Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 12:51 PM Jun 2016

Hillary Clinton’s State Department Gave South Sudan’s Military a Pass for Its Child Soldiers

Rebel forces in southern Sudan began using child soldiers long before seceding from Sudan in 2011. The United States, on the other hand, passed a law in 2008 that banned providing military assistance to nations that use child soldiers. The law was called the Child Soldiers Prevention Act, or CSPA, but after South Sudan’s independence, the White House issued annual waivers that kept aid flowing to the world’s newest nation despite its use of child soldiers. President Obama stated in 2012 that the waiver that year was in “the national interest of the United States.”

The president’s move was criticized by human rights activists and others. Rep. Jeff Fortenberry, a Republican from Nebraska and the author of the CSPA, described the use of child soldiers as an “unthinkable practice.” The U.S. “must not be complicit in this practice,” he said. “The intent of the law is clear — the waiver authority should be used as a mechanism for reform, not as a way of continuing the status quo.” Because of the requirements of the law, the waivers were issued by the White House rather than the State Department, so Obama was the target of most of the criticism.

Hillary Clinton, who was secretary of state when the first waivers were issued, was apparently never asked to comment on them, and the State Department never provided any explanations about its role. Clinton had spent years vowing to defend the rights of children worldwide — in 2012, she railed against “modern-day slavery” in the introduction to a State Department report on human trafficking that took aim at the “unlawful recruitment or use of children” by armed forces. Yet she does not appear to have publicly explained her role in allowing South Sudan and other countries to receive military support despite using children as combatants. In fact, the State Department played a central role in issuing the controversial waivers, according to two sources, including a former State Department official.

As a presidential candidate, Clinton has made her foreign policy experience a centerpiece of her campaign. Under scrutiny, however, Clinton’s acumen has been consistently called into question — from her vote, as a U.S. senator, for the Iraq War (which led to the collapse of that country into near failed-state status) to her relentless push to intervene in Libya (which led to the collapse of that country into near failed-state status); not to mention her handling of the Russian “reset,” the so-called pivot to Asia, and the Arab Spring, among other issues.

continued at
https://theintercept.com/2016/06/09/hillary-clintons-state-department-gave-south-sudans-military-a-pass-for-its-child-soldiers/

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton’s State Department Gave South Sudan’s Military a Pass for Its Child Soldiers (Original Post) pdsimdars Jun 2016 OP
i guess we should have invaded? MariaThinks Jun 2016 #1
As with this same exact post from earlier today, The SoS works directly for the President. tonyt53 Jun 2016 #2
From the qouted text NWCorona Jun 2016 #4
Did you read the headline? TwilightZone Jun 2016 #12
Yes NWCorona Jun 2016 #14
What happened to unity? nt asuhornets Jun 2016 #3
Pretty damning stuff ... . pdsimdars Jun 2016 #5
An Example... kadaholo Jun 2016 #6
Her.Supporters.Don't.Care. Child soldiers? Cluster bombs? Central American illegal coups? riderinthestorm Jun 2016 #7
I'm actually starting to believe they think of these things as positives Fumesucker Jun 2016 #9
I'm having trouble here on DU lately. I used to actually think many here were friends riderinthestorm Jun 2016 #15
Six months or so ago I found myself wishing I'd never come to DU in the first place Fumesucker Jun 2016 #18
I'm also over at JPR but find myself losing interest in politics altogether as well riderinthestorm Jun 2016 #19
They will probably call it Waiting For Everyman Jun 2016 #8
People pay big money to send their kids to places like The Citadel Fumesucker Jun 2016 #11
True, that. Waiting For Everyman Jun 2016 #16
There was an email about Bill Clinton wanting to give a speech or two for 650,000 or 750,000. Skwmom Jun 2016 #10
lol, Jeff Fortenberry? Seriously? That's their quoted source? TwilightZone Jun 2016 #13
Child Soldiers Prevention Act PufPuf23 Jun 2016 #17
K & R AzDar Jun 2016 #20
 

tonyt53

(5,737 posts)
2. As with this same exact post from earlier today, The SoS works directly for the President.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 12:58 PM
Jun 2016

They do exactly what the President says they do. You failed to mention Obama in your post, so this post has one clear agenda. Sad attempt to blame Hillary for somebody else's decisions.

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
4. From the qouted text
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 01:07 PM
Jun 2016

"Because of the requirements of the law, the waivers were issued by the White House rather than the State Department, so Obama was the target of most of the criticism. "

Did you even read the link?

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
7. Her.Supporters.Don't.Care. Child soldiers? Cluster bombs? Central American illegal coups?
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 11:08 PM
Jun 2016

Impending climate change catastrophe? Libya?

I've discovered they simply don't care.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
9. I'm actually starting to believe they think of these things as positives
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 11:16 PM
Jun 2016

They show how "tough" Hillary is.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
15. I'm having trouble here on DU lately. I used to actually think many here were friends
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 11:24 PM
Jun 2016

In fact, I'm sure I was friends with a lot of DUers. I never believed I'd be so alienated by their blind support for Hillary Clinton that they'd actually willfully deny, defend, and support stuff that's entirely antithetical to Dem principles.

But here it is.

I grieve. I wonder if its a cult of personality or if they're so blinded by the history of "first woman president" blah blah.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
18. Six months or so ago I found myself wishing I'd never come to DU in the first place
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 11:47 PM
Jun 2016

At this point it's a habit I'd just as soon be done with, there are still people here I like a lot such as yourself but the overall atmosphere has become very toxic and I think it's just going to get worse.

I used to post on a few right wing boards and a portion of DU has that atmosphere of "Defend Everything!!!" that was so prevalent on right wing sites when Dubya was Pres, it's a huge turn off. I've toyed with going over to Discussionist again but I'm losing interest in politics, nothing ever really changes.

To quote Jackson Browne, I should have been a happy idiot and struggled for the legal tender.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
19. I'm also over at JPR but find myself losing interest in politics altogether as well
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 12:03 AM
Jun 2016

That's a whole other psychiatric phenomenon I presume. I dare not claim any special status but I believe there's an entire subset of Bernie supporters who are similar.

I don't like echo chambers. So here we are - echo chambers on every front but reddit (which is as bad as the old AOL chat boards)

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
10. There was an email about Bill Clinton wanting to give a speech or two for 650,000 or 750,000.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 11:16 PM
Jun 2016

He kept asking and they said no because the country had a bad record on women and girls. And I remember thinking, but what about the young boys, for example that are forced to be soldiers.... Like they did not matter because that wasn't the focus of a campaign marketing message.

TwilightZone

(25,428 posts)
13. lol, Jeff Fortenberry? Seriously? That's their quoted source?
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 11:23 PM
Jun 2016

The guy is one of the biggest GOP hacks in Congress. The guy is a complete sleezeball.

"The president’s move was criticized by human rights activists and others. Rep. Jeff Fortenberry, a Republican from Nebraska and the author of the CSPA, described the use of child soldiers as an “unthinkable practice.”

You should seriously reconsider the veracity of this story if they have to resort to quoting Jeff Fortenberry.

PufPuf23

(8,755 posts)
17. Child Soldiers Prevention Act
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 11:46 PM
Jun 2016

The Child Soldier Prevention Act (CSPA) is a United States federal statute signed into law by President George W. Bush on 3 October 2008.[1][2] The law criminalizes leading a military force which recruits child soldiers. The law's definition of child soldiers includes "any person under 18 years of age who takes a direct part in hostilities as a member of governmental armed forces."

The law was also intended to prevent arms trade by the United States with suspected countries, although the president may waive this rule in the national interest. President Barack Obama most recently waived the application of this rule on 28 September 2013 to Chad, South Sudan, Yemen, Somalia, and Democratic Republic of the Congo.[3]

from wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_Soldiers_Protection_Act

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton’s State D...