to bring it down to double digits.

You need 60+% to have a coherent argument.

onenote

(42,694 posts)
23. You apparently don't understand who the supers are and why they were created
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 12:25 PM
Jun 2016

The supers are made up of two groups, primarily. Current Democratic elected officials (Governors, Senators, Congressmen). The second, and larger group is made up of Democratic Party officials and insiders.

In other words, the vast majority of the supers are precisely the folks -- the Democratic Establishment -- that Bernie and his supporters spend so much time and effort railing against. You run as an outsider, don't expect support from the insiders -- not as long as Clinton remains in the race.

Plus, the idea that the supers role is to prevent the party from electing some one who is not electable tells only part of the story. The underlying purpose is to give the Democratic Party establishment a modicum of control over the end result of the process -- in other words, something short of a return to closed door, smoke-filled rooms, but a check on a free-for-all that doesn't let the party elders have a significant say.

Finally, of course, there are two other problems. First, even if the supers see Bernie winning California, that isn't going to convince them she is not electable. California is going Democratic in GE no matter what. Second, by nearly every remaining primary, I assume you are leaving yourself an out for when Clinton wins New Jersey and Puerto Rico and DC, leaving Bernie with a win in California and in North and South Dakota. I guarantee that the supers are going to be more impressed by Clinton's win in NJ than with losses in the Dakotas.

onenote

(42,694 posts)
29. i can guarantee that when its raining outside its raining
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 12:51 PM
Jun 2016

You don't seem to have your eyes open so you can't tell what actually is happening.

And, by the way, if you have anything substantive to say in response to my post, please do.

Not that I think you can or will even try. You prefer your fantasy to reality.

onenote

(42,694 posts)
32. My original post was anything but non-responsive. You're just hiding from it.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 03:14 PM
Jun 2016

Make your rebuttal case about who the superd's are and why they were created.

Trenzalore

(2,331 posts)
40. The Super Delegates being party insiders
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 04:10 PM
Jun 2016

Are going to suddenly over turn an election based on the voting of the last 3 states in a 50 state primary contest?

They are party insiders. If anything unfortunate would happen to Hillary, Biden will be nominated. That is their purpose.

onenote

(42,694 posts)
42. Actually based on facts.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 10:30 PM
Jun 2016

Last edited Sat Jun 4, 2016, 11:06 PM - Edit history (1)

Here's a list of super delegates. You can see who they are. You can see that the vast majority are Democratic party insiders.

I would say that the premise that the Democratic insiders Sanders is attacking aren't going to rush to his support is indeed a valid premise. And that the belief that these insiders, who endorsed Clinton and have stayed with her this far aren't going to switch to Bernie even if he wins California if she captures a majority of pledged delegates.

But keep on believing whatever you want. Just don't act shocked when reality smacks you in the face.

Meteor Man

(385 posts)
44. Missing a few branches on your logic tree
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 10:45 PM
Jun 2016

Astonishing actually. The foundation of your so called premise is "because I say so."

Your opinion is what is known as "jumping to a conclusion". Calling an inferential leap a premise does not add any credibility to your opinion.

onenote

(42,694 posts)
45. You, like the Emperor have no clothes.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 11:09 PM
Jun 2016

Unlike the Emperor, you know it and don't mind letting everyone else know you know it.

Enjoy the next couple of weeks.
Enjoy it when Elizabeth Warren, Barrack Obama and Joe Biden, all super delegates, announce that they are recognizing Clinton as the nominee and supporting her. Enjoy it when Sanders doesn't get delegates to switch to him, but instead watches some of his delegate switch to Clinton.

Meteor Man

(385 posts)
47. I'm The New Emperor!
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 12:50 PM
Jun 2016

Last edited Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:12 PM - Edit history (1)

About time the greatness known as Meteor Man was recognized!

Optimism

(142 posts)
24. The FEDERAL BUREAU of INVESTIGATION.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 12:28 PM
Jun 2016

Superdelegates can SAY that they plan to vote for Clinton at the convention. BUT she is under criminal investigation. The FBI report will be highly negative, without doubt. If it's released before the final convention vote, and is as troubling as all suspect, the Superdelegates will have EVERY reason to switch and vote for SANDERS. Their whole reason for being is to make sure the Democrats win in November. Dereliction of duty if they don't.

So it looks like it's simply an FBI waiting game at this point. Very risky game the establishment Dems are playing with the future of the country.

 

tonyt53

(5,737 posts)
27. No, she is NOT under criminal investigation, so don't keep repeating it.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 12:49 PM
Jun 2016

You are waiting for something that is not going to happen.

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
35. So the FBI is investigating her emails because they're investigating someone else?
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 03:31 PM
Jun 2016

Is that what you're trying to sell?

The FBI doesn't screw around for a year because nothing is there. And yes, laws were broken. People with a smidgen of objectivity realize this.

2cannan

(344 posts)
38. Guess you missed this?
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 03:38 PM
Jun 2016

FBI formally confirms its investigation of Hillary Clinton’s email server
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/fbi-formally-confirms-its-investigation-hillary-clintons-email-server

In a letter disclosed Monday in a federal court filing, the FBI confirms one of the world’s worst-kept secrets: It is looking into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server.

Why say this at all, since it was widely known to be true? Because in August in response to a judge’s direction, the State Department asked the FBI for information about what it was up to. Sorry, the FBI said at the time, we can neither confirm nor deny the existence of any investigation.

Now, in a letter dated February 2 and filed in court Monday, the FBI’s general counsel, James Baker, notes that in public statements and congressional testimony, the FBI “has acknowledged generally that it is working on matters related to former Secretary Clinton’s use of a private email server.”

Baker says the FBI has not, however, “publicly acknowledged the specific focus, scope or potential targets of any such proceedings.”

He ends the one-paragraph letter by saying that the FBI cannot say more “without adversely affecting on-going law enforcement efforts.”

onenote

(42,694 posts)
30. When did this investigation begin?
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 12:53 PM
Jun 2016

Have any supers endorsed her after it began? If so, what is going to cause them to change their endorsements as long as she is still in the race.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
22. As opposed to shills gonna shill.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 12:22 PM
Jun 2016

Prefer to stand up with those who believe in Democratic Action as opposed to those who talk about it, but have no clue, no offense intended.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
34. "presumptive nominee" is enough for a candidate to move to GE posture
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 03:26 PM
Jun 2016

and that will happen Tuesday.

It's over, and has been for quite some time.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
52. Forturnately, presumptive nominee means NOTHING. The convention decides the real nominee.
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:08 PM
Jun 2016

Those are the rules. You know the ones Hillary fanatics have been screaming at Bernie for complaining about? Now who's whining about the rules?

Meteor Man

(385 posts)
57. The difference this time
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:15 PM
Jun 2016

Bernie has momentum. Bernie easily beats Trump. Bernie is not being investigated by the FBI.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
55. YES!
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:11 PM
Jun 2016

When the people will stand together, there is nothing we can't accomplish.

Thank you, Bernie, for reminding millions and millions in America and around the world of this truth.

 

beachbumbob

(9,263 posts)
56. She won't be official until the first ballot
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:12 PM
Jun 2016

Be she will be the presumptive nominee which is pretty much the same thing..sanders intimidation as well as threats of violence outside our convention will just insure Hillary is our nominee..better good use to it

Meteor Man

(385 posts)
58. Pretty much the same thing
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:17 PM
Jun 2016

is not the same thing. See how that works? The adjectival modifier trumps your own argument.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why Berniacs Won't Quit