2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWho is going to be the Republican nominee...
Say, you, like me are now convinced that Donald J. Trump will not be the republican on the ballot in November, who do you think would replace him? Ryan? Romney? Someone else?
Schema Thing
(10,283 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,674 posts)If they did a thing at the convention like the Dems did in '68 (nominate somebody who had never run in any primary), all hell would break loose, way worse than '68, because Trump's supporters are violent assholes who would totally riot. Say the GOPers did decide to take that risk and dump Trump, and managed to talk somebody else into taking the job, that person would lose the GE spectacularly because Trump is so popular with the GOP's racist, xenophobic base that he'd either run on a third party ticket or urge them to write him in. The substitute candidate's political career would be ruined. I can't imagine anyone wanting anything to do with that scenario.
Tobin S.
(10,418 posts)They aren't going to risk that. As much as the Republican establishment dislikes Trump, I think they hate Hillary even more.
Lord Magus
(1,999 posts)That's the kind of people who join the Trump cult.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)It was only after that election cycle that we started getting a caucus or primary in every state. Meanwhile, the state party in each state controlled the delegates, and at the time of RFK's assassination, Humphrey had the majority of delegates.
Tal Vez
(660 posts)swhisper1
(851 posts)CanonRay
(14,101 posts)SFnomad
(3,473 posts)him ... and then they will be crushed in November. They very well may be crushed in November anyway .. but to replace tRump with someone else will make the crushage epic.
swhisper1
(851 posts)SFnomad
(3,473 posts)If he tries to do it as an Indy, he'll run up against "sore loser" laws in about a dozen (or maybe it's more) states that would not allow him on the ballot. As long as he ends up on the ballot on battleground states ... the crushage would be epic.
swhisper1
(851 posts)Lord Magus
(1,999 posts)Especially if he gave them a hefty "donation" in exchange for the nomination.
Lord Magus
(1,999 posts)They don't have access in all 50 states but he wouldn't need 50-state access if his agenda is revenge against the RNC rather than actually winning.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)and appoints someone? It won't matter.
After the riots, any nominee would be lucky to if he could be elected as dog catcher in a town where he was the only voter.
Ryan won't take it. He is too smart to be a sacrificial lamb on the altar of the RNC. I know it's popular to call him dumb here, but he isn't. He already said no to the #StopTrump movement. He will not accept the nomination.
Romney would like it, but he could not win in 2012, and he will do worse in 2016. A member of the Republican elite could not win the nomination, and he won't win the general election.
Should such a ridiculous thing happen, I think it would be Romney. No one else would go near it that has even the slightest hope of a career in Republican politics.
glennward
(989 posts)My thoughts/
TSIAS
(14,689 posts)I think many establishment Republicans are comfortable with Clinton's hawkish foreign policy. If Trump isn't the nominee, his supporters will be so upset that it would be hard for Romney or Ryan or anyone to win.
I think the GOP essentially let Trump fully own this loss and move on quickly to 2020.
Contrary1
(12,629 posts)Jeb or Ted.