Fuck the Thirdway and NEO Liberals.

[Phlem]

Carry on.

[pkdu]

1. Cough it up..all of it ( by June 15th) nt

[Phlem]

2. Well then you better visit this lovely thread too.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512132600

[TwilightZone]

6. Nader isn't a Democrat.

You really think your cutesy copycat post is equivalent?

[Phlem]

7. Are you fucking kidding me with that?

If you can't get that she's referring to Bernie supporters with that, then your totally on the wrong website.

Your right, Nader isn't a fucking Democrat, thanks for stating the fucking obvious.

[TwilightZone]

11. Well, many Sanders supporters aren't Democrats, either.

So, I suspect the point you're making isn't the one you intended.

Nader was an intentional spoiler. I don't anticipate that Sanders intends to play the same role, though it would seem that some of his supporters would prefer that he do so. He's been pretty clear that he intends to endorse Clinton once she's the nominee.

By the way, it's "you're". And I'm on the right website, thank you very much. This isn't BernieUnderground.com, after all.

[Phlem]

12. uh huh. Okee Dokee.

[hrmjustin]

3. .

[RandySF]

4. .

[Phlem]

5. Don't Cry Randy

We knew Hillary couldn't win it fair and square. Actually this shit happens all the time, every time. A corrupt politicians becomes President. Seems par for the course, why change it?

I know right? Cause everyone is doing so fucking well we can handle another Wall Street Toady as President.

Pure logic huh.

[redstateblues]

13. Corrupt? When Bernie was pressed in the debate to come up with one instance

Of corruption he couldn't name one after railing about it for the last year

[Capt. Obvious]

8. AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service

On Mon Jun 6, 2016, 02:04 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

Fuck the Thirdway and NEO Liberals.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512133991

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

No comments added by alerter

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Jun 6, 2016, 02:17 AM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No comments no hide
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

[Phlem]

10. If this goes, the other has to also.

This trying to unite the party is hard stuff.

[Juicy_Bellows]

9. I agree.