Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 09:48 AM Jun 2016

How to explain this: Hillary Clinton praised a former president

https://www.yahoo.com/news/hillary-clinton-invokes-unlikely-allies-000000292.html

The man she spoke of was not her husband, Bill Clinton, or Barack Obama, whom she hopes to succeed. It was George W. Bush — long one of the left’s most potent villains.

In an unusual election year, when a quarter of Republicans say they do not have a favorable opinion of their presumptive nominee, Clinton is making striking overtures to conservatives even as she works to shore up support on the left flank of her party by winning over Sen. Bernie Sanders’ liberal backers.

That’s included surprisingly warm talk about both former Presidents Bush, as well as GOP icon Ronald Reagan. At a campaign stop in Westminster, Calif., earlier this month, Clinton said she was fortunate enough to have known “a lot of presidents.”

“I knew President George H.W. Bush, and he was always willing to talk about issues and ask what was on your mind,” she said. Of his son, she offered more specific praise, saying he was “absolutely committed” after 9/11 to his promise to get New York City the billions of dollars it needed to rebuild. “He never wavered and I’ll never forget that,” she said of Bush, as a few supporters clapped tepidly. (At Nancy Reagan’s funeral in March, a CNN journalist posted a photo of the two hugging.)


241 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How to explain this: Hillary Clinton praised a former president (Original Post) blackspade Jun 2016 OP
moderates, centrists and independents eat that shit up. geek tragedy Jun 2016 #1
Regardless of his flaws and they were many Bush never demonized Muslims or Hispanics. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #6
Oh my unicorn he is practically a saint then isn't he! Well I was wrong! Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #9
Compared to Trump Bush was a saint. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #15
Ask Mrs. King. Octafish Jun 2016 #22
Thank you for your input. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #25
You are most welcome! Octafish Jun 2016 #37
Thank you for sharing those photographs with me. I never saw them before. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #46
you do realize the only reason Wallace was in that photo dsc Jun 2016 #138
Thanks for the back story. Octafish Jun 2016 #146
again it isn't the choice I would have made dsc Jun 2016 #150
At one time George Wallace was quite progressive and was endoresed by the NAACP BlueStateLib Jun 2016 #217
Speaks volumes to me, and many of the troops, Sir. bobthedrummer Jun 2016 #187
bush never dissed......... heaven05 Jun 2016 #210
Ohhh dear excuse me for critizing your man!!! Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #44
Thank you for misrepresenting my position and sneaking in an ad hominem attack as well DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #50
As you did mine! You have a very nice weekend as well! Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #60
I don't believe I misrepresented your position as my commitment to veracity is my sine qua non. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #64
You are kinda cute! You know that though eh! Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #71
I live in the SFV. It's going to be > 105 degrees !!! DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #74
5000 dead US soldiers and 100, 000 dead innocent Iraqis based on a lie? Chasstev365 Jun 2016 #59
You must have left out your sarcasm thingy. jonestonesusa Jun 2016 #112
And Dubya never praised Mussolini nor Hitler! Obama should give him a Medal of Freedom award! imagine2015 Jun 2016 #153
George W Bush met Hillary Clinton at Nancy Reagan’s funeral BlueStateLib Jun 2016 #218
W didnt disparage, he just stole from them, used them and lied to them swhisper1 Jun 2016 #231
Lol Dem2 Jun 2016 #19
I would venture to say it is you that is dangerous to our country! Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #56
Now you're just spamming fallacies Dem2 Jun 2016 #68
Have a lovely day! Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #85
this is the kind of black and white thinking that cause something like the OP treestar Jun 2016 #211
candidate Bush in 2000 was WAY more moderate and acceptable than any of the Republican geek tragedy Jun 2016 #10
GWB never "demonized" Muslims sure; GWB just lied the USA into war and blew up Muslims with PufPuf23 Jun 2016 #80
Thank you for your input. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #81
Your threats are childish. blackspade Jun 2016 #95
I didn't threaten anybody in this thread. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #101
Your silly continual references to Monday's changeover.... blackspade Jun 2016 #119
Exactly. I wondered by this person kept saying this over and over... Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #123
That wasn't my intention. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #134
Party unity is a dirty word to some... blackspade Jun 2016 #141
What an odd inference. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #125
Oh yes, how odd. blackspade Jun 2016 #139
I take that as you have no intention to apologize for disrespecting, dehumaninizing.... DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #142
Disrespect, dehumanize, and delegitimize? blackspade Jun 2016 #172
There is no need to disrespect , deligitimize, and dehumanize me DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #179
Lather, rinse, repeat.... blackspade Jun 2016 #181
No projection, sir or madame. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #182
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #136
I refuse to respond to your attempt to denigrate, disrespect, and dehumazine me in kind. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #143
Candor compels to opine that you must have slept through Shock and Awe Autumn Jun 2016 #191
There is no need for us to address our fellow members in such a hurtful fashion. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #196
Just don't bother to PM me. I blocked messages from you after the last one. Autumn Jun 2016 #198
Thank you for getting another shot in and insulting me again. I refuse to respond in kind. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #199
. Autumn Jun 2016 #200
Thank you... I hope to be your model. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #204
You are the perfect role model and the quintessential DUer. Autumn Jun 2016 #206
Thank you. I think. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #207
Good grief. Cary Jun 2016 #219
You bet your fucking ass I'm bitter, I lost a Nephew in that clusterfuck so put your Autumn Jun 2016 #221
Enjou Cary Jun 2016 #222
Whoa. Hissyspit Jul 2016 #240
Whatever. Cary Jul 2016 #241
Somehow that didn't stop you from supporting Clinton in 2008 BainsBane Jun 2016 #232
That's not the reason I won't support her. nt Autumn Jun 2016 #236
Presidents and First Ladies are the only ones who knows the crap they go through yeoman6987 Jun 2016 #94
Hey nice Bernie attack there. Sneaky too! Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #66
this is the primary forum, correct? geek tragedy Jun 2016 #70
You do know Hillary won the primary don't you? Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #82
I know it, but the junior Senator from Vermont refuses to admit it nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #87
And you care because WHY? Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #234
Until he suspends his campaign he is in the picture. By his choice. n/t pnwmom Jun 2016 #220
I guess Bush wasn't that bad. I still think he's a war criminal tho NWCorona Jun 2016 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author Fresh_Start Jun 2016 #4
I know and I actually thought that note was a nice gesture to Bill NWCorona Jun 2016 #7
Mike Malloy... ReRe Jun 2016 #34
Nope. blackspade Jun 2016 #20
Exactly Ned_Devine Jun 2016 #98
.... Else You Are Mad Jun 2016 #107
Yes that was an attempt at sarcasm on my part. NWCorona Jun 2016 #129
Why would anyone support GWB? Blows my mind. n/t Paper Roses Jun 2016 #3
She has admitted she's after the Republican vote..... KoKo Jun 2016 #8
For every Republican vote she gains... ReRe Jun 2016 #77
A Dem base she doesn't care about any way Ned_Devine Jun 2016 #100
Well... ReRe Jun 2016 #111
It's vulgar Ned_Devine Jun 2016 #147
Is this what it means to be a "pragmatic progressive"? demwing Jun 2016 #189
Bernie also said he hoped one_voice Jun 2016 #135
The difference is that Bernie never pandered to them arikara Jun 2016 #209
Support? That's not how I read this. Sheepshank Jun 2016 #35
In politics, sometimes people have to be diplomatic shenmue Jun 2016 #215
George HW Bush used the phrase voodoo economics against Reagan in their primary tonyt53 Jun 2016 #5
Moneynfor his banker friends to rebuild! Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #13
And he got a vote for his war from that money. Goblinmonger Jun 2016 #43
Indeed I suppose it does! Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #88
As a New York Senator, she asked for things from him and got them. leftofcool Jun 2016 #11
At Nancy's funeral Hillary spoke a litany of lies in service to Reagan at the expense of the truth Bluenorthwest Jun 2016 #12
It's good politics, appealing to centrists and Republicans uncomforatble with Trump. YouDig Jun 2016 #14
Expanding the wrong way; to the right. blackspade Jun 2016 #23
Every vote counts the same. If there are centrist votes available, and with Trump, there are, YouDig Jun 2016 #26
Centrists don't like the Bushes.... blackspade Jun 2016 #48
Some centrists do. And I can't think of too many Democrats that would vote against her YouDig Jun 2016 #51
Recall GWB's gaff in calling his war making a "crusade"? eom PufPuf23 Jun 2016 #90
yes I do heaven05 Jun 2016 #239
Nope...Sanders himself (and many DUers agreed) he was wooing the "R" vote. Sheepshank Jun 2016 #63
You mean she behaved like a grown up person La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #16
Praising a war criminal? blackspade Jun 2016 #24
As long as he remains unconvicted by any courts La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #27
By that loose definition any member of Congress who votes for defense spending is a war criminal. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #33
So he gets a pass from you. blackspade Jun 2016 #38
Lol. Such drama. La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #53
Oh yes, death and destruction is "drama" blackspade Jun 2016 #62
I'm sure her reaction would be the same if Bernie praised W. I'm sure of it Ned_Devine Jun 2016 #102
You mean how we're told that Bernie supporters are mostly angry, white, appalachiablue Jun 2016 #148
It's been constant forever. This past year has been like a frustrating nightmare that won't end Ned_Devine Jun 2016 #149
Nightmare is it. What twisted, contradictory and absurd claims offensive to many groups. appalachiablue Jun 2016 #152
She praises the opposition when it is not apporpriate nor even accurate: Bluenorthwest Jun 2016 #29
She said that at a funeral and apologized for being wrong La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #30
No, she said that after the funeral, to the press without being asked about it. Bluenorthwest Jun 2016 #39
Why are you lying about me? I've criticized Ronald Reagan a million times on du La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #52
You mock me for caring about the history. "No matter how obsessed you are with this" you snark Bluenorthwest Jun 2016 #75
I mock you for using a misstatement for an irrational hatred La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #78
You mock me for caring about the truth and seeking to bring that truth to the table. Bluenorthwest Jun 2016 #104
Ahhh was she tired and overworked. Poor Hillary! Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #108
March, 2016. Hillary Clinton with MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell appalachiablue Jun 2016 #131
I totally agree! nt LAS14 Jun 2016 #159
She likes war criminals - Kissinger, Netanyahu etc so her affection for the Bush crime family Arazi Jun 2016 #213
Legitimizing a corrupt and criminal regime that gave us torture, unjustified wars tabasco Jun 2016 #17
George W Bush who ignored NSA, CIA, FBI warnings about Osama bin Laden? Octafish Jun 2016 #18
This means he couldn't have helped out New York after 9/11??? nt LAS14 Jun 2016 #161
Hadn't thought of it that way. Thought he was criminally negligent, at best. Octafish Jun 2016 #171
Yeah...you missed the part where they won't endorse her...of course you did. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #21
Didn't miss it. blackspade Jun 2016 #32
I know it's hard for those on the far, far end of the political spectrum to understand, but... Tarc Jun 2016 #28
Cordial terms do not require false or undue praise nor the revision of important history to serve Bluenorthwest Jun 2016 #31
Why do you always manage not to include that she apologized La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #36
Why is an apology all it takes to make that go away? Goblinmonger Jun 2016 #49
Because the Clinton's have a long history of HIV AIDS activism La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #76
Saying that a person who shit on HIV problems was a champion for it Goblinmonger Jun 2016 #86
Bob Hattoy at the 1992 Democratic Convention, spoken in Hillary's presence: Bluenorthwest Jun 2016 #93
I think that is the truth! Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #120
Oh, she bashed then said 'sorry'? That means it can't be discussed? She said what she said on TV Bluenorthwest Jun 2016 #61
She didn't bash anyone. Your hatred is making you blind La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #73
Sorry but when you take away the good works of an oppressed group and credit those actions Bluenorthwest Jun 2016 #84
She apologized only because she saw the polls dropping!!! Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #114
+2 The cold, calculating truth. appalachiablue Jun 2016 #133
I believe that Clinton long apologized for the AIDS and Reagan comments Tarc Jun 2016 #65
I buried the love of my life back then, also half my friends and mentors. Bluenorthwest Jun 2016 #79
You get out what you put in, as the saying goes Tarc Jun 2016 #91
I'll just let readers read what you have just said and what I said. Bluenorthwest Jun 2016 #105
The readers will see you dredging up some thing Hillary said that she already apologized for Tarc Jun 2016 #116
"Love and Kindness" QC Jun 2016 #128
I am so sorry Blue. Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #126
This^^^ Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #110
Some are not sophisticated and well read enough to understand that historical context. Trust Buster Jun 2016 #45
So that's what we're doing now? Goblinmonger Jun 2016 #55
To the extent that you wish to demonize everything about those Republicans that have served this Trust Buster Jun 2016 #97
Disingenuous bullshit. blackspade Jun 2016 #115
Being a Democratic website does not mean that one must hate every aspect of Republicans. Trust Buster Jun 2016 #122
Snort. blackspade Jun 2016 #137
There isn't a fucking "tea party left" blackspade Jun 2016 #57
No freeper ever hated liberals more than QC Jun 2016 #69
No kidding. blackspade Jun 2016 #96
"Hating" is going crazy over Hillary complimenting past presidents. Projection. Trust Buster Jun 2016 #103
No, hating is his kind of stuff. QC Jun 2016 #113
Nope, hating is being so sanctimonious as believing everything is black and white and good and evil Trust Buster Jun 2016 #118
I find the Cavers at DI to be more open minded and friendly. Autumn Jun 2016 #214
Post #97 applies to your post as well. Trust Buster Jun 2016 #99
Chah! What do you think this is? The Democratic Underground? lumberjack_jeff Jun 2016 #162
Because the best way to win a general election is call the other party names. BootinUp Jun 2016 #40
Somebody just above you referred to progressives Goblinmonger Jun 2016 #67
I used the term "Tea Party Left" as it applies to totally demonizing the service of past presidents Trust Buster Jun 2016 #106
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #225
Re-read the OP and maybe you will understand the subject matter better. Trust Buster Jun 2016 #226
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #227
Hillary said none of that in the OP. Go re-read the OP so you have a better understanding of the Trust Buster Jun 2016 #229
Because she's not the "burn the whole house down and demonize everyone" person that a Trust Buster Jun 2016 #41
Obama pinned a medal on Poppy Octafish Jun 2016 #42
Because hating on an old man that served his country in WWII, the CIA, the vice presidency and Trust Buster Jun 2016 #47
HW Bush was a murderer and a coward WDIM Jun 2016 #83
Your over the top and sanctimonious attitude does not impress me at all. Trust Buster Jun 2016 #109
If reality is over the top and sanctimonious for you WDIM Jun 2016 #121
Get a grip. Re-read the OP. It criticized Hillary for saying that H.W. asked her opinions and Trust Buster Jun 2016 #124
Terrorists for Bush Octafish Jun 2016 #132
Not hate, telling the truth. Octafish Jun 2016 #130
Revolting Doctor_J Jun 2016 #54
Democrats have been taken over WDIM Jun 2016 #127
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #58
That was the straw that broke the camel's back. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #72
So we, as liberals, are expected to believe ... surrealAmerican Jun 2016 #89
Eliz. Warren explained it a few years back. QC Jun 2016 #92
Warren certainly received the treatment from Summers about the Club. appalachiablue Jun 2016 #144
She certainly did, and then she compounded her grievous sin QC Jun 2016 #145
Roll out those tortured rationales, oh brave cognitive dissonants. RufusTFirefly Jun 2016 #117
I have no problem with her saying truthful nice things about Bush dsc Jun 2016 #140
Hitler created the autobahn and the VW bug Buzz cook Jun 2016 #151
Really? blackspade Jun 2016 #155
We were headed toward Godwin's rule Buzz cook Jun 2016 #160
Maybe you should run for president on those observations. n/t lumberjack_jeff Jun 2016 #163
Gotta remember this excellent comeback. Unfortunately... LAS14 Jun 2016 #174
How to explain that? It's pretty easy ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #154
That's a lousy explanation. blackspade Jun 2016 #156
Okay ... But that IS how the real world works. 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #164
Especially when criminals are given a pass. blackspade Jun 2016 #167
Why should we have to explain it? Do we want... LAS14 Jun 2016 #157
Sorry, not giving the Bush criminals a pass. blackspade Jun 2016 #166
So acknowledging a good thing about someone is giving... LAS14 Jun 2016 #173
That poster is way out there. Trust Buster Jun 2016 #175
Way out where? blackspade Jun 2016 #183
It's a big club, and although you're not in it, we insist you vote for it. lumberjack_jeff Jun 2016 #158
How is acknowledging what is probably simply true "pivoting to the right???" nt LAS14 Jun 2016 #165
Some think that politicians should be kicking each other in the balls or ovaries. grossproffit Jun 2016 #168
Some balls and ovaries deserve to be kicked. n/t lumberjack_jeff Jun 2016 #169
If your goal is going to jail for assault and battery. grossproffit Jun 2016 #170
A lot if hatred in this thread over nothing. Trust Buster Jun 2016 #176
And a lot of casuistry, sophistry, obscurantism as well... DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #180
That is disturbing DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #184
I find the language and imagery disturbing. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #185
A lot of the comments defending her statements are unbelievable to me. Juicy_Bellows Jun 2016 #177
Ain't that some shit? d_legendary1 Jun 2016 #178
It's the new way. EndElectoral Jun 2016 #193
It is very simple to explain. potone Jun 2016 #186
Beings the current Prez Go Vols Jun 2016 #188
OMG, is Team Hill openly embracing the Bushes now? Hydra Jun 2016 #190
If "praising" means speaking the truth. As NY Senator she relied on Bush to get the funding needed glennward Jun 2016 #194
It was dishonest of her to lie for the Bushes to get them a blank check for the Iraq war Hydra Jun 2016 #197
Huh? Lie for the Bushes? When, where? You mean voting for the war like so many other glennward Jun 2016 #216
Lol Hydra Jun 2016 #223
Oh my gawd! She's a grown up that behaves professionally! Lil Missy Jun 2016 #192
I've noticed how many Republicans have praised Obama. EndElectoral Jun 2016 #195
DU liberals justifying this... Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #201
Sickening, ain't it? pokerfan Jun 2016 #212
Obviously they're not liberals. HooptieWagon Jun 2016 #230
Have you ever watched the House or Senate in action on C-Span? George II Jun 2016 #202
I imagine she's trying to get votes from Republicans who can't stand Trump gollygee Jun 2016 #203
The optics is all true and has been for 50 years. gordianot Jun 2016 #205
The vitriol being spewed in this post primary season is what happens redstateblues Jun 2016 #208
That red arrow felix_numinous Jun 2016 #224
He was committed to getting New York money to rebuild -- as praise goes, that's hardly even praise fishwax Jun 2016 #228
and that's supposed to convince people BainsBane Jun 2016 #233
Sure, cut the crap. blackspade Jun 2016 #237
A presidential candidate doesn't get to do scorched-earth... Orsino Jun 2016 #235
One word. Carter. blackspade Jun 2016 #238
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
1. moderates, centrists and independents eat that shit up.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 09:52 AM
Jun 2016

she's trying to win the votes of moderates, centrists and independents, and draw a contrast with the scorched-earth, extremist polarizers like Trump, Cruz, etc.

Sanders is refusing to even acknowledge that she won, let alone help her win.

When someone refuses to get off the sideline, they wind up being marginalized.

 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
9. Oh my unicorn he is practically a saint then isn't he! Well I was wrong!
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:00 AM
Jun 2016

Hillary only waited a few days to turn her back on progressives to court the right. Glad to see I was correct. Now I get to watch all my fears come true I 2017.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
15. Compared to Trump Bush was a saint.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:04 AM
Jun 2016

He never dissed Hispanics
" " Muslims
" " African Americans
" " women
" " Jews
" " Asians

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
22. Ask Mrs. King.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:14 AM
Jun 2016

Bush laughed when he mentioned ''hanging'' Dr. King's portrait at White House.



Ask the Gold Star Mom.

The little turd from Crawford was sore busy with his wit when he gave his ''commemorative coin'' to Goldstar mother and says: "Don't go selling it on eBay." Bush actually said that in the White House to a woman whose son died in Iraq for no reason Bush or anyone ever gave to the American people.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x1828225


Ask Fred Malek.

dsc

(52,155 posts)
138. you do realize the only reason Wallace was in that photo
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 12:31 PM
Jun 2016

was that Black Alabamians voted for him in both a contested primary and again in a general election. It isn't a decision that I would have made had I been them, but it was their decision to make, not mine, not yours, and not Bill Clinton's. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Wallace#Final_term_as_governor

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
146. Thanks for the back story.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 01:46 PM
Jun 2016

I remember him for "Segregation now! Segregation tomorrow! Segregation forever!" statements from his inaugural of Jan. 14, 1963.



Didn't know he had turned into such a liberal, especially considering the lengths to which Nixon's White House, in which Poppy Bush was a player, went to exploit his near-assassination.

"Reluctantly, I began to pack a bag, adding to it the shaving kit that held my CIA-issue physical disguise and documents....I called several airlines and found that the only available flight would put me in Milwaukee about 11 o’clock that night." -- E. Howard Hunt

E. Howard Hunt, Undercover (New York: Berkley Publishing Corporation, 1974), p. 217 via "Bremer & Wallace: It’s Déjà Vu All Over Again" by Lisa Pease.

dsc

(52,155 posts)
150. again it isn't the choice I would have made
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 01:55 PM
Jun 2016

presumedly you wouldn't have made that choice either, but in a democracy the people of the state in question get to make that decision, and they decided, for whatever reason, that his was a story of redemption and that they should honor it by making him governor one last time.

BlueStateLib

(937 posts)
217. At one time George Wallace was quite progressive and was endoresed by the NAACP
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 03:40 PM
Jun 2016

In 1958, George Wallace ran against John Patterson in his first gubernatorial race. In that Alabama election, Wallace refused to make race an issue, and he declined the endorsement of the Ku Klux Klan. This move won Wallace the support of the NAACP. Patterson, on the other hand, embraced Klan support, and he trounced Wallace in the election. In 1962 Wallace, having realized the power of race as a political tool, ran for governor again—this time as a proponent of segregation. He won by a landslide.
http://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-by-era/civil-rights-movement/resources/george-wallace-segregation-1964
 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
210. bush never dissed.........
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 11:44 AM
Jun 2016

he sure did cause the NEEDLESS death of many.........Iraq incursion......american dead and wounded covering all those you say he didn't diss and between 100,000 to 900,000 Iraqi civilian deaths.....by the way most were Muslim.....no he "never dissed"....he just killed.

 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
44. Ohhh dear excuse me for critizing your man!!!
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:29 AM
Jun 2016

Didn't "diss" women ohhh please.

Well enjoy celebrating how wonderful President Bush is and good luck with that meme!

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
50. Thank you for misrepresenting my position and sneaking in an ad hominem attack as well
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:33 AM
Jun 2016

Have a lovely weekend filled with joy and splendor.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
64. I don't believe I misrepresented your position as my commitment to veracity is my sine qua non.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:37 AM
Jun 2016

May the upcoming weekend be the best weekend of your life.

 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
71. You are kinda cute! You know that though eh!
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:41 AM
Jun 2016

You have a truly wonderful weekend and enjoy being a winner. You know Hillary won right! So rejoice!!

jonestonesusa

(880 posts)
112. You must have left out your sarcasm thingy.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 11:21 AM
Jun 2016

Never dissed Muslims? Invaded Iraq based on lies? No demonizing there.

Never demonized black people. I don't know, Bernie made me white, so I can't speak to that anymore.

Wow...I guess I've misunderstood compassionate conservatism for all those years. I didn't realize how non-racist it was.

 

imagine2015

(2,054 posts)
153. And Dubya never praised Mussolini nor Hitler! Obama should give him a Medal of Freedom award!
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 02:15 PM
Jun 2016
What a wonderful and outstanding dude Dubya was.

It's time to rewrite history on the man who the rightwing Republican controlled Supreme Court made president in 2000.



 

swhisper1

(851 posts)
231. W didnt disparage, he just stole from them, used them and lied to them
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 09:46 PM
Jun 2016

in bed with the Saudis, oil, I could go on and on

Trump bilks people, but hasnt tortured or killed any yet. He says disruptive things to get free press and he works the human nature of the destitute and misguided, appeals to the worst in people, but hasnt done any of it. It is just all talk so far- talk to get votes.

No, Bush is far worse. He took glee in harming others. We dont know what Trump will actually do. I dont want to know, but at this point, it is conjecture.

Hillary is really stupid to endorse W, and Kissenger, and several others. She is proving her republican roots

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
19. Lol
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:10 AM
Jun 2016

Just toss out the logical fallacies to dismiss even the slightest desire to work with those whom we disagree.

All or nothing leaves the whole world blind. Your positions are dangerous for our country.

 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
56. I would venture to say it is you that is dangerous to our country!
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:35 AM
Jun 2016

Your conservative slip is showing when you defend President Bush as a good man. When did the other side ever indicate to you they want to work with US??

Giving into them has not worked thus far! Four years of nothing from the current capital hill gang shows you what you can get by cozing up with them. But as I have said Hillary is good with Republicans and friends with hawks so it should go well IF YOU ARE THE 1% or hope to climb into that club!

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
68. Now you're just spamming fallacies
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:40 AM
Jun 2016

Where did I defend Bush? Conservative?

You're on a roll today - I'm done with angry slash-and-burn types like yourself.

Jesus you're angry. Bye.

 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
85. Have a lovely day!
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:50 AM
Jun 2016

Off to work. May I suggest you read your own posts and you may see what I saw. Otherwise why care what I say "angry person that I am"

P.S. I am not angry just supper sad about the tragedies of late!

treestar

(82,383 posts)
211. this is the kind of black and white thinking that cause something like the OP
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 11:45 AM
Jun 2016

it's not THAT black and white.

They don't have to hate each other and condemn each other personally. That's for Republicans, because they make it about the people, not the policies.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
10. candidate Bush in 2000 was WAY more moderate and acceptable than any of the Republican
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:01 AM
Jun 2016

candidates this year.

Of course, President Bush was much worse than candidate Bush.

PufPuf23

(8,767 posts)
80. GWB never "demonized" Muslims sure; GWB just lied the USA into war and blew up Muslims with
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:46 AM
Jun 2016

"Shock and Awe".

GWB never "demonized" Hispanics but hired Rumsfeld who referred to Bolivia, Ecuador, and Venezuela as a western hemisphere "Axis of Evil".

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
95. Your threats are childish.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 11:05 AM
Jun 2016

Come Monday is will still be fine to pillory Rethug asshats and conservatives.
So you have a great weekend yourself further dividing the Democratic Party.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
101. I didn't threaten anybody in this thread.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 11:11 AM
Jun 2016
Your threats are childish.



I didn't threaten anybody in this thread. I request you peer into your conscience, heed your better angels, and apologize for libeling me.

When we libel others we don't cover ourselves in glory.

Thank you in advance.


May you have a lovely weekend.
 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
123. Exactly. I wondered by this person kept saying this over and over...
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 11:29 AM
Jun 2016

Now I get it. Honestly they are full of anger and they won. Imagine if they had lost!

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
125. What an odd inference.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 11:32 AM
Jun 2016

Again:


I didn't threaten anybody in this thread. I request you peer into your conscience, heed your better angels, and apologize for libeling me.

When we libel others we don't cover ourselves in glory.

Thank you in advance.

Now that we got that bit of housekeeping out of the way, have a lovely summer.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
142. I take that as you have no intention to apologize for disrespecting, dehumaninizing....
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 12:41 PM
Jun 2016

I take that as you have no intention to apologize for disrespecting, dehumaninizing, and deligitimizing me.

I still, after all that, believe most people are good.

Have a lovely life.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
172. Disrespect, dehumanize, and delegitimize?
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 03:01 PM
Jun 2016

I did none of those.
I just called out your devisive bullshit.
Deal with it.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
179. There is no need to disrespect , deligitimize, and dehumanize me
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 04:21 PM
Jun 2016
Disrespect, dehumanize, and delegitimize?

"I did none of those.
I just called out your devisive (sp) bullshit.
Deal with it. "

-blackspade



There is no need to denigrate, disrespect , deligitimize, and dehumanize me or any of the other denizens of this board from the anonymity of an internet modem. We don't cover ourselves in glory when we do that.






Have a wonderful life.




DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
182. No projection, sir or madame.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 04:58 PM
Jun 2016

I am just defending myself from your hurtful, calumnious, and unprovoked attacks.

I call on you to peer into your conscience, heed your better angels, apologize to me, and restore me to the position I enjoyed before you imputed my motives.

Thank you in advance.


I would be remiss if I didn't tell you to have a wonderful life, though.

Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #81)

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
143. I refuse to respond to your attempt to denigrate, disrespect, and dehumazine me in kind.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 12:45 PM
Jun 2016

At least here.






Have a lovely weekend and life.






I detest Bush. I detest Trump. But candor compels me to state the former didn't go out of way to take rhetorical dumps on vulnerable people.

Autumn

(45,056 posts)
191. Candor compels to opine that you must have slept through Shock and Awe
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 08:45 AM
Jun 2016

because that was the biggest mother fucking dump taken on vulnerable people in a hell of a long time. It sure as fuck wasn't a kiss on the fucking head. candor my ass.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
196. There is no need for us to address our fellow members in such a hurtful fashion.
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 09:01 AM
Jun 2016

I will be the bigger person and not respond in kind.

It is up to all of us to elevate the discourse on our once august board.


DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
199. Thank you for getting another shot in and insulting me again. I refuse to respond in kind.
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 09:53 AM
Jun 2016

I will continue to peer into my conscience, heed my better angels, and not further inflame the situation that has brought our once august board into the abyss.


Change begins with me.



DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
204. Thank you... I hope to be your model.
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 10:22 AM
Jun 2016

Thank you... I hope to be your model in making Democratic Underground a kinder and gentler website. If we are all kinder and gentler to the next poster than he or she was to us we can make Democratic Underground the kindest and gentlest website on the internet.







Autumn

(45,056 posts)
221. You bet your fucking ass I'm bitter, I lost a Nephew in that clusterfuck so put your
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 05:05 PM
Jun 2016

party of one in a cozy nice spot.

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
240. Whoa.
Sun Jul 31, 2016, 05:19 AM
Jul 2016

I just saw this.

A tiny violin of snark for someone who lost their nephew in Bush's war? Wow.

BainsBane

(53,031 posts)
232. Somehow that didn't stop you from supporting Clinton in 2008
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 01:11 AM
Jun 2016

against Obama for the nomination, but now 8 years later you can't support the Democratic nominee because of it? That strikes me as very odd.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
94. Presidents and First Ladies are the only ones who knows the crap they go through
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 11:04 AM
Jun 2016

It is a group made up up 44 presidents and 44 First Ladies. Nobody can even begin to understand what it's like and not to mention she actually knows the two she faintly praised. I don't see it as a big deal really. But outrage is emotional.

 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
66. Hey nice Bernie attack there. Sneaky too!
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:38 AM
Jun 2016

This article says NOTHING about Bernie yet you got in a good left hook! Well played NOT! Try defending your candidate rather than deflecting - or cheap shotsnare just too much fun?

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
70. this is the primary forum, correct?
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:41 AM
Jun 2016

and it is definitely part of the electoral calculus--Sanders is dithering on joining the fight against Trump and getting his people behind the nominee, so she has to look for additional votes elsewhere.

intransigence does not get rewarded. p=

 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
82. You do know Hillary won the primary don't you?
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:47 AM
Jun 2016

I am so confused by people who are continuing the fight between Hillary and Bernie. He is out of the picture and yet it continues to he Bernie v Hillary. Weirdest thing I have seen in my 42 years of watching and voting in America!

Bernie is not going to support Trump he said so loudly and clearly last night! I think it must be that Hillary supporters must now work to get their candidate elected and are afraid they can't so they point at things they hope will distract others from seeing her clearly! You wanted her! You got her! Now get her elected! Hopefully not by making President Bush less of an asshats then he was!

 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
234. And you care because WHY?
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 02:53 AM
Jun 2016

You want to stomp him under to your feet? You need him to bow down and accept it to prove you are right and we are all wrong?

Get over that my friend - move on go get your candidate elected in the General!

Peace be with you.

Response to NWCorona (Reply #2)

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
7. I know and I actually thought that note was a nice gesture to Bill
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 09:59 AM
Jun 2016

And while I was talking about GWB I meant the Bush family in general. Both father and son have blood on their hands.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
34. Mike Malloy...
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:25 AM
Jun 2016

... calls them the "Bush Crime Family." And that's how perpetuity is going to remember them.

 

Ned_Devine

(3,146 posts)
98. Exactly
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 11:09 AM
Jun 2016

I just read the article. Mow THAT's something I thought I'd never see in a dem nominee; praising George W. Bush. Such is life in "Upside-down World".

Else You Are Mad

(3,040 posts)
107. ....
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 11:17 AM
Jun 2016

Please tell me you are joking, right? GWB was worse, but GHWB was one of the driving forces behind the latter part of the Reagan administration...

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
129. Yes that was an attempt at sarcasm on my part.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 11:39 AM
Jun 2016

I said that as it seems like the Bush family is having a renaissance lately and I think that's craziness.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
8. She has admitted she's after the Republican vote.....
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:00 AM
Jun 2016

With "The Donald" collapsing and no replacement candidate yet available, she is seizing the moment to increase the size of "her" Democratic Party with Republican infiltrators. I'm sure many here will find that good news.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
77. For every Republican vote she gains...
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:44 AM
Jun 2016

... by saying things like that, she loses votes from the Dem base.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
111. Well...
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 11:20 AM
Jun 2016

Is she a Democrat or not? What's up with a supposed Democratic Party candidate who would rather have Republican votes than Democratic votes?

Effing bazarro twilight zone this country has turned into. Totally sicko.

 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
189. Is this what it means to be a "pragmatic progressive"?
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 06:58 PM
Jun 2016

Whats pragmatic about sleeping with the enemy?



arikara

(5,562 posts)
209. The difference is that Bernie never pandered to them
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 10:55 AM
Jun 2016

Bernie just figured that even republicans would see the value of his platform and many of the sane ones did. Her nibs on the other hand is going after the PNACers, warmongers, billionaires and industrialists. Its two totally different constituencies.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
35. Support? That's not how I read this.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:25 AM
Jun 2016

I see couched terms used and words crafted carefully to find something positive that other Republicans would find complimentary enough to consider looking at Hillary. Especially for those in the Never Trump camp.

 

tonyt53

(5,737 posts)
5. George HW Bush used the phrase voodoo economics against Reagan in their primary
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 09:57 AM
Jun 2016

I think the guy was very conflicted with his own feelings and what the GOP wanted. HE actually went only as far as the UN resolution said during the first Gulf War. With his own convictions being challenged by the GOP, he just did not seem like a very happy person. I'm not saying that he was a keeper by any means (I sure worked hard to make him a a one term guy), but he was far better than his ass wipe son. However, on the help for NY thing, he did work to get that money. Nothing wrong with giving credit when it it due.

leftofcool

(19,460 posts)
11. As a New York Senator, she asked for things from him and got them.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:02 AM
Jun 2016

She is only giving credit where it is due.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
12. At Nancy's funeral Hillary spoke a litany of lies in service to Reagan at the expense of the truth
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:03 AM
Jun 2016

and with great disregard for LGBT persons and our history. She aggressively claimed that Reagan did all the early activism that was actually done by LGBT groups and credited Ron and Nancy for doing the exact things they are reviled for not doing.

Such reckless verbiage does not help the LGBT community at all. It leaves us dangling as targets for very nasty bigots. It says 'they have no friends and deserve none'.

YouDig

(2,280 posts)
14. It's good politics, appealing to centrists and Republicans uncomforatble with Trump.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:04 AM
Jun 2016

Isn't that what Bernie keeps talking about? Expanding the party?

YouDig

(2,280 posts)
26. Every vote counts the same. If there are centrist votes available, and with Trump, there are,
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:16 AM
Jun 2016

it would be stupid of her not to go after them. And I don't see a problem with pointing out that W never called to ban Muslims, but actually made a point to say that we aren't at war with Islam. It's the truth. What do you object to about that?

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
48. Centrists don't like the Bushes....
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:32 AM
Jun 2016

She is appealing to rethugs at the expense of Democratic votes.

YouDig

(2,280 posts)
51. Some centrists do. And I can't think of too many Democrats that would vote against her
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:33 AM
Jun 2016

simply because she drew a contrast between Trump and W. They'd have to be crazy not to vote Hillary.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
239. yes I do
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 12:32 PM
Jun 2016

and the holy war those Saudi's and GWB started, still have direct implications for much of the 'troubles' being experiened in the 'holy war' region of Syria, Libya, Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan and the world today. Refugess, bombings and attempted bombings in Europe, inspiring already mentally unbalanced people to do heinous acts against innocent americans all can be laid at the feet of those Saudi's and Bushco. And if true that there were actionable warning of the Saudi's doing what they did on 9-11, then Bushco wanted this 'holy war'.

Yep. Sure do remember. He used those exact words 2008. Our religious nut jobs then latched on to those words. Consequently the agenda driven religious nut jobs abrogated the true meaning of the tenet of jihad in the Islamic religion and the holy war was on and is continuing.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
63. Nope...Sanders himself (and many DUers agreed) he was wooing the "R" vote.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:37 AM
Jun 2016

so it was ok for Sanders, but not for Hillary? Better check your hatred and set it aside for one moment to clearly see the bigger picture. I'ts been talked about here on DU on numerous threads.

http://reason.com/blog/2015/12/28/bernie-sanders-says-hell-try-to-woo-dona
quote from Bernie:
[div class="excerpt""Look, many of Trump's supporters are working-class people. And they are angry.

And they're angry because they are working longer hours for lower wages. They're angry because their jobs have left this country and gone to China or other low-wage countries. They're angry because they can't afford to send their kids to college or they can't retire with dignity.

And I think what Trump has done successfully, I would say, is take that anger, take that anxiety about terrorism and say to a lot of people in this country, look, the reason for our problems is because of Mexicans. And he says, they're all criminals and rapists. We have got to hate Mexicans. Or he says about the Muslims, they are all terrorists, and we got to keep them out of this country. Those are—that's what we have to deal with to make America great.

Meanwhile, interestingly enough, John, this is a guy who does not want to raise the minimum wage. In fact, he has said that he thinks wages in America are too high. But he does want to give hundreds of billions of dollars in tax breaks to the top three-tenths of 1 percent.

So, I think for his working-class and middle-class supporter, I think we can make the case that if we really want to address the issues that people are concerned about, why the middle class is disappearing, massive income and wealth inequality in this country, that we need policies that bring us together, that take on the greed of Wall Street, the greed of corporate America, and create a middle class that works for all of us, rather than an economy that works just for a few".

http://legalinsurrection.com/2016/01/bernie-sanders-campaign-attempts-to-woo-trump-supporters/

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/why-bernie-sanders-holds-potential-appeal-trump-voters-n488051

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2015/1228/Can-Bernie-Sanders-win-over-Donald-Trump-supporters



 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
16. You mean she behaved like a grown up person
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:06 AM
Jun 2016

Praising the opposition when appropriate and not making random attacks. Oh the humanity.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
27. As long as he remains unconvicted by any courts
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:18 AM
Jun 2016

Other presidents and nominees, including Obama, will have to find something about him to praise when trying to strike a bipartisan tone.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
38. So he gets a pass from you.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:27 AM
Jun 2016

100's of thousands dead and 'bipartisanship' is your response.
Sickening how low DU has sunk....

appalachiablue

(41,127 posts)
148. You mean how we're told that Bernie supporters are mostly angry, white,
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 01:49 PM
Jun 2016

misogynistic, anti-diversity, privileged and also less educated working class men. Aka 'Bernie Bros.' Amazing.

appalachiablue

(41,127 posts)
152. Nightmare is it. What twisted, contradictory and absurd claims offensive to many groups.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 02:08 PM
Jun 2016

Real Kafkaesque contortions to fabricate alleged constituents, one the craziest efforts I've ever seen.

Must do-

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
29. She praises the opposition when it is not apporpriate nor even accurate:
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:18 AM
Jun 2016

"It may be hard for your viewers to remember how difficult it was for people to talk about HIV/AIDS back in the 1980s and because of both president and Mrs. Reagan — in particular Mrs. Reagan — we started a national conversation, when before nobody would talk about it, nobody wanted to do anything about it, and that too is something I really appreciate with her very effective low-key advocacy. It penetrated the public conscience and people began to say, hey, we have to do something about this too."

That is of course a load of bullshit. There were about 30,000 American dead before Reagan even managed to say the word 'AIDS' out loud, seven entire years of silence.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
30. She said that at a funeral and apologized for being wrong
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:20 AM
Jun 2016

No matter how obsessed you are with this, the clintons were great on hiv/AIDS which is a large part of why they have such strong support among most lgbt people

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
39. No, she said that after the funeral, to the press without being asked about it.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:28 AM
Jun 2016

The Clintons were better on HIV/AIDS than Reagan. But Hillary made her claims not about Bill and herself but about Ron and Nancy, the unmitigated villains of that time.

I buried dozens of people before your St Ronnie even said 'AIDS' out loud. So yes it does matter to me. The question is why does it not matter to you? Why are you willing to help erase our history?

The United States needs to be supporting and honoring LGBT history and citizens so that maybe we can have some years without massive death and shootings and plagues. Using us as fodder to pander to the right wing is vile. Reckless.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
52. Why are you lying about me? I've criticized Ronald Reagan a million times on du
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:33 AM
Jun 2016

And youre not the only one affected my hiv/AIDS. It's a very important issue to me, and her misstatements made when she was tired and overworked, does not erase the great work the clintons did on HIV/AIDS.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
75. You mock me for caring about the history. "No matter how obsessed you are with this" you snark
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:43 AM
Jun 2016

about the plague that killed many of my peers. You smeared me for giving a fuck. That indicates that you yourself don't give a fuck and don't want others to either. Your objective is to silence me. Because I am correct and you don't like that.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
78. I mock you for using a misstatement for an irrational hatred
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:45 AM
Jun 2016

When the clintons have had such a great actual track record on the issue you claim to care about.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
104. You mock me for caring about the truth and seeking to bring that truth to the table.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 11:13 AM
Jun 2016

It's that simple. What she said was not a 'misstatement', that's your characterization of it. I am speaking nothing but truth. You characterize.

In this thread I'm speaking facts. You accuse me of being obsessed, of 'hate' and whatever you feel like flinging. No citations, no quotes,just 'you are this and you are that'.

 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
108. Ahhh was she tired and overworked. Poor Hillary!
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 11:18 AM
Jun 2016

Fuck I am tired and overworked every fucking day! She better get used to being tired and overworked as that is the job in the White House. Tired does mNOT justify praising asshats at their funeral. A nice comment like "she was the first lady" would have been sufficient! But she tried to make both Regan's saints - yuck!

appalachiablue

(41,127 posts)
131. March, 2016. Hillary Clinton with MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 11:57 AM
Jun 2016

after Nancy Regan's funeral bringing up the Reagans, particularly Nancy's "very effective but low key advocacy on AIDS." During the interview HC talked at length and was Not tired. The comments she added were offensive and intentional, especially to the millions of people who lost family members and loved ones like we did, all because of Pres. Ronald Reagan's refusal for years to approve funding for AIDS research, and only when heterosexuals began experiencing the disease. Any attempt to try to cover up or excuse the lies is worse ~ My little brother died far too young in 1992 at the height of the crisis because of this unforgivable bigotry and prejudice. In 1991-92 when Bill Clinton's name came up my brother shook his head I recall. We're longtime Democrats and to this day I wonder why he did not like Clinton then.
~ "This country will suffer for 3 or 4 generations for the policies of my father." Patti (Reagan) Davis.

ABC News reports: The former first lady will perhaps be best remembered for her loyalty to her husband. She became fiercely protective of him after a 1981 assassination attempt, and later stood by him as Alzheimer’s disease overtook him in his last years.. During her White House years, she sponsored a major drug prevention crusade aimed at children and young adults.. As first lady from 1981 to 1989, Reagan endured criticism for bringing high fashion and a lavish lifestyle to the White House in a time of recession. Some critics called her “Queen Nancy.”
Mrs. Reagan also stood by as her husband stayed silent during the AIDS crisis. The President waited years before mentioning it publicly, impeding government action as thousands and thousands died. According to reports published last year, Nancy Reagan blocked Rock Hudson’s last ditch effort to get AIDs treatment: Read more, http://www.towleroad.com/2016/03/former-first-lady-nancy-reagan-dead-at-94/



*Starts 4 Min. mark. Hillary on the Reagans, and Nancy Reagan's supposed low key advocacy on AIDS. March, 2016.

Arazi

(6,829 posts)
213. She likes war criminals - Kissinger, Netanyahu etc so her affection for the Bush crime family
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 12:49 PM
Jun 2016

and Reagan is understandable

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
17. Legitimizing a corrupt and criminal regime that gave us torture, unjustified wars
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:09 AM
Jun 2016

and the worst terrorist attack ever on the US. Of course, H. Clinton was a partner with that regime, and strongly advocated for the illegal war in the Senate.

is right.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
18. George W Bush who ignored NSA, CIA, FBI warnings about Osama bin Laden?
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:09 AM
Jun 2016
The Out-of-Towner

While Bush vacationed, 9/11 warnings went unheard.


By Fred Kaplan

In an otherwise dry day of hearings before the 9/11 commission, one brief bit of dialogue set off a sudden flash of clarity on the basic question of how our government let disaster happen.

The revelation came this morning, when CIA Director George Tenet was on the stand. Timothy Roemer, a former Democratic congressman, asked him when he first found out about the report from the FBI's Minnesota field office that Zacarias Moussaoui, an Islamic jihadist, had been taking lessons on how to fly a 747. Tenet replied that he was briefed about the case on Aug. 23 or 24, 2001.

Roemer then asked Tenet if he mentioned Moussaoui to President Bush at one of their frequent morning briefings. Tenet replied, "I was not in briefings at this time." Bush, he noted, "was on vacation." He added that he didn't see the president at all in August 2001. During the entire month, Bush was at his ranch in Texas. "You never talked with him?" Roemer asked. "No," Tenet replied. By the way, for much of August, Tenet too was, as he put it, "on leave."

And there you have it. National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice has made a big point of the fact that Tenet briefed the president nearly every day. Yet at the peak moment of threat, the two didn't talk at all. At a time when action was needed, and orders for action had to come from the top, the man at the top was resting undisturbed.

Throughout that summer, we now well know, Tenet, Richard Clarke, and several other officials were running around with their "hair on fire," warning that al-Qaida was about to unleash a monumental attack. On Aug. 6, Bush was given the now-famous President's Daily Brief (by one of Tenet's underlings), warning that this attack might take place "inside the United States." For the previous few years—as Philip Zelikow, the commission's staff director, revealed this morning—the CIA had issued several warnings that terrorists might fly commercial airplanes into buildings or cities.

And now, we learn today, at this peak moment, Tenet hears about Moussaoui. Someone might have added 2 + 2 + 2 and possibly busted up the conspiracy. But the president was down on the ranch, taking it easy. Tenet wasn't with him. Tenet never talked with him. Rice—as she has testified—wasn't with Bush, either. He was on his own and, willfully, out of touch.

A USA Today story, written right before Bush took off, reported that the vacation—scheduled to last from Aug. 3 to Sept. 3—would tie one of Richard Nixon's as the longest that any president had ever taken. A week before he left, Bush made a videotaped message for the Boy Scouts of America. On the tape, he said, "I'll be going to my ranch in Crawford, where I'll work and take a little time off. I think it is so important for the president to spend some time away from Washington, in the heartland of America."

Dana Milbank and Mike Allen of the Washington Post recently wrote a story recalling those halcyon days in Crawford. On Aug. 7, 2001, the day after the fateful PDB, Bush, they wrote, "was in an expansive mood … when he ran into reporters while playing golf." The president's aides emphasized that he was working, now and then, on a few issues—education, immigration, Social Security, and his impending decision on stem-cell research. On Aug. 29, less than a week after Tenet found out about Moussaoui, Bush gave a speech before the American Legion. The White House press office headlined the text of the address, "President Discusses Defense Priorities." Those priorities: boosting soldiers' pay and abandoning the Anti-Ballistic-Missile Treaty. Nothing about terrorism, Osama Bin Laden, hijackings. Nothing that reflected the PDB or Moussaoui.

CONTINUED...

http://www.slate.com/id/2098861

Demsrule86

(68,552 posts)
21. Yeah...you missed the part where they won't endorse her...of course you did.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:13 AM
Jun 2016




"The friendship between these two American dynasties does not erase their political differences, however, and neither of the Presidents Bush seem likely to join the conservatives who have backed Clinton. But they also won’t back Trump, who has arguably criticized George W. Bush more harshly than Clinton has this election. (Trump said Bush didn’t keep the country “safe” and lied about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, but has since backed off those critiques.) After former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush lost his primary bid, both Bushes said they would sit out this election entirely."

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
28. I know it's hard for those on the far, far end of the political spectrum to understand, but...
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:18 AM
Jun 2016

Former presidents and first ladies are on quite cordial terms with one or another, regardless of party affiliation. There' a kinship that develops among people who have had to live under the enormous scrutiny that focuses on the First Family during their time in the White House.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
31. Cordial terms do not require false or undue praise nor the revision of important history to serve
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:22 AM
Jun 2016

another ex-official.
"It may be hard for your viewers to remember how difficult it was for people to talk about HIV/AIDS back in the 1980s and because of both president and Mrs. Reagan — in particular Mrs. Reagan — we started a national conversation, when before nobody would talk about it, nobody wanted to do anything about it, and that too is something I really appreciate with her very effective low-key advocacy. It penetrated the public conscience and people began to say, hey, we have to do something about this too."

I know that for those of you who are Reagan Democrat types these words are like music to your ears but those words are mendacious and toxic.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
49. Why is an apology all it takes to make that go away?
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:32 AM
Jun 2016

Who makes that mistake? It's not like she was born in 2000 and never lived through it and just heard things. She was ALIVE then. She was active in politics then. Did she care so little about the gay community at the time that she didn't realize how fucking horrible Reagan was?

That's not a "mistake." That's a fundamental flaw of something.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
76. Because the Clinton's have a long history of HIV AIDS activism
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:43 AM
Jun 2016

So when some one like her says she misspoke, it doesn't come from no where

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
86. Saying that a person who shit on HIV problems was a champion for it
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:51 AM
Jun 2016

is that she "misspoke" is a pretty hard pill to swallow.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
93. Bob Hattoy at the 1992 Democratic Convention, spoken in Hillary's presence:
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 11:01 AM
Jun 2016

" You see, I have AIDS. I could be an African American woman, a Latino man, a 10-year old boy or girl. AIDS has many faces. And AIDS knows no class or gender, race or religion, or sexual orientation. AIDS does not discriminate, but George Bush's White House does.

AIDS is a disease of the Reagan-Bush years. The first case was detected in 1981, but it took 40,000 deaths and seven years for Ronald Reagan to say the word "AIDS." It's five years later, 70,000 more dead and George Bush doesn't talk about AIDS, much less do anything about it....."
http://www.towleroad.com/2007/03/bob_hattoys_spe/

Full speech is a barn burner and heaps praise on Bill Clinton.....

Same Convention, Elizabeth Glaser, again Hillary present in the room:
"Today, I am here because it's a matter of life and death. Exactly -- Exactly four years ago my daughter died of AIDS. She did not survive the Reagan Administration. I am here because my son and I may not survive four more years of leaders who say they care, but do nothing.
I understand the sense of frustration and despair in our country, because I know firsthand about shouting for help and getting no answer. I went to Washington to tell Presidents Reagan and Bush that much, much more had to be done for AIDS research and care, and that children couldn't be forgotten. The first time, when nothing happened, I thought, "They just didn't hear me." The second time, when nothing happened, I thought, "Maybe I didn't shout loud enough." But now I realize they don't hear because they don't want to listen."
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/elizabethglaser1992dnc.htm

We should at least remember Hattoy and Glaser and the words they spoke, they are both of them passed on now and they gave us so much. To pretend they never existed in order to gloss up some Reagan myth is just not acceptable.

 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
120. I think that is the truth!
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 11:28 AM
Jun 2016

Hillary didn't care one wit. Her religious view justified the illness. Oh I know she has evolved and is all cured from her bias now and that is swell. And yes the Clinton foundation does work for AIDS/HIV now that it is cool and the hippester thing to do. Back then though it was different. Very different. I was there and I REMEBER and I will never forget or forgive Hillary's WORDS about this or many other things she has "evolved" about!

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
61. Oh, she bashed then said 'sorry'? That means it can't be discussed? She said what she said on TV
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:36 AM
Jun 2016

National Television. Her 'apology' was a Tweet. She never sought out a camera to make those corrections in spite of the fact that she sought out that camera to make those bogus and hurtful assertions.

It's not my job to point out that after a nationally televised revision of LGBT history some politician whispered a quiet apology for being entirely wrong. It's her job to correct the record.

Look around you. Does this country strike you as a place where it is safe to misrepresent the courage of the LGBT community as some sort of toxic apathy which only Ronald Reagan could cut through? Are we really the community she needs to misspeak about and use to gain right wing support? Do you think such lies help the LGBT community? I sure don't.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
84. Sorry but when you take away the good works of an oppressed group and credit those actions
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:49 AM
Jun 2016

to the very persons who most oppressed them, claiming the oppressed did nothing to help themselves until their oppressor showed them how to take action is in fact bashing those oppressed people.

It's bashing. Seven years of activism by LGBT prior to Reagan even saying the word 'AIDS' erased and credited to Reagan. That's bashing.

And of course you keep taking personal shots at me instead of discussing the facts. Says so much in and of itself.

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
65. I believe that Clinton long apologized for the AIDS and Reagan comments
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:38 AM
Jun 2016

as she misspoke.

Then again you knew that, and just dredge up a dead issue for a few cheap points. You are nothing if not consistent, Mr. Blue.

PS - I miss your near-daily jabs you used to give me over the transparency page.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
79. I buried the love of my life back then, also half my friends and mentors.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:45 AM
Jun 2016

You respond with ugliness and emoticons. Good for you. Good for your candidate. Such a grand and compassionate culture you have!!!

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
91. You get out what you put in, as the saying goes
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:56 AM
Jun 2016

If you're going to harp on Hillary forever for a misstatement, no one will take you very seriously.

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
116. The readers will see you dredging up some thing Hillary said that she already apologized for
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 11:25 AM
Jun 2016

Trying to score some last-minute points.

 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
126. I am so sorry Blue.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 11:34 AM
Jun 2016
I believe you are doing the right thing to honor your life love! I stand with you!!!
 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
45. Some are not sophisticated and well read enough to understand that historical context.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:30 AM
Jun 2016

The Tea Party Left have their own ideas.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
55. So that's what we're doing now?
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:34 AM
Jun 2016

Progressives are now being called the "Tea Party Left"?

That's fucking reprehensible. When the Dem party continues to move to the right, we can point to posts like yours as the reason why it was allowed to happen. I'm sure you will be happy with Clinton's pivot right as we get closer to November, but those of us that are progressives aren't going to like it so much. Glad you think you can just shit on us and still get our votes.

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
97. To the extent that you wish to demonize everything about those Republicans that have served this
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 11:08 AM
Jun 2016

country for a minimum of 8 years, then yes, that's the way the Tea Party views every aspect of past Democratic leaders. It serves no purpose other than to be nasty and intolerant. No one is pure evil. Those that haven't served yet think that they know it all are the people that are the most suspect in my mind.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
115. Disingenuous bullshit.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 11:23 AM
Jun 2016

This is a Democratic website. Republicans and their supporters/enablers/praises get no passes.

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
122. Being a Democratic website does not mean that one must hate every aspect of Republicans.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 11:29 AM
Jun 2016

The OP has a hissy fit merely because Hillary complimented former President George H.W. Bush for asking about her thoughts and being willing to listen to her. Absolutely ridiculous. I called it for what it is.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
137. Snort.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 12:31 PM
Jun 2016

What aspects of the rethugs over the last 20 years is not worth hate and derision?

Complements to a war criminal should not be coming from a Democratic nominee.

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
118. Nope, hating is being so sanctimonious as believing everything is black and white and good and evil
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 11:25 AM
Jun 2016
 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
162. Chah! What do you think this is? The Democratic Underground?
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 02:44 PM
Jun 2016

We don't abide any of this partisan criticism of election stealing neocon war criminals.

BootinUp

(47,141 posts)
40. Because the best way to win a general election is call the other party names.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:28 AM
Jun 2016

Tell them they aren't serious people, etc.


 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
67. Somebody just above you referred to progressives
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:38 AM
Jun 2016

as "Tea Party Left." You might want to go wag your finger at them. Or perhaps you don't care about losing progressives.

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
106. I used the term "Tea Party Left" as it applies to totally demonizing the service of past presidents
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 11:16 AM
Jun 2016

of the opposition party. The Tea Party does the exact same thing. Everything is so black and white. Good vs. Evil. That is foolish and unproductive behavior IMO.

Response to Trust Buster (Reply #106)

Response to Trust Buster (Reply #226)

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
229. Hillary said none of that in the OP. Go re-read the OP so you have a better understanding of the
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 08:47 PM
Jun 2016

subject matter.

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
41. Because she's not the "burn the whole house down and demonize everyone" person that a
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:28 AM
Jun 2016

Sanders supporter would like. That attitude failed miserably for the Tea Party and will fail miserably for the Sanders coalition. That's why.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
42. Obama pinned a medal on Poppy
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:29 AM
Jun 2016

"We are surely a kinder and gentler nation because of you."



"You've described for us those thousand points of light -- all the people and organizations spread out all across the country who are like stars brightening the lives of those around them," Obama said at the White House. "But given the humility that's defined your life, I suspect it's harder for you to see something that's clear to everybody else around you, and that's how bright a light you shine."

"On behalf of all of us, let me just say that we are surely a kinder and gentler nation because of you, and we can't thank you enough," Obama added.

SOURCE: http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/07/15/19487988-obama-toasts-bush-we-are-surely-a-kinder-and-gentler-nation-because-of-you


Apart from all the wars and death and misery and poverty and wasted lives, maybe.
 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
47. Because hating on an old man that served his country in WWII, the CIA, the vice presidency and
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:31 AM
Jun 2016

the presidency will do so much in forwarding your progressive cause.

WDIM

(1,662 posts)
83. HW Bush was a murderer and a coward
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:47 AM
Jun 2016

Sending other people to do his dirty work.

The CIA has killed millions because of their secret wars and destabilizing countries.

As Vice President he was involved in Iran Contra which was ran by the CIA and the Contras killed thousands in their brutal overthrow of a democratically elected government.

As president he bombed countless civilian target's in Iraq and cause countless casualities and death.

Being honest about people and our governments actions around the world is exactly the way to foward the progressive cause of peace.

WDIM

(1,662 posts)
121. If reality is over the top and sanctimonious for you
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 11:28 AM
Jun 2016

You should probably just stay asleep and happy in your fantasy world that HW Bush was a great human being that did so much for peace.

Lets just ignore the countless lives destroyed by that man and his son. Go on believing the lie that our Government only brings good and peace to the world and ignore the true death and destruction it has caused at the hands of men like Bush.

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
124. Get a grip. Re-read the OP. It criticized Hillary for saying that H.W. asked her opinions and
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 11:31 AM
Jun 2016

listened to her. Geez, this hate EVEYTHING about those that served is ridiculous.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
132. Terrorists for Bush
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 12:04 PM
Jun 2016

Original OP from 2006: Know your BFEE or "Hey, America! Wake Up and Smell the Sulfur!"

Few today remember a most heinous terrorist act: The assassinations of former Chilean ambassador Orlando Letelier and American Ronnie Karpen Moffit.



Ms. Moffit was an American citizen murdered by agents of a foreign government on U.S. soil. Her only crime was being with Orlando Letelier, whose crime was to speak out against the military coup that toppled the democratically elected Chilean government he served. Because he refused to turn over the Chilean secret police and their American contacts, these assassinations were allowed, if not sanctioned, by George Bush, then director of central intelligence and head of the CIA.

As with all things having to do with the BFEE, the world get worse. So, a reminder:

October will mark the 30th anniversary of another most heinous terrorist act: The bombing of a Cuban civilian airliner that killed 73 passengers and crew. The pilots reported the blast caused their aircraft to catch fire and they were burning up as they attempted an emergency landing. The plane crashed into the Caribbean, a few miles west of Barbados. All aboard perished, including a close friend of the Great DUer malaise.



Cubana Airlines DC-8 like the one bombed by BFEE members Luis Posada Carriles and Orlando Bosch. Both turds have been protected by Poppy and Baby Doc Bush and the CIA, which strangely has been loyal to them rather than to various presidencies before and in-between.

Here’s an excellent essay based on the facts:



The Charmed Life of a Mass Murderer

Posada Carriles and Bush's Anti-Terror Hoax

By SAUL LANDAU
Counterpunch June 9, 2005

President George W. Bush has emphasized that if one of the myriad of U.S. police agencies even suspect someone of planning, abetting or carrying out a terrorist act, he will, at a minimum, get tossed into a dark hole. Indeed, Bush has thrown the Magna Carta into the garbage heap when it comes to Muslims suspected of pernicious thoughts toward the United States.

But if suspected terrorists turn their rage toward the detested Fidel Castro, these rules don't apply.

Indeed, those who try to bomb Cuban targets, or those related to Cuba, receive special treatment. This double-standard casts a shadow over the president's commitment to fight terrorism.

For example, TV footage showed Homeland Security cops arresting Posada in mid May. But the arresting officers didn't even handcuff the Western Hemisphere's most notorious terrorist. (Remember how Bush's pal Ken "Kenny Boy" Lay ­ ENRON's CEO ­ got handcuffed?) Justice Department spokespeople said they plan to charge the foremost terrorist in the western hemisphere with "illegal entry into the United States."

The FBI has reams of files on Posada, affectionately called "Bambi" by his terrorist friends. Former FBI Special Agent Carter Cornick told New York Times reporter Tim Weiner that Posada was "up to his eyeballs" in the October 1976 destruction of a Cuban commercial airliner over Barbados. All 73 passengers and crew members died. Recently published FBI and CIA documents not only confirm Cornick's statement, but also reveal that U.S. agencies had knowledge of the plot and did not inform Cuban authorities or try to stop the bombing.

SNIP…

One wonders: Did Posada announce his illegal presence in the United States with the idea that U.S. government complicity in aiding and abetting his past acts of terrorism would protect him? U.S. authorities didn't inform Cuba or try to stop the 1976 air-bombing plot, and in 1971, as Veciana stated, the CIA made the gun that Posada's agents placed inside the camera to assassinate Castro. And Ollie North has knowledge of Posada's covert activities for U.S. intelligence as well.

CONTINUED…

http://www.counterpunch.org/landau06092005.html



[font color="red"]What ties these two events together is the involvement of George Herbert Walker Bush, as then-CIA director, in their cover-up as crimes and in the protection of their perpetrators, as in the person of one Luis Posada Carriles, Orlando Bosch and their colleagues-in-terror.[/font color]

Think about it: A murder-forgiving CIA director Bush went on to become President of the United States. Today, Bush’s son, George, acts as president. The younger Bush has used his office from Day One to protect and cover-up the crimes of his father.

That’s what Hugo Chavez was talking about when he smelled the sulfur and called Bush “The Devil.”

America needs to wake up and smell the sulfur, too. Here’s some background on the above:



LUIS POSADA CARRILES
THE DECLASSIFIED RECORD


CIA and FBI Documents Detail Career in International Terrorism; Connection to U.S.

National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 153

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB153 /

Don’t forget to check out Orlando Bosch, while you’re at it. GOOGLE with Jeb Bush for some interesting connections to the present day.

Democracy Now’s Amy Goodman and Juan Gonzalez interviewed National Security Archive’s Peter Kornbluh and Letelier’s son, Francisco:

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/09/21/153...



Another important point to remember, is Kissinger's close association with Operation CONDOR, the assassination program run out of "The Cone" to silence democrats, liberals, union leaders, progressives, socialists, communists or anyone who stood for justice and equality.



Chile security chief was CIA informer

BBC Tuesday, 19 September, 2000, 23:24 GMT 00:24 UK

Recently declassified documents in the United States show that the former head of the secret police in Chile, Manuel Contreras, was a paid informant for the US intelligence agency, the CIA.

The report, comprising CIA documents requested by the US Congress, show that contact with Contreras began in 1974 - a year after the military coup that brought General Augusto Pinochet to power.

Contreras oversaw the much-feared security service DINA

The report adds that the contact was maintained until 1977 - a year after Contreras plotted the killing of the then Chilean Foreign Minister and foe of General Pinochet, Orlando Letelier, in Washington.

A BBC correspondent in Washington, Nick Bryant, says the documents reinforce the view that the US turned a blind eye towards political repression in Chile during the Pinochet era and that the CIA was complicit in many human rights abuses.

Pinochet's confidant

As head of the security service, DINA, Contreras became the one of the most feared men in Chile, second only to General Pinochet.

The general's iron rule was underpinned by the tactics of brutal repression that saw thousands die and thousands more flee into exile. Others disappeared or were tortured.

CONTINUED…

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/932897.stm



Of course, there are even more sulferous friends than these…



Bush s Longstanding Criminal Mexican Amigos

The disturbing ties of some of George W. Bush's Latino advisors

More on Bush-Amigos links in PBS Frontline interview with Gary Jacobs


By Julie Reynolds
Research assistance by Victor Almazán and Ana Leonor Rojo

LOS AMIGOS DE BUSH

“Dime con quién andas y te diré quién eres. (Tell me who you side with and I will tell you who you are.)” – “George W. Bush for President” web site

Those who say that George W. Bush has scant knowledge of foreign affairs don't understand his family's relationship with Mexico.

If one event could be said to make that relationship visible, it had to be the state dinner given eleven years ago by President Bush for Mexico's president, Carlos Salinas. It was an elegant yet boisterous gala, where the biggest movers and shakers in Texas and Mexico congregated and celebrated. This group was to become W's Mexican legacy, a gift of ties and connections passed on from the father to his son.

SNIP…

The Mexican president had spent a long day with President Bush signing trade pacts, the precursors of NAFTA. Salinas brought his so-called Dream Team: his commerce secretary, finance minister, and his personal Machiavelli, Jose Córdoba. It would later be astounding to see, as the decade unfolded, how many of that administration's proud men and women fell shamefully from grace - some exiled, some imprisoned and some assassinated.

No one knew it then, but many at that banquet would survive to one day help young W beat a path back to the White House. There were loyal "Bushfellas" who were old friends of the family: Commerce Secretary Robert Mosbacher Sr., General Colin Powell, and George Bush Senior's ever-present friend, Secretary of State James Baker. Gary Jacobs, whose Texas bank was about to be bought by the son of Mexico's billionaire-politico Carlos Hank González, was also a guest. Tony Garza, then a young judge, is now a Bush cabinet contender. Today, all are advisors or contributors to W's campaign.

Hidden among the glitterati were two relative unknowns. They were, however, familiar to the group at hand. They were the loyal "Amigos de Bush" from San Antonio: criminal defense lawyer Roy Barrera Jr. and car dealer Ernesto Ancira Jr. In contrast to the Salinas group, the ties of Barrera and Ancira to drug cartels would remain unnoticed for another decade. Their ties to George W. would grow stronger.

CONTINUED…

GOOGLE cache:

http://72.14.209.104/search?q=cache:Th5_dq9beuYJ:www.el...

May also be at:

http://www.newsmakingnews.com/contents10,2,00.htm





Henry Kissinger and Agusto Pinochet

[font size="3"][font color="green"]“I don't see why we need to stand by and watch a country go communist due to the irresponsibility of its people. The issues are much too important for the Chilean voters to be left to decide for themselves.” -- Henry A. Kissinger[/font color][/font size]

Remember: If Kissinger -- friend of Hillary and the guy Poppy's Dim Son wanted to appoint head of the 9-11 Commission -- feels that way about democracy in Chile, what’s there to make us think he and those for whom he toils believe differently about democracy in the United States of America?

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
130. Not hate, telling the truth.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 11:55 AM
Jun 2016
The Bush Family Evil Empire

Bartcop coined the phrase to put a handle on the cabal that use their political and economic power to enrich themselves at the expense of the nation. They include the Wall Street types and their heirs who were the political and legal enemies of Gen. Smedley Butler.



Bill Moyers, Alfred W. McCoy and others have identified some of these players as part of “The Secret Government.” They use political and financial power under the cover of official secrecy to selfishly gain and unreservedly serve the ultra-right and ultra-rich who through their combined and concerted criminal actions have become the most powerful and undemocratic group in human history.

Among their policies that have remained in place since at least 1981 are the major tax cuts for the rich, while simultaneously increasing public spending on military hardware and now warfare and disaster capitalism without end while cutting back public expenditures, if not eliminating entirely, public education, housing, healthcare, welfare and other social-benefit programs. It also is why, by design and by law, most of the wealth created since Reaganomics has accrued in the pockets of the richest of the rich. It was supposed to.



Rather than bringing all that up, while still making them easy to identify, I call them the BFEE. Perhaps the best moniker for them is the War Party, for using their positions to make money through death, suffering and the exploitation of humanity. It’s what George W Bush meant when he said, “Money trumps peace.” And for the record, the last president to stand up and oppose these unmitigated warmongers was President John F. Kennedy.

Anyway, that bothers some DUers. Tuesday, I made the observation that a person is only a suspect until convicted in a trial. That concept is central to our system of justice, yet I got mocked by several DUers for stating it. The idea that all are innocent until proven guilty and the idea that all are equal under the law are basic to democratic government.

Here’s what I suspect these DUers don’t know or don’t want to acknowledge knowing. There are truly evil people in positions of power, both in and out of government. An important example is this guy, thoughtfully misidentified by Fox TV as a Democrat, the former Republican representative out of Florida, Mark Foley, BFEE:



The now-known child predator was given a position to oversee laws designed to protect children from child molesters. What’s more, Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) covered it up. In America, married households may now be a minority, but parents who have kids hate child molesters. Same for most people, in general: Child molestation generates universal hatred.

That’s why Fox and so many other “news” media have tried to connect Foley, “by accident,” to the Democrats. Even Huffington Post made the connection. Once an idea is in a person’s head, it takes a LOT of Truth to drive it out. Consider the nonexistent ties between Osama and Saddam that so many Americans still believe to exist. So, if the connection between the House Republicans and Foley can be made in the minds of enough Americans, they will not vote for Republikkkens.



Eleven GOPers Fingered in Foley Cover-Up

By Justin Rood - September 30, 2006, 9:32 PM
Roll Call's John Bresnahan reports:

As of Saturday evening, nearly a dozen House GOP lawmakers and staffers have acknowledged that they knew of the initial batch of non-sexually explicit messages from Foley to a 16-year-old former House page, some of them for a year or more. These include Hastert (R-IL); Majority Leader John Boehner (Ohio); National Republican Congressional Committee Chairman Tom Reynolds (N.Y.); Reps. Rodney Alexander (La.) and John Shimkus (Ill.); Mike Stokke, the Speaker’s deputy chief of staff; Ted Van Der Meid, Hastert’s counsel; Paula Nowakowski, Boehner’s chief of staff; Jeff Trandahl, the former Clerk of the House; and another Hastert aide and Alexander’s chief of staff, according to public statements and GOP insiders.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/eleven-gopers-fingered-in-foley-cover-up



Not only did he chair the Congressional Caucus on Missing and Exploited Children, Foley was in the House GOP leadership. As Deputy Majority Whip, he might’ve followed in the sweaty steps of his mentor, Dennis Hastert as Speaker of the House. That’s something you won’t hear mentioned by John Boehner or anyone on Fox TV.

Foley never went to trial. But he should have been investigated in public, preferably by a Grand Jury led by a Special Prosecutor. Same for his colleagues in power, Dennis Hastert. A big reason they aren't around when you need one is George H.W. Bush let the special prosecutor law expire.



This is hard to write about when all the powers are with those in secret offices of government. Consider what Snowden, Assange and the other brave whistleblowers in and out of government and private industry have endured just to give us a peak at the top of the iceberg that represents the virtually unlimited spy powers applied by the FBI, NSA, DIA, CIA and who knows what else.

Then again, if DU, like Bartcop before us, and Thom Hartmann and Talking Points Memo and ConsortiumNews and the all too few others didn’t, who would? Rupert Murdoch? Roger Ailes? ABCNNBCBSFakeNoiseNutworks? Not bloody likely.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
54. Revolting
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:34 AM
Jun 2016

Most of her political allies and mentors are republicans. She treasures her endorsement from Kissinger and honorary membership in the Bush Crime Family.

WDIM

(1,662 posts)
127. Democrats have been taken over
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 11:36 AM
Jun 2016

By moderate Republicans.

Even people on this board defend HW and W it's disgusting.

Response to blackspade (Original post)

surrealAmerican

(11,360 posts)
89. So we, as liberals, are expected to believe ...
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:55 AM
Jun 2016

... that this statement is disingenuous pandering, but, when she talks favorably about progressive policies, she's utterly sincere.

How do we know it isn't the other way around?

appalachiablue

(41,127 posts)
144. Warren certainly received the treatment from Summers about the Club.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 01:39 PM
Jun 2016

And I don't mean the well known power DC restaurant.

QC

(26,371 posts)
145. She certainly did, and then she compounded her grievous sin
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 01:45 PM
Jun 2016

by telling us Great Unwashed about the club rules.

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
117. Roll out those tortured rationales, oh brave cognitive dissonants.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 11:25 AM
Jun 2016

I bet you never saw THIS coming.


(Gee, this shit sandwich is surprisingly tasty!)

dsc

(52,155 posts)
140. I have no problem with her saying truthful nice things about Bush
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 12:33 PM
Jun 2016

there aren't many to say, but there is no harm in saying the few that there are from time to time. Her comments on Reagan were idiotic and she admits they were.

Buzz cook

(2,471 posts)
151. Hitler created the autobahn and the VW bug
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 02:06 PM
Jun 2016

He was also a vegetarian.

I've said three positive things about Hitler, I guess that makes me a Nazi.

Buzz cook

(2,471 posts)
160. We were headed toward Godwin's rule
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 02:42 PM
Jun 2016

I just took the short cut.

Any association with people I don't like makes you a person I don't like.

LAS14

(13,783 posts)
174. Gotta remember this excellent comeback. Unfortunately...
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 03:07 PM
Jun 2016

... I'm sure I'll bump into more occasions to use it...

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
154. How to explain that? It's pretty easy ...
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 02:15 PM
Jun 2016

In the real world, people frequently speak favorably about others ... even those they don't like ... especially when asked, or at funerals, or on the campaign trail.

LAS14

(13,783 posts)
157. Why should we have to explain it? Do we want...
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 02:41 PM
Jun 2016

... a political system where those that disagree with us on most issues can have no good qualities?? I don't, for one.

LAS14

(13,783 posts)
173. So acknowledging a good thing about someone is giving...
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 03:05 PM
Jun 2016

... them a criminal pass???? In what world are you living?

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
183. Way out where?
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 05:00 PM
Jun 2016

Holding republicans to account for their murderous criminal bullshit is way out there?

Holy fuck!

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
158. It's a big club, and although you're not in it, we insist you vote for it.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 02:41 PM
Jun 2016

Pivot to the right after the nomination? I guess I was wrong, the nomination isn't for a month yet.

Juicy_Bellows

(2,427 posts)
177. A lot of the comments defending her statements are unbelievable to me.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 03:35 PM
Jun 2016

Principles don't mean shit to some around here.

Go Team Blue! Fuck the Facts!
Go Team Blue! Fuck the Facts!
Go Team Blue! Fuck the Facts!

Hooray!

I'm disgusted.

d_legendary1

(2,586 posts)
178. Ain't that some shit?
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 04:18 PM
Jun 2016

Hillary won the election, but ignore the voter disenfranchisement.

Hillary is the true progressive, but ignore the paid speeches, the pro-war statements, and the anti-gay marriage remarks.

Hillary is down with A.A.'s, but ignore her comments about C.P. time and Super predators.

Trump is under investigation, but ignore that Hillary is also under investigation.

Disgusted is the understatement of the century.

Go Vols

(5,902 posts)
188. Beings the current Prez
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 06:29 PM
Jun 2016

said he would be considered a moderate R in the '80s,this does not surprise me.More of the same.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
190. OMG, is Team Hill openly embracing the Bushes now?
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 11:58 PM
Jun 2016

Comments further up seem to cement that. We've come full circle- The Bushes stole an election and DU was born. They stole our party and now DU is about to die.

You can't make this stuff up.

 

glennward

(989 posts)
194. If "praising" means speaking the truth. As NY Senator she relied on Bush to get the funding needed
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 08:52 AM
Jun 2016

for helping NY and NYC rebound after 9/11. How soon we forget that right after 9/11 most people were united in helping NY and fighting a common foe. Hillary is merely acknowledging what she knows to be true. She could not say the same for the GOP in Congress who tried to thwart help for her state and NYC. It would be dishonest of her to speak otherwise of President Bush on this issue. However, she has many other issues about which she has been critical of President Bush.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
197. It was dishonest of her to lie for the Bushes to get them a blank check for the Iraq war
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 09:39 AM
Jun 2016

Or is that ok too now?

 

glennward

(989 posts)
216. Huh? Lie for the Bushes? When, where? You mean voting for the war like so many other
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 03:21 PM
Jun 2016

Congress members based on faulty information she believe was reliable?

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
223. Lol
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 06:24 PM
Jun 2016

She believed was reliable? Nobody here believes she's stupid. We all knew it was a lie, she knew it was a lie, and she stumped for them. It may not have passed without her help.

Don't worry about it though- her team tells us that it's ok to embrace Bushco now. Will you?

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
230. Obviously they're not liberals.
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 09:14 PM
Jun 2016

As near as I can tell they're pro-choice RW Republicans. They like Bush, Kissinger, trickle-down supply side economics, tax-cuts for the wealthy, wage stagnation for working class, and war...lots of war.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
203. I imagine she's trying to get votes from Republicans who can't stand Trump
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 10:22 AM
Jun 2016

Which isn't surprising since this is election season.

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
208. The vitriol being spewed in this post primary season is what happens
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 10:45 AM
Jun 2016

When the "leader" you're following is an anger and envy merchant.

felix_numinous

(5,198 posts)
224. That red arrow
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 06:36 PM
Jun 2016

points the way of inevitability, first screw over the left, then move to the right. First time I saw that symbol I was in shock of the open insult.

BainsBane

(53,031 posts)
233. and that's supposed to convince people
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 01:26 AM
Jun 2016

Not to support Clinton and help Trump get elected?

The tangled excuses truly are astounding.

Yet when Bernie spoke at Liberty university and praised Sensenbrener, that was supposed to signs of his ability to work with Republicans. He can endorse anti choice candidates or opponents of the Iran nuclear deal, and his supporters shell out cash to help get them elected, but Clinton notes that Bush had some positive attributes, and that's supposed to be an excuse for opposing the Democratic nominees do as a result help Trump get elected.

Let's cut the crap, why don't we? the way the arguments twist and turn for political expediency is transparent.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
237. Sure, cut the crap.
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 10:07 AM
Jun 2016

Clinton is the nominee, so your continual references to what others do is irrelevant at this point. What Clinton says and does from this point forward will impact the general election and to say that discussing and questioning her actions is 'electing Trump' is childish.
Grow up. If we can't have honest discussions about our candidate, then we relegate ourselves to the status if children.
Children are taught to bow to authority, to not question, to deflect and obfuscate. Some grow out of it, but obviously that is hit or miss even here at DU.

So, if you can't discuss Clinton's actions in terms of their impact on her chances in November like an adult, then I suggest you find another hobby.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
235. A presidential candidate doesn't get to do scorched-earth...
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 07:57 AM
Jun 2016

...especially when speaking of a president who (nearly) won two general elections.

Not even Sanders does honesty brutal enough to describe the Bush II regime accurately.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
238. One word. Carter.
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 10:14 AM
Jun 2016

The RW has poloried him for decades. Where is the praise and love for him? Even from our own party elite?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»How to explain this: Hill...