2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHow to explain this: Hillary Clinton praised a former president
https://www.yahoo.com/news/hillary-clinton-invokes-unlikely-allies-000000292.htmlThe man she spoke of was not her husband, Bill Clinton, or Barack Obama, whom she hopes to succeed. It was George W. Bush long one of the lefts most potent villains.
In an unusual election year, when a quarter of Republicans say they do not have a favorable opinion of their presumptive nominee, Clinton is making striking overtures to conservatives even as she works to shore up support on the left flank of her party by winning over Sen. Bernie Sanders liberal backers.
Thats included surprisingly warm talk about both former Presidents Bush, as well as GOP icon Ronald Reagan. At a campaign stop in Westminster, Calif., earlier this month, Clinton said she was fortunate enough to have known a lot of presidents.
I knew President George H.W. Bush, and he was always willing to talk about issues and ask what was on your mind, she said. Of his son, she offered more specific praise, saying he was absolutely committed after 9/11 to his promise to get New York City the billions of dollars it needed to rebuild. He never wavered and Ill never forget that, she said of Bush, as a few supporters clapped tepidly. (At Nancy Reagans funeral in March, a CNN journalist posted a photo of the two hugging.)
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)she's trying to win the votes of moderates, centrists and independents, and draw a contrast with the scorched-earth, extremist polarizers like Trump, Cruz, etc.
Sanders is refusing to even acknowledge that she won, let alone help her win.
When someone refuses to get off the sideline, they wind up being marginalized.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Hillary only waited a few days to turn her back on progressives to court the right. Glad to see I was correct. Now I get to watch all my fears come true I 2017.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)He never dissed Hispanics
" " Muslims
" " African Americans
" " women
" " Jews
" " Asians
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Bush laughed when he mentioned ''hanging'' Dr. King's portrait at White House.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x2965160
Ask the Gold Star Mom.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x1828225
Ask Fred Malek.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Have a wonderful weekend.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Some say that's like a curse.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Have a wonderful weekend.
dsc
(52,155 posts)was that Black Alabamians voted for him in both a contested primary and again in a general election. It isn't a decision that I would have made had I been them, but it was their decision to make, not mine, not yours, and not Bill Clinton's. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Wallace#Final_term_as_governor
Octafish
(55,745 posts)I remember him for "Segregation now! Segregation tomorrow! Segregation forever!" statements from his inaugural of Jan. 14, 1963.
Didn't know he had turned into such a liberal, especially considering the lengths to which Nixon's White House, in which Poppy Bush was a player, went to exploit his near-assassination.
E. Howard Hunt, Undercover (New York: Berkley Publishing Corporation, 1974), p. 217 via "Bremer & Wallace: Its Déjà Vu All Over Again" by Lisa Pease.
dsc
(52,155 posts)presumedly you wouldn't have made that choice either, but in a democracy the people of the state in question get to make that decision, and they decided, for whatever reason, that his was a story of redemption and that they should honor it by making him governor one last time.
BlueStateLib
(937 posts)http://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-by-era/civil-rights-movement/resources/george-wallace-segregation-1964
bobthedrummer
(26,083 posts)CheneyWatch
http://www.cheneywatch.org
heaven05
(18,124 posts)he sure did cause the NEEDLESS death of many.........Iraq incursion......american dead and wounded covering all those you say he didn't diss and between 100,000 to 900,000 Iraqi civilian deaths.....by the way most were Muslim.....no he "never dissed"....he just killed.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Didn't "diss" women ohhh please.
Well enjoy celebrating how wonderful President Bush is and good luck with that meme!
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Have a lovely weekend filled with joy and splendor.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)May the upcoming weekend be the best weekend of your life.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)You have a truly wonderful weekend and enjoy being a winner. You know Hillary won right! So rejoice!!
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Wish me well...
Chasstev365
(5,191 posts)No saint; a war criminal!
jonestonesusa
(880 posts)Never dissed Muslims? Invaded Iraq based on lies? No demonizing there.
Never demonized black people. I don't know, Bernie made me white, so I can't speak to that anymore.
Wow...I guess I've misunderstood compassionate conservatism for all those years. I didn't realize how non-racist it was.
imagine2015
(2,054 posts)It's time to rewrite history on the man who the rightwing Republican controlled Supreme Court made president in 2000.
BlueStateLib
(937 posts)swhisper1
(851 posts)in bed with the Saudis, oil, I could go on and on
Trump bilks people, but hasnt tortured or killed any yet. He says disruptive things to get free press and he works the human nature of the destitute and misguided, appeals to the worst in people, but hasnt done any of it. It is just all talk so far- talk to get votes.
No, Bush is far worse. He took glee in harming others. We dont know what Trump will actually do. I dont want to know, but at this point, it is conjecture.
Hillary is really stupid to endorse W, and Kissenger, and several others. She is proving her republican roots
Just toss out the logical fallacies to dismiss even the slightest desire to work with those whom we disagree.
All or nothing leaves the whole world blind. Your positions are dangerous for our country.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Your conservative slip is showing when you defend President Bush as a good man. When did the other side ever indicate to you they want to work with US??
Giving into them has not worked thus far! Four years of nothing from the current capital hill gang shows you what you can get by cozing up with them. But as I have said Hillary is good with Republicans and friends with hawks so it should go well IF YOU ARE THE 1% or hope to climb into that club!
Dem2
(8,168 posts)Where did I defend Bush? Conservative?
You're on a roll today - I'm done with angry slash-and-burn types like yourself.
Jesus you're angry. Bye.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Off to work. May I suggest you read your own posts and you may see what I saw. Otherwise why care what I say "angry person that I am"
P.S. I am not angry just supper sad about the tragedies of late!
treestar
(82,383 posts)it's not THAT black and white.
They don't have to hate each other and condemn each other personally. That's for Republicans, because they make it about the people, not the policies.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)candidates this year.
Of course, President Bush was much worse than candidate Bush.
PufPuf23
(8,767 posts)"Shock and Awe".
GWB never "demonized" Hispanics but hired Rumsfeld who referred to Bolivia, Ecuador, and Venezuela as a western hemisphere "Axis of Evil".
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)May you enjoy your weekend.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Come Monday is will still be fine to pillory Rethug asshats and conservatives.
So you have a great weekend yourself further dividing the Democratic Party.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I didn't threaten anybody in this thread. I request you peer into your conscience, heed your better angels, and apologize for libeling me.
When we libel others we don't cover ourselves in glory.
Thank you in advance.
May you have a lovely weekend.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Now I get it. Honestly they are full of anger and they won. Imagine if they had lost!
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Have a lovely forever.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Twisting the knife is second nature.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Again:
I didn't threaten anybody in this thread. I request you peer into your conscience, heed your better angels, and apologize for libeling me.
When we libel others we don't cover ourselves in glory.
Thank you in advance.
Now that we got that bit of housekeeping out of the way, have a lovely summer.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I take that as you have no intention to apologize for disrespecting, dehumaninizing, and deligitimizing me.
I still, after all that, believe most people are good.
Have a lovely life.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)I did none of those.
I just called out your devisive bullshit.
Deal with it.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)"I did none of those.
I just called out your devisive (sp) bullshit.
Deal with it. "
-blackspade
There is no need to denigrate, disrespect , deligitimize, and dehumanize me or any of the other denizens of this board from the anonymity of an internet modem. We don't cover ourselves in glory when we do that.
Have a wonderful life.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Your projection is noted.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I am just defending myself from your hurtful, calumnious, and unprovoked attacks.
I call on you to peer into your conscience, heed your better angels, apologize to me, and restore me to the position I enjoyed before you imputed my motives.
Thank you in advance.
I would be remiss if I didn't tell you to have a wonderful life, though.
Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #81)
Post removed
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)At least here.
Have a lovely weekend and life.
I detest Bush. I detest Trump. But candor compels me to state the former didn't go out of way to take rhetorical dumps on vulnerable people.
Autumn
(45,056 posts)because that was the biggest mother fucking dump taken on vulnerable people in a hell of a long time. It sure as fuck wasn't a kiss on the fucking head. candor my ass.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I will be the bigger person and not respond in kind.
It is up to all of us to elevate the discourse on our once august board.
Autumn
(45,056 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I will continue to peer into my conscience, heed my better angels, and not further inflame the situation that has brought our once august board into the abyss.
Change begins with me.
Autumn
(45,056 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Thank you... I hope to be your model in making Democratic Underground a kinder and gentler website. If we are all kinder and gentler to the next poster than he or she was to us we can make Democratic Underground the kindest and gentlest website on the internet.
Autumn
(45,056 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Cary
(11,746 posts)(DU intercom)
Bitter, party of one, your table is ready.
Autumn
(45,056 posts)party of one in a cozy nice spot.
I just saw this.
A tiny violin of snark for someone who lost their nephew in Bush's war? Wow.
Cary
(11,746 posts)That wasn't what it was about but go for the righteous indignation schtick.
BainsBane
(53,031 posts)against Obama for the nomination, but now 8 years later you can't support the Democratic nominee because of it? That strikes me as very odd.
Autumn
(45,056 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)It is a group made up up 44 presidents and 44 First Ladies. Nobody can even begin to understand what it's like and not to mention she actually knows the two she faintly praised. I don't see it as a big deal really. But outrage is emotional.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)This article says NOTHING about Bernie yet you got in a good left hook! Well played NOT! Try defending your candidate rather than deflecting - or cheap shotsnare just too much fun?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)and it is definitely part of the electoral calculus--Sanders is dithering on joining the fight against Trump and getting his people behind the nominee, so she has to look for additional votes elsewhere.
intransigence does not get rewarded. p=
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)I am so confused by people who are continuing the fight between Hillary and Bernie. He is out of the picture and yet it continues to he Bernie v Hillary. Weirdest thing I have seen in my 42 years of watching and voting in America!
Bernie is not going to support Trump he said so loudly and clearly last night! I think it must be that Hillary supporters must now work to get their candidate elected and are afraid they can't so they point at things they hope will distract others from seeing her clearly! You wanted her! You got her! Now get her elected! Hopefully not by making President Bush less of an asshats then he was!
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)You want to stomp him under to your feet? You need him to bow down and accept it to prove you are right and we are all wrong?
Get over that my friend - move on go get your candidate elected in the General!
Peace be with you.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Response to NWCorona (Reply #2)
Fresh_Start This message was self-deleted by its author.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)And while I was talking about GWB I meant the Bush family in general. Both father and son have blood on their hands.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)... calls them the "Bush Crime Family." And that's how perpetuity is going to remember them.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)She's talking about both.
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)I just read the article. Mow THAT's something I thought I'd never see in a dem nominee; praising George W. Bush. Such is life in "Upside-down World".
Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)Please tell me you are joking, right? GWB was worse, but GHWB was one of the driving forces behind the latter part of the Reagan administration...
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)I said that as it seems like the Bush family is having a renaissance lately and I think that's craziness.
Paper Roses
(7,473 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)With "The Donald" collapsing and no replacement candidate yet available, she is seizing the moment to increase the size of "her" Democratic Party with Republican infiltrators. I'm sure many here will find that good news.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)... by saying things like that, she loses votes from the Dem base.
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)ReRe
(10,597 posts)Is she a Democrat or not? What's up with a supposed Democratic Party candidate who would rather have Republican votes than Democratic votes?
Effing bazarro twilight zone this country has turned into. Totally sicko.
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)demwing
(16,916 posts)Whats pragmatic about sleeping with the enemy?
one_voice
(20,043 posts)Republicans would vote for him..
arikara
(5,562 posts)Bernie just figured that even republicans would see the value of his platform and many of the sane ones did. Her nibs on the other hand is going after the PNACers, warmongers, billionaires and industrialists. Its two totally different constituencies.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)I see couched terms used and words crafted carefully to find something positive that other Republicans would find complimentary enough to consider looking at Hillary. Especially for those in the Never Trump camp.
shenmue
(38,506 posts)tonyt53
(5,737 posts)I think the guy was very conflicted with his own feelings and what the GOP wanted. HE actually went only as far as the UN resolution said during the first Gulf War. With his own convictions being challenged by the GOP, he just did not seem like a very happy person. I'm not saying that he was a keeper by any means (I sure worked hard to make him a a one term guy), but he was far better than his ass wipe son. However, on the help for NY thing, he did work to get that money. Nothing wrong with giving credit when it it due.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Of course he helped!
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)Seems fair.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)She is only giving credit where it is due.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)and with great disregard for LGBT persons and our history. She aggressively claimed that Reagan did all the early activism that was actually done by LGBT groups and credited Ron and Nancy for doing the exact things they are reviled for not doing.
Such reckless verbiage does not help the LGBT community at all. It leaves us dangling as targets for very nasty bigots. It says 'they have no friends and deserve none'.
YouDig
(2,280 posts)Isn't that what Bernie keeps talking about? Expanding the party?
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Sanders is attempting to expand to the left.
YouDig
(2,280 posts)it would be stupid of her not to go after them. And I don't see a problem with pointing out that W never called to ban Muslims, but actually made a point to say that we aren't at war with Islam. It's the truth. What do you object to about that?
blackspade
(10,056 posts)She is appealing to rethugs at the expense of Democratic votes.
YouDig
(2,280 posts)simply because she drew a contrast between Trump and W. They'd have to be crazy not to vote Hillary.
PufPuf23
(8,767 posts)heaven05
(18,124 posts)and the holy war those Saudi's and GWB started, still have direct implications for much of the 'troubles' being experiened in the 'holy war' region of Syria, Libya, Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan and the world today. Refugess, bombings and attempted bombings in Europe, inspiring already mentally unbalanced people to do heinous acts against innocent americans all can be laid at the feet of those Saudi's and Bushco. And if true that there were actionable warning of the Saudi's doing what they did on 9-11, then Bushco wanted this 'holy war'.
Yep. Sure do remember. He used those exact words 2008. Our religious nut jobs then latched on to those words. Consequently the agenda driven religious nut jobs abrogated the true meaning of the tenet of jihad in the Islamic religion and the holy war was on and is continuing.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)so it was ok for Sanders, but not for Hillary? Better check your hatred and set it aside for one moment to clearly see the bigger picture. I'ts been talked about here on DU on numerous threads.
http://reason.com/blog/2015/12/28/bernie-sanders-says-hell-try-to-woo-dona
quote from Bernie:
[div class="excerpt""Look, many of Trump's supporters are working-class people. And they are angry.
And they're angry because they are working longer hours for lower wages. They're angry because their jobs have left this country and gone to China or other low-wage countries. They're angry because they can't afford to send their kids to college or they can't retire with dignity.
And I think what Trump has done successfully, I would say, is take that anger, take that anxiety about terrorism and say to a lot of people in this country, look, the reason for our problems is because of Mexicans. And he says, they're all criminals and rapists. We have got to hate Mexicans. Or he says about the Muslims, they are all terrorists, and we got to keep them out of this country. Those arethat's what we have to deal with to make America great.
Meanwhile, interestingly enough, John, this is a guy who does not want to raise the minimum wage. In fact, he has said that he thinks wages in America are too high. But he does want to give hundreds of billions of dollars in tax breaks to the top three-tenths of 1 percent.
So, I think for his working-class and middle-class supporter, I think we can make the case that if we really want to address the issues that people are concerned about, why the middle class is disappearing, massive income and wealth inequality in this country, that we need policies that bring us together, that take on the greed of Wall Street, the greed of corporate America, and create a middle class that works for all of us, rather than an economy that works just for a few".
http://legalinsurrection.com/2016/01/bernie-sanders-campaign-attempts-to-woo-trump-supporters/
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/why-bernie-sanders-holds-potential-appeal-trump-voters-n488051
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2015/1228/Can-Bernie-Sanders-win-over-Donald-Trump-supporters
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)Praising the opposition when appropriate and not making random attacks. Oh the humanity.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)How appropriate.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)Other presidents and nominees, including Obama, will have to find something about him to praise when trying to strike a bipartisan tone.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)100's of thousands dead and 'bipartisanship' is your response.
Sickening how low DU has sunk....
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)appalachiablue
(41,127 posts)misogynistic, anti-diversity, privileged and also less educated working class men. Aka 'Bernie Bros.' Amazing.
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)appalachiablue
(41,127 posts)Real Kafkaesque contortions to fabricate alleged constituents, one the craziest efforts I've ever seen.
Must do-
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)"It may be hard for your viewers to remember how difficult it was for people to talk about HIV/AIDS back in the 1980s and because of both president and Mrs. Reagan in particular Mrs. Reagan we started a national conversation, when before nobody would talk about it, nobody wanted to do anything about it, and that too is something I really appreciate with her very effective low-key advocacy. It penetrated the public conscience and people began to say, hey, we have to do something about this too."
That is of course a load of bullshit. There were about 30,000 American dead before Reagan even managed to say the word 'AIDS' out loud, seven entire years of silence.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)No matter how obsessed you are with this, the clintons were great on hiv/AIDS which is a large part of why they have such strong support among most lgbt people
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)The Clintons were better on HIV/AIDS than Reagan. But Hillary made her claims not about Bill and herself but about Ron and Nancy, the unmitigated villains of that time.
I buried dozens of people before your St Ronnie even said 'AIDS' out loud. So yes it does matter to me. The question is why does it not matter to you? Why are you willing to help erase our history?
The United States needs to be supporting and honoring LGBT history and citizens so that maybe we can have some years without massive death and shootings and plagues. Using us as fodder to pander to the right wing is vile. Reckless.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)And youre not the only one affected my hiv/AIDS. It's a very important issue to me, and her misstatements made when she was tired and overworked, does not erase the great work the clintons did on HIV/AIDS.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)about the plague that killed many of my peers. You smeared me for giving a fuck. That indicates that you yourself don't give a fuck and don't want others to either. Your objective is to silence me. Because I am correct and you don't like that.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)When the clintons have had such a great actual track record on the issue you claim to care about.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)It's that simple. What she said was not a 'misstatement', that's your characterization of it. I am speaking nothing but truth. You characterize.
In this thread I'm speaking facts. You accuse me of being obsessed, of 'hate' and whatever you feel like flinging. No citations, no quotes,just 'you are this and you are that'.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Fuck I am tired and overworked every fucking day! She better get used to being tired and overworked as that is the job in the White House. Tired does mNOT justify praising asshats at their funeral. A nice comment like "she was the first lady" would have been sufficient! But she tried to make both Regan's saints - yuck!
appalachiablue
(41,127 posts)after Nancy Regan's funeral bringing up the Reagans, particularly Nancy's "very effective but low key advocacy on AIDS." During the interview HC talked at length and was Not tired. The comments she added were offensive and intentional, especially to the millions of people who lost family members and loved ones like we did, all because of Pres. Ronald Reagan's refusal for years to approve funding for AIDS research, and only when heterosexuals began experiencing the disease. Any attempt to try to cover up or excuse the lies is worse ~ My little brother died far too young in 1992 at the height of the crisis because of this unforgivable bigotry and prejudice. In 1991-92 when Bill Clinton's name came up my brother shook his head I recall. We're longtime Democrats and to this day I wonder why he did not like Clinton then.
~ "This country will suffer for 3 or 4 generations for the policies of my father." Patti (Reagan) Davis.
ABC News reports: The former first lady will perhaps be best remembered for her loyalty to her husband. She became fiercely protective of him after a 1981 assassination attempt, and later stood by him as Alzheimers disease overtook him in his last years.. During her White House years, she sponsored a major drug prevention crusade aimed at children and young adults.. As first lady from 1981 to 1989, Reagan endured criticism for bringing high fashion and a lavish lifestyle to the White House in a time of recession. Some critics called her Queen Nancy.
Mrs. Reagan also stood by as her husband stayed silent during the AIDS crisis. The President waited years before mentioning it publicly, impeding government action as thousands and thousands died. According to reports published last year, Nancy Reagan blocked Rock Hudsons last ditch effort to get AIDs treatment: Read more, http://www.towleroad.com/2016/03/former-first-lady-nancy-reagan-dead-at-94/
*Starts 4 Min. mark. Hillary on the Reagans, and Nancy Reagan's supposed low key advocacy on AIDS. March, 2016.
LAS14
(13,783 posts)Arazi
(6,829 posts)and Reagan is understandable
tabasco
(22,974 posts)and the worst terrorist attack ever on the US. Of course, H. Clinton was a partner with that regime, and strongly advocated for the illegal war in the Senate.
is right.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)While Bush vacationed, 9/11 warnings went unheard.
By Fred Kaplan
In an otherwise dry day of hearings before the 9/11 commission, one brief bit of dialogue set off a sudden flash of clarity on the basic question of how our government let disaster happen.
The revelation came this morning, when CIA Director George Tenet was on the stand. Timothy Roemer, a former Democratic congressman, asked him when he first found out about the report from the FBI's Minnesota field office that Zacarias Moussaoui, an Islamic jihadist, had been taking lessons on how to fly a 747. Tenet replied that he was briefed about the case on Aug. 23 or 24, 2001.
Roemer then asked Tenet if he mentioned Moussaoui to President Bush at one of their frequent morning briefings. Tenet replied, "I was not in briefings at this time." Bush, he noted, "was on vacation." He added that he didn't see the president at all in August 2001. During the entire month, Bush was at his ranch in Texas. "You never talked with him?" Roemer asked. "No," Tenet replied. By the way, for much of August, Tenet too was, as he put it, "on leave."
And there you have it. National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice has made a big point of the fact that Tenet briefed the president nearly every day. Yet at the peak moment of threat, the two didn't talk at all. At a time when action was needed, and orders for action had to come from the top, the man at the top was resting undisturbed.
Throughout that summer, we now well know, Tenet, Richard Clarke, and several other officials were running around with their "hair on fire," warning that al-Qaida was about to unleash a monumental attack. On Aug. 6, Bush was given the now-famous President's Daily Brief (by one of Tenet's underlings), warning that this attack might take place "inside the United States." For the previous few yearsas Philip Zelikow, the commission's staff director, revealed this morningthe CIA had issued several warnings that terrorists might fly commercial airplanes into buildings or cities.
And now, we learn today, at this peak moment, Tenet hears about Moussaoui. Someone might have added 2 + 2 + 2 and possibly busted up the conspiracy. But the president was down on the ranch, taking it easy. Tenet wasn't with him. Tenet never talked with him. Riceas she has testifiedwasn't with Bush, either. He was on his own and, willfully, out of touch.
A USA Today story, written right before Bush took off, reported that the vacationscheduled to last from Aug. 3 to Sept. 3would tie one of Richard Nixon's as the longest that any president had ever taken. A week before he left, Bush made a videotaped message for the Boy Scouts of America. On the tape, he said, "I'll be going to my ranch in Crawford, where I'll work and take a little time off. I think it is so important for the president to spend some time away from Washington, in the heartland of America."
Dana Milbank and Mike Allen of the Washington Post recently wrote a story recalling those halcyon days in Crawford. On Aug. 7, 2001, the day after the fateful PDB, Bush, they wrote, "was in an expansive mood when he ran into reporters while playing golf." The president's aides emphasized that he was working, now and then, on a few issueseducation, immigration, Social Security, and his impending decision on stem-cell research. On Aug. 29, less than a week after Tenet found out about Moussaoui, Bush gave a speech before the American Legion. The White House press office headlined the text of the address, "President Discusses Defense Priorities." Those priorities: boosting soldiers' pay and abandoning the Anti-Ballistic-Missile Treaty. Nothing about terrorism, Osama Bin Laden, hijackings. Nothing that reflected the PDB or Moussaoui.
CONTINUED...
http://www.slate.com/id/2098861
LAS14
(13,783 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)Treasonous, most likely.
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/Octafish/88
Demsrule86
(68,552 posts)"The friendship between these two American dynasties does not erase their political differences, however, and neither of the Presidents Bush seem likely to join the conservatives who have backed Clinton. But they also wont back Trump, who has arguably criticized George W. Bush more harshly than Clinton has this election. (Trump said Bush didnt keep the country safe and lied about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, but has since backed off those critiques.) After former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush lost his primary bid, both Bushes said they would sit out this election entirely."
blackspade
(10,056 posts)It's irrelevant.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)Former presidents and first ladies are on quite cordial terms with one or another, regardless of party affiliation. There' a kinship that develops among people who have had to live under the enormous scrutiny that focuses on the First Family during their time in the White House.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)another ex-official.
"It may be hard for your viewers to remember how difficult it was for people to talk about HIV/AIDS back in the 1980s and because of both president and Mrs. Reagan in particular Mrs. Reagan we started a national conversation, when before nobody would talk about it, nobody wanted to do anything about it, and that too is something I really appreciate with her very effective low-key advocacy. It penetrated the public conscience and people began to say, hey, we have to do something about this too."
I know that for those of you who are Reagan Democrat types these words are like music to your ears but those words are mendacious and toxic.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)For being wrong about that one comment?
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)Who makes that mistake? It's not like she was born in 2000 and never lived through it and just heard things. She was ALIVE then. She was active in politics then. Did she care so little about the gay community at the time that she didn't realize how fucking horrible Reagan was?
That's not a "mistake." That's a fundamental flaw of something.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)So when some one like her says she misspoke, it doesn't come from no where
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)is that she "misspoke" is a pretty hard pill to swallow.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)" You see, I have AIDS. I could be an African American woman, a Latino man, a 10-year old boy or girl. AIDS has many faces. And AIDS knows no class or gender, race or religion, or sexual orientation. AIDS does not discriminate, but George Bush's White House does.
AIDS is a disease of the Reagan-Bush years. The first case was detected in 1981, but it took 40,000 deaths and seven years for Ronald Reagan to say the word "AIDS." It's five years later, 70,000 more dead and George Bush doesn't talk about AIDS, much less do anything about it....."
http://www.towleroad.com/2007/03/bob_hattoys_spe/
Full speech is a barn burner and heaps praise on Bill Clinton.....
Same Convention, Elizabeth Glaser, again Hillary present in the room:
"Today, I am here because it's a matter of life and death. Exactly -- Exactly four years ago my daughter died of AIDS. She did not survive the Reagan Administration. I am here because my son and I may not survive four more years of leaders who say they care, but do nothing.
I understand the sense of frustration and despair in our country, because I know firsthand about shouting for help and getting no answer. I went to Washington to tell Presidents Reagan and Bush that much, much more had to be done for AIDS research and care, and that children couldn't be forgotten. The first time, when nothing happened, I thought, "They just didn't hear me." The second time, when nothing happened, I thought, "Maybe I didn't shout loud enough." But now I realize they don't hear because they don't want to listen."
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/elizabethglaser1992dnc.htm
We should at least remember Hattoy and Glaser and the words they spoke, they are both of them passed on now and they gave us so much. To pretend they never existed in order to gloss up some Reagan myth is just not acceptable.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Hillary didn't care one wit. Her religious view justified the illness. Oh I know she has evolved and is all cured from her bias now and that is swell. And yes the Clinton foundation does work for AIDS/HIV now that it is cool and the hippester thing to do. Back then though it was different. Very different. I was there and I REMEBER and I will never forget or forgive Hillary's WORDS about this or many other things she has "evolved" about!
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)National Television. Her 'apology' was a Tweet. She never sought out a camera to make those corrections in spite of the fact that she sought out that camera to make those bogus and hurtful assertions.
It's not my job to point out that after a nationally televised revision of LGBT history some politician whispered a quiet apology for being entirely wrong. It's her job to correct the record.
Look around you. Does this country strike you as a place where it is safe to misrepresent the courage of the LGBT community as some sort of toxic apathy which only Ronald Reagan could cut through? Are we really the community she needs to misspeak about and use to gain right wing support? Do you think such lies help the LGBT community? I sure don't.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)to the very persons who most oppressed them, claiming the oppressed did nothing to help themselves until their oppressor showed them how to take action is in fact bashing those oppressed people.
It's bashing. Seven years of activism by LGBT prior to Reagan even saying the word 'AIDS' erased and credited to Reagan. That's bashing.
And of course you keep taking personal shots at me instead of discussing the facts. Says so much in and of itself.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Pandering does not an apology make!
appalachiablue
(41,127 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)as she misspoke.
Then again you knew that, and just dredge up a dead issue for a few cheap points. You are nothing if not consistent, Mr. Blue.
PS - I miss your near-daily jabs you used to give me over the transparency page.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)You respond with ugliness and emoticons. Good for you. Good for your candidate. Such a grand and compassionate culture you have!!!
Tarc
(10,476 posts)If you're going to harp on Hillary forever for a misstatement, no one will take you very seriously.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)nt
Tarc
(10,476 posts)Trying to score some last-minute points.
QC
(26,371 posts)Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)The Tea Party Left have their own ideas.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)Progressives are now being called the "Tea Party Left"?
That's fucking reprehensible. When the Dem party continues to move to the right, we can point to posts like yours as the reason why it was allowed to happen. I'm sure you will be happy with Clinton's pivot right as we get closer to November, but those of us that are progressives aren't going to like it so much. Glad you think you can just shit on us and still get our votes.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)country for a minimum of 8 years, then yes, that's the way the Tea Party views every aspect of past Democratic leaders. It serves no purpose other than to be nasty and intolerant. No one is pure evil. Those that haven't served yet think that they know it all are the people that are the most suspect in my mind.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)This is a Democratic website. Republicans and their supporters/enablers/praises get no passes.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)The OP has a hissy fit merely because Hillary complimented former President George H.W. Bush for asking about her thoughts and being willing to listen to her. Absolutely ridiculous. I called it for what it is.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)What aspects of the rethugs over the last 20 years is not worth hate and derision?
Complements to a war criminal should not be coming from a Democratic nominee.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Your efforts at party unity are a total fail.
QC
(26,371 posts)our very own Sensible Pragmatic Centrists do.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)QC
(26,371 posts)Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)Autumn
(45,056 posts)Strange.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)We don't abide any of this partisan criticism of election stealing neocon war criminals.
BootinUp
(47,141 posts)Tell them they aren't serious people, etc.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)as "Tea Party Left." You might want to go wag your finger at them. Or perhaps you don't care about losing progressives.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)of the opposition party. The Tea Party does the exact same thing. Everything is so black and white. Good vs. Evil. That is foolish and unproductive behavior IMO.
Response to Trust Buster (Reply #106)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)Response to Trust Buster (Reply #226)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)subject matter.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)Sanders supporter would like. That attitude failed miserably for the Tea Party and will fail miserably for the Sanders coalition. That's why.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)"We are surely a kinder and gentler nation because of you."
"On behalf of all of us, let me just say that we are surely a kinder and gentler nation because of you, and we can't thank you enough," Obama added.
SOURCE: http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/07/15/19487988-obama-toasts-bush-we-are-surely-a-kinder-and-gentler-nation-because-of-you
Apart from all the wars and death and misery and poverty and wasted lives, maybe.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)the presidency will do so much in forwarding your progressive cause.
WDIM
(1,662 posts)Sending other people to do his dirty work.
The CIA has killed millions because of their secret wars and destabilizing countries.
As Vice President he was involved in Iran Contra which was ran by the CIA and the Contras killed thousands in their brutal overthrow of a democratically elected government.
As president he bombed countless civilian target's in Iraq and cause countless casualities and death.
Being honest about people and our governments actions around the world is exactly the way to foward the progressive cause of peace.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)WDIM
(1,662 posts)You should probably just stay asleep and happy in your fantasy world that HW Bush was a great human being that did so much for peace.
Lets just ignore the countless lives destroyed by that man and his son. Go on believing the lie that our Government only brings good and peace to the world and ignore the true death and destruction it has caused at the hands of men like Bush.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)listened to her. Geez, this hate EVEYTHING about those that served is ridiculous.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Original OP from 2006: Know your BFEE or "Hey, America! Wake Up and Smell the Sulfur!"
Few today remember a most heinous terrorist act: The assassinations of former Chilean ambassador Orlando Letelier and American Ronnie Karpen Moffit.
Ms. Moffit was an American citizen murdered by agents of a foreign government on U.S. soil. Her only crime was being with Orlando Letelier, whose crime was to speak out against the military coup that toppled the democratically elected Chilean government he served. Because he refused to turn over the Chilean secret police and their American contacts, these assassinations were allowed, if not sanctioned, by George Bush, then director of central intelligence and head of the CIA.
As with all things having to do with the BFEE, the world get worse. So, a reminder:
October will mark the 30th anniversary of another most heinous terrorist act: The bombing of a Cuban civilian airliner that killed 73 passengers and crew. The pilots reported the blast caused their aircraft to catch fire and they were burning up as they attempted an emergency landing. The plane crashed into the Caribbean, a few miles west of Barbados. All aboard perished, including a close friend of the Great DUer malaise.
Cubana Airlines DC-8 like the one bombed by BFEE members Luis Posada Carriles and Orlando Bosch. Both turds have been protected by Poppy and Baby Doc Bush and the CIA, which strangely has been loyal to them rather than to various presidencies before and in-between.
Heres an excellent essay based on the facts:
The Charmed Life of a Mass Murderer
Posada Carriles and Bush's Anti-Terror Hoax
By SAUL LANDAU
Counterpunch June 9, 2005
President George W. Bush has emphasized that if one of the myriad of U.S. police agencies even suspect someone of planning, abetting or carrying out a terrorist act, he will, at a minimum, get tossed into a dark hole. Indeed, Bush has thrown the Magna Carta into the garbage heap when it comes to Muslims suspected of pernicious thoughts toward the United States.
But if suspected terrorists turn their rage toward the detested Fidel Castro, these rules don't apply.
Indeed, those who try to bomb Cuban targets, or those related to Cuba, receive special treatment. This double-standard casts a shadow over the president's commitment to fight terrorism.
For example, TV footage showed Homeland Security cops arresting Posada in mid May. But the arresting officers didn't even handcuff the Western Hemisphere's most notorious terrorist. (Remember how Bush's pal Ken "Kenny Boy" Lay ENRON's CEO got handcuffed?) Justice Department spokespeople said they plan to charge the foremost terrorist in the western hemisphere with "illegal entry into the United States."
The FBI has reams of files on Posada, affectionately called "Bambi" by his terrorist friends. Former FBI Special Agent Carter Cornick told New York Times reporter Tim Weiner that Posada was "up to his eyeballs" in the October 1976 destruction of a Cuban commercial airliner over Barbados. All 73 passengers and crew members died. Recently published FBI and CIA documents not only confirm Cornick's statement, but also reveal that U.S. agencies had knowledge of the plot and did not inform Cuban authorities or try to stop the bombing.
SNIP
One wonders: Did Posada announce his illegal presence in the United States with the idea that U.S. government complicity in aiding and abetting his past acts of terrorism would protect him? U.S. authorities didn't inform Cuba or try to stop the 1976 air-bombing plot, and in 1971, as Veciana stated, the CIA made the gun that Posada's agents placed inside the camera to assassinate Castro. And Ollie North has knowledge of Posada's covert activities for U.S. intelligence as well.
CONTINUED
http://www.counterpunch.org/landau06092005.html
[font color="red"]What ties these two events together is the involvement of George Herbert Walker Bush, as then-CIA director, in their cover-up as crimes and in the protection of their perpetrators, as in the person of one Luis Posada Carriles, Orlando Bosch and their colleagues-in-terror.[/font color]
Think about it: A murder-forgiving CIA director Bush went on to become President of the United States. Today, Bushs son, George, acts as president. The younger Bush has used his office from Day One to protect and cover-up the crimes of his father.
Thats what Hugo Chavez was talking about when he smelled the sulfur and called Bush The Devil.
America needs to wake up and smell the sulfur, too. Heres some background on the above:
LUIS POSADA CARRILES
THE DECLASSIFIED RECORD
CIA and FBI Documents Detail Career in International Terrorism; Connection to U.S.
National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 153
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB153 /
Dont forget to check out Orlando Bosch, while youre at it. GOOGLE with Jeb Bush for some interesting connections to the present day.
Democracy Nows Amy Goodman and Juan Gonzalez interviewed National Security Archives Peter Kornbluh and Leteliers son, Francisco:
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/09/21/153...
Another important point to remember, is Kissinger's close association with Operation CONDOR, the assassination program run out of "The Cone" to silence democrats, liberals, union leaders, progressives, socialists, communists or anyone who stood for justice and equality.
Chile security chief was CIA informer
BBC Tuesday, 19 September, 2000, 23:24 GMT 00:24 UK
Recently declassified documents in the United States show that the former head of the secret police in Chile, Manuel Contreras, was a paid informant for the US intelligence agency, the CIA.
The report, comprising CIA documents requested by the US Congress, show that contact with Contreras began in 1974 - a year after the military coup that brought General Augusto Pinochet to power.
Contreras oversaw the much-feared security service DINA
The report adds that the contact was maintained until 1977 - a year after Contreras plotted the killing of the then Chilean Foreign Minister and foe of General Pinochet, Orlando Letelier, in Washington.
A BBC correspondent in Washington, Nick Bryant, says the documents reinforce the view that the US turned a blind eye towards political repression in Chile during the Pinochet era and that the CIA was complicit in many human rights abuses.
Pinochet's confidant
As head of the security service, DINA, Contreras became the one of the most feared men in Chile, second only to General Pinochet.
The general's iron rule was underpinned by the tactics of brutal repression that saw thousands die and thousands more flee into exile. Others disappeared or were tortured.
CONTINUED
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/932897.stm
Of course, there are even more sulferous friends than these
Bush s Longstanding Criminal Mexican Amigos
The disturbing ties of some of George W. Bush's Latino advisors
More on Bush-Amigos links in PBS Frontline interview with Gary Jacobs
By Julie Reynolds
Research assistance by Victor Almazán and Ana Leonor Rojo
LOS AMIGOS DE BUSH
Dime con quién andas y te diré quién eres. (Tell me who you side with and I will tell you who you are.) George W. Bush for President web site
Those who say that George W. Bush has scant knowledge of foreign affairs don't understand his family's relationship with Mexico.
If one event could be said to make that relationship visible, it had to be the state dinner given eleven years ago by President Bush for Mexico's president, Carlos Salinas. It was an elegant yet boisterous gala, where the biggest movers and shakers in Texas and Mexico congregated and celebrated. This group was to become W's Mexican legacy, a gift of ties and connections passed on from the father to his son.
SNIP
The Mexican president had spent a long day with President Bush signing trade pacts, the precursors of NAFTA. Salinas brought his so-called Dream Team: his commerce secretary, finance minister, and his personal Machiavelli, Jose Córdoba. It would later be astounding to see, as the decade unfolded, how many of that administration's proud men and women fell shamefully from grace - some exiled, some imprisoned and some assassinated.
No one knew it then, but many at that banquet would survive to one day help young W beat a path back to the White House. There were loyal "Bushfellas" who were old friends of the family: Commerce Secretary Robert Mosbacher Sr., General Colin Powell, and George Bush Senior's ever-present friend, Secretary of State James Baker. Gary Jacobs, whose Texas bank was about to be bought by the son of Mexico's billionaire-politico Carlos Hank González, was also a guest. Tony Garza, then a young judge, is now a Bush cabinet contender. Today, all are advisors or contributors to W's campaign.
Hidden among the glitterati were two relative unknowns. They were, however, familiar to the group at hand. They were the loyal "Amigos de Bush" from San Antonio: criminal defense lawyer Roy Barrera Jr. and car dealer Ernesto Ancira Jr. In contrast to the Salinas group, the ties of Barrera and Ancira to drug cartels would remain unnoticed for another decade. Their ties to George W. would grow stronger.
CONTINUED
GOOGLE cache:
http://72.14.209.104/search?q=cache:Th5_dq9beuYJ:www.el...
May also be at:
http://www.newsmakingnews.com/contents10,2,00.htm
Henry Kissinger and Agusto Pinochet
[font size="3"][font color="green"]I don't see why we need to stand by and watch a country go communist due to the irresponsibility of its people. The issues are much too important for the Chilean voters to be left to decide for themselves. -- Henry A. Kissinger[/font color][/font size]
Remember: If Kissinger -- friend of Hillary and the guy Poppy's Dim Son wanted to appoint head of the 9-11 Commission -- feels that way about democracy in Chile, whats there to make us think he and those for whom he toils believe differently about democracy in the United States of America?
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Bartcop coined the phrase to put a handle on the cabal that use their political and economic power to enrich themselves at the expense of the nation. They include the Wall Street types and their heirs who were the political and legal enemies of Gen. Smedley Butler.
Bill Moyers, Alfred W. McCoy and others have identified some of these players as part of The Secret Government. They use political and financial power under the cover of official secrecy to selfishly gain and unreservedly serve the ultra-right and ultra-rich who through their combined and concerted criminal actions have become the most powerful and undemocratic group in human history.
Among their policies that have remained in place since at least 1981 are the major tax cuts for the rich, while simultaneously increasing public spending on military hardware and now warfare and disaster capitalism without end while cutting back public expenditures, if not eliminating entirely, public education, housing, healthcare, welfare and other social-benefit programs. It also is why, by design and by law, most of the wealth created since Reaganomics has accrued in the pockets of the richest of the rich. It was supposed to.
Rather than bringing all that up, while still making them easy to identify, I call them the BFEE. Perhaps the best moniker for them is the War Party, for using their positions to make money through death, suffering and the exploitation of humanity. Its what George W Bush meant when he said, Money trumps peace. And for the record, the last president to stand up and oppose these unmitigated warmongers was President John F. Kennedy.
Anyway, that bothers some DUers. Tuesday, I made the observation that a person is only a suspect until convicted in a trial. That concept is central to our system of justice, yet I got mocked by several DUers for stating it. The idea that all are innocent until proven guilty and the idea that all are equal under the law are basic to democratic government.
Heres what I suspect these DUers dont know or dont want to acknowledge knowing. There are truly evil people in positions of power, both in and out of government. An important example is this guy, thoughtfully misidentified by Fox TV as a Democrat, the former Republican representative out of Florida, Mark Foley, BFEE:
The now-known child predator was given a position to oversee laws designed to protect children from child molesters. Whats more, Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) covered it up. In America, married households may now be a minority, but parents who have kids hate child molesters. Same for most people, in general: Child molestation generates universal hatred.
Thats why Fox and so many other news media have tried to connect Foley, by accident, to the Democrats. Even Huffington Post made the connection. Once an idea is in a persons head, it takes a LOT of Truth to drive it out. Consider the nonexistent ties between Osama and Saddam that so many Americans still believe to exist. So, if the connection between the House Republicans and Foley can be made in the minds of enough Americans, they will not vote for Republikkkens.
Eleven GOPers Fingered in Foley Cover-Up
By Justin Rood - September 30, 2006, 9:32 PM
Roll Call's John Bresnahan reports:
As of Saturday evening, nearly a dozen House GOP lawmakers and staffers have acknowledged that they knew of the initial batch of non-sexually explicit messages from Foley to a 16-year-old former House page, some of them for a year or more. These include Hastert (R-IL); Majority Leader John Boehner (Ohio); National Republican Congressional Committee Chairman Tom Reynolds (N.Y.); Reps. Rodney Alexander (La.) and John Shimkus (Ill.); Mike Stokke, the Speakers deputy chief of staff; Ted Van Der Meid, Hasterts counsel; Paula Nowakowski, Boehners chief of staff; Jeff Trandahl, the former Clerk of the House; and another Hastert aide and Alexanders chief of staff, according to public statements and GOP insiders.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/eleven-gopers-fingered-in-foley-cover-up
Not only did he chair the Congressional Caucus on Missing and Exploited Children, Foley was in the House GOP leadership. As Deputy Majority Whip, he mightve followed in the sweaty steps of his mentor, Dennis Hastert as Speaker of the House. Thats something you wont hear mentioned by John Boehner or anyone on Fox TV.
Foley never went to trial. But he should have been investigated in public, preferably by a Grand Jury led by a Special Prosecutor. Same for his colleagues in power, Dennis Hastert. A big reason they aren't around when you need one is George H.W. Bush let the special prosecutor law expire.
This is hard to write about when all the powers are with those in secret offices of government. Consider what Snowden, Assange and the other brave whistleblowers in and out of government and private industry have endured just to give us a peak at the top of the iceberg that represents the virtually unlimited spy powers applied by the FBI, NSA, DIA, CIA and who knows what else.
Then again, if DU, like Bartcop before us, and Thom Hartmann and Talking Points Memo and ConsortiumNews and the all too few others didnt, who would? Rupert Murdoch? Roger Ailes? ABCNNBCBSFakeNoiseNutworks? Not bloody likely.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Most of her political allies and mentors are republicans. She treasures her endorsement from Kissinger and honorary membership in the Bush Crime Family.
WDIM
(1,662 posts)By moderate Republicans.
Even people on this board defend HW and W it's disgusting.
Response to blackspade (Original post)
rjsquirrel This message was self-deleted by its author.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)surrealAmerican
(11,360 posts)... that this statement is disingenuous pandering, but, when she talks favorably about progressive policies, she's utterly sincere.
How do we know it isn't the other way around?
QC
(26,371 posts)appalachiablue
(41,127 posts)And I don't mean the well known power DC restaurant.
QC
(26,371 posts)by telling us Great Unwashed about the club rules.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)I bet you never saw THIS coming.
(Gee, this shit sandwich is surprisingly tasty!)
dsc
(52,155 posts)there aren't many to say, but there is no harm in saying the few that there are from time to time. Her comments on Reagan were idiotic and she admits they were.
Buzz cook
(2,471 posts)He was also a vegetarian.
I've said three positive things about Hitler, I guess that makes me a Nazi.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)The Hitler defense?
Buzz cook
(2,471 posts)I just took the short cut.
Any association with people I don't like makes you a person I don't like.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)LAS14
(13,783 posts)... I'm sure I'll bump into more occasions to use it...
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)In the real world, people frequently speak favorably about others ... even those they don't like ... especially when asked, or at funerals, or on the campaign trail.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Given the Bush family crimes and the rethug vilification of Democrats.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)Sadly
LAS14
(13,783 posts)... a political system where those that disagree with us on most issues can have no good qualities?? I don't, for one.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)LAS14
(13,783 posts)... them a criminal pass???? In what world are you living?
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)Holding republicans to account for their murderous criminal bullshit is way out there?
Holy fuck!
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Pivot to the right after the nomination? I guess I was wrong, the nomination isn't for a month yet.
LAS14
(13,783 posts)grossproffit
(5,591 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)grossproffit
(5,591 posts)Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Oh, and healthy does of ad hominem attacks.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)Principles don't mean shit to some around here.
Go Team Blue! Fuck the Facts!
Go Team Blue! Fuck the Facts!
Go Team Blue! Fuck the Facts!
Hooray!
I'm disgusted.
d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)Hillary won the election, but ignore the voter disenfranchisement.
Hillary is the true progressive, but ignore the paid speeches, the pro-war statements, and the anti-gay marriage remarks.
Hillary is down with A.A.'s, but ignore her comments about C.P. time and Super predators.
Trump is under investigation, but ignore that Hillary is also under investigation.
Disgusted is the understatement of the century.
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)potone
(1,701 posts)She is pandering.
Go Vols
(5,902 posts)said he would be considered a moderate R in the '80s,this does not surprise me.More of the same.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)Comments further up seem to cement that. We've come full circle- The Bushes stole an election and DU was born. They stole our party and now DU is about to die.
You can't make this stuff up.
glennward
(989 posts)for helping NY and NYC rebound after 9/11. How soon we forget that right after 9/11 most people were united in helping NY and fighting a common foe. Hillary is merely acknowledging what she knows to be true. She could not say the same for the GOP in Congress who tried to thwart help for her state and NYC. It would be dishonest of her to speak otherwise of President Bush on this issue. However, she has many other issues about which she has been critical of President Bush.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)Or is that ok too now?
glennward
(989 posts)Congress members based on faulty information she believe was reliable?
She believed was reliable? Nobody here believes she's stupid. We all knew it was a lie, she knew it was a lie, and she stumped for them. It may not have passed without her help.
Don't worry about it though- her team tells us that it's ok to embrace Bushco now. Will you?
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)Buddyblazon
(3,014 posts)What the fuck happened to this place?
pokerfan
(27,677 posts)Just wait till Monday when they get to really let us have it.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)As near as I can tell they're pro-choice RW Republicans. They like Bush, Kissinger, trickle-down supply side economics, tax-cuts for the wealthy, wage stagnation for working class, and war...lots of war.
George II
(67,782 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)Which isn't surprising since this is election season.
gordianot
(15,237 posts)redstateblues
(10,565 posts)When the "leader" you're following is an anger and envy merchant.
felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)points the way of inevitability, first screw over the left, then move to the right. First time I saw that symbol I was in shock of the open insult.
fishwax
(29,149 posts)BainsBane
(53,031 posts)Not to support Clinton and help Trump get elected?
The tangled excuses truly are astounding.
Yet when Bernie spoke at Liberty university and praised Sensenbrener, that was supposed to signs of his ability to work with Republicans. He can endorse anti choice candidates or opponents of the Iran nuclear deal, and his supporters shell out cash to help get them elected, but Clinton notes that Bush had some positive attributes, and that's supposed to be an excuse for opposing the Democratic nominees do as a result help Trump get elected.
Let's cut the crap, why don't we? the way the arguments twist and turn for political expediency is transparent.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Clinton is the nominee, so your continual references to what others do is irrelevant at this point. What Clinton says and does from this point forward will impact the general election and to say that discussing and questioning her actions is 'electing Trump' is childish.
Grow up. If we can't have honest discussions about our candidate, then we relegate ourselves to the status if children.
Children are taught to bow to authority, to not question, to deflect and obfuscate. Some grow out of it, but obviously that is hit or miss even here at DU.
So, if you can't discuss Clinton's actions in terms of their impact on her chances in November like an adult, then I suggest you find another hobby.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)...especially when speaking of a president who (nearly) won two general elections.
Not even Sanders does honesty brutal enough to describe the Bush II regime accurately.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)The RW has poloried him for decades. Where is the praise and love for him? Even from our own party elite?