Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
70 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fuck Naderites. (Original Post) arely staircase Jun 2016 OP
Fuck neo-liberals. Carry on. nt LWolf Jun 2016 #1
+1 mmonk Jun 2016 #6
... SamKnause Jun 2016 #25
+3, 4, 5 and 6 basselope Jun 2016 #51
+7 JimDandy Jun 2016 #53
+8 Cobalt Violet Jun 2016 #58
8, 9 & 10!!! Peace Patriot Jun 2016 #59
Results of your alert: sufrommich Jun 2016 #2
Is Nader running, first I've heard of it or is Naderite code for something else if so explain please azurnoir Jun 2016 #3
Sounds like a whistle to me..... Segami Jun 2016 #5
No whistle. Just a big 'fuck off' to GOper enabling Naderites. arely staircase Jun 2016 #15
... Ned_Devine Jun 2016 #27
Nobody here is a Naderite. And it does't help the GOP to support the only progressive in the race. Ken Burch Jun 2016 #39
Who said I am talking about DUrs? arely staircase Jun 2016 #60
If you aren't talking about Du'ers, why did you post this here? n/t. Ken Burch Jun 2016 #62
Out of my brain, Ken. SHOO! Scootaloo Jun 2016 #64
Because it is relevant. The same Naderite idiots like Susan Serandon arely staircase Jun 2016 #69
Well, you're posting to DU, and being read by peopel who read DU, so... Scootaloo Jun 2016 #63
George W. Bush is their biggest fan. nt onehandle Jun 2016 #4
Roger Stone likes 'em too. nt BootinUp Jun 2016 #21
Probably the most despicable person on the planet. nt arely staircase Jun 2016 #70
And what of his Sis-in-law Hillary BuelahWitch Jun 2016 #67
DU rec...nt SidDithers Jun 2016 #7
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #8
Yet nt arely staircase Jun 2016 #16
The fact that this was alerted Stuckinthebush Jun 2016 #9
Yeppers nt arely staircase Jun 2016 #10
I don't think a single DUer takes offense at the OP... Miles Archer Jun 2016 #11
There's a 0% chance it has anything to do with Nader melman Jun 2016 #29
I was being charitable, in the spirit of DU "unity" Miles Archer Jun 2016 #30
Right-wingers are strange. Broward Jun 2016 #12
MY you're on a roll today Armstead Jun 2016 #13
Thanks. arely staircase Jun 2016 #14
You missed a "t." morningfog Jun 2016 #38
What kind of Democratic message board is this? How foul. bjo59 Jun 2016 #17
It is a very pro Democrat sentiment nt arely staircase Jun 2016 #19
+1 Exactly. n/t FSogol Jun 2016 #22
Specifically, pro-turncoat Democrat. Since it was party-jumper Democrats who cost us 2000 Scootaloo Jun 2016 #28
Bullshit. sofa king Jun 2016 #34
And there were 300,000 Democrats in Florida who voted for Bush Scootaloo Jun 2016 #37
Nader denialism lives! The fact remains that Nader voters contributed greatly to redstateblues Jun 2016 #40
Only your denialism that you're spouting mythology Scootaloo Jun 2016 #44
Spoken like a true Nader voter. Without those 97,000 no BushCheney. redstateblues Jun 2016 #46
No, spoken like someone who's actually looked at the numbers of the 2000 election Scootaloo Jun 2016 #57
Time for bed... Fairgo Jun 2016 #18
Just made coffee. nt arely staircase Jun 2016 #20
Is Nader running? AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #23
When all else fails invoke Nader. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2016 #24
Whatever you're into, I guess. Scootaloo Jun 2016 #26
Please tell Susan Sarandon-everyone's favorite Naderite to go away redstateblues Jun 2016 #41
A woman with an opinion different from yours! OFF WITH HER HEAD! Scootaloo Jun 2016 #52
Anyone who claims to be progressive and thinks electing Trump redstateblues Jun 2016 #55
No no, go on with your haranguing and lying about a woman for not agreeing with you Scootaloo Jun 2016 #61
Yep, sounds like a sexist swipe to me... BuelahWitch Jun 2016 #68
Nader is a sad person who no one pays any attention to now Gothmog Jun 2016 #31
awful fast to excuse vote-cagers aren't we? MisterP Jun 2016 #32
Fuck Nader. trumad Jun 2016 #33
Why would you think this is appropriate for GD:P "discussion"? It's simply disruptive meta. Electric Monk Jun 2016 #35
Criticizing Ralph Nader is now somehow "disruptive meta-discussion"? Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #42
Susan 'fuck the poor so they violently revolt' Sarandon comes to mind. arely staircase Jun 2016 #50
Fuck Nader! tandem5 Jun 2016 #36
The Nader voters always come out of the woodwork to defend their mistake! redstateblues Jun 2016 #43
FUCK people who throw a winnable election by supporting a LOSING candidate... AzDar Jun 2016 #45
The text and the avatar do not match. Very confusing! ContinentalOp Jun 2016 #48
... qdouble Jun 2016 #66
And Fuck Nader too. Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #47
Yah two minutes of hate!!!! nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #49
People are voting for Nader? Odd. merrily Jun 2016 #54
lulz Rex Jun 2016 #56
God bless the Naderites TSIAS Jun 2016 #65

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
2. Results of your alert:
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 06:45 PM
Jun 2016

Fuck Naderites.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512132600

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

purposeless flamebait from this poster

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Jun 5, 2016, 06:44 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Inappropriate title
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Lol,no. Fuck Nadarites is perfectly acceptable. This is a board for democrats,go find Nadar Underground.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: "Purposeless flamebait from this poster", Don't agree with alert.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: If there are Naderites here, there shouldn't be. I don't see the problem.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I can't disagree with the sentiment towards a third party that was responsible for Bush being elected.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
15. No whistle. Just a big 'fuck off' to GOper enabling Naderites.
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 07:15 PM
Jun 2016

Just wanted to post something all Dems can agree on.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
39. Nobody here is a Naderite. And it does't help the GOP to support the only progressive in the race.
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 10:30 PM
Jun 2016

carry on.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
69. Because it is relevant. The same Naderite idiots like Susan Serandon
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 07:42 AM
Jun 2016

now want Trump to win so it can bring about "the revolution." Fuck all her ilk.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
63. Well, you're posting to DU, and being read by peopel who read DU, so...
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 01:47 AM
Jun 2016

Are you expecting some sort of widespread coverage? is ABC going ot break into the latest episode of "The Bachelorette" is news that Arley Staircase, a poster on a website named "Democratic Underground" has opined, "fuck naderites"?

You're talking (well, shrieking... well, typing the equivalent of a shriek) to DU'ers, on DU, so one must be forgiven for assuming your target audience is among DU'ers.

Response to arely staircase (Original post)

Stuckinthebush

(10,842 posts)
9. The fact that this was alerted
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 06:57 PM
Jun 2016

Is illuminating. Nader screwed Dems, the country and the world. No Dem on Democratic underground should take offense at this OP.

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
11. I don't think a single DUer takes offense at the OP...
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 07:00 PM
Jun 2016

...if, in fact, the post is actually about Nader, and given the current tone here, I'd say that there is a 50-50 chance that it has nothing to do with Ralph Nader.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
28. Specifically, pro-turncoat Democrat. Since it was party-jumper Democrats who cost us 2000
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 09:35 PM
Jun 2016

When 20% of your party jumps to vote for the other party, you can't blame the 3-5% of voters who consistently don't vote for either party for not voting for yours.

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
34. Bullshit.
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 10:13 PM
Jun 2016

There were over 97 thousand dumbasses in Florida who voted for Nader instead of the environmental candidate who had a chance to win.

Now lead and mercury levels are higher in the drinking water, the sea levels are rising, climate change is runaway, and golf course water hazards comprise a tragic percentage of America's "wetlands."

You did all of that, Nader voters. Don't try to blame the imaginary "turncoat Democrats," who cannot be quantified. Blame the ninety seven thousand of you fools who thought there was no difference between the political parties and made America a shittier place to be as a direct result.

And keep drinking that cool, clean Florida water.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
37. And there were 300,000 Democrats in Florida who voted for Bush
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 10:25 PM
Jun 2016

20% of Democrats nationwide joined them in doing so. This isn't imaginary, this is hard statistics from the election.

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
40. Nader denialism lives! The fact remains that Nader voters contributed greatly to
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 10:31 PM
Jun 2016

Giving us Bush/Cheney. Not a dimes worth of difference? Thanks for Bushco and the Iraq War. Fuck Nader

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
44. Only your denialism that you're spouting mythology
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 11:18 PM
Jun 2016

Three hundred and eight thousand Democrats voted for George Bush in Florida. I don't know how math works in your private universe, where Perot voters are apparently "the left" as well, but in the physics of my universe, three hundred and eight thousand is a larger number than ninety-seven thousand. More than three times as large, in fact.

Also math in my universe shows that when you take three hundred and eight thousand items from one side, and put htem on a different side, that's a total swing of six hundred and sixteen thousand between the two. While if you take ninety-seven thousand, and don't move them to a different side, they don't create any swing at all.

I could draw an illustration for you, if you like?

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
46. Spoken like a true Nader voter. Without those 97,000 no BushCheney.
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 11:42 PM
Jun 2016

I didn't say it was the only reason but a major contribution. It's amazing how Nader supporters stay in denial of the consequences of their mistake

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
57. No, spoken like someone who's actually looked at the numbers of the 2000 election
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 01:37 AM
Jun 2016

173,000 voters being purged from the rolls in Florida had an impact.

Another 100-200k voters having their votes invalidated or misappropriated through that "hanging chad" nonsense had an impact.

308,000 voters from the Democratic party voting for the Republican candidate had an impact.

This is just looking at the voting itself, if you really like I could get into the state GOP's corruption and efforts to fuck over the entire process. And if you've got time, I could point out that Gore was running a fucking awful campaign.

All of the above are factors well before 97,000 non-Democrats voting for someone other than a Democrat. Seriously, hte fact that Republicans voted for the Republican is more consequential and you might as well be demanding they be ashamed for not voting for the Democrat. It'd make as much sense.

"Blame Nader" is the Democratic Party's coping mechanism. it has no basis in reality, but it's a reflexive tow-minute hate meant to absolve Gore of any responsibility for his godawful campaign, and also to preserve the Democratic Party's fetishization of bipartisanship by avoiding any blame directed at the GOP.

And, hate to burst another bubble of yours, but at the time I was 17 years old and living in Alaska. So your hypothesis of why I'm taking your bullshit to task is sorely mistaken.

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
55. Anyone who claims to be progressive and thinks electing Trump
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 12:55 AM
Jun 2016

Would be a good idea is crazy. BTW my wife is apolitical and has many opinions that I don't hold but she knows what a disaster Trump would be.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
61. No no, go on with your haranguing and lying about a woman for not agreeing with you
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 01:44 AM
Jun 2016

Show us the full range of this skillset of yours.

 

Electric Monk

(13,869 posts)
35. Why would you think this is appropriate for GD:P "discussion"? It's simply disruptive meta.
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 10:16 PM
Jun 2016
Statement of Purpose

A forum for general discussion of the Democratic presidential primaries. Disruptive meta-discussion is forbidden.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
42. Criticizing Ralph Nader is now somehow "disruptive meta-discussion"?
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 10:34 PM
Jun 2016

I'm really not seeing that. I do see your point that perhaps this thread should be in GD as opposed to GD-P.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
50. Susan 'fuck the poor so they violently revolt' Sarandon comes to mind.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 12:43 AM
Jun 2016

Her ilk games us Bush. Apparently they aren't satisfied and want to give us Trump now.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Fuck Naderites.