2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIs it trolling or just plain stubbornness?
I'm leaning towards stubborness. I mean, damn! How long does it take a person to count up the delegates and realize that they lost? I really have never seen anything so remarkably hopeless and useless as hanging on as one's influence diminishes by the second.
I bet there will be a cold reception when the losing candidate returns to the vaunted halls of our Senate and he realizes he has called his colleagues corrupt for the past year on the campaign trail. I guess somebody can say 'bye bye' to those committee assignments and 'hello' to obscurity and a primary challenger.
I mean, unless he wants stop being so stubborn and endorse our first Female Nominee. To do anything else would be uncivilized.
Autumn
(45,042 posts)tallahasseedem
(6,716 posts)of Democratic primary races and it was eye opening. Bernie lost by 13%...Hillary in 2008? Tied at 48%. She bowed out with class, something I wish would happen now.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I'm honestly embarassed for him at this point.
sheshe2
(83,728 posts)men do not concede to women. Not ever.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Her win was historic and some want to strip that from her
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)There are two factions in the Democratic Party, and the one that Bernie represents refuses to be ignored. Many people who voted for Hillary still agree with Bernie on the issues. They aren't wringing their hands over the convention.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)Bernie has every right to go to the convention. There are many states with too many voting irregularities. Yes, he lost, okay. But he still won a number of states and takes with him a large number of delegates working for positive change.
If the voting machines are not fixed, exactly what are you counting on come November?
Do you honestly believe that election fraud will not continue?
Very sad for you Brave.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I saw nothing where voting machines made him lose. Look at the margins in DC. That is real. Time to give it up.
7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)I think it might be time for you to "give it up". Bernie and his pledged delegates are going to the Democratic convention. No more and no less.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Quite delicate
swhisper1
(851 posts)visit the humour group or the photograpy group and chill
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Hope that clears it up for ya
Zynx
(21,328 posts)If anything comes of that, which I doubt, we can handle it at the convention. The race, however, is over. He lost.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)She is the first presumed presidential candidate under active FBI investigation in US history.
If anyone is indicted, or if there is any criminal wrongdoing found, she will be forced to drop out. Even after the convention.
Running a candidate under active FBI investigation is political suicide, and Sanders fully realizes this.
Zynx
(21,328 posts)And the superdelegates don't buy it, either.
PepperHarlan
(124 posts)eastwestdem
(1,220 posts)to take her place. Someone who is a loyal party member. (i.e. not Sanders)
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)msongs
(67,394 posts)publically acknowledge he lost and she won
bravenak
(34,648 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Er, wait, no.
ram2008
(1,238 posts)Remember her famous Robert Kennedy quote?
[quote]
"We all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California," Clinton told the editorial board of a South Dakota newspaper. " I don't understand it," Clinton added, alluding to the calls for her to quit.[/quote]
Terrible thing to say, but I guess her point was anything could happen. For Bernie, I imagine he thinks theres a small chance of an FBI indictment derailing her campaign. There is no reason for him to leave until the nomination is completely finished, however, he can tacitly suspend his campaign by not attacking Clinton anymore, ceasing campaign events, etc. Which to my knowledge he will do.
Another reason he shouldn't leave yet is to leverage his position in order to influence the party platform. I think everyone knows Hillary will be the nominee, but there's no reason to push him out.
Zynx
(21,328 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)ram2008
(1,238 posts)Her SOS position and Obama setting up for her 2016 run were most likely part of negotiations. There is no ransom going on, just politics.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)ram2008
(1,238 posts)Where possibly putting her on the ticket, retiring her campaign debt etc were discussed.
Clinton plans to suspend her campaign within days, her campaign said. By suspending instead of dropping out, Clinton technically would remain a candidate, entitled to keep statewide pledged delegates and district-level delegates.
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/06/06/clinton.obama.wrap/index.html?iref=newssearch
In the end Bernie will support Hillary, give it time. No need to turn off Bernie supporters by calling him a troll. The same exact process is happening now, not sure where all the outrage comes from.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Not sure if trolling on top of that
ram2008
(1,238 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)DLCWIdem
(1,580 posts)Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)ram2008
(1,238 posts)Arguably where Bernie won is very important. He won the youth vote by enormous margins, which means his ideas are literally the future of the party.
Also, Obama wasn't under FBI investigation.
lancer78
(1,495 posts)prove? She is under FBI investigation and still beat him by 13 points. He might have the youth vote, but they stayed home when he needed them.
ram2008
(1,238 posts)In the end, Bernie will endorse Hillary if she stays true to the progressive cause and avoids indictment.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)oasis
(49,370 posts)it must yield significant results. He'd better work his hiney off on the campaign trail.
But I think it's hopeless to rely on him
oasis
(49,370 posts)That should give us a hint on the level of his commitment on defeating Trump.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Zynx
(21,328 posts)situations were also ambiguous, though even they couldn't bring her over the top at full strength. Her win in 2016 has been much more decisive than her loss in 2008.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Isn't he meeting with Hillary at this moment?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)It's not like we were waiting on a recount or something.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)She endirsed Obama and gave a great speech and stumped for him. Bernie is not behaving lik he has any intention of helping us
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Doesn't he have a press event scheduled for Thurs?
Hillary endorsed Obama June 7th 4 days after the last vote was counted.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Or do we all have to wait on him to get on our side. He needs to get with the program and help us fight Trump and stop wasting time.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Just stirring the pot I see.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Sans this op because I'll be honest enough to tell you that I think it's a bit much.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)He left from his conversation with Hillary. I dont stay up on his schedule beyond that.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)It should be apparent that things are moving somewhat in tandem behind the scenes.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Everything up to that point has been chess moves.
I don't know what he will say or do but what ever it is I will most likely support but I never expected him to finalize anything today.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I expect no change
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Who knows, maybe you'll be pleasantly surprised this time.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Only that he and Clinton have more work to do. The article actually mentioned that it gives no indication of his plans and then the author falls back on earlier statements for the head line.
What does that prove other than what we've already covered here?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I'm just waiting for him to get it together. Trump is having hate rallies and it would b nice to spend our energy on him
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Focus on Trump.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Why can't you? Seriously? You say with one breath that you want him to get on board and then the other you belittle him. There is a process to this and it is being played out. Have some patience and what and see what he has to say on Thurs.
Something to think about.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Why should it matter to you? I don't see you stopping folks from bashing Hillary. And mind, this op is no where near as bad as the stuff said about Hillary daily, like when they call her a murderer
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)I have called out a few but you are right I do give that a pass even tho I shouldn't. But to be honest even though I have zero on my block list I tend to tune out a lot on both sides. Especially the hit it and quit it types.
Do or die date aside. You and I both know you are on one with this op.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)eastwestdem
(1,220 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Response to bravenak (Original post)
Post removed
bravenak
(34,648 posts)You feel better now, since you got that amazing speech off your chest?
akbacchus_BC
(5,704 posts)decide whom they want to vote for rather than you being in their face all the time?
You are not doing your presumptive nominee any favours, you are alienating voters who need to regroup and make a decision. Voting is a civic right!
bravenak
(34,648 posts)akbacchus_BC
(5,704 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)Right now the Republicans have 55 seats. If the Democrats hold the Vice Presidency and make a net gain of five seats, then they'll need Bernie's vote (and Angus King's) to have a majority.
If the Democrats have a seat or two to spare, they still won't go out of their way to tick off Bernie, just to get their rocks off or to please vindictive Internet posters. They'll be aware that many Senators are elderly and that many of the governors who would appoint a replacement are Republicans.
And then there's 2018. I think it's 23 Democrats (plus King and Sanders) whose terms will be expiring. Bernie Sanders has a list of more than two million donors (not just supporters, but people who've actually given money). He's already demonstrated that he can raise a significant amount of money for someone else just by sending out one email blast. If, in a Senate Democratic caucus meeting in early 2017, some hothead from a safely blue state calls for ostracizing Bernie, I believe that quite a few other Democrats will speak up and say, "Well, let's not be so hasty, here."
And as for "obscurity", well, no. Practical politicians will recognize that Bernie reached millions of voters, and made a fight of it against the party establishment's candidate who was the overwhelming pre-primary favorite. They'll know that not a one of them, had he or she entered the race, could have come anywhere close to that kind of showing against the massed force of the party establishment, let alone done so without big donors and without much media coverage. Practical politicians respect success.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)They will focus on those committee chairships and subcommittee chairships they crave, plus their own personal re-election chances. They will give those factors far, far more weight than any number of Internet calls for retribution.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)I explained the pragmatic considerations that will lead Senate Democrats to continue to want to work with Bernie. You think all that will be outweighed because they still won't have recovered from having been criticized half a year earlier?
Get real. Politicians are criticized all the time. Their attitude will be "That was then, this is now." They'll be thinking about those chairships and those two million donors. They won't be interested in childish petulance.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)He might have to be more respectful to get his committee assignments. Fughting us at the convention might make some of those establishment dems withold support. Best to keep it peaceful.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)You think the Senate Democrats will act the way members of the Hillary Clinton Group would act in their place.
At this point, you and I are talking past each other. You have no interest in addressing the practical considerations that I think will be overwhelmingly important. I don't think I can say anything else useful here. You may now have the last word in this subthread, and we'll see what happens in January.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)They might not like it no matter politics or not.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)That's all we could hope to get out of him, so we're good.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)immoderate
(20,885 posts)--imm
bravenak
(34,648 posts)immoderate
(20,885 posts)--imm
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)coyote
(1,561 posts)considering our "presumptive" nominee is under a FBI criminal investigation.
MFM008
(19,804 posts)The meeting between her and Sanders went very well and lasted longer than planned.
A hopeful sign.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)She is the type to be empathetic