Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LuvLoogie

(6,903 posts)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 08:58 PM Jun 2016

NYT Opinion: Sanders, the Windows 95 of Progressive Politics?

The real progressive agenda will be written over the next few years, either to push the Clinton administration or to shape a challenge to a Republican president and Congress. But it’s unlikely that this new progressive agenda will be Mr. Sanders’s agenda, specifically, or that Mr. Sanders himself will be the leading advocate and arbiter of progressive policies in the way that Senator Edward M. Kennedy once was. Mr. Sanders is still running the Windows 95 version of progressive politics.


http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/15/opinion/campaign-stops/is-the-sanders-agenda-out-of-date.html?_r=0
106 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYT Opinion: Sanders, the Windows 95 of Progressive Politics? (Original Post) LuvLoogie Jun 2016 OP
LOL.. he needs an upgrade! DCBob Jun 2016 #1
The problem is that Bernie is actually a real populist progressive. They'd much rather have Skwmom Jun 2016 #3
Yep. They'd rather have a pretentiously fake Democrat than a REAL one. n/t Triana Jun 2016 #7
This article makes some good points. Hortensis Jun 2016 #49
The author of this NYT opinion is a director at New America fasttense Jun 2016 #63
Can't. On this he's saying what I've thought Hortensis Jun 2016 #68
I would say that Occupy lit the fire. blackspade Jun 2016 #80
No, not to take away from those earnest Hortensis Jun 2016 #89
Sanders wouldn't have run, if Warren had been a candidate. He would have been Cal33 Jun 2016 #95
I imagine you're right. But my question was Hortensis Jun 2016 #100
We need an agenda that might actually get implemented. DCBob Jun 2016 #10
You would think helping a billionaire MAKE BILLIONS because of tax loopholes would be fantasy Skwmom Jun 2016 #13
Actually a good point. What I like best about Hortensis Jun 2016 #50
TG people like you were not around in the days of FDR. We'd still be in the Depression. jillan Jun 2016 #18
People like you seem to want to send us all back to the FDR depression era. DCBob Jun 2016 #19
Clinton represents those who want take us back to the Gilded Age Armstead Jun 2016 #24
Are you really unfamiliar with FDR? Wow. Stunning. jillan Jun 2016 #30
Did you know him? DCBob Jun 2016 #31
you are out of you depth, with wooden, clumsy retorts like that AntiBank Jun 2016 #58
So your personal attack is better?? DCBob Jun 2016 #65
did you look in the mirror before you said that? hobbit709 Jun 2016 #67
.. DCBob Jun 2016 #69
I think you already are. hobbit709 Jun 2016 #81
wasn't a personal attack, I called you on your snarky comment AntiBank Jun 2016 #73
Is snark banned? DCBob Jun 2016 #75
A right-wing agenda, of course n/t arcane1 Jun 2016 #32
ok, I will bite, list off your non-fantasy progressive agenda you want to go through AntiBank Jun 2016 #56
Hillary has many items on her agenda... DCBob Jun 2016 #76
As I have stated and will continue to state angrychair Jun 2016 #92
It's not a bug. It's a feature. LuvLoogie Jun 2016 #43
A mil goes a long way..lots of derision...little on her merits MaeScott Jun 2016 #82
Who is the candidate of 90's nostalgia again? Armstead Jun 2016 #23
The article is not about Hillary. DCBob Jun 2016 #25
Depends on how far into the future one projects.... Armstead Jun 2016 #27
Bernie has at least opened the window.. I will give you that. DCBob Jun 2016 #29
Long day, short post I agree with. Hortensis Jun 2016 #54
Old school to the fullest bravenak Jun 2016 #2
Windows 95 - An Operating Systems before embedded corporate data mining & remote controls TheBlackAdder Jun 2016 #96
This part right here bravenak Jun 2016 #4
The Windows 95 version...the way he's going that will be his legacy. nt procon Jun 2016 #5
Hillary-the Windows ME of progressive politics. hobbit709 Jun 2016 #6
+1 n/t Triana Jun 2016 #8
that was after the upgrade, in her heart she is still Windows 3.1 ,Third Way Edition virtualobserver Jun 2016 #70
Clintons-DLC-Third Way are the ILOVEYOU virus of progressive politics tk2kewl Jun 2016 #85
This is an excellent article. Must read for all DUers. DCBob Jun 2016 #9
I agree, this is hilarious. My girlfriend sent it to me because it is just too funny! JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #11
The author is credible.. DCBob Jun 2016 #16
And take this from the credibility of inside Washington, DC!!! MrMickeysMom Jun 2016 #55
You don't like the Roosevelt Institute? Really? Hortensis Jun 2016 #61
The key point there is angrychair Jun 2016 #93
Gotcha. We'll all get to see. Of course, the Hortensis Jun 2016 #101
I don't disagree angrychair Jun 2016 #102
Imo, that last is a rather silly statement. Hortensis Jun 2016 #104
My premise is factually based angrychair Jun 2016 #105
Final word sounds good. Hortensis Jun 2016 #106
Meh...David Brooks and a bunch of fusty old and young centrists Armstead Jun 2016 #21
Agreed!! nt eastwestdem Jun 2016 #44
If anything it would be Windows XP Pro NWCorona Jun 2016 #12
Reccing. This is hilarious. JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #14
oh, ouch! okasha Jun 2016 #15
Even better!! DCBob Jun 2016 #17
Or the Vic-20 (n/t) PJMcK Jun 2016 #37
I would say Radio Shack TRS-80. stevenleser Jun 2016 #51
then Hillary is the TI 99/4A. hobbit709 Jun 2016 #57
Nah, Hillary is an Altair 8800 Fumesucker Jun 2016 #59
That worked way better than a TI. hobbit709 Jun 2016 #62
I remember that computer. -none Jun 2016 #84
Nope, she is actually capable of carrying out the things she promises. nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #72
The only thing I see her doing is what she's done all along for her $pon$or$. hobbit709 Jun 2016 #78
I liked my TI-99/4A. reflection Jun 2016 #103
Meh -- New America -- David Brooks, Farhid Zakaria, Steve Rattner... Armstead Jun 2016 #20
Lots of corporate "education reform" propaganda, too. QC Jun 2016 #38
If Sanders is Windows 95 what's Hillary? An abacus, slide-rule, and quill pen? Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2016 #22
LOL Armstead Jun 2016 #26
MS-DOS at best. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2016 #34
Good one. 840high Jun 2016 #41
I think of her more as the ILOVEYOU virus. aikoaiko Jun 2016 #45
Who knows? She still trying to figure out that email thing. B Calm Jun 2016 #48
What Windows version was it that used a cloth to delete files? That would be the Hillary version. NorthCarolina Jun 2016 #79
True, but she'll be running against cuneiform marks on clay tablets. (n/t) Jim Lane Jun 2016 #91
That was a good read. Thank you! Lucinda Jun 2016 #28
Sanders is definitely Linux AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #33
or Mac. k8conant Jun 2016 #40
and the bitterness continues. GeorgeGist Jun 2016 #35
More like the Amiga Pro ucrdem Jun 2016 #36
Best insurgent campaign in a generation. PowerToThePeople Jun 2016 #39
Judging by the number of endorsements from his colleagues and the votes he got from Democrats Number23 Jun 2016 #42
Reagan got more votes than Carter or Mondale Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #53
Obviously a hell of a lot more people thought so. And Reagan is still viewed among conservatives Number23 Jun 2016 #97
Bernie Sanders is the only Senator in the Congressional Progressive Caucus. Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #98
The Progressive Caucus also encompasses Congress. And many of those members came nowhere near him Number23 Jun 2016 #99
HRC is the one who won't change with the times and Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #46
Just another "No We Can't" opinion. Cobalt Violet Jun 2016 #47
It doesn't really matter, Hillary wouldn't know how to read her email on it anyway Fumesucker Jun 2016 #52
article is shit, advocates wonky neoliberal 3rd way crap AntiBank Jun 2016 #60
This entire site will become reflective of that political mindset come the 20th. -nt- NorthCarolina Jun 2016 #83
More like a Commodore 64 Gomez163 Jun 2016 #64
That proves you know little about computer history. hobbit709 Jun 2016 #66
OK, Sparky Gomez163 Jun 2016 #88
Ageism is funny! CanadaexPat Jun 2016 #71
And so is hypersensitivity. NurseJackie Jun 2016 #86
Massive K & R. Thanks for posting. Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #74
Is the NYT the Windows 3.1 of Journalism? blackspade Jun 2016 #77
More like CP/M hobbit709 Jun 2016 #87
The NYT wishes all these kids would get with the modern times. lumberjack_jeff Jun 2016 #90
+1, the Windows 95 version rarely spoke to PoC issues as separate issues uponit7771 Jun 2016 #94

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
3. The problem is that Bernie is actually a real populist progressive. They'd much rather have
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 09:04 PM
Jun 2016

a fake one.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
49. This article makes some good points.
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 05:32 AM
Jun 2016

Elizabeth Warren was always the candidate we needed. I looked at Sanders carefully and decided he was no substitute. Don't you ever wonder why he wasn't famous for decades of fighting alongside Senators Kennedy and Waxman, and others, for progressive changes? Those who can, do.

Well, he finally did step up and make a difference.

Mr. Sanders’s achievement has been to show the leadership of his recently adopted party that Democrats and many independents under 35 — that is, those who weren’t adults during Bill Clinton’s administration — are eager for a full-throated progressive agenda and are unafraid of backlash.


This is a big contribution, and I for one am grateful (for that if not his other behaviors). But the fact that he is way behind the curve on how to proceed forward is very telling, and this article only makes a point many others already have touched on. He is a very rigid thinker, and new ideas are no more his strong point than working with others to make change actually happen is.



 

fasttense

(17,301 posts)
63. The author of this NYT opinion is a director at New America
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 07:07 AM
Jun 2016

I would take anything he said with a huge grain of salt.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
68. Can't. On this he's saying what I've thought
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 07:19 AM
Jun 2016

for a long time.

Tell me, Fasttense, what would have happened if Elizabeth Warren had run for president? SHE lit the fire that Sanders took advantage of. She and others have been working for years to make progressive reforms real, mostly with relatively minor to no practical assistance from Sanders.

Would you have voted for Sanders if he'd run against her? Or would you have wanted her? Why?

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
89. No, not to take away from those earnest
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 09:42 AM
Jun 2016

young people without leadership or specific goals, but they were a sign of change already happening. Where do you think that black liberal in the White House came from? He wasn't dropped in by aliens with a wicked sense of humor.

 

Cal33

(7,018 posts)
95. Sanders wouldn't have run, if Warren had been a candidate. He would have been
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 05:36 PM
Jun 2016

pro-Warren all the way. If I remember correctly, he ran only because Warren
chose not to.

I think Sanders ran because he is more than sick and tired of the "status quo"
which has been visiting incredible disasters upon us, and right now is responsible
for bringing our nation closer and closer to becoming an Oligarchic dictatorship!

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
100. I imagine you're right. But my question was
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 06:19 PM
Jun 2016

how great would he seem if dynamic scourge-of-Wall-Street Warren had run... My guess is not great at all.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
10. We need an agenda that might actually get implemented.
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 09:15 PM
Jun 2016

Not the idealistic fantasy feel-good stuff Bernie is pushing.

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
13. You would think helping a billionaire MAKE BILLIONS because of tax loopholes would be fantasy
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 09:18 PM
Jun 2016

stuff, but not in the US of Corporations.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
50. Actually a good point. What I like best about
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 05:47 AM
Jun 2016

Sanders is his call to stop the very wealthy who have been sacking our nation and are determined to restyle our government of, by, and for the people. Many others may agree, but he's the one yelling warnings from the pulpit.

angrychair

(8,669 posts)
92. As I have stated and will continue to state
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 05:12 PM
Jun 2016

Far into the future:
"It's easy to talk about the virtues of compromise when you are not the one being compromised."

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
23. Who is the candidate of 90's nostalgia again?
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 09:29 PM
Jun 2016

Let's put the Clintons back in the White House

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
25. The article is not about Hillary.
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 09:32 PM
Jun 2016

Its about who is going to be the next "liberal lion" and it makes a good case its not going to be Bernie.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
27. Depends on how far into the future one projects....
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 09:37 PM
Jun 2016

As the old philosopher said "In the long run, we're all dead."

I think for the near future Sanders has broken the stale mold encrusted straightjacket that passes for democratic politics otherwise -- and politics in general.

Whether the Democrats decide to open the windows and air the place out continue to moulder is an open question.

Pardon all my mixed metaphors. Been a long day.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
54. Long day, short post I agree with.
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 05:59 AM
Jun 2016

Change is in the air. Hillary should be a strong administrator. With luck, we'll be finding out how forward-thinking she can be in dealing with a constantly changing world. She's "progressive" politically, like all liberals, but as that article wonders, will she be out front in a new progressive wave or merely "nudged and challenged" by it?

TheBlackAdder

(28,155 posts)
96. Windows 95 - An Operating Systems before embedded corporate data mining & remote controls
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 05:45 PM
Jun 2016

.


Windows 10 is a collective data miner, sending user's directory structures and contents to Amazon and their hub for future heuristic advertising and solicitations.

.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
4. This part right here
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 09:04 PM
Jun 2016
For one thing, he has never had the kind of influence with his colleagues that he found with the grass roots this year, in part because he never defined himself as a Democrat. No one expects that he’ll run for president again at 78 or 82, so he won’t have the clout of a senator who is seen as a potential president. And any institutional power he may gain as chairman or a ranking member of the Senate Budget Committee sounds a lot bigger than it really is. The committee’s main job is to produce a nonbinding budget resolution, and in many recent years, it hasn’t even done that.
 

tk2kewl

(18,133 posts)
85. Clintons-DLC-Third Way are the ILOVEYOU virus of progressive politics
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 09:12 AM
Jun 2016
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ILOVEYOU

Trojan Horse of progressives

Bernie is part of an opensource progressive movement.

This NYT opinion piece is garbage

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
11. I agree, this is hilarious. My girlfriend sent it to me because it is just too funny!
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 09:16 PM
Jun 2016

It reads like a The Onion piece.

Hopefully nobody takes this seriously. Or maybe that would be even funnier, if they did.



Seriously though, this opinion piece is pure bullshit.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
16. The author is credible..
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 09:20 PM
Jun 2016
Schmitt is the Roosevelt Institute's Senior Fellow and Director of the Fellows Program. Before that he was executive editor of The American Prospect, a position he held since 2008. He guided the Prospect during a period when it won several awards, including the Utne Reader award for best political magazine, for its coverage of the policy and political battles of the first two years of the Obama administration. Schmitt was policy director to former Senator Bill Bradley in the 1990s and a senior advisor on Bradley's 2000 presidential campaign. From 1998 to 2005, he directed a program on political reform at George Soros's Open Society Institute. Before joining the Prospect, he was a senior fellow at the New America Foundation.[3] He earned his bachelor's degree from Yale in 1984.


At least more more credible than you.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
61. You don't like the Roosevelt Institute? Really?
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 06:42 AM
Jun 2016

I pulled this quickly from Wickipedia, there's other stuff out there.

Joseph Stiglitz is the Roosevelt Institute's chief economist. In 2015, a report authored by Stiglitz offered an indictment of 35 years of U.S. economic policies. The report was expected to influence the economic agenda of Hillary Clinton, whose economic team has ties to the Roosevelt Institute. Elizabeth Warren and Bill deBlasio joined Stiglitz at the press conference to announce the report. The 37 policy recommendations in the Stiglitz report include progressive taxation and an expansion of government programs.[14]

Time called the Stiglitz report "a roadmap for what many progressives would like to see happen policy wise over the next four years." According to the Washington Post, the Institute's plan is "firmly rooted in the conviction that more government can solve most of America's economic challenges. It is a plan seemingly designed to rally liberals, enrage free-market economists and push a certain presumptive presidential nominee to the left."


Now, not that bad? Sanders is not exactly a voice in the wilderness.

angrychair

(8,669 posts)
93. The key point there is
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 05:25 PM
Jun 2016

"Expected to influence".
Given that a significant portion of her economic and financial advisers are Wall St insiders who became millionaires working at Wall St. firms, I'm not holding my breath that any of them give two shits about the growing income inequality that they are not just examples of but exemplifies given the gross exaggeration of wealth with her inner circle.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
101. Gotcha. We'll all get to see. Of course, the
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 07:51 PM
Jun 2016

problem with learning by experience is that Experience doesn't bother to explain the lesson. Understanding is up to us.

angrychair

(8,669 posts)
102. I don't disagree
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 08:55 PM
Jun 2016

I would love to see her move toward more positive change with regard to income inequality, unfortunately there is nothing in her history that would give any such indication. Her documented opinion of being broke is only having a couple million dollars.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
104. Imo, that last is a rather silly statement.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 04:41 AM
Jun 2016

You either actually know that it is not an accurate depiction of her character, and her history, or you do not.

This is kind of what I meant. How we choose to interpret the information that is incredibly available to us today is everything. Misinterpreted information can never become knowledge, and the entire process is inimical to wisdom.

Btw, did you know that on one study of cable TV viewers ardent Fox News viewers knew LESS about the world than people who watched no news at all? Or that by far most Fox news content is decided on based on what the viewers WANT to hear?

angrychair

(8,669 posts)
105. My premise is factually based
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 09:51 AM
Jun 2016

My statement about her concept of "dead broke" was backed up by a reliable source, quoting her own words. Don't know about you but I have been "dead broke" and no one was loaning me almost $3 million to buy a home.
I know she came back much latter on and walked back some of that but only because it didn't tract with the public image she is trying to sell.

Read my post here, it is meant to be my final word on this Sanders vs. Clinton thing.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
51. I would say Radio Shack TRS-80.
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 05:48 AM
Jun 2016

This was a computer that looked good and interesting in the store, but couldn't really do anything, but a lot of people bought it.

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
62. That worked way better than a TI.
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 06:44 AM
Jun 2016

TI's problem was that they wanted to make everything proprietary, software and hardware wise, so they could maximize their profit margin. sound familiar?

-none

(1,884 posts)
84. I remember that computer.
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 09:11 AM
Jun 2016

That row of switches across the front were used to program it so it was smart enough to boot from a teletype tape.
One mistake and you started all over on a multi-page check list. Oh the fun back then.

QC

(26,371 posts)
38. Lots of corporate "education reform" propaganda, too.
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 10:38 PM
Jun 2016

Kevin Carey, the resident education "scholar," is the worst writer on the subject in America. He's the one who thinks we should "unbundle" high ed and just let the proles take some online courses. (People whose dads have lucrative gigs at corporate propaganda mills like New America will, presumably, go to elite schools.)

They're a front group for outfits like Gates and Sallie Mae.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
22. If Sanders is Windows 95 what's Hillary? An abacus, slide-rule, and quill pen?
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 09:28 PM
Jun 2016

She's to progressive what Twinkies are to nutrition.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
42. Judging by the number of endorsements from his colleagues and the votes he got from Democrats
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 11:49 PM
Jun 2016

Calling him the Windows 95 of politics may be too good of a compliment.

Not only did the vast majority of Dems -- both in Congress and regulars -- support Hillary but even Dem think tanks thought Sanders' ideas were farfetched, poorly thought out and completely unimplementable. He's like the MySpace of politics.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
97. Obviously a hell of a lot more people thought so. And Reagan is still viewed among conservatives
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 05:58 PM
Jun 2016

as some sort of demi-God, 30 years later.

Sanders' own colleagues in the Senate -- including the members of the Progressive and Black Caucuses -- wouldn't give him the time of day. Says it all.

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
98. Bernie Sanders is the only Senator in the Congressional Progressive Caucus.
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 06:04 PM
Jun 2016

The co-chairs of the Congressional Progressive Caucus endorsed Sanders and campaigned for him.

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
46. HRC is the one who won't change with the times and
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 04:02 AM
Jun 2016

...advocate
- free tuition
- an end to the death penalty and mandatory minimums
- legalizing marijuana

 

AntiBank

(1,339 posts)
60. article is shit, advocates wonky neoliberal 3rd way crap
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 06:39 AM
Jun 2016

especially odious is the spurious attack on Glass-Steagall as outdated

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
90. The NYT wishes all these kids would get with the modern times.
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 10:19 AM
Jun 2016

I'm convinced that the writers for most media have been replaced by artificial stupidity programs.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»NYT Opinion: Sanders, the...