Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:41 PM Jun 2016

Are we STILL doing this idiotic 'supers don't vote till July' NONSENSE???



Good GAWD I wish people would cut this crap out. No delegates vote till July. Why the everloving HELL they would switch to Bernie after he called the entire PARTY Corrupt has never ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever been explained. Ever. They DO NOT LIKE HIM!!! Can y'all get that through your heads? Cant just force people who cannot stand you to switch to support you just cause you say you can beat Trump. Nobody CARES what he says about the polls with him vs Trump. This is past the point of ignorance. This is deliberate dumbassery.
194 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Are we STILL doing this idiotic 'supers don't vote till July' NONSENSE??? (Original Post) bravenak Jun 2016 OP
Bernie is gonna change everyone's minds with a Big Hippie Rally in Philly Gomez163 Jun 2016 #1
Lord! bravenak Jun 2016 #12
What else have they got? NurseJackie Jun 2016 #2
27 dollars they can keep for themselves bravenak Jun 2016 #11
Ha! NurseJackie Jun 2016 #16
.... rbrnmw Jun 2016 #147
Today is just too much bravenak Jun 2016 #149
I know rbrnmw Jun 2016 #150
So you agree nothing is official until July 25thish? Joe the Revelator Jun 2016 #3
Hell naw I dont agree bravenak Jun 2016 #6
Tonight's announcement is merely a snapshot of where things stand CURRENTLY. randome Jun 2016 #7
True. But at this point in 2008, Bernie came out and endorsed President Obama and said the race was Jitter65 Jun 2016 #10
2016 =/= 2008 nt Joe the Revelator Jun 2016 #21
Mr integrity should be consistent though uponit7771 Jun 2016 #47
Superdelegate rules didn't change between 2008 & 2016. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #79
Nope Bernie only did that when Obama had clinched the majority of pledged delegates Vattel Jun 2016 #28
Bernie said nothing about pledged delegates when endorsing Obama. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #82
Because it had, Obama had the pledged delegates. Hillary doesn't. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #162
This message was self-deleted by its author WhollyHeretic Jun 2016 #194
Was this before or after Sanders dropped out of the running TimPlo Jun 2016 #29
A " beauty contest" MFM008 Jun 2016 #54
The first Democratic convention was in 1832 Joe the Revelator Jun 2016 #58
Nope, we never were doing that. bettyellen Jun 2016 #4
For real. I know I wasn't. This is just way more dumb than it was yesterday bravenak Jun 2016 #8
what language you be speakin? wendylaroux Jun 2016 #19
You sure be up my ying yang if you know what ah mean bravenak Jun 2016 #48
lol,I love it!!!! your such a bravenak,I do believe wendylaroux Jun 2016 #60
Since 1984, the Candidate won when supers + pledged delegates Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #5
I have no IDEA why he will not stop saying it to his supporters bravenak Jun 2016 #9
Because he needed something to keep true believers Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #14
Bus gonna back up over him when they find out bravenak Jun 2016 #18
Awwwww... Liberal Jesus Freak Jun 2016 #13
I made my resolution bravenak Jun 2016 #15
because he is jewish,we know bravey wendylaroux Jun 2016 #23
Oh bullshit I couldn't care less what race he is or religion. bravenak Jun 2016 #26
I love your posts,everyone does.,they are fascinating. wendylaroux Jun 2016 #31
I KNOW THAT, GAH! I'm the bomb. People save and track my posts all over the web cause they be bravenak Jun 2016 #36
I am just glad that you recognize your bad behavior was, in your own words, "unnecessary. Gore1FL Jun 2016 #37
Make YOUR OWN RESOLUTIONS bravenak Jun 2016 #43
I am just glad you are looking inside. Gore1FL Jun 2016 #62
Ain't that the truth! Cali_Democrat Jun 2016 #17
I mean, DAMN! bravenak Jun 2016 #20
For some reason there wasn't a peep about that from Bernie Sanders in June 2008, Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #22
He was a man tho bravenak Jun 2016 #27
There's a much more important factor than that. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #83
Quite tiresome bravenak Jun 2016 #97
+1 uponit7771 Jun 2016 #174
Lol. K&R. nt ecstatic Jun 2016 #24
Time to drink beer bravenak Jun 2016 #35
'cause you know BernieMath (TM) Hokie Jun 2016 #25
Shit shit shit!!!! bravenak Jun 2016 #30
That's the official lie from the Sanders campaign - straight from the horse's mouth. baldguy Jun 2016 #32
Aint got no sense bravenak Jun 2016 #38
Are you suggesting the convention rules are idiotic? nt Gore1FL Jun 2016 #33
Suggesting that the very idea that folks are switching to him is idiotic. bravenak Jun 2016 #39
We don't crown people here. Gore1FL Jun 2016 #61
The people spoke. She won. bravenak Jun 2016 #74
The delegates get to speak at the convention. Gore1FL Jun 2016 #101
And they will speak for HER. Not him. bravenak Jun 2016 #102
If yo are so sure of the outcome why do you want to short-circuit the process? nt Gore1FL Jun 2016 #104
The process has been THIS my entire life bravenak Jun 2016 #113
We've had conventions as long as I can remember. Gore1FL Jun 2016 #121
Never said we have not had them. Just that we have known the nominee. bravenak Jun 2016 #124
They always had a vote to make it official. Gore1FL Jun 2016 #126
Ok. And she will win that vote. So what difference does it make? bravenak Jun 2016 #128
It makes a very big difference. Gore1FL Jun 2016 #132
I actually makes no difference whatsoever bravenak Jun 2016 #134
So you support the outcome of Bush v Gore? Gore1FL Jun 2016 #137
Bush v Gore is history bravenak Jun 2016 #138
I support having the vote. Gore1FL Jun 2016 #142
We will have the vote bravenak Jun 2016 #143
Crowning would be giving the nomination to the loser. She won. She won my a huge margin lunamagica Jun 2016 #159
She'll win at the convention. Gore1FL Jun 2016 #185
It's all they have left. They don't really have any choice. They can either accept reality... TwilightZone Jun 2016 #34
I still think it's so scandalous bravenak Jun 2016 #40
To be honest, I could understand the motivation to some degree until it was noted that Sanders TwilightZone Jun 2016 #49
I understand it too bravenak Jun 2016 #55
Agreed. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #59
Wasn't aware KULawHawk Jun 2016 #41
AP called the race. BOOM. Done damn deal bravenak Jun 2016 #45
Thanks DWS. KULawHawk Jun 2016 #50
AP gets a vote now? Are they Super Duper delegates? nt Gore1FL Jun 2016 #63
The DNC did not change but clarified the rules last weekend Gothmog Jun 2016 #171
Put a lid on it, Bravenak, k8conant Jun 2016 #42
Try minding not tending out for a change bravenak Jun 2016 #44
Can you say that in understandable language? k8conant Jun 2016 #46
Here bravenak Jun 2016 #51
Then don't fling your Kool-Aid around so much. k8conant Jun 2016 #52
You still minding not tending bravenak Jun 2016 #53
Ever what you say... k8conant Jun 2016 #56
Yeah okay bravenak Jun 2016 #72
see post #35 melman Jun 2016 #65
The poster is flustered. Look at the random non sentences throughout this thread. Gore1FL Jun 2016 #66
No need for Hillary supporters to vote tomorrow. HooptieWagon Jun 2016 #57
BS will lose many of his superdelegates before July 25th... dubyadiprecession Jun 2016 #64
I think so too bravenak Jun 2016 #70
Seems pretty clear to me bravenak! BootinUp Jun 2016 #67
To me too! bravenak Jun 2016 #68
Why bother with this. She won. Wtf difference does it make what yodermon Jun 2016 #69
Why do they bother with the superdelegate nonsense? bravenak Jun 2016 #71
Brav...you are correct at the core! Sancho Jun 2016 #73
All those attacks sure were not gonna get him any support bravenak Jun 2016 #76
Your bang on . TheFarS1de Jun 2016 #75
The PROCESS has her over the threshold and the presumptive nominee bravenak Jun 2016 #78
Has it fully played out yet ? TheFarS1de Jun 2016 #84
It has played out enough to call the race bravenak Jun 2016 #85
So fuck the rules . TheFarS1de Jun 2016 #87
The RULES state that a candidate needs to hit 2383 this cycle. She did that. He cannot do that now. bravenak Jun 2016 #88
Have they held the convention ? TheFarS1de Jun 2016 #93
This is making me laugh my natural ass off bravenak Jun 2016 #95
Yes it is . TheFarS1de Jun 2016 #99
Same nominee no matter what. Cracks me up bravenak Jun 2016 #100
Legal processes . TheFarS1de Jun 2016 #106
Mere formality bravenak Jun 2016 #109
Are you secretly afraid of something? Gore1FL Jun 2016 #139
No bravenak Jun 2016 #144
Except that the rules are to wait. Gore1FL Jun 2016 #186
Are you secretly hoping that something magical Bobbie Jo Jun 2016 #175
Not at all. Gore1FL Jun 2016 #188
There is no DNC rule against counting super delegates Gothmog Jun 2016 #172
yup larkrake Jun 2016 #77
Yeah, but chill. Nobody's mind will be changed at DU or other online venues. The AP should've.... Hekate Jun 2016 #80
I know. I just had to get it out that one last time bravenak Jun 2016 #86
The AP wasn't going to sit on for a simple reason. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #107
I know they wanted the scoop. It's just that it fits the victimy Sanders narrative so well... Hekate Jun 2016 #111
DNC doing a survey of all SDs June 15 according to a BS delegate in Maryland robbedvoter Jun 2016 #81
That sounds good to me bravenak Jun 2016 #89
Yes. Fast Walker 52 Jun 2016 #90
What a sad state of affairs bravenak Jun 2016 #91
Did they vote yet? SheenaR Jun 2016 #92
They ARE NOT GOING TO VOTE FOR HIM bravenak Jun 2016 #94
Nowhere did I say they would SheenaR Jun 2016 #96
Superfluous bravenak Jun 2016 #98
If you think the convention is a superfluous, take it up with the DNC. nt Gore1FL Jun 2016 #103
Her comments: superfluous. bravenak Jun 2016 #114
I am glad you support the convention then. Gore1FL Jun 2016 #122
I support Hillary's convention, yes bravenak Jun 2016 #125
It might be hers. Gore1FL Jun 2016 #127
Are we still being rude about it? ThinkCritically Jun 2016 #105
You try it first and I may give it a go next week bravenak Jun 2016 #112
I'm always civil. ThinkCritically Jun 2016 #129
Spread it around to your comrades and I will totally notice and be nicey nicey bravenak Jun 2016 #130
Comrades? ThinkCritically Jun 2016 #131
Oh jesus christ! Give me a break! Terribly hilarious. bravenak Jun 2016 #133
Just trying to figure out if you're going to make the leap... ThinkCritically Jun 2016 #135
Break TOS how? This seems like a rude accusation bravenak Jun 2016 #136
I'm being civil, not polite. ThinkCritically Jun 2016 #140
Good for you bravenak Jun 2016 #146
Thanks. :) ThinkCritically Jun 2016 #148
tent shredders reddread Jun 2016 #180
Idiotic is calling a race the night before the largest state in the country votes. A shitbird move AzDar Jun 2016 #108
Not really bravenak Jun 2016 #116
Being the largest state doesn't mean CA decides the outcome. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #123
AMEN! chillfactor Jun 2016 #110
Sad we have to keep saying this.... bravenak Jun 2016 #117
Tell it, bravenak. Kang Colby Jun 2016 #115
His declarations change by the day bravenak Jun 2016 #119
I agree Gothmog Jun 2016 #173
Calm down, will you? Supers don't vote till July. bvf Jun 2016 #118
Reminds me of another rant I read somewhere. bvf Jun 2016 #120
A totally idiotic process, they should only be able to commit at the convention Logical Jun 2016 #141
Maybe they should. But it is what it is bravenak Jun 2016 #145
Those are the rules... leftinportland Jun 2016 #151
What is idiotic is pretending the supers will flip bravenak Jun 2016 #152
What is idiotic is pretending they are a determining factor leftinportland Jun 2016 #153
She also has the pledged delegate lead bravenak Jun 2016 #157
I wish people would cut the "Hillary cares about working-class women" out... but that hasn't ScreamingMeemie Jun 2016 #154
Meh. bravenak Jun 2016 #156
Sorry, but we will always disagree on that. ScreamingMeemie Jun 2016 #161
I am sorry to hear that you are out bravenak Jun 2016 #163
wow. I guess facts DON'T matter, do they. nilram Jun 2016 #155
Yes. That is why i posted this op bravenak Jun 2016 #158
They don't. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #160
Do too bravenak Jun 2016 #164
Nope. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #167
You'll see bravenak Jun 2016 #168
See what? They don't count until the convention. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #170
If they were going to swith they would have done it by now, while he vote was going on. lunamagica Jun 2016 #165
Agreed bravenak Jun 2016 #166
There is no requirement that anybody vote for anybody. pokerfan Jun 2016 #169
And the GE isn't decided in November. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #176
Bobby Kennedy, to use a phrase from Hillary berni_mccoy Jun 2016 #177
There are times in which your posts appear to be deliberately provocative. SujiwanKenobee Jun 2016 #178
Oh please bravenak Jun 2016 #179
Its a tantrum JoePhilly Jun 2016 #181
A lot of us never did rock Jun 2016 #182
Take it up with DWS if you need an earlier convention. n/t Orsino Jun 2016 #183
Even Sanders didn't think that in the last primary season (2008) George II Jun 2016 #184
Rules are rules. Even for Hillary. Marr Jun 2016 #187
Why do you hate Democracy? AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #189
Now I understand why you were given that time out before. Perogie Jun 2016 #190
Why are you posting on an op from monday just to lob an attack? It's OVER. Move on. Or dont. bravenak Jun 2016 #191
Some still are apparently. Ace Rothstein Jun 2016 #192
Seriously? That is just plain ridiculous bravenak Jun 2016 #193
 

randome

(34,845 posts)
7. Tonight's announcement is merely a snapshot of where things stand CURRENTLY.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:46 PM
Jun 2016

They're not likely to change, though, so you can keep praying for whatever 'miracles' you want.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]

 

Jitter65

(3,089 posts)
10. True. But at this point in 2008, Bernie came out and endorsed President Obama and said the race was
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:47 PM
Jun 2016

over. Just say'in.

Lord Magus

(1,999 posts)
79. Superdelegate rules didn't change between 2008 & 2016.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 10:45 PM
Jun 2016

If the counted before the convention in 08, they do now too.

Lord Magus

(1,999 posts)
82. Bernie said nothing about pledged delegates when endorsing Obama.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 10:48 PM
Jun 2016

He just said that the nominee had been chosen.

Response to Live and Learn (Reply #162)

MFM008

(19,803 posts)
54. A " beauty contest"
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 10:06 PM
Jun 2016

For 32 years they have gone into convention with the vote is a formality. That's NOT going to change for Sanders.

 

Joe the Revelator

(14,915 posts)
58. The first Democratic convention was in 1832
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 10:09 PM
Jun 2016

So the last 32 years....8 presidental cycles....two incumbent years....that makes 6Some of those were complete blowouts for the nomination.....so lets say at best 4...4 conventions....you think that sets precedent?

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
8. For real. I know I wasn't. This is just way more dumb than it was yesterday
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:46 PM
Jun 2016

Just gets dumber by the day. Be next January and folks gon still be talking bout superdelegates might switch.

wendylaroux

(2,925 posts)
60. lol,I love it!!!! your such a bravenak,I do believe
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 10:10 PM
Jun 2016

you are the most interesting person I have come across in all my years.

I mean that,yes I do.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
5. Since 1984, the Candidate won when supers + pledged delegates
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:44 PM
Jun 2016

Hit the number.
The Sanders rule was never the Norm.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
26. Oh bullshit I couldn't care less what race he is or religion.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:53 PM
Jun 2016

You all swear you have something you can repeat completely off topic t shut me up. NOT WORKING. And soon follwing me around and around and around repeating your ignored selves to my posts will get ya gone bye bye. Cause this is the very last time I'll respond to any of you alls nonsensical off topic ace in the hole crapola.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
36. I KNOW THAT, GAH! I'm the bomb. People save and track my posts all over the web cause they be
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:56 PM
Jun 2016

FASCINATED by me. Obsessed even. Ridiculous.

Gore1FL

(21,087 posts)
37. I am just glad that you recognize your bad behavior was, in your own words, "unnecessary.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:56 PM
Jun 2016

You should still probably not go out of your way to be obnoxious, however. Maybe make that resolution tonight.

Gore1FL

(21,087 posts)
62. I am just glad you are looking inside.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 10:12 PM
Jun 2016

Sometimes progress is slow. But buck up, at least you admit to bad behavior and are endeavoring to fix it.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
22. For some reason there wasn't a peep about that from Bernie Sanders in June 2008,
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:50 PM
Jun 2016

when he announced that he was supporting Obama as the presumed nominee, even before Hillary had conceded, and despite the fact that Hillary could still have won the nomination if Obama's superdelegates had flipped to her.

Lord Magus

(1,999 posts)
83. There's a much more important factor than that.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 10:50 PM
Jun 2016

He wasn't running against Bernie Sanders. That's Bernie's real objection to calling Hillary the nominee. If she's the nominee that means he isn't, and that's just not acceptable to him.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
102. And they will speak for HER. Not him.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:19 PM
Jun 2016

She has the majority. This keeps up his supers will flip to her

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
113. The process has been THIS my entire life
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:26 PM
Jun 2016

Yall the ones that want a brand new special way of doing things to wait on an indictment that aint never comin

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
124. Never said we have not had them. Just that we have known the nominee.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:36 PM
Jun 2016

During my lifetime. Same. Majority wins, sometimes they have a bunch of candidates and they work out deals. But in the last two person race, we knew way before the conventions. Weeks before, in fact.

Gore1FL

(21,087 posts)
132. It makes a very big difference.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:54 PM
Jun 2016

It comes across as much more honest when the rules are followed through completion.

For example, I wanted them to finish counting the vote in FL in 2000 rather than having Bush declared the winner.

Sorry if you disagree.

Gore1FL

(21,087 posts)
137. So you support the outcome of Bush v Gore?
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 12:02 AM
Jun 2016

That explains a lot.

Some of us appreciate the process. If you feel otherwise, write the DNC and ask them to skip the convention. I and the majority of the Democratic party look forward to the convention vote.

But please, your meltdown is amusing, so don't let fact and logic get in the way now!

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
143. We will have the vote
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 12:11 AM
Jun 2016

She will win. I have no idea why we cannot deal with that. She is running the convention because she is the nominee. The vote will happen. She will be officialized. Nothing changes.

lunamagica

(9,967 posts)
159. Crowning would be giving the nomination to the loser. She won. She won my a huge margin
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 02:47 AM
Jun 2016

Last edited Tue Jun 7, 2016, 03:42 AM - Edit history (1)

It has never happened, and it won't happen now.

TwilightZone

(25,418 posts)
34. It's all they have left. They don't really have any choice. They can either accept reality...
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:55 PM
Jun 2016

or stick with the narrative that Bernie is magically going to become the nominee at the convention.

Their history pretty much indicated which road they were going to take, no?

TwilightZone

(25,418 posts)
49. To be honest, I could understand the motivation to some degree until it was noted that Sanders
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 10:02 PM
Jun 2016

endorsed Obama well before the convention in 2008. At that point, his entire argument went out the window, and he just looks like a hypocrite.

And by "understand the motivation", I don't mean that I agree with it, only that I understand how some could see how the delegate process works and (wrongly) conclude that nothing happens in the primary process until the convention. Craziness at the convention is the seldom exception, of course, and certainly not the rule. It's usually just a coronation, to steal one of their favorite words.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
55. I understand it too
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 10:06 PM
Jun 2016

But we both see the selfishness that lies within these actions. Very difficult to pivot to the enemy when allies are trying to slapbox.

TwilightZone

(25,418 posts)
59. Agreed.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 10:09 PM
Jun 2016

Denial can be a very powerful motivator. I think we're going to find out a lot about Bernie Sanders in the next few days.

Gothmog

(144,844 posts)
171. The DNC did not change but clarified the rules last weekend
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 06:15 AM
Jun 2016


The Sanders claim that the DNC rules prohibit the counting of super delegates is false
 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
57. No need for Hillary supporters to vote tomorrow.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 10:08 PM
Jun 2016

It's s done deal. Hillarians, just stay home. No need to vote.

dubyadiprecession

(5,674 posts)
64. BS will lose many of his superdelegates before July 25th...
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 10:15 PM
Jun 2016

These superdelegates of his will not want to stay on the losing side. It just keeps getting worse for BS.

yodermon

(6,143 posts)
69. Why bother with this. She won. Wtf difference does it make what
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 10:30 PM
Jun 2016

we berniebros think or say at this point. Scoreboard.
Well winner privilege I guess

Sancho

(9,067 posts)
73. Brav...you are correct at the core!
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 10:38 PM
Jun 2016

The super delegate system may not be your cup of tea, but Bernie spent 30 years as an independent - but not contributing to the party. As supers are mostly colleagues, he started off behind. He personally pissed off most of the Democrats in Congress.

Then, they let him use the Democratic name to run for President. He responded by attacking the DNC and suing the DNC - after an investigation showed his staff stole data.
Then he complained or sued about half the state voting processes, and openly complained about the DNC Chair picked by President Obama. Then he criticized Obama.
All those DNC folks are also super delegates.

Now he wants the SDs to join his side??? Even SDs sympathy to his message don't like Bernie!


 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
76. All those attacks sure were not gonna get him any support
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 10:42 PM
Jun 2016

Everybody has done him a solid. He got to use the systems that the oldest party in the us has at it's disposal for his own attempt at a whitehouse run. I have never seen anything like this in my life in politics.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
78. The PROCESS has her over the threshold and the presumptive nominee
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 10:44 PM
Jun 2016

Seems like some folks want to nullify our votes and say fuck you to the democratic process and voters and party. Not cool

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
85. It has played out enough to call the race
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 10:58 PM
Jun 2016

Once she lapped him, it was done but here it is, 3 months past super tudsday and the AP called it. Time to come together like butt cheecks

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
88. The RULES state that a candidate needs to hit 2383 this cycle. She did that. He cannot do that now.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:09 PM
Jun 2016

She won. Time to knock this off.

TheFarS1de

(1,017 posts)
93. Have they held the convention ?
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:13 PM
Jun 2016

No ? Then no one has voted OFFICIALLY as yet . So it's basically rules are hard . Gotchya .

TheFarS1de

(1,017 posts)
106. Legal processes .
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:22 PM
Jun 2016

Still I can see why you would ignore them , rules are for the ruled . I am so glad you find the ever increasing disillusionment with governance such a humorous topic . Laugh a minute , especially with Trump in the wings .

Gore1FL

(21,087 posts)
139. Are you secretly afraid of something?
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 12:04 AM
Jun 2016

Why is it so difficult for you to wait for them to have the actual vote?

Gore1FL

(21,087 posts)
186. Except that the rules are to wait.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 08:54 PM
Jun 2016

Teh nominee gets the nomination at the convention. It's really cool.

Bobbie Jo

(14,341 posts)
175. Are you secretly hoping that something magical
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 06:52 AM
Jun 2016

is going to happen on the convention floor to sway delegates to Bernie??

I keep seeing people threaten, "see you at the convention," as if the sheer presence of Bernie supporters will be enough to bully the delegates into voting for him at the last damn minute??

It's just not going to happen, folks.

Gore1FL

(21,087 posts)
188. Not at all.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 08:56 PM
Jun 2016

I simply don't understand why there is such a rush to declare something as official that isn't going to happen for a while.

I don't celebrate my birthday until my birthday even though I know what age I will be before hand.


Not sure what the strident rush is all about.

Hekate

(90,496 posts)
80. Yeah, but chill. Nobody's mind will be changed at DU or other online venues. The AP should've....
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 10:46 PM
Jun 2016

....kept it to themselves until 24 hours from now, but the fact is the narrative from the Sanders campaign has been set in stone for quite some time: victimhood, stabbed in the back, rigged, any results not in BS favor is SIGH

His minions online are absolutely itching for a fistfight at the Convention. Are they Democrats? Were they EVER Democrats? Were they EVER going to work for a Dem nominee if not Bernie? Oy. With friends like these, who needs enemies?

Lord Magus

(1,999 posts)
107. The AP wasn't going to sit on for a simple reason.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:22 PM
Jun 2016

They're not the only ones who have the names and phone #'s of every superdelegate. If they didn't report it, some other outlet would've collected the same info and reported it.

Hekate

(90,496 posts)
111. I know they wanted the scoop. It's just that it fits the victimy Sanders narrative so well...
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:25 PM
Jun 2016

It's kind of aggravating.

robbedvoter

(28,290 posts)
81. DNC doing a survey of all SDs June 15 according to a BS delegate in Maryland
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 10:47 PM
Jun 2016

After primaries done, they need to have it all clear BEFORE the convention - which is not meant as a dog fight but a pageant meant to promote the party/candidates in the media.

SheenaR

(2,052 posts)
92. Did they vote yet?
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:11 PM
Jun 2016

No.

When do they vote? July.

Not that preposterous.

Must be some sort of Bernie sexist White Privilege logic I've got going on.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
94. They ARE NOT GOING TO VOTE FOR HIM
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:13 PM
Jun 2016

They do not want to vote for him. If they did, they would SAY SO.

SheenaR

(2,052 posts)
96. Nowhere did I say they would
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:16 PM
Jun 2016

The question you posed, I answered. They have not voted yet. This, people can still say that they have not voted yet and be correct.

 

AzDar

(14,023 posts)
108. Idiotic is calling a race the night before the largest state in the country votes. A shitbird move
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:24 PM
Jun 2016

that will prove to be disastrous....

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
116. Not really
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:27 PM
Jun 2016

Not disaster coming. Checked my crystal ball and tarot cards and the words on the wind.

Lord Magus

(1,999 posts)
123. Being the largest state doesn't mean CA decides the outcome.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:36 PM
Jun 2016

And nominees usually get chosen before the California primary. 08 was unusual for having CA on Super Tuesday instead of late on the schedule.

 

Kang Colby

(1,941 posts)
115. Tell it, bravenak.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:27 PM
Jun 2016

Last edited Tue Jun 7, 2016, 06:24 AM - Edit history (1)

My god have I enjoyed your posts this primary.

Bernie started some nonsense about Hillary needs a majority of delegates (SD+PD) using only pledged delegates. That's gotta be one of the dumbest things I've ever heard...wait that's not true...I did listen to a quarter of a Bernie speech once. Thankfully, CNN cut back to real news after a few minutes.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
119. His declarations change by the day
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:29 PM
Jun 2016

First supers should vote with the pledged. Then it was kinda quiet. Now they should vote based on polls six months out. Good grief! Does he believe this shit?

leftinportland

(247 posts)
151. Those are the rules...
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 01:15 AM
Jun 2016

Sorry you view the process as idiotic and nonsense...maybe you should start your own party.

leftinportland

(247 posts)
153. What is idiotic is pretending they are a determining factor
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 01:53 AM
Jun 2016

in deciding the nominee, not since 1984 have they played a role in determining the winner...
http://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2016/mar/22/debbie-wasserman-schultz/debbie-wasserman-schultz-says-superdelegates-never/

Clinton uses them to gain a psychological advantage...she did the same in 2008. Prior to 2008 they rarely got mentioned and played almost no role in the primary.

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
154. I wish people would cut the "Hillary cares about working-class women" out... but that hasn't
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 02:09 AM
Jun 2016

happened yet either. I know, it sucks.

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
161. Sorry, but we will always disagree on that.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 02:49 AM
Jun 2016

This isn't the party I have worked for for so many years. 13 years ago, many here called me a centrist... some even called me a freeper. Now, I'm a crazy far leftist because I won't lockstep behind a woman who basically has a "let them eat cake" mentality. Not one of my positions, ideals and beliefs have changed in that time. Sorry, bravenak. I wish you all the best, and I've enjoyed our many conversations, but you can have her. I'm out. I'm only sorry I let myself hope again.

Take care of yourself,

Laura

lunamagica

(9,967 posts)
165. If they were going to swith they would have done it by now, while he vote was going on.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 02:54 AM
Jun 2016

They have never gone against the will of the people, and they won't start now.

pokerfan

(27,677 posts)
169. There is no requirement that anybody vote for anybody.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 03:10 AM
Jun 2016

Every delegate with very few exceptions is free to make up his or her mind however they choose.

We talk a lot about so-called pledged delegates, but every delegate is expected to exercise independent judgment.

Also remember that pledged delegates in most states are not pledged.

There is no requirement that anybody vote for anybody. They're just like superdelegates.

SujiwanKenobee

(290 posts)
178. There are times in which your posts appear to be deliberately provocative.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 07:35 AM
Jun 2016

Do you relish getting people riled up on purpose like a swarm of fire ants? This attitude contributes to the division we're feeling whie you poke a stick at Bernie's people and bask in drawing those who support your positions. I don't see how there will be healing until this kind of incendiary thinking stops coming out through your fingers to the keyboard.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
179. Oh please
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 07:44 AM
Jun 2016

I notice people can't see any of the crap that their side engages in, and love to place full blame on me. Time to grow up and deal with people saying thing that upset you. I get insulted constantly on this forum, is it any wonder I gave up being diplomatic months ago? No. It is not.

If people ge riled up by me pointing out exactly what they are doing and mocking them? They can stop at any time. I don't save links to mess with people for being wrong. If a person gives up the idiocy, cool, they never hear from me or get offended by posts like this anymore. Th only people getting offended are the ones described in this op. And too bad for them caus I just dont feel one bit bad.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
191. Why are you posting on an op from monday just to lob an attack? It's OVER. Move on. Or dont.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 10:09 PM
Jun 2016

I'm moving on regardless.

Ace Rothstein

(3,139 posts)
192. Some still are apparently.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 10:13 PM
Jun 2016

They even started a new thread about it. I'm not sure if they are delusional or trolling.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Are we STILL doing this i...