Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

portlander23

(2,078 posts)
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:16 PM Jun 2016

'That is not journalism': Cenk Uygur goes off on CNN host for counting superdelegates



'That is not journalism': Cenk Uygur goes off on CNN host for counting super delegates
DAVID EDWARDS
Raw Story

“If you count them in the official tally when you know they can and often do switch their votes and have not voted yet, that is simply incorrect,” Uygur said. “That is the opposite of a fact.”

Uygur argued that superdelegates were only meant to overturn the will of the Democratic primary voters in “extraordinary circumstances.”

“You know what would be extraordinary? If one of the candidates were indicted!” he exclaimed. “You guys keep assuming there will be no indictment. And, Brian, I hear you have ‘reliable sources’ so do you have any sources inside the FBI or State Department that have already told you that she is not going to get indicted?”


I think it's unlikely Mrs. Clinton will be indicted, but I agree that calling the primary before all the votes are cast is incorrect. Of course, the Democratic Party has been trying to call the primary since Iowa, so this is nothing new.
40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'That is not journalism': Cenk Uygur goes off on CNN host for counting superdelegates (Original Post) portlander23 Jun 2016 OP
Ding Ding Ding n/t davidlynch Jun 2016 #1
So the fact these delegates have announced who they are supporting should be ignored? hrmjustin Jun 2016 #2
it's part of the me me MariaThinks Jun 2016 #26
It makes no difference what you or I think. The world will acknowledge Hillary upaloopa Jun 2016 #3
If you mean after the convention, yes. Before? No. floppyboo Jun 2016 #31
Let them include the supers. If Hillary is indicted, even pledged delegates will be switching! reformist2 Jun 2016 #4
Poor l'lil Cenk Tarc Jun 2016 #5
Cenk speaking at Bernie rallies isn't journalism either. Hello, bias! CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #6
Has Cenk claimed to be, or held himself out as, an objective journalist? merrily Jun 2016 #12
Cenk loves to say he "keeps it real." Lord Magus Jun 2016 #16
No it is a keeping it real TimPlo Jun 2016 #19
Just because metroins Jun 2016 #34
Is that a claim of objective journalism? merrily Jun 2016 #20
They do describe themselves as 'news'. CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #22
What would that fraud know about journalism? He's a book peddler, at this point, nothing but an BobbyDrake Jun 2016 #7
Who, Cenk? demwing Jun 2016 #35
He's the progressive version of Glenn Beck. Stop fooling yourself, unless you can't. nt BobbyDrake Jun 2016 #39
I watched it....poor guy apcalc Jun 2016 #8
Cenk sounded ridiculous. Trust Buster Jun 2016 #9
You mean, "Noted Hypocrite, Cenk Uygur." MadBadger Jun 2016 #10
Where's the clip of Cenk from 2008 in regards to Obama? grossproffit Jun 2016 #11
Cenk appears desperate. JoePhilly Jun 2016 #13
Yeah, because the Dems have never counted delegates that way before. Jitter65 Jun 2016 #14
Cenk is 100% correct. Sky Masterson Jun 2016 #15
"they can and often do switch their votes" No, they do not. You're right, piss poor journalism. seabeyond Jun 2016 #17
kick Segami Jun 2016 #18
As if Cenk would know "journalism" from his own hind-end. LOL! Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #21
Bernie mouthpiece pretends that slavish devotion to geek tragedy Jun 2016 #23
K&R For Cenk felix_numinous Jun 2016 #24
They 'often' switch their votes? Where does that come from? randome Jun 2016 #25
Cenk was made to look fooish itsrobert Jun 2016 #27
Correction: Cenk simply IS foolish. No one needs to apply any effort toward that. randome Jun 2016 #29
It's not hard to make a fool look foolish... comradebillyboy Jun 2016 #33
Is it also wrong to call before all votes are cast in a non-competitive primary? Lord Magus Jun 2016 #28
Cenk has a bad case of sour grapes. Makes him look foolish. riversedge Jun 2016 #30
Hillary is winning without the super delegates oberliner Jun 2016 #32
Former Republican uses right wing talking points against the Democratic nominee ContinentalOp Jun 2016 #36
Cenk is wrong-super delegates have been counted by real journalists in every past contest Gothmog Jun 2016 #37
Math and civics aren't requirements to be a "reporter/glorified blogger" MyNameGoesHere Jun 2016 #38
Armenian genocide denier says what now?????? beaglelover Jun 2016 #40
 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
2. So the fact these delegates have announced who they are supporting should be ignored?
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:17 PM
Jun 2016

I think not!

Deal with it!

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
3. It makes no difference what you or I think. The world will acknowledge Hillary
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:20 PM
Jun 2016

as the primary winner. We can either agree with it or not.

We can't change that fact.

floppyboo

(2,461 posts)
31. If you mean after the convention, yes. Before? No.
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 03:04 PM
Jun 2016

You see, we have other news sources and tend to look at what is apparently, and rightfully, a full on battle, with a different perspective. And we aren't shamed into watching the prescribed news channels.

I, like many other citizens of the world, are hoping to end oligarchy. I want equal say for all the people in decisions that will lead to climate, political, social, economic justice. I also believe in the sovereignty of nation states. And so comment from the peanut gallery only.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
12. Has Cenk claimed to be, or held himself out as, an objective journalist?
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:31 PM
Jun 2016

Conversely, has CNN proclaimed its bias?

Lord Magus

(1,999 posts)
16. Cenk loves to say he "keeps it real."
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:37 PM
Jun 2016

But with his insistence that supers not be counted he's keeping it unreal.

 

TimPlo

(443 posts)
19. No it is a keeping it real
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:42 PM
Jun 2016

The SD do not have to vote a set way. Just because they say Oh I am going to vote xyz does not mean that when actual vote is cast it is going to be for xyz. No one knows the future and how the SD really are going to vote saying otherwise is just lying or speculation, and if you are speculating as a reporter you need to be clear that is what you are doing.

metroins

(2,550 posts)
34. Just because
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 03:25 PM
Jun 2016

Somebody says they're going to do something, (like vote for a candidate), doesn't mean we should believe they are going to vote the way they say they will.

I mean, it's just words right? We shouldn't believe them.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
20. Is that a claim of objective journalism?
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:42 PM
Jun 2016

BTW, there is a lot of room between insisting supers NOT be counted ever and announcing numbers from day one without differentiating between super and pledged delegates, or even mentioning that there are two kinds.

AND, btw, the DNC is saying pretty much the same thing as cenk, although the DNC sure waited long enough to say it.

 

BobbyDrake

(2,542 posts)
7. What would that fraud know about journalism? He's a book peddler, at this point, nothing but an
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:24 PM
Jun 2016

extension of the burgeoning Progressive Entertainment Complex.

 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
35. Who, Cenk?
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 03:31 PM
Jun 2016

of yeah, there's that winner/whiner bullshit in your sig line - you're talking about Cenk.

In answer, I'd say he knows considerably more about journalism than you and I put together. You've just got a sad on because Hillary is a corrupt liar, and Cenk calls her out on it daily.

Boo-fucking-hoo

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
25. They 'often' switch their votes? Where does that come from?
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:55 PM
Jun 2016

[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
29. Correction: Cenk simply IS foolish. No one needs to apply any effort toward that.
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:58 PM
Jun 2016

[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]

Lord Magus

(1,999 posts)
28. Is it also wrong to call before all votes are cast in a non-competitive primary?
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:57 PM
Jun 2016

By that I mean something like in 2000 where Gore ran away with the nomination in an epic landslide and had already clinched in March.

BTW that claim that "the Democratic Party has been trying to call the primary since Iowa" is absurd nonsense.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
32. Hillary is winning without the super delegates
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 03:05 PM
Jun 2016

In fact, if you cancel the votes of the super delegates entirely, then there is literally no way that Bernie can win.

ContinentalOp

(5,356 posts)
36. Former Republican uses right wing talking points against the Democratic nominee
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 03:32 PM
Jun 2016

to try to prop up the losing independent candidate who has infiltrated the Democratic party with the intention of destroying it from within.

Gothmog

(145,063 posts)
37. Cenk is wrong-super delegates have been counted by real journalists in every past contest
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 04:22 PM
Jun 2016

Cenk is wrong. In every past contested Democratic primary, the presumptive winner was announced by the press based on super delegates. President Obama was correct in making this call and it will be appropriate for Hillayr Clinton to also make this call


?1464552977

?1464620111

?1464554531

?1464555844

?1464621209

?1464616682



History is a good thing and Sanders does not get special treatment that is different from all past contested democratic primaries
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»'That is not journalism':...