Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Playinghardball

(11,665 posts)
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 01:37 PM Jun 2016

Bernie Sanders Doesn’t Owe the Democratic Party a Damn Thing

Bernie Sanders brought millions of new people into the Democratic Party, including young people, independents, and first-time voters. But what has the Democratic Party done in return?

Now that all states and territories have voted (with the exception of Washington, D.C.) and Hillary Clinton has emerged as the presumptive Democratic nominee, the pressure is mounting for the Vermont senator to drop out and endorse Hillary Clinton, and for his supporters to fall in line and vote for the candidate the establishment pre-selected before anyone got a chance to vote.

The media never gave Bernie a chance

Months before Bernie Sanders announced his campaign for the Democratic nomination, Hillary Clinton had used the powerful connections her family has long had to Democratic Party insiders to virtually secure the nomination with an insurmountable lead in superdelegates. This led to the establishment media crowning Clinton as the “uncontested” nominee, who was “poised to win the Democratic nomination without a serious contest.”

More here: http://usuncut.com/politics/bernie-sanders-doesnt-owe-the-dems/

147 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie Sanders Doesn’t Owe the Democratic Party a Damn Thing (Original Post) Playinghardball Jun 2016 OP
A-M-E-N Faux pas Jun 2016 #1
He Lost... jzodda Jun 2016 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author rhett o rick Jun 2016 #23
Well said. n/t JimDandy Jun 2016 #30
Yes. I agree ... erlewyne Jun 2016 #116
+2. n/t bvf Jun 2016 #90
Your first sentence GulfCoast66 Jun 2016 #94
Have you looked at the polls today? vdogg Jun 2016 #106
Good. I guess there is no need to keep disparaging Sanders and Sanders supporters then. nm rhett o rick Jun 2016 #136
Good post! DJ13 Jun 2016 #108
Can't disagree, but now we're stuck with Hillary... unless the FBI has something to say about it. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2016 #126
I am not giving up until the Convention. But one way or the other, our work is just rhett o rick Jun 2016 #137
Nope. Bernie is not the stronger general election candidate. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #141
How is being critical of the election system an insult to voters. Once all Democrats were rhett o rick Jun 2016 #142
What you're really being critical of is the outcome. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #144
How do you know it wasn't rigged? Sounds like wishful thinking. We know the Powers That Be rhett o rick Jun 2016 #145
No we didn't see "evidence of voter fraud and disenfranchisement in most states." Or any states. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #146
No, the poor and the middle class lost once again. notadmblnd Jun 2016 #55
So true... Bernie was their last hope. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2016 #127
If you were concerned about Trump you should not have supported the weaker candidate with all GoneFishin Jun 2016 #102
Not disagreeing... but now we have to make the best of a bad situation. What choice do we have? InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2016 #128
R-A-m-e-n yourpaljoey Jun 2016 #36
But he wants the Democratic Party to owe him much.....he really doesn't play well. n/t Sheepshank Jun 2016 #2
They need him more than he needs them democrattotheend Jun 2016 #5
Owe, such as? Play Well? Rather vague and dripping with insignificance. libdem4life Jun 2016 #6
I'll say this Ned_Devine Jun 2016 #56
I don't think he thinks that way. He might think the Dem party owes the American People Hiraeth Jun 2016 #67
Whatever. He never was a Democrat anyway, and what he does and does not do will determine... NNadir Jun 2016 #3
and that means your place is in history is .... Hiraeth Jun 2016 #66
Apparently neither was I, and I had been voting for Democratic candidates since I could vote. n/t That Guy 888 Jun 2016 #95
Jeez get over it already workinclasszero Jun 2016 #4
This is in direct response to you all's constant posts that Bernie was allowed to run as a Democrat JimDandy Jun 2016 #34
No, Bernie didn't lose. The Working class and the poor lost yet again. notadmblnd Jun 2016 #60
The working class and the poor chose Hillary lunamagica Jun 2016 #70
You keep telling yourself that. notadmblnd Jun 2016 #72
It's the truth lunamagica Jun 2016 #74
Keep telling yourself that notadmblnd Jun 2016 #75
They always seem to lose when the establishment is in charge... why is that? hmmm InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2016 #130
because they don't see us as human. notadmblnd Jun 2016 #132
Some life... what could have been. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2016 #129
How far would he have come without them? baldguy Jun 2016 #7
And it's really strange giving him credit for so many new voters when it's clear HRC had a lot more bettyellen Jun 2016 #9
Wait? I am getting confused. Are you saying that Clinton doesn't need his supporters? If so rhett o rick Jun 2016 #26
I didn't say either of those things, lol. Not so good on the listening part are you? bettyellen Jun 2016 #41
It's known as deflection rock Jun 2016 #61
Yeah, they need to keep up the belief that all new voters were Berners... bettyellen Jun 2016 #62
Exactly. "How far would he have come without them?" Not very damn far. Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #20
That statement implies that they helped him at all Ned_Devine Jun 2016 #63
He wouldn't have received his 12.5 million votes without the (D) after his name. baldguy Jun 2016 #97
Do you deny any of the content of my post? Ned_Devine Jun 2016 #98
Show the official DNC press statements supporting your charges. baldguy Jun 2016 #110
DNC press statements? Ned_Devine Jun 2016 #112
Oh, so it's a conspiracy. Or should I say **ANOTHER** conspiracy? baldguy Jun 2016 #114
Time for beddy bye, fella Ned_Devine Jun 2016 #118
Exactly. It's beyond clear that Sanders needed the Dem party a hell of alot more than many Dems feel Number23 Jun 2016 #87
Democratic Party Doesn’t Owe Bernie Sanders a Damn Thing RogerM Jun 2016 #8
Exactly. What is clear though, is that many of Bernie's followers feel entitled to something. tonyt53 Jun 2016 #27
It's far from over. We aint siting down and shutting up. We've just got a good start. rhett o rick Jun 2016 #28
They just don't get it. Thirties Child Jun 2016 #65
Just remember. DLCWIdem Jun 2016 #80
Wow, another new Hillary fan jumping in. rhett o rick Jun 2016 #84
"...by no means adversarial ..." You seem to have forgotten the "I welcome their hatred" part. Scuba Jun 2016 #123
Yes, I am really really hoping, just like you that Sanders moves on JimDandy Jun 2016 #39
The only "shenanigans" in NV were that Bernie supporters tried to steal the convention. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #44
Not true. But I'm not interested in educating you... JimDandy Jun 2016 #69
Not interested and also not capable. -nt- Lord Magus Jun 2016 #99
So then why are you still on a democratic website? AgadorSparticus Jun 2016 #119
The "Bernie Sanders brought millions of new people into the Democratic Party" meme is getting old. qdouble Jun 2016 #10
I Guess... kadaholo Jun 2016 #12
It's a conspiracy of course. qdouble Jun 2016 #13
How is he bringing them into the party if they're not registered Democrats? ContinentalOp Jun 2016 #14
Zap! Hekate Jun 2016 #47
He is the one who thinks that he is owed something KingFlorez Jun 2016 #15
The Democratic party is a participatory organization. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #16
What a strange thing to say, "and trying to do the most good for the most people." rhett o rick Jun 2016 #31
Sorry you find that to be such a strange thing. I have noticed that trend. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #37
So let me get this straight... tallahasseedem Jun 2016 #17
" ... legitimately lost ...". Delusional much? nt GoneFishin Jun 2016 #103
Let me set you straight demwing Jun 2016 #111
You can't have it both ways. athena Jun 2016 #121
And yet he's pledged to Democratic wins in November. Orsino Jun 2016 #18
people just don't get it. I hope you enjoy the reich under the republicans if they win MariaThinks Jun 2016 #19
If she is the nominee then Trump will win. You have no one to thank but those who voted for the GoneFishin Jun 2016 #105
The Dem Party allowed him to use its infrastructure, which he had NO part in building... Hekate Jun 2016 #21
Use their infrastructure. You mean the infrastructure that consistently helped Clinton? Skwmom Jun 2016 #25
Without that infrastructure how many of Bernie's supporters would've ever heard of him? Lord Magus Jun 2016 #46
I agree with everything you just said. 100% Right on! skylucy Jun 2016 #48
+ a million. If he'd been half as focused on educating his supporters on how the registration and Number23 Jun 2016 #88
+10000000000 treestar Jun 2016 #93
I am sure he regrets it. He let them get close enough to stab him in the back. They lied about him GoneFishin Jun 2016 #107
wish I could k and r this. niyad Jun 2016 #125
Thanks ... and done Hekate Jun 2016 #133
It's being less well-received there than it is here. Hekate Jun 2016 #139
but you did make it to greatest there!! niyad Jun 2016 #140
Your reality appears to be a vast and interesting place. Scootaloo Jun 2016 #134
They let him run as a Dem because they never thought he'd gain any traction. TDale313 Jun 2016 #138
and the Democratic Party owes him NOTHING as well--certainly not getting his way on the rules niyad Jun 2016 #22
and ...... you have some power over all this .... Hiraeth Jun 2016 #68
where do you come up with that? I am simply pointing out to the OP that his assertion works niyad Jun 2016 #71
"The media never gave Bernie a chance" Tarc Jun 2016 #24
media 3hummingbirds Jun 2016 #32
MSNBC is the most leftist of the "corporate media" Tarc Jun 2016 #45
They might be leftist lancer78 Jun 2016 #79
Yeah, right. You are a regular comedian. GoneFishin Jun 2016 #109
bull shit DLCWIdem Jun 2016 #100
To it's membership, sure. To it's "leadership?" Not a thing. (nm) Lizzie Poppet Jun 2016 #29
Except a quick and overdue exit. Eom. MyNameGoesHere Jun 2016 #33
no democratic party = no bernie or bernie's $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$. more delusional thinking from msongs Jun 2016 #35
Bullshit... quickesst Jun 2016 #38
I would think Lance Bass esquire Jun 2016 #40
The party needs to take up our issues dreamnightwind Jun 2016 #42
GOOD! Then the Party also OWES HIM NOTHING! Lil Missy Jun 2016 #43
just as well. they gave him nothing except the screw. nt restorefreedom Jun 2016 #52
The Democratic party apcalc Jun 2016 #49
Bernie's VENUE came from Progressive online sites and 'tv stations'. Nothing more. Jennylynn Jun 2016 #59
Well, Bernie said it himself. apcalc Jun 2016 #78
True. Didn't quite work out for him. Maybe he shouldn't have said it. Jennylynn Jun 2016 #81
Bernie should have run an independent campaign WhiteTara Jun 2016 #50
He owes Clinton a concession, that's it.....nt asuhornets Jun 2016 #51
Sanders has done the Democratic Party a great service azurnoir Jun 2016 #53
Amen to that Ned_Devine Jun 2016 #54
Very well said, sir! I agree, wholeheartedly. djean111 Jun 2016 #58
when you chose to run as a democrat MFM008 Jun 2016 #57
Sanders should listen to the advice that Gore gave Dean when Dean dropped out. Beacool Jun 2016 #64
That 50 state strategy needs to come back. Skink Jun 2016 #82
I think that it will this year. Beacool Jun 2016 #85
The Democratic Party doesn't owe Bernie Sanders a Damn Thing. eom tarheelsunc Jun 2016 #73
They owe him thanks for making them think outside the Beltway Box. ancianita Jun 2016 #76
And the reverse is true as well . WE DON't OWE BERNIE SANDERS A THING bravenak Jun 2016 #77
That's right! And the Democratic Party doesn't owe Bernie a damn thing either. XRubicon Jun 2016 #83
Remember when Clinton was accused of being "entitled" and SDs were bad??? Bleacher Creature Jun 2016 #86
Caucusing with Senate Dems jamese777 Jun 2016 #89
Yes he does. We let him run as a democrat! demosincebirth Jun 2016 #91
Nor does anyone not on their payroll. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2016 #92
Bernie Sanders will endorse HRC. He has telegraphed it over and over emulatorloo Jun 2016 #96
True, since he's never been a Democrat. RandySF Jun 2016 #101
And we don't owe him anything. vdogg Jun 2016 #104
Okay, he doesn't owe the Democratic Party a damn thing.... Skid Rogue Jun 2016 #113
I thought we'd already moved from "Denial" to "Anger" to "Bargaining" brooklynite Jun 2016 #115
The denial stage apparently takes a very long time. athena Jun 2016 #122
Neither does the Democratic Party/Hillary Proud Liberal Dem Jun 2016 #117
In that case jrandom421 Jun 2016 #120
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #124
"Debbie Washerman Shithead"? "Shillary"? does it get more Right Wing than that? Tick tock. Hekate Jun 2016 #135
Completely illogical...Bernie and his supporters ARE the Democratic party! Do they owe themselves? Sancho Jun 2016 #131
Agreed. He is not a Democrat, and does not offer much to the party. Certainly not enough to warrant eastwestdem Jun 2016 #143
Thank you. We own our votes. I will choose and Bernie will choose and I'll never think less of him. George Eliot Jun 2016 #147

jzodda

(2,124 posts)
11. He Lost...
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 01:51 PM
Jun 2016

Its not about the Democratic Party.

He owes this country to NOT help Trump in any way, shape or form. The most progressive leader in a generation can't let Trump come in there and wipe away Obama's legacy.

He can help HRC win and then we can start to try to move his issues through legislation but if he "burns" it all down we won't have a legacy to save will we.

Response to jzodda (Reply #11)

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
94. Your first sentence
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 08:57 PM
Jun 2016

Pretty much says that because I supported Hillary I a want trump win.

Can you not at least admit that many of us in good faith think Hillary will be the stronger candidate and better president.

I get it you disagree, but I do not assign your support of him to any nefarious beliefs.

I like Bernie and would have supported him but truly think he would have lost the GE.

Have a nice evening.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
137. I am not giving up until the Convention. But one way or the other, our work is just
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 05:02 PM
Jun 2016

beginning. We need to work down ticket to build a progressive base so we can eventually throw our those in government that are corrupted by the Big Money and Big Corporations.

Lord Magus

(1,999 posts)
141. Nope. Bernie is not the stronger general election candidate.
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 06:19 PM
Jun 2016

And please quit insulting the voters by pretending our choice wasn't legitimate.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
142. How is being critical of the election system an insult to voters. Once all Democrats were
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 06:43 PM
Jun 2016

united against Big Money influencing our government. Now only the Progressive Democrats feel that way.

Lord Magus

(1,999 posts)
144. What you're really being critical of is the outcome.
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 06:50 PM
Jun 2016

More people voted for Hillary than for Bernie. A lot more. This wasn't rigged, the majority of the primary voters just wanted her to win.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
145. How do you know it wasn't rigged? Sounds like wishful thinking. We know the Powers That Be
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 06:55 PM
Jun 2016

rig presidential elections. We saw evidence of voter fraud and disenfranchisement in most states, all of it favoring the Powers That Be's favorite candidate.

I do understand the need to believe that your government is good. But if you are wrong, the wrong people will pay. It will only hurt those among us that are vulnerable and suffering. That's who we are fighting for. Why hate us?

Lord Magus

(1,999 posts)
146. No we didn't see "evidence of voter fraud and disenfranchisement in most states." Or any states.
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 07:00 PM
Jun 2016

For somebody who's so proudly of the left, you're quick to resort to RW memes when you don't like an election's outcome.

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
102. If you were concerned about Trump you should not have supported the weaker candidate with all
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 09:58 PM
Jun 2016

of her baggage.

Don't look around now for someone else to blame for your mistake.

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
5. They need him more than he needs them
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 01:41 PM
Jun 2016

He is beloved in Vermont and is unlikely to need DSCC funds to get re-elected. They need him to continue caucusing with them in the Senate. He could leave the caucus and probably still get reelected easily. And right now, they need him to help get his supporters on board with Hillary.

Most politicians in his situation are easier to pacify with some sort of personal reward, such as a cabinet post, committee chairmanship, etc. They are having a hard time figuring out what to do with Bernie because all indications are that he doesn't want that - he actually cares about the issues he is advocating for.

 

Ned_Devine

(3,146 posts)
56. I'll say this
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 04:40 PM
Jun 2016

You really post some of the most ridiculous things. It's almost as if there's no thought process for you to go through before you write it down.

Hiraeth

(4,805 posts)
67. I don't think he thinks that way. He might think the Dem party owes the American People
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 05:41 PM
Jun 2016

but, not just him as an individual.

NNadir

(33,474 posts)
3. Whatever. He never was a Democrat anyway, and what he does and does not do will determine...
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 01:40 PM
Jun 2016

...whatever tiny place he has in history, so it's his choice.

 

That Guy 888

(1,214 posts)
95. Apparently neither was I, and I had been voting for Democratic candidates since I could vote. n/t
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 08:58 PM
Jun 2016

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
34. This is in direct response to you all's constant posts that Bernie was allowed to run as a Democrat
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 03:23 PM
Jun 2016

and that because of that he now has an obligation to do what the Party tells him to do going forward. So yes, get over it already, life goes on.

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
132. because they don't see us as human.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 02:24 PM
Jun 2016

And don't give a shit about anyone but themselves. Once they wring every cent we ever produced in our lives- out of us ,we can all eat shit and die. They only need enough of us to drive their limos, mow their lawns and clean their shit stains from toilets.

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
7. How far would he have come without them?
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 01:43 PM
Jun 2016

Was it his plan from the beginning to use the party for all it's worth, and then unceremoniously dump it one he won?

Thankfully he didn't win.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
9. And it's really strange giving him credit for so many new voters when it's clear HRC had a lot more
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 01:45 PM
Jun 2016

Support than he does. Not all of the new voters are Berners.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
26. Wait? I am getting confused. Are you saying that Clinton doesn't need his supporters? If so
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 03:09 PM
Jun 2016

then why are you bashing him for not helping her? Which is it?

He brought out those people looking for an honest candidate. Some will support HRC out of fear, but many won't because of Hillary and whatever he says won't change their minds.

 

Ned_Devine

(3,146 posts)
63. That statement implies that they helped him at all
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 05:12 PM
Jun 2016

Unless their idea of "helping" him was to stack the primary schedule against him, give him zero coverage, hire a party chair that was the former chair of HRC's 2008 campaign, accuse him and his supporters of being racist, sexist and any other nefarious word that ends with -ist, tell him to drop out on a steady basis from the first month of the primary onward and if he doesn't he's a racist and responsible for Donald Trump. Is that the "help" the party gave him to get him so far? What a joke.

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
110. Show the official DNC press statements supporting your charges.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:31 PM
Jun 2016

That's right, there are none. Because it's bullshit.

Meanwhile, Sanders thought he could use the DNC organization, DNC funds and DNC voter lists to gain the WH. Thankfully he failed.

 

Ned_Devine

(3,146 posts)
112. DNC press statements?
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:42 PM
Jun 2016

Are you actually this obtuse? There's no need for a press statement because these things actually happened. I should have known I was communicating with an "Even when they're wrong they're right" blind loyalist. This conversation can stop now.

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
114. Oh, so it's a conspiracy. Or should I say **ANOTHER** conspiracy?
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:31 PM
Jun 2016

Sanders lost. He lost fair and square. Under rules that he understood & agreed to when he signed up as a Democrat. And the reason he lost isn't the DNC's doing, but due to the fact that he spend a good deal of his time bashing Democrats and the Democratic Party with baseless accusations - much like you've done.

Sanders is the proverbial dog who bites the hand that feeds him. Such dogs don't last long in the caregiver's good graces.

 

Ned_Devine

(3,146 posts)
118. Time for beddy bye, fella
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 12:56 AM
Jun 2016

You're getting all worked up. The great part is that you seemed to hope to want to sound clever with your lines about dogs and care givers and so on. It was adorable.

I have no problem saying factual things about the democratic party. They're just the new corporatist conservative party that keeps its voters pacified by convincing them that their social security will disappear without them, or that the social issues we hold dear will vanish without them. Yet at the same time they're totally cool with drone strikes on brown people, the TPP, fracking, hiring an insurance lobbyist to be your state's insurance regulator if you're the Gov. of CT., giving secret $250K speeches to the same Wall St. banks that tanked the economy in '08 and then claiming to want to rein them in, promising to close Guantanamo but then backing down because the GOP didn't like the idea, laughing and fist pumping saying "We came, we saw, he died." after finding out a world leader was murdered, saying "Impeachment is off the table" in regards to Bush and Cheney in 2007 for their war crimes, and this list could go on.

I'm not going to swear allegiance to a party that cares more about its donors and corporate paymasters than poor people like me. So please, save the dog and caregiver analogy. I'm sure it sounded really smart in your head and probably felt great to type out, but it's totally ridiculous and I think you're pretty ridiculous too.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
87. Exactly. It's beyond clear that Sanders needed the Dem party a hell of alot more than many Dems feel
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 07:59 PM
Jun 2016

that they need him.

 

tonyt53

(5,737 posts)
27. Exactly. What is clear though, is that many of Bernie's followers feel entitled to something.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 03:12 PM
Jun 2016

I'm not exactly sure what, but something.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
28. It's far from over. We aint siting down and shutting up. We've just got a good start.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 03:12 PM
Jun 2016

We are going to fight against the culture of corruption of Big Money in our government. We are fighting to end poverty. Wish you were on our side.

Thirties Child

(543 posts)
65. They just don't get it.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 05:40 PM
Jun 2016

I don't think they've ever understood that this is about principle, about the direction of the country, about the good of the people, about going back to the Democratic Party of FDR. Sometimes I think they must be too young to know what the party once stood for. I'm an octogenarian, cast my first vote for Eisenhower in 1956, am old enough to remember what once was. The Democratic Party has tilted so far right, I can no longer recognize it. The Republicans have gone the way of the John Birchers, and the Democrats have become moderate Republicans. This leaves a vacuum where the Democratic Party once lived. Let's fill that vacuum.

DLCWIdem

(1,580 posts)
80. Just remember.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 07:29 PM
Jun 2016

Te party of FDR was a racist party that embraced Jim Crow and desegregation. In addition, glorifying FDR as the be all and re-visioning history is not the way of progress. In order to.get his New Deal passed, FDR worked with business. It was by no means adversarial relationship.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
123. "...by no means adversarial ..." You seem to have forgotten the "I welcome their hatred" part.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 07:45 AM
Jun 2016

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
39. Yes, I am really really hoping, just like you that Sanders moves on
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 03:31 PM
Jun 2016

Just like I did. I was a one-party, life-long Dem for 35+ years. I got OVER it after the Party's shenanigans in NV and left the Party for good. As did nearly ALL the Dem lifers in my family.

THE END.

Bernie PLEASE move on!!!

Lord Magus

(1,999 posts)
44. The only "shenanigans" in NV were that Bernie supporters tried to steal the convention.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 03:42 PM
Jun 2016

But they got voted down because they were not the majority. If you "left the Party for good" because that, good riddance.

qdouble

(891 posts)
10. The "Bernie Sanders brought millions of new people into the Democratic Party" meme is getting old.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 01:48 PM
Jun 2016

Bernie had less votes than Clinton and Trump...and less votes than Clinton and Obama in '08. If he is such a boon to the democratic party, why aren't they showing up at the voting booth?

kadaholo

(304 posts)
12. I Guess...
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 01:53 PM
Jun 2016

a bigger question might be why so many votes were not counted and why so many folks were not allowed to vote.
Still pondering...

ContinentalOp

(5,356 posts)
14. How is he bringing them into the party if they're not registered Democrats?
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 01:56 PM
Jun 2016

Independents by definition haven't been brought into the party. And especially if they refuse to support the Democratic nominee or stay home and don't vote for other Democrats down ticket. Judging by his supporters' constant attacks on the party, the primary system, the superdelegates, and just about every respected long time Democratic politician, I don't think he has brought them into the party at all. Arguably he has turned a number of people against the party and really only drew people into his own cult of personality.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
16. The Democratic party is a participatory organization.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 01:58 PM
Jun 2016

It isn't about owing or being owed. These are comments based on self and in opposition to what progressivism truly means. It's about having skin in the game and trying to do the most good for the most people. Participate or don't. That is on the individual. I participate and attempt to influence the group.

And yes, the party is allowed to ask me for favors or support.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
31. What a strange thing to say, "and trying to do the most good for the most people."
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 03:16 PM
Jun 2016

Do you honestly think that an administration that was bought and paid for by Wall Street and the Banksters will have any thing to do with, "the most good for the most people."?? If you do, you know nothing about capitalism and corporations. Profits are their only goal. And to hell with the poor.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
37. Sorry you find that to be such a strange thing. I have noticed that trend.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 03:30 PM
Jun 2016

It's like you didn't read my post. That is what is strange here.

Happy Friday!!!

tallahasseedem

(6,716 posts)
17. So let me get this straight...
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 01:59 PM
Jun 2016

An Independent who ran on the Dem ticket and wanted to be our Dem nominee for President doesn't owe the party anything after he legitimately lost the primary. Okie Dokie.

This is becoming the new PUMA movement and it's already a tired movement.

 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
111. Let me set you straight
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:32 PM
Jun 2016

Sanders has brought more to the Democratic party than he has received in return. He brought new blood, new enthusiasm, and a new take on our old dreams. In return he was...what? Vilified? Lied about? Dismissed?

If you're tired, go take a nap.

athena

(4,187 posts)
121. You can't have it both ways.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 01:36 AM
Jun 2016

You can't have Bernie supporters go on about how they will absolutely not vote for HRC, and then turn around and claim that Sanders has brought voters to the Democratic Party.

MariaThinks

(2,495 posts)
19. people just don't get it. I hope you enjoy the reich under the republicans if they win
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 02:07 PM
Jun 2016

and destroy SCOTUS.

but you can feel warm that you posted this type of whatever you want to call it.

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
105. If she is the nominee then Trump will win. You have no one to thank but those who voted for the
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:08 PM
Jun 2016

weaker candidate with the corporate ties and sketchy baggage.

Don't bother looking around for someone else to blame for your own mistake.

Hekate

(90,560 posts)
21. The Dem Party allowed him to use its infrastructure, which he had NO part in building...
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 02:13 PM
Jun 2016

...and is worth millions of dollars to any candidate. He then proceeded to "bite the hand that fed him" throughout the campaign.

He failed to actually educate the folks who came to his rallies (how and when to register to vote, how to check their status, the importance of registering AS DEMOCRATS TO VOTE IN A DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY) and then kept telling them the system was rigged and unfair when they had failed to comply with logical rules in place before they were born.

Initially I was glad to see him in the race. He and Hillary have voted together something like 93% of the time; did you know that? And she, not he, brought a Socialist health care plan before the Senate; did you know that? She also got crucified for it, and a lot of the canards against Hillary that are repeated today by BS supporters originated in the feverswamps of Right Wing strategy in those days.

The media gave Bernie every chance in the world. They never had a bad word to say about him, and you know why? Because they never took him seriously enough to even bother with basic journalistic research. It was an incredible blessing for Bernie. Every nasty question and innuendo that Andrea Mitchell lobbed at Hillary has a counterpart for Bernie -- but remained entirely unspoken.

As for the GOP candidates, their oppo file on Bernie has got to be mighty thick, and what they can't get from the Vermont newspapers they will simply pull out of their butts, because it's what they do. But have they? No, because they never took Bernie seriously either. They have expended all their considerable venom on Hillary Clinton, hoping to bring her down. In their fondest dreams the GOP wants to run against Bernie, a colorful, if angry, old man from a tiny state who's never ever been vetted by the mainstream media.

Instead, the GOP has to put up Tinyhands Trump against the woman with a spine of steel, a woman who has always made the men in that party clutch their delicate parts defensively.

Bernie "owes" the Democratic Party a helluva lot. Now let's see if he returns the favor in any measure at all by bringing his people over after a suitable period of mourning.

Lord Magus

(1,999 posts)
46. Without that infrastructure how many of Bernie's supporters would've ever heard of him?
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 03:49 PM
Jun 2016

It's often brought up that Bernie was a little-known senator until late last year to highlight how much he accomplished by coming this far in the primaries. But had he instead announced an independent bid for the presidency last April, he would've remained a little-known senator. It was his running in the Democratic primaries that gave him the high profile needed to attract so many new supporters.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
88. + a million. If he'd been half as focused on educating his supporters on how the registration and
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 08:02 PM
Jun 2016

voting process worked as he was on fundraising, this whole thing may have turned out differently.

And what's so funny is that so many of his supporters keep screaming that black people, women and everybody else were the ones that needed "educating" but it wasn't black folks that didn't know how to show up at the polls and acted like lunatics, screaming death threats at Democratic officials when things didn't go as we wanted.

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
107. I am sure he regrets it. He let them get close enough to stab him in the back. They lied about him
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:14 PM
Jun 2016

and cheated their asses off in nearly every state.

Every tentacle of the Democratic Party machine worked to tilt the playing field against him.

It's vindicating in a way that the DNC knew she couldn't win without rampant cheating.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
134. Your reality appears to be a vast and interesting place.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 04:48 PM
Jun 2016

Have you considered writing a few novels set in this fantastical landscape?

TDale313

(7,820 posts)
138. They let him run as a Dem because they never thought he'd gain any traction.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 05:15 PM
Jun 2016

They had cleared the decks of all "serious" contenders and the grumbling from the left that Hillary would effectively be running unopposed was beginning to build. They thought what the hell, throw the lefties a bone. If he gets 10% of the vote it'll be a miracle.

Bernie had caucused with them for decades- been a reliable Democratic vote on most issues, voted his conscience when he felt it was right. He and Washington Dems had a mostly warm and mutually beneficial relationship before this primary season. He had supported many Democratic candidates over the years. But yes, he called them out where he felt they were in the wrong- often on economic and national security issues.

Once it became clear Bernie was actually gaining traction in the primaries, every lever the DNC and Democratic Party had at their disposal was used to give Hillary more of an edge than she already had. Which, fine, they had a candidate they preferred. I get that. But this pretense of "They gave him all this help, threw their arms around him and stabbed them in the back" Bull fucking shit.

Dems should be thanking their lucky stars he's a man of his word and won't run third party.

niyad

(113,074 posts)
22. and the Democratic Party owes him NOTHING as well--certainly not getting his way on the rules
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 02:15 PM
Jun 2016

committee, nor on HRC's cabinet picks (both reported on this board)

works both ways.

niyad

(113,074 posts)
71. where do you come up with that? I am simply pointing out to the OP that his assertion works
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 06:51 PM
Jun 2016

both directions.

Tarc

(10,472 posts)
24. "The media never gave Bernie a chance"
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 03:07 PM
Jun 2016

It isn't the media's job to cheerlead a politician. We're not the USSR publishing Pravda here.

Tarc

(10,472 posts)
45. MSNBC is the most leftist of the "corporate media"
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 03:45 PM
Jun 2016

If that isn't enough for you, perhaps you're just too far down the spectrum to... matter?

DLCWIdem

(1,580 posts)
100. bull shit
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 09:55 PM
Jun 2016

Chris Hayes and LOD were fairly pissing over themselves with glee over him and worshiped at his feet. Rachel also had a crush on him until he showed his hypocrisy by going after the SDs. She also did not like that he tampered with her reporting and tried to convince voters that he did not compete in the South. She had whole segments on how he had women teaching campaigners to " talk to black women" and how he was first down in the south opening offices, before Clinton.

msongs

(67,361 posts)
35. no democratic party = no bernie or bernie's $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$. more delusional thinking from
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 03:23 PM
Jun 2016

the bernie crowd

 

Lance Bass esquire

(671 posts)
40. I would think
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 03:31 PM
Jun 2016

By that logic it would work both ways.
I see it as voters need to unite to stop trump because We all owe it to our country. The labels of democrat..independent. ..progressive libertarian and republican be damned... to much at stake. JMHO

dreamnightwind

(4,775 posts)
42. The party needs to take up our issues
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 03:41 PM
Jun 2016

or they have no standing with us. From the article linked in the OP:

The one way the establishment can unite the party before November

The truth is, the establishment is desperately hoping Sanders’ supporters will be bullied into supporting Clinton, as the sheer numbers behind the #BernieOrBust movement has the potential to swing the general election, given Clinton’s obvious vulnerabilities in the electoral college. But the Democratic Party has an easy solution to rally Sanders’ supporters behind their chosen candidate. All the party has to do is ban corporate lobbyists from the DNC, abolish the undemocratic superdelegate system, run on Sanders’ policy proposals like a $15/hour national minimum wage, tuition-free public college, and single-payer health care, divorce itself from Wall Street and the military-industrial complex, and actively work to remove the influence of big money in politics.

apcalc

(4,462 posts)
49. The Democratic party
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 04:16 PM
Jun 2016

Gave Sanders a venue, he got coverage and exposure.... Without that he'd still be at 3%.

WhiteTara

(29,692 posts)
50. Bernie should have run an independent campaign
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 04:23 PM
Jun 2016

if he feels no allegiance to the Democratic Party that gave him a platform and a data base to run on.

BTW...here's what is said about USUNCUT
Warning: Propaganda Sites Are Spreading Deceptive Bernie vs Hillary Poll Results
http://thedailybanter.com/2016/02/warning-propaganda-sites/

Has “U.S. Uncut” Abandoned Journalistic Integrity?
https://www.buzzfeed.com/randomthoughtsbahahaha/has-us-uncut-abandoned-journalistic-integrity-cgw8

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
53. Sanders has done the Democratic Party a great service
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 04:34 PM
Jun 2016

he made the perfect canary, Hillary needed to run against someone and Sanders cost the Democratic party nothing nada zilch no Democratic Senator, House member, or Governor was sacrificed, only an indi whois probably close to retirement anyway, I've heard rumors that a Democrat will choosen to run in his place or somesuch

 

Ned_Devine

(3,146 posts)
54. Amen to that
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 04:38 PM
Jun 2016

And neither do I. I'm changing my status to unenrolled. I don't want to be affiliated with corrupt politicians of any gender. Dannel Malloy appointing an insurance lobbyist as his state's insurance regulator? Ridiculous. Ed Rendell working for a fracking lobbying firm after he leaves office, and his state in an ecological mess after inviting the fracking industry to his state on a red carpet? Absurd. Hillary Clinton giving $250K speeches to Wall St. banks, the same groups that tanked the US economy in 2008, and then telling us she wants to rein in Wall St.? Piss off. I'm a fucking liberal, not a sucker. That's how it feels to vote for the democrats now. It's like we're constantly being bamboozled by a bunch of fucking liars.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
58. Very well said, sir! I agree, wholeheartedly.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 04:45 PM
Jun 2016

Will be changing to unaffiliated in August, after I vote for Grayson, in a primary.

MFM008

(19,803 posts)
57. when you chose to run as a democrat
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 04:42 PM
Jun 2016

you usually accept to abide by those rules.
I disagree, you missed a lot of television then because I saw Mr. Sanders on there as frequently as I saw HRC.
If he didn't have enough surrogates to cover interviews or out there supporting him, that was an error in HIS campaign.
(They covered every minute of his rally here in Seattle.)
When you sign up for the military you have to operate in their framework and you KNOW that going in.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
64. Sanders should listen to the advice that Gore gave Dean when Dean dropped out.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 05:38 PM
Jun 2016

Al Gore had endorsed Howard Dean in 2004. When Dean dropped out of the race, Gore called him. Dean talked about venting to Gore and complaining about every perceived slight. Finally, Gore stopped him and told him that it was not about him, that it was about the country. Dean rallied and supported Kerry when he became the nominee. The following year he became the DNC Chairman and pursued the now well known "50 state strategy".

After DC has voted, someone should take over the Gore role and call Sanders.

XRubicon

(2,212 posts)
83. That's right! And the Democratic Party doesn't owe Bernie a damn thing either.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 07:44 PM
Jun 2016

How long has Hillary been a Democrat? And Bernie?

We should push him out on his own in the Senate.

jamese777

(546 posts)
89. Caucusing with Senate Dems
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 08:11 PM
Jun 2016

Bernie Sanders has been a member of the Democratic Party's Senate Caucus since 2007. I'm betting that he would like once again to be the Chair of a Senate Committee so that he can draft legislation and shepherd it through Congress to be signed into law by a president.
Somehow I don't see the Republican Party assisting Senator Sanders with his legislative agenda.

emulatorloo

(44,066 posts)
96. Bernie Sanders will endorse HRC. He has telegraphed it over and over
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 09:25 PM
Jun 2016

And he is a man of his word.

Has nothing to do with "owing the party".

He said just the other day he's looking forward to working w HRC to defeat Trump.


(IMHO "owing the party" is a bullshit strawman meme coming from your source)

No matter how many misleading angry rants that 'uncut' site produces, that is the reality. Bernie is a man of his word and will do what he thinks is right.

You used to have a lot better taste in sources. .

Skid Rogue

(711 posts)
113. Okay, he doesn't owe the Democratic Party a damn thing....
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:53 PM
Jun 2016

But he said he'll do whatever it takes to defeat Trump. So, maybe he owes the human race something?

Sanders will do the right thing. It has nothing to do with the Democratic Party.

athena

(4,187 posts)
122. The denial stage apparently takes a very long time.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 01:37 AM
Jun 2016

Just look at all the threads declaring that Bernie can still win California.

Response to Playinghardball (Original post)

Hekate

(90,560 posts)
135. "Debbie Washerman Shithead"? "Shillary"? does it get more Right Wing than that? Tick tock.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 04:49 PM
Jun 2016

By the way, Freeperville is thataway ----->

Sancho

(9,067 posts)
131. Completely illogical...Bernie and his supporters ARE the Democratic party! Do they owe themselves?
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 02:12 PM
Jun 2016

Otherwise, it they don't think of themselves as part of the party that they claim, then they are hypocrites, thieves, and lying assholes.

Which is it? Are they who they say they are? Will they work for the Democratic Party? Put their time and money into the Democratic Party efforts? Vote for the Democratic Party nominee?

If not, then get off the pot and go away.

 

eastwestdem

(1,220 posts)
143. Agreed. He is not a Democrat, and does not offer much to the party. Certainly not enough to warrant
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 06:49 PM
Jun 2016

the ring kissing he is demanding.

George Eliot

(701 posts)
147. Thank you. We own our votes. I will choose and Bernie will choose and I'll never think less of him.
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 07:30 PM
Jun 2016

After the disrespect and coercive tactics employed by DWS, DNC, Clinton and MSNBC, he owes them nada. Rail against him if you must, he'll go back to doing the small things he's always done and make smart decisions for the benefit of the average American whether it be Jew, Black, Native American, Asian, Muslim, Christian, male, female, and any other category I missed. That's who he is.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie Sanders Doesn’t Ow...