2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumR B Garr
(16,950 posts)Absolutely.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)but I would never say that myself!
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)If you're arguing that Hillary being the nominee is winning, then I would sure hate to see what losing looks like.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)I don't want to give away any spoilers!
BootinUp
(47,141 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Hillary Clinton's Released White House Records show she Lied about Opposing NAFTA
By Steven Leser
One of the things you would expect of someone who really has good experience and judgment is that they can articulate a basic set of principles and positions on issues that they can run on and defend and that stay relatively static. I'm not saying you have to stick to them in the face of overwhelming evidence that one of your positions has been proven to be wrong, like George W. Bush does, even someone who has good experience and judgment occasionally changes their mind. That is not what we have with Hillary. Hillary gives a different opinion on the same subjects every couple of weeks depending on her audience and what she thinks it will net her. As evidence of this is now coming out and is going to be presented to the American people in the starkest terms, how can one be expected to trust her to do anything that she says she is going to do? How can one really know what she believes or intends to do about anything? The only things Hillary's experience seems to be good for is perfecting how to talk out of both sides of her mouth, engaging in the politics of personal destruction and other aspects of her ruthless pursuit of power that remind one of what a Karl Rove might do. That kind of person ought not to be the Democratic nominee.
(emphasis mine)
HumanityExperiment
(1,442 posts)have invoked selective processing on their 'appreciation' full facts are filtered out
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)That was eight years ago. We've moved on. Time to turn the page eh?
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Exilednight
(9,359 posts)Page 75 back to page 1 is not progress.
Leser claims to be a journalist, but as someone said, that'd like a heroin dealer claiming to be a pharmacist.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Broward
(1,976 posts)Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)What ARE they going on about?
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)are working overtime.
Then again, they've lost, so there is that.
Thank you for this OP and thank you To all who posted nice responses. As for the rest, as the vernacular goes, haters gonna hate.
Logical
(22,457 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)K&R
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
mcar
(42,302 posts)Response to ucrdem (Original post)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
Gothmog
(145,129 posts)I agree with ucrdem, you are one of the good guys, Steven!
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)He has been very open with his thoughts here for a long time. Some of the pieces I saw of him on Fox were really good. He did a great job of spreading a progressive message to a hostile audience.
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)Lord have mercy.
longship
(40,416 posts)That's all.
Take his posts at their content.
I like some of them; I don't like some of them. He's mostly into promoting himself, by my reading. In other words, he's just about like everybody else here (except for the self-promoting part).
Self promoting does not get one any credence here. One also has to have something beyond that.
I click through many Leser's posts. But I find that I do much less like him these days. Let him live with that.
Flagrant self promotion does not mean much of anything here.
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Peacetrain
(22,875 posts)greatauntoftriplets
(175,731 posts)rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)You know he's right.