Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,973 posts)
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 03:28 PM Jun 2016

The momentum argument is gone, so why is Bernie staying in the race?

What other reason does he have for taking "the fight to the convention?"

If he were worried about Hillary's sudden incapacity, he could simply suspend his campaign. But instead he's going to be trying to "persuade" the super delegates to reverse the outcome of the election, and the votes of the majority of pledged delegates.

Why? On what basis? Do national opinion polls count more than elections in his view?

89 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The momentum argument is gone, so why is Bernie staying in the race? (Original Post) pnwmom Jun 2016 OP
Ego? Doesn't like losing to a female candidate? nt LexVegas Jun 2016 #1
he's not campaigning to be the nominee anymore, he signaled that last geek tragedy Jun 2016 #2
I did not hear that Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #20
he didn't mention the nomination. nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #23
But that's why he is trying to flip the supers. n/t pnwmom Jun 2016 #28
he's not trying to flip them. he isn't calling any. geek tragedy Jun 2016 #29
interesting development today. drray23 Jun 2016 #80
That's good news. Hopefully they can work it out. n/t pnwmom Jun 2016 #81
What does going to the convention mean? Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #77
Platform, process reform etc nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #79
It's true. He is maximizing earned votes and delegates even though he cannot win. It's simple. aikoaiko Jun 2016 #69
To drive you crazy AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #3
He wants to have a greater say in the platform. CaliforniaPeggy Jun 2016 #4
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #5
Because he values doing the right thing. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2016 #6
He is not doing the right thing Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #21
Indeed. He's doing the wrong thing Stuckinthebush Jun 2016 #66
I do not know what is up with Sanders. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #74
because his ego will not accept reality. because he is not and never has been a team player. etc nt msongs Jun 2016 #65
He can't handle losing? His ego is yuuuge? He thinks he can BreakfastClub Jun 2016 #7
"The fight" is not for the nomination. morningfog Jun 2016 #8
Let's hope that's all it is. NurseJackie Jun 2016 #13
Until he formally concedes it would wouldn't make sense to morningfog Jun 2016 #58
If he does not suspend or concede Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #25
Actually it's exactly the place for it. Scootaloo Jun 2016 #32
In modern times, the convention is for the party to promote its nominee as chosen in the primaries Yavin4 Jun 2016 #60
Actually it is not Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #76
Not quite sure why Clinton's progressives hate Bernie's platform so much Scootaloo Jun 2016 #78
for the same reason some people see Don Quixote as a fool. Voice for Peace Jun 2016 #85
Just to piss off all the Hill-Bullies. John Poet Jun 2016 #9
It's difficult to know for sure. I believe many of the theories that have been shared ... NurseJackie Jun 2016 #10
Oh, I've seen all sorts of "awesome" theories from you and yours. Which ones in particular? Scootaloo Jun 2016 #33
Clearly, he was denying reality for quite a while... anotherproletariat Jun 2016 #11
He promised to fight for every last vote democrattotheend Jun 2016 #12
yep, I think people are a little too primed to see geek tragedy Jun 2016 #26
I'm not all that concerned by his staying in the race until DC has voted onenote Jun 2016 #14
I agree. Finish D.C. and then move on together. But he seemed so furious pnwmom Jun 2016 #17
He wears his emotions on his sleeve. Maybe not the best thing, but given last night's results onenote Jun 2016 #18
The Liberal, Progressive cause is bigger than Hillary or Bernie. That's why he's staying. kpola12 Jun 2016 #15
It's also bigger than Bernie. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #16
If Trump gets elected Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #27
FBI potentialities. If that admittedly unlikely shoe drops AntiBank Jun 2016 #19
Merely suspending his campaign would allow for any sudden withdrawal. pnwmom Jun 2016 #22
Staying in means a lot psychologically in terms of power projection AntiBank Jun 2016 #36
It isn't "how the game is played." What other candidate who has lost pnwmom Jun 2016 #44
Bernie resists convention when he has a cause. aikoaiko Jun 2016 #71
Refusing to suspend his campaign doesn't actually make him more likely to get the nom if the... Lord Magus Jun 2016 #34
certainly doesn't hurt it AntiBank Jun 2016 #37
It actually could. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #40
one man's destruction is another redemption AntiBank Jun 2016 #50
Because of this? MoonRiver Jun 2016 #24
He needs money that was another reason Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #30
I know... he should be loading up on that sweet, sweet Goldman cash... Raster Jun 2016 #39
Elections are expensive Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #75
REALLY, Nader? You don't think those 200,000 registered Florida Dems... Raster Jun 2016 #84
This kind of stuff coming from him is what makes it really hard for me to heal and let it go. boston bean Jun 2016 #31
It could be "drama deficiency anemia." immoderate Jun 2016 #47
Gee we just haven't had enough of threads asking DU to read Sanders' mind as an excuse merrily Jun 2016 #35
Agreed. Passive aggression is for cowards. QC Jun 2016 #41
DC MFM008 Jun 2016 #38
What other reason could there be but to piss you off? immoderate Jun 2016 #42
are you that blind? the momentum has just begun larkrake Jun 2016 #43
national polls have Bernie ahead, you mean dem polls larkrake Jun 2016 #45
That's what I'm saying. He seems to think those polls count more than elections. n/t pnwmom Jun 2016 #46
There is one more primary and he said the people in DC have the right to vote Armstead Jun 2016 #48
Are you really looking for an answer? HumanityExperiment Jun 2016 #49
Doesn't the winner of the campaign normally get to write the platform? pnwmom Jun 2016 #51
winner...winner...chicken dinner... HumanityExperiment Jun 2016 #55
"true power" sounds an awful lot like male strutting and bullying when you put it that way. n/t pnwmom Jun 2016 #56
people power HumanityExperiment Jun 2016 #61
The voters exercised "people power," but the losing side wants to overrule them. pnwmom Jun 2016 #62
'entitled' HumanityExperiment Jun 2016 #64
Winning by 4 million votes is people power. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #67
was I referring to the nomination process? HumanityExperiment Jun 2016 #72
This is about a revolution to remake the Democratic party. It was never ONLY about the White House davidn3600 Jun 2016 #52
Remake the party? Why doesn't he just start his own? lanlady Jun 2016 #63
+1000 -nt- Lord Magus Jun 2016 #68
So are you a Jacksonian Democrat? Scootaloo Jun 2016 #86
You do realize, of course, that Senator Sanders is the founder of the Congressional Progressive.. Raster Jun 2016 #88
Personal pride or he wants trump to win? what else could it be? MariaThinks Jun 2016 #53
He didn't say anything about trying to flip supers last night. He said, "the struggle continues". highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #54
He's going to back Hillary for president herding cats Jun 2016 #57
A LOT of people voted for him, and his ideas should be represented. Atman Jun 2016 #59
I find it rather offensive when the choice of over 16 million voters is called a corontation. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #70
I find it rather offensive when the will of millions is dismissed. Atman Jun 2016 #73
Dismissing the will of millions is what you're doing. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #89
Its a secret plan, aimed at pissing off jerky, sore winner types, and.. jack_krass Jun 2016 #82
He has 315,711,000 reasons Voice for Peace Jun 2016 #83
To tick you off. Good for him. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #87
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
2. he's not campaigning to be the nominee anymore, he signaled that last
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 03:29 PM
Jun 2016

night.

it's about a movement now, apparently.

but he's stopped campaigning against Clinton and is resigned to her being the nominee

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
29. he's not trying to flip them. he isn't calling any.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 04:08 PM
Jun 2016

his only meeting with a super delegate is Obama, and that's to broker his ending of his campaign

drray23

(7,627 posts)
80. interesting development today.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 11:36 PM
Jun 2016

His campaign was supposed to be sending a letter to delegates to attempt to convince them to flip. They did not do it. It was postponed. That might be a sign he is attempting to land his campaign, hence the meeting with the president and harry reid tomorrow.

Demsrule86

(68,539 posts)
77. What does going to the convention mean?
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 11:35 PM
Jun 2016

I am glad he did not send out the letters asking the supers to switch today. That is a good sign.

aikoaiko

(34,165 posts)
69. It's true. He is maximizing earned votes and delegates even though he cannot win. It's simple.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 06:24 PM
Jun 2016


We see how his opponent lords ever net vote and delegate as more evidence of her agenda. By the same rationale, Bernie can and is trying to minimize the impact of her lead in the battle of agendas.

Response to pnwmom (Original post)

Demsrule86

(68,539 posts)
21. He is not doing the right thing
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 04:03 PM
Jun 2016

He lost and needs to concede and endorse...there is no point to his behavior...spite and anger.

Stuckinthebush

(10,843 posts)
66. Indeed. He's doing the wrong thing
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 05:28 PM
Jun 2016

If he is interested in advancing his agenda, working to unify the party, and working to beat the true evil Trump.

This game has gone on long enough and he is losing support fast.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
8. "The fight" is not for the nomination.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 03:34 PM
Jun 2016

He seems to be intending to stay in through DC next week and then take "the fight" to the convention in the form of his delegates and platform. I would bet money that he no longer contests at the convention. He wants to be able to say, I think, that he ran the entire race, won over 11 million votes, XXXX pledged delegates and his supporters should be heard. Not that he should be the nominee.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
13. Let's hope that's all it is.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 03:42 PM
Jun 2016


He's not unintelligent, but I think he can be a bit short-sighted at times, and neglects to look around his immediate circumstances to see the broader picture and to directly acknowledge what's going on right around him.

It really is a shame that he chose to gloss over and skim past Hillary's historic nomination. It will be many years before we know for sure, but I suspect that the history books of the future will not overlook that small, but meaningful, detail.

Maybe he'll manage to pull it off and find a way to come out of this smelling like a rose, but I continue to have my doubts.
 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
58. Until he formally concedes it would wouldn't make sense to
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 05:01 PM
Jun 2016

congratulate her on the nomination. Hillary didn't congratulate Obama on his historic presumptive nomination status until she endorsed him.

Yavin4

(35,432 posts)
60. In modern times, the convention is for the party to promote its nominee as chosen in the primaries
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 05:02 PM
Jun 2016

It's a four night political ad for the party with the final night for the nominee.

Demsrule86

(68,539 posts)
76. Actually it is not
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 11:34 PM
Jun 2016

One vote then out he goes if he has not conceded and endorsed. No speech and no platform.

 

Voice for Peace

(13,141 posts)
85. for the same reason some people see Don Quixote as a fool.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 11:58 PM
Jun 2016

I just watched this clip again and it made me weep. I had forgotten the ending.

I wanted to post it everywhere and say hey everyone, see, this is why Bernie's followers can't walk away. (Sophia Loren nails it.)

But then I remembered.. people think DQ was a fool. Some do. Lots don't. Peter O'Toole got it.



NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
10. It's difficult to know for sure. I believe many of the theories that have been shared ...
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 03:37 PM
Jun 2016

... previously may be on the right track.

 

anotherproletariat

(1,446 posts)
11. Clearly, he was denying reality for quite a while...
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 03:38 PM
Jun 2016

When looking at his reactions last night, and of many of his supporters this morning, you see utter shock at the defeat. I do not know how anyone can be surprised at a fate that was all but sealed on March 15. Part of this is because Sanders tried to keep his campaign going by instilling false hope in his supporters so they would continue to contribute to him as well as show up at his rallies. I really think he believed that the tide was going to turn, and miraculously a majority of people were going to put him over the top.

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
12. He promised to fight for every last vote
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 03:42 PM
Jun 2016

And that is what he is doing. I am glad to see him give voters in DC some attention. Even though it's right there where they work, national politicians rarely stump for votes in DC.

I would like to see Hillary hold an event there too for DC voters, just to send the message that the party still values their votes.

After the DC primary, which I expect Hillary to win handily, I predict Bernie will concede. At the very least, he will not continue to criticize Hillary - he did not do so last night in his speech.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
26. yep, I think people are a little too primed to see
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 04:05 PM
Jun 2016

hostility from the other's camp

he's winding down, not immediately standing down, and people see this is as intransigence instead of cooling off

onenote

(42,685 posts)
14. I'm not all that concerned by his staying in the race until DC has voted
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 03:45 PM
Jun 2016

But within a week after that, he should be signaling that he is suspending his campaign and engaging in discussions with the Clinton campaign and DNC about how they can all fruitfully work together to consider platform changes acceptable to both sides and move forward into the general election season ready to defeat Donald Trump and regain control of the Senate and House.

onenote

(42,685 posts)
18. He wears his emotions on his sleeve. Maybe not the best thing, but given last night's results
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 03:59 PM
Jun 2016

I'm willing to give him some time to step back and, hopefully, view the big picture and the fact that he now has the opportunity to move from outsider to leader within the Senate Democratic caucus if he gets on board and uses his campaign's resources (mailing lists etc) as well as his bully pulpit -- to support Democratic Senate candidates, even those with whom he doesn't necessarily see eye to eye on all issues.

TwilightZone

(25,456 posts)
16. It's also bigger than Bernie.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 03:48 PM
Jun 2016

I know this may come as a shock, but most Democrats have been fighting for liberal, progressive causes for decades. This isn't our first rodeo.

Demsrule86

(68,539 posts)
27. If Trump gets elected
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 04:06 PM
Jun 2016

there won't be a liberal , progressive cause...not with five picks for the courts. Bernie needs to stop feeling sorry for himself and move on.

 

AntiBank

(1,339 posts)
19. FBI potentialities. If that admittedly unlikely shoe drops
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 04:02 PM
Jun 2016

he doesn't want to get "Bidened" by the Dem potentates. That and he wants a fair say in the platorm.

pnwmom

(108,973 posts)
22. Merely suspending his campaign would allow for any sudden withdrawal.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 04:04 PM
Jun 2016

And how does "fighting" Hillary's nomination all the way to the convention help him get a fairer say in the platform?

 

AntiBank

(1,339 posts)
36. Staying in means a lot psychologically in terms of power projection
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 04:13 PM
Jun 2016

if Clinton was recommended for indictment. As for the platform, his concession is a bargaining chip. Love it or hate it, that's the way the game is played.

pnwmom

(108,973 posts)
44. It isn't "how the game is played." What other candidate who has lost
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 04:23 PM
Jun 2016

by millions of votes, and hundreds of pledged delegates, has gone on fighting to the convention? Instead of conceding and joining the fight against the other side?

Lord Magus

(1,999 posts)
34. Refusing to suspend his campaign doesn't actually make him more likely to get the nom if the...
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 04:11 PM
Jun 2016

...indictment fairy actually does show up.

Lord Magus

(1,999 posts)
40. It actually could.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 04:17 PM
Jun 2016

If Bernie is perceived as trying to destroy the Democratic Party, they're certainly not going to give him the nomination even if Hillary somehow ceases to be an option.

Demsrule86

(68,539 posts)
30. He needs money that was another reason
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 04:08 PM
Jun 2016

Thanks...when I see him bleeding these kids some of whom are unemployed, it makes me literally sick. I don't care how many times BSSers tell me how 'ethical' Bernie is , I don't believe it.

Raster

(20,998 posts)
39. I know... he should be loading up on that sweet, sweet Goldman cash...
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 04:16 PM
Jun 2016

...you know, like the other candidate.

Demsrule86

(68,539 posts)
75. Elections are expensive
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 11:32 PM
Jun 2016

And it is thanks to a Nader spoiler that we got George Bush and United which forces all candidates to raise money...Bernie could not name one instance where Hil helped out Goldman's...Bernie would have had to raise cash for the general too...of course, he does not now...but he spent a great deal of money and is in debt. I heard he has to pay for the Vatican trip out of his own pocket.

Raster

(20,998 posts)
84. REALLY, Nader? You don't think those 200,000 registered Florida Dems...
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 11:54 PM
Jun 2016

...that voted for Bush* had anything to do with it?

That $750,000 Goldman cash is for services to be rendered.

boston bean

(36,220 posts)
31. This kind of stuff coming from him is what makes it really hard for me to heal and let it go.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 04:08 PM
Jun 2016

But I am trying! Really, I am trying!

merrily

(45,251 posts)
35. Gee we just haven't had enough of threads asking DU to read Sanders' mind as an excuse
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 04:13 PM
Jun 2016

for Hillary supporters to take a pointless, vapid pot shot at him.


None of you is hurting his feelings. None of you is changing a single mind, not a poster's, not a lurkers. None of you is impressing anyone over 11. You are not unifying the party against him. You are just looking desperate to be low.

Yet again.

QC

(26,371 posts)
41. Agreed. Passive aggression is for cowards.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 04:19 PM
Jun 2016

I have much more respect for those who just come right out with the snark and venom than those who try to pretty it up with an unconvincing display of naivete and concern.

 

larkrake

(1,674 posts)
43. are you that blind? the momentum has just begun
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 04:23 PM
Jun 2016

5 of his candidates won yesterday
You still think this was about the presidency- well, bless your heart

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
48. There is one more primary and he said the people in DC have the right to vote
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 04:29 PM
Jun 2016

And he's not a quitter. You can admire or dislike that about him. But he wants to at least make sure the significant share of people who voted for m him are not unrepresented at the convention.

pnwmom

(108,973 posts)
51. Doesn't the winner of the campaign normally get to write the platform?
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 04:42 PM
Jun 2016

Or does that only apply to male winners?

In what other elections has the 2nd place finisher felt this degree of entitlement?

Because, as you know, Bernie already has 5 spots on the platform committee -- one less than Hillary. This is five more than any other 2nd placer has ever had.

And I still don't see what this has to do with fighting to flip super delegates.

 

HumanityExperiment

(1,442 posts)
55. winner...winner...chicken dinner...
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 04:48 PM
Jun 2016

people power... those energized rally goers, the ones that HRC supporters dismissed... This is how true power is displayed and now you are recognizing the beginnings of the results of that power

THIS 'Because, as you know, Bernie already has 5 spots on the platform committee -- one less than Hillary. This is five more than any other 2nd placer has ever had.'

I get it, you're inability to recognize that taking this fight to the convention matter, that article explains it, take another moment to re-read... it will sink in, I am sure you understand how Bernie is going to 'lock in' whomever is the nominee of the party to specific principles based upon the platform


 

HumanityExperiment

(1,442 posts)
61. people power
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 05:08 PM
Jun 2016

to be dismissive of the millions that voted for and support Bernie is called what again?

Let's re-frame your point shall we...

pnwmom

(108,973 posts)
62. The voters exercised "people power," but the losing side wants to overrule them.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 05:16 PM
Jun 2016

That's not 'people power" -- that's bullying.

 

HumanityExperiment

(1,442 posts)
64. 'entitled'
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 05:20 PM
Jun 2016

you're entitled to your own perception but your not entitled to your own facts...

the article clearly points out what's at stake in what's important to this movement, and how this movement will get that accomplished

energized people are making DEM establishment respond, proof is already on display by the amount of seats given to Bernie... more is to come

Lord Magus

(1,999 posts)
67. Winning by 4 million votes is people power.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 06:20 PM
Jun 2016

Just because Bernie's supporters are more likely to be part of a crowd of "energized rally goers" doesn't mean they're more important than the larger number of people who voted for Hillary. And just because Bernie has been given an unprecedented degree of input into the platform for a 2nd place finisher doesn't mean it's reasonable for him to demand still more concessions.

 

HumanityExperiment

(1,442 posts)
72. was I referring to the nomination process?
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 06:34 PM
Jun 2016

'Just because Bernie's supporters are more likely to be part of a crowd of "energized rally goers" doesn't mean they're more important than the larger number of people who voted for Hillary.'

The article I linked and the reaction of the DNC says otherwise

'doesn't mean it's reasonable for him to demand still more concessions'

we will have to agree to disagree on that last point you posted... suffice it to say that the convention is going to be fun to watch

 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
52. This is about a revolution to remake the Democratic party. It was never ONLY about the White House
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 04:42 PM
Jun 2016

The party's rigged primary system must change so outsiders have chance without having to kiss ass to rich, corrupt party insiders.

The old guard is dying. It's time for millennials to start making their mark.

The fact our DNC chairwoman is literally in bed with payday predatory lenders says it all. This party is a joke. Everything it claims to be, it is not. These people in the establishment don't give a fuck about the working class. They are bought and paid for. And those days will come to an end.

The polls are clear on both sides of the political spectrum....the status quo is no longer desirable. D.C. needs a shake-up. We need something different. Hillary is not different. She's more of the same.

lanlady

(7,133 posts)
63. Remake the party? Why doesn't he just start his own?
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 05:17 PM
Jun 2016

He's been sitting on the sidelines for years, voting to rename post offices and other low-level activity. He's never been associated with any populist causes. Has he even written one editorial in his life? Made any sort of noteworthy speech outside of Vermont in the years prior to his campaign? Please explain to me what in the heck he's been doing for the past 74 years that he wants to "remake" a political party that he only joined last year.

Pardon me for thinking he's just a scold and a lazy opportunist. He has no right in an election year to throw bombs at MY party.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
86. So are you a Jacksonian Democrat?
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 12:04 AM
Jun 2016

'Cause the party has changed a lot, and has done so several times since the 1830's when it first took the big political stage. it's been remade again and again. Sometimes for the better, sometimes for the worse.

Raster

(20,998 posts)
88. You do realize, of course, that Senator Sanders is the founder of the Congressional Progressive..
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 12:40 AM
Jun 2016

...Caucus, one of the oldest and largest Caucuses in Congress? Nah, I bet you didn't, judging by the highly erroneous crap you spewing.

Take a look below at the company he keeps and EDUCATE YOURSELF at the work they have done.

And just maybe, instead of taking the David Brock slander as gospel, you might actually realize your own opinion, not some campaign, regurgitated slush.

YOUR PARTY??? Indeed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Progressive_Caucus

Background
The CPC is committed to government of the people, by the people, and for the people. Their policy agenda is rooted in four core principles: (1) fighting for economic justice and security in the U.S. and global economies; (2) protecting and preserving civil rights and civil liberties; (3) promoting global peace and security; and (4) strengthening environmental protection and energy independence. Their fundamental fairness plan reflects national priorities that are consistent with the values, needs, and hopes of all Americans, not just the powerful and the privileged. Accordingly, the CPC also advocates "universal access to affordable, high quality healthcare", fair trade agreements, living wage laws, the right of all workers to organize into labor unions and engage in collective bargaining, the abolition of the USA PATRIOT Act, the legalization of same-sex marriage, US participation in international treaties such as the climate change related Kyoto Accords, strict campaign finance reform laws, a crackdown on corporate welfare and influence, an increase in income tax rates on upper-middle and upper class households, tax cuts for the poor, and an increase in welfare spending by the federal government.

Legislative history
The Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) was established in 1991 by six members of the United States House of Representatives: U.S. Representatives Ron Dellums (D-CA), Lane Evans (D-IL), Thomas Andrews (D-ME), Peter DeFazio (D-OR), Maxine Waters (D-CA), and Bernie Sanders (I-VT). Additional House Members joined soon thereafter, including Major Owens (D-NY), Nydia Velázquez (D-NY), David Bonior (D-MI), Bob Filner (D-CA), Barney Frank (D-MA), Maurice Hinchey (D-NY), Jim McDermott (D-WA), Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), Patsy Mink (D-HI), George Miller (D-CA), Pete Stark (D-CA), John Olver (D-MA), Lynn Woolsey (D-CA), and Nancy Pelosi (D-CA). Then-U.S. Representative Bernie Sanders was the convener and first CPC Chairman. Bill Goold served as Staff Coordinator for the Progressive Caucus in its early years until 1998.


 

highprincipleswork

(3,111 posts)
54. He didn't say anything about trying to flip supers last night. He said, "the struggle continues".
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 04:46 PM
Jun 2016

That it does.

The struggle to represent the people Bernie inspired, who are only fighting for traditional Democratic values, as well as the existing Clinton supporters.

The struggle to make sure the Democratic Party is really one for the people.

All that can be easily done, unless the Democratic Party doesn't want to do it. In any case, the case for this is being presented by Bernie, and he is taking that at the very least to the convention.

herding cats

(19,558 posts)
57. He's going to back Hillary for president
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 04:57 PM
Jun 2016

Listen to his speech last night. He didn't lay one dig on Hillary, only Trump.


He said:
"Our campaign from day one has understood some very basic points and that is first, we will not allow right-wing Republicans to control our government.

And that is especially true with Donald Trump as the Republican candidate.

The American people, in my view, will never support a candidate whose major theme is bigotry…who insults Mexicans, who insults…

… who insults Muslims and women, and African-Americans. We will not allow Donald Trump to become president of the United States."


Yes, he also said he they were going fight hard to win DC. Which is understandable if he's trying to keep his people engaged.

The wording of this statement is important I think:
"And then, we take our fight for social, economic, racial and environmental justice to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania."

Notice how he didn't say the fight for the nomination? Just the issues that matter to his supporters.

Then he went on to lay the groundwork to reconciling with the Democratic Party.

He said:
"Tonight, I had a very kind call from President Obama, and I look forward to working with him to make sure that we move this country forward.

And tonight, I had a very gracious call from Secretary Clinton and congratulated her on her victories tonight. Our fight is to transform this country and to understand — and to understand that we are in this together.

To understand that all of what we believe is what the majority of the American people believe."


It sounded like a speech by a politician who has accepted their loss, but is still trying to keep his supporters engaged and active in the process. He's letting his supporters adjust to the change, but he knows the primary race is over. He just doesn't want them to think he's not going to work toward the same goals for them as best he can, just not as the Democratic candidate for president.

In the end it's boils down to what he said about understanding we're all in this together, which was a nod to Hillary's we're stronger together, I believe.

I feel he's going to support Hillary after hearing that speech last night, and I wasn't that sure he was going to before it.

Atman

(31,464 posts)
59. A LOT of people voted for him, and his ideas should be represented.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 05:02 PM
Jun 2016

Hillary is a Wall Street darling, and most people understand that she has tons of political baggage. Bernie is just trying to be a voice for the millions of people who feel left out of the corporate media coronation process.

I will back Hillary, I will work for Hillary, I will vote for Hillary. But I really, really would have liked to see America break the chain of oligarchy. Bernie is right to stress that point.

Lord Magus

(1,999 posts)
70. I find it rather offensive when the choice of over 16 million voters is called a corontation.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 06:25 PM
Jun 2016

I believe the proper term is election.

Atman

(31,464 posts)
73. I find it rather offensive when the will of millions is dismissed.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 08:35 PM
Jun 2016

You have to admit, this is a coronation. Hillary should not ever been in such a tight race. She was the media/corporate pick from day one. It's embarrassing that the cranky old man from Vermont have her such a run. She didn't whittle it down from a field of seventeen -- she was the presumptive nominee from the very beginning. Bernie Sanders has every right to hold her feet to the fire.

Lord Magus

(1,999 posts)
89. Dismissing the will of millions is what you're doing.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 12:49 AM
Jun 2016

Over 16 million people voted for Hillary. That's not a coronation, it's an election. The candidate with 12 million votes doesn't beat the candidate with 16 million.

And this hasn't been a tight race. Just because it wasn't an over-on-Super-Tuesday demolition like many primaries have been in the past doesn't mean it was tight. That's the disconnect that many Bernie supporters seem to have. You think it was close, but the math says it wasn't.

 

jack_krass

(1,009 posts)
82. Its a secret plan, aimed at pissing off jerky, sore winner types, and..
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 11:44 PM
Jun 2016

From the looks of this place its working exactly as expected.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The momentum argument is ...