2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary Clinton’s State Department Gave South Sudan’s Military a Pass for Its Child Soldiers
Rebel forces in southern Sudan began using child soldiers long before seceding from Sudan in 2011. The United States, on the other hand, passed a law in 2008 that banned providing military assistance to nations that use child soldiers. The law was called the Child Soldiers Prevention Act, or CSPA, but after South Sudans independence, the White House issued annual waivers that kept aid flowing to the worlds newest nation despite its use of child soldiers. President Obama stated in 2012 that the waiver that year was in the national interest of the United States.
The presidents move was criticized by human rights activists and others. Rep. Jeff Fortenberry, a Republican from Nebraska and the author of the CSPA, described the use of child soldiers as an unthinkable practice. The U.S. must not be complicit in this practice, he said. The intent of the law is clear the waiver authority should be used as a mechanism for reform, not as a way of continuing the status quo. Because of the requirements of the law, the waivers were issued by the White House rather than the State Department, so Obama was the target of most of the criticism.
Hillary Clinton, who was secretary of state when the first waivers were issued, was apparently never asked to comment on them, and the State Department never provided any explanations about its role. Clinton had spent years vowing to defend the rights of children worldwide in 2012, she railed against modern-day slavery in the introduction to a State Department report on human trafficking that took aim at the unlawful recruitment or use of children by armed forces. Yet she does not appear to have publicly explained her role in allowing South Sudan and other countries to receive military support despite using children as combatants. In fact, the State Department played a central role in issuing the controversial waivers, according to two sources, including a former State Department official.
As a presidential candidate, Clinton has made her foreign policy experience a centerpiece of her campaign. Under scrutiny, however, Clintons acumen has been consistently called into question from her vote, as a U.S. senator, for the Iraq War (which led to the collapse of that country into near failed-state status) to her relentless push to intervene in Libya (which led to the collapse of that country into near failed-state status); not to mention her handling of the Russian reset, the so-called pivot to Asia, and the Arab Spring, among other issues.
continued at
https://theintercept.com/2016/06/09/hillary-clintons-state-department-gave-south-sudans-military-a-pass-for-its-child-soldiers/
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)tonyt53
(5,737 posts)They do exactly what the President says they do. You failed to mention Obama in your post, so this post has one clear agenda. Sad attempt to blame Hillary for somebody else's decisions.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)"Because of the requirements of the law, the waivers were issued by the White House rather than the State Department, so Obama was the target of most of the criticism. "
Did you even read the link?
TwilightZone
(25,428 posts)asuhornets
(2,405 posts)pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)kadaholo
(304 posts)...of this candidate's "foreign affairs" experience.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Impending climate change catastrophe? Libya?
I've discovered they simply don't care.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)They show how "tough" Hillary is.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)In fact, I'm sure I was friends with a lot of DUers. I never believed I'd be so alienated by their blind support for Hillary Clinton that they'd actually willfully deny, defend, and support stuff that's entirely antithetical to Dem principles.
But here it is.
I grieve. I wonder if its a cult of personality or if they're so blinded by the history of "first woman president" blah blah.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)At this point it's a habit I'd just as soon be done with, there are still people here I like a lot such as yourself but the overall atmosphere has become very toxic and I think it's just going to get worse.
I used to post on a few right wing boards and a portion of DU has that atmosphere of "Defend Everything!!!" that was so prevalent on right wing sites when Dubya was Pres, it's a huge turn off. I've toyed with going over to Discussionist again but I'm losing interest in politics, nothing ever really changes.
To quote Jackson Browne, I should have been a happy idiot and struggled for the legal tender.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)That's a whole other psychiatric phenomenon I presume. I dare not claim any special status but I believe there's an entire subset of Bernie supporters who are similar.
I don't like echo chambers. So here we are - echo chambers on every front but reddit (which is as bad as the old AOL chat boards)
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)a youth education program.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)It's said that a school like that produced The Donald, so... that should be a cautionary tale.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)He kept asking and they said no because the country had a bad record on women and girls. And I remember thinking, but what about the young boys, for example that are forced to be soldiers.... Like they did not matter because that wasn't the focus of a campaign marketing message.
TwilightZone
(25,428 posts)The guy is one of the biggest GOP hacks in Congress. The guy is a complete sleezeball.
"The presidents move was criticized by human rights activists and others. Rep. Jeff Fortenberry, a Republican from Nebraska and the author of the CSPA, described the use of child soldiers as an unthinkable practice.
You should seriously reconsider the veracity of this story if they have to resort to quoting Jeff Fortenberry.
PufPuf23
(8,755 posts)The Child Soldier Prevention Act (CSPA) is a United States federal statute signed into law by President George W. Bush on 3 October 2008.[1][2] The law criminalizes leading a military force which recruits child soldiers. The law's definition of child soldiers includes "any person under 18 years of age who takes a direct part in hostilities as a member of governmental armed forces."
The law was also intended to prevent arms trade by the United States with suspected countries, although the president may waive this rule in the national interest. President Barack Obama most recently waived the application of this rule on 28 September 2013 to Chad, South Sudan, Yemen, Somalia, and Democratic Republic of the Congo.[3]
from wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_Soldiers_Protection_Act