There were reputable polls showing Hillary winning big in California,

[MoonRiver]

but they were rarely reported by the media. I'm not sure if this was due to blatant bias for Bernie, or the desire to keep things a horse race. Either way our media and/or pollsters can't be trusted. These "mistakes" have been happening throughout this primary.

[tonyt53]

1. The "news" needed news. The polls with her in a sizable lead made for a bad story.

[MoonRiver]

4. And that's why I can't trust the "news," regarding polling.

[metroins]

2. Ratings aka horse race

Same thing happened to Obama vs Romney and the same thing will happen to Clinton vs Trump.

[texstad79]

3. Expect more of the same in the GE

There will be plenty of crappy polls showing a horse race that the media will cherrypick. The final margin is likely to be close to double digits and the biggest Democratic landslide since 1964.

[Agnosticsherbet]

5. Reporting it's over does not sell advertisements. They wanted the horse race with tight finish.

But compared to 2008, it was never that close.

[Gothmog]

6. More than one poll had Clinton winning by 10 percent

[MoonRiver]

7. Yes and I remember being infuriated that only the ones showing them 2 pts. apart were reported.

Our media is a disgrace.

[democrattotheend]

8. Which polls?

Who were the pollsters?

[DemocratSinceBirth]

9. L A Times and Survey USA. The latter is a A rated pollster.

[geek tragedy]

10. "candidate comfortably ahead in last state to vote in primary where winner not in doubt"

doesn't make for a lot of page views.