2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum'That is not journalism': Cenk Uygur goes off on CNN host for counting superdelegates
DAVID EDWARDS
Raw Story
If you count them in the official tally when you know they can and often do switch their votes and have not voted yet, that is simply incorrect, Uygur said. That is the opposite of a fact.
Uygur argued that superdelegates were only meant to overturn the will of the Democratic primary voters in extraordinary circumstances.
You know what would be extraordinary? If one of the candidates were indicted! he exclaimed. You guys keep assuming there will be no indictment. And, Brian, I hear you have reliable sources so do you have any sources inside the FBI or State Department that have already told you that she is not going to get indicted?
I think it's unlikely Mrs. Clinton will be indicted, but I agree that calling the primary before all the votes are cast is incorrect. Of course, the Democratic Party has been trying to call the primary since Iowa, so this is nothing new.
davidlynch
(644 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I think not!
Deal with it!
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)as the primary winner. We can either agree with it or not.
We can't change that fact.
floppyboo
(2,461 posts)You see, we have other news sources and tend to look at what is apparently, and rightfully, a full on battle, with a different perspective. And we aren't shamed into watching the prescribed news channels.
I, like many other citizens of the world, are hoping to end oligarchy. I want equal say for all the people in decisions that will lead to climate, political, social, economic justice. I also believe in the sovereignty of nation states. And so comment from the peanut gallery only.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Conversely, has CNN proclaimed its bias?
Lord Magus
(1,999 posts)But with his insistence that supers not be counted he's keeping it unreal.
TimPlo
(443 posts)The SD do not have to vote a set way. Just because they say Oh I am going to vote xyz does not mean that when actual vote is cast it is going to be for xyz. No one knows the future and how the SD really are going to vote saying otherwise is just lying or speculation, and if you are speculating as a reporter you need to be clear that is what you are doing.
metroins
(2,550 posts)Somebody says they're going to do something, (like vote for a candidate), doesn't mean we should believe they are going to vote the way they say they will.
I mean, it's just words right? We shouldn't believe them.
merrily
(45,251 posts)BTW, there is a lot of room between insisting supers NOT be counted ever and announcing numbers from day one without differentiating between super and pledged delegates, or even mentioning that there are two kinds.
AND, btw, the DNC is saying pretty much the same thing as cenk, although the DNC sure waited long enough to say it.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)extension of the burgeoning Progressive Entertainment Complex.
demwing
(16,916 posts)of yeah, there's that winner/whiner bullshit in your sig line - you're talking about Cenk.
In answer, I'd say he knows considerably more about journalism than you and I put together. You've just got a sad on because Hillary is a corrupt liar, and Cenk calls her out on it daily.
Boo-fucking-hoo
BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)apcalc
(4,463 posts)Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)MadBadger
(24,089 posts)grossproffit
(5,591 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Jitter65
(3,089 posts)Sky Masterson
(5,240 posts).
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Segami
(14,923 posts)Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)BernieFacts is litmus test of journalism
felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)How the mighty has fallen.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]
comradebillyboy
(10,139 posts)Lord Magus
(1,999 posts)By that I mean something like in 2000 where Gore ran away with the nomination in an epic landslide and had already clinched in March.
BTW that claim that "the Democratic Party has been trying to call the primary since Iowa" is absurd nonsense.
riversedge
(70,182 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)In fact, if you cancel the votes of the super delegates entirely, then there is literally no way that Bernie can win.
ContinentalOp
(5,356 posts)to try to prop up the losing independent candidate who has infiltrated the Democratic party with the intention of destroying it from within.
Gothmog
(145,063 posts)Cenk is wrong. In every past contested Democratic primary, the presumptive winner was announced by the press based on super delegates. President Obama was correct in making this call and it will be appropriate for Hillayr Clinton to also make this call
?1464552977
?1464620111
?1464554531
?1464555844
?1464621209
?1464616682
History is a good thing and Sanders does not get special treatment that is different from all past contested democratic primaries
MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)He is forgiven for being stupid.