I can't help but think it could be Bernie out there making these speeches excoriating Trump.

[boston bean]

It's too bad, really.

[Happyhippychick]

1. I don't see him that way

That's one of the reasons I prefer Hillary, I think she's better at being blunt and cutting with trump.

[boston bean]

2. It's such a lost opportunity for him. I think he could be good at it.

But I will agree, I think Hillary was even better than Elizabeth Warren. But Elizabeth was good!

[Happyhippychick]

8. Elizabeth is my new girl crush! I hope Hillary picks her!

[frazzled]

3. The presidential candidate never plays the attack dog role

That's for the VP candidate or the surrogates to do. The presidential candidate debates the opposition, but must maintain a presidential demeanor in doing so. The attacks have to be subtle and refined, not bare toothed.

[Bluenorthwest]

4. These speeches? Warren just gave the first great Trump take down, in part because she's

not the candidate, in part because she's just very good at that sort of thing. It sure was a ripper.

[msongs]

5. sorry but hillary was first, last week nt

[boston bean]

6. Right. And it was a thing of beauty!

[CrowCityDem]

7. I don't think Bernie has it in him to do what Warren just did.

[PeaceNikki]

12. Agreed.

[Joe the Revelator]

9. Have you even enjoyed, for a minute, the fact your candidate won?

[boston bean]

11. Why yes I have! Thanks for caring. nt

[chillfactor]

10. I think Elizabeth Warren..

is doing a better job of eviscerating trump than Bernie could....she wiped the floor with trump and the GOP today!

[brooklynite]

13. This is -- seriously -- one of my worries about Sanders as nominee...

I feel he's too set in stone on his issues, and his speeches which never seem to change. I worried that he'd decide to just keep giving his basic campaign message and assume he didn't need to change or take on Trump directly.