Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

wyldwolf

(43,867 posts)
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 07:44 PM Jun 2016

Hey Hillary, one of these women needs to be your VP

Hillary Clinton smashed a giant glass ceiling June 7 when she became the presumptive nominee for the Democratic Party. She is now the first woman to lead a major party ticket in the United States. But why stop there?

That’s right people, the feminist fun has only begun. With Clinton as a lock for the Democratic nominee, it’s only fitting we turn to her running mate. And as Nancy Pelosi recently suggested, having an all-female ticket would be, well, awesome.

So we’ve rounded up five kick-ass women who would all be excellent vice presidents, if Clinton's elected. It does read a little like a list of perennial female favorites, but hey, with only 20% representation in Congress, there’s not a lot of female politicians to choose from.

Here’s hoping Hillary — or one of these five women — can help change that...

5. Kamala Harris

As the first female African-American and Indian-American attorney general in California, Harris is no stranger to breaking barriers. And she could probably help Clinton break down a few of her own: Harris's work on both immigration reform and the Black Lives Matter movement prove she could definitely help Clinton on social justice issues.

Harris earned accolades for her work on women's rights as attorney general, and even picked up a few big-name endorsements along the way. Cory Booker — who has been floated as a potential VP pick himself — says he "reveres" her.

The only thing keeping Harris from topping our list is her relative lack of experience. She's yet to serve in Congress, which is the generally accepted training ground for higher office. But she just scored first place in the California's U.S. Senate primary, showing enthusiasm for her in a national position. We're sure California wouldn't mind if we borrowed her for four years, right?

More:

http://www.revelist.com/politics/hillary-vp-picks/2866/kamala-harris/1

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hey Hillary, one of these women needs to be your VP (Original Post) wyldwolf Jun 2016 OP
my bet = experienced hispanic male (not a lightweight like that juan castro) nt msongs Jun 2016 #1
No. Way. TheCowsCameHome Jun 2016 #2
I know. TWO OF THEM!#### After 240 years of men!!! Just men!!!# nt msanthrope Jun 2016 #8
What a terrific Op. I rejected two women ticket at first, then considered. Anyone who won't vote seabeyond Jun 2016 #3
Senators and a senator candidate???? longship Jun 2016 #4
re: "Least of all Warren whose seat could flip to GOP with the MA GOP governor. " thesquanderer Jun 2016 #5
Well, Harry Reid has no sway in MA election law. longship Jun 2016 #22
I agree. okasha Jun 2016 #7
Massachusetts would have a special election mythology Jun 2016 #20
Yup! We learned not to take out a Dem MA Senator! longship Jun 2016 #21
Horrible idea to have a female VP. woolldog Jun 2016 #6
How would two women not be balanced? Does a penis provide balance? nt msanthrope Jun 2016 #9
Yes exactly. woolldog Jun 2016 #12
Kinda a tripod thing? You still haven't explained how two women would be msanthrope Jun 2016 #14
Balanced in terms of gender woolldog Jun 2016 #16
Indeed...so 240 years of two penises per ticket was balanced? nt msanthrope Jun 2016 #17
No it was not. woolldog Jun 2016 #19
. PeaceNikki Jun 2016 #13
Why you...you...neandrethal - what are you thinking????. TheCowsCameHome Jun 2016 #10
Of the 5. Chan790 Jun 2016 #11
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #15
No poaching Kamala! Starry Messenger Jun 2016 #18
younger/Latino or Latina Florencenj2point0 Jun 2016 #23
 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
3. What a terrific Op. I rejected two women ticket at first, then considered. Anyone who won't vote
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 07:57 PM
Jun 2016

for a two woman ticket won't vote for one, so screw it. The power of a two woman ticket would be incredibly fun. Now, I am all on board and would love it. Glad this conversation is being had.

longship

(40,416 posts)
4. Senators and a senator candidate????
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 08:01 PM
Jun 2016

I have an idea. Let's not strip the US Senate of one of its prominent -- and very few -- women.

Least of all Warren whose seat could flip to GOP with the MA GOP governor.

What are you people thinking?

We need to take the US Senate back, not gut it.

thesquanderer

(11,970 posts)
5. re: "Least of all Warren whose seat could flip to GOP with the MA GOP governor. "
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 08:42 PM
Jun 2016

there was an article recently about how Harry Reid found a way to probably be able to maneuver around that.

longship

(40,416 posts)
22. Well, Harry Reid has no sway in MA election law.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 03:13 AM
Jun 2016

Upon a Senate vacancy, MA would have a special election, and we know how those things turn out in MA.

Leave Elizabeth Warren alone!!

okasha

(11,573 posts)
7. I agree.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 08:52 PM
Jun 2016

I don't want any Democrat taken out of either House until we have at least a majority on that side of the Capitol.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
20. Massachusetts would have a special election
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 09:38 PM
Jun 2016

Granted last time that gave us Scott Brown, but I think we learned from that experience.

longship

(40,416 posts)
21. Yup! We learned not to take out a Dem MA Senator!
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 03:07 AM
Jun 2016

Any other conclusion would mean that the lesson wasn't learned very well.

My best to you.

 

woolldog

(8,791 posts)
6. Horrible idea to have a female VP.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 08:45 PM
Jun 2016

She needs a balanced ticket. In order to win, Clinton needs to keep her margin of loss among male voters respectable. A dual female ticket would hurt that goal.

 

woolldog

(8,791 posts)
16. Balanced in terms of gender
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 09:21 PM
Jun 2016

Should also be balanced in terms of age (i.e. Someone a lot younger), balanced geographically (someone from the South not the east coast) and so on. The idea is to appeal to groups Clinton doesn't appeal to so much now. Doubling down on gender is not going to win her more male votes...which is what she needs most to win.

 

woolldog

(8,791 posts)
19. No it was not.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 09:26 PM
Jun 2016

But that doesn't change the reality of the present situation, which is that a two woman ticket will not help (and will in fact hurt) her chances of winning the GE.

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
11. Of the 5.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 09:00 PM
Jun 2016

Warren is a terrible idea because we lose a key Senate Dem, Davis is a terrible idea because she's a nice person and fierce but her qualifications for the job make Sarah Palin look presidential, Gillibrand is a terrible idea because she's from the same state and that means forfeiting the EC votes of NY, Harris is a terrible idea because she literally adds no benefit to the ticket in terms of electability...and that leaves Amy Klobuchar who I doubt excites anybody all that much as a running mate.

Response to wyldwolf (Original post)

Florencenj2point0

(435 posts)
23. younger/Latino or Latina
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 06:56 AM
Jun 2016

that is my only thought. I am not interested in EW. I am not interested in a centrist.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hey Hillary, one of these...