2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumAbortion is weakness for Clinton VP favorite
Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) is generally seen as a safe vice presidential pick for Hillary Clinton.
A white man fluent in Spanish and from a swing state, Kaine is a former Democratic National Committee (DNC) chairman.
Hed provide some balance to the Clinton ticket and give her a running mate many see as an ideal partner in government. Theres only one big problem with picking Kaine: abortion.
While Kaine does not back overturning the Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion, he is personally opposed to the practice and has backed controversial restrictions, such as parental notification laws and a ban on late-term abortions.
more
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/284379-abortion-is-weakness-for-clinton-vp-favorite
AntiBank
(1,339 posts)If she picks him it is a slap in the face big time to the progressive base.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)alarimer
(16,245 posts)She can do no wrong, according to some. Picking him would mean I am right not to trust her.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Most people support bans on late term abortion provided that there are exceptions for the life and health of the mother, for example. Ditto for parental notification with judicial override.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Many Democrats are personally opposed to abortion due to their faith. That does not mean they oppose it for others.
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)He has backed some problematic abortion restrictions.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Chan790
(20,176 posts)InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)Banning abortion after 20 weeks targets the most vulnerable abortion seekers: families with wanted pregnancies where serious fetal anomalies have been detected (which often cannot be detected until the 20 weeks mark).
Kaine would not be my favorite VP choice anyway, even though rationally I can see why he might be a good choice.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)Ill leave it at that.
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)Although I could also see why doing medical procedures on minors without parental consent is problematic, at the same time that I see that requiring parental consent is deeply problematic e.g. in cases of incest etc.
But I specifically mentioned the 20 week because a lot of people are for late-term abortion bans on moral grounds even if they support earlier abortion. The problem is that post-20 week bans ignore the fact that those abortions are often sought after tragic diagnoses.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)Mom and or dad forces daughter to get an abortion against her will. It's about choice and requiring parental notification compromises it. It's also a slippery slope as some states are taking it a step further and requiring that women get consent (permission!!) from the man.
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)The question it raises is when can a minor consent to medical procedures in general without parental consent. As a parent I can see why that can be a slippery slope.
But the slippery slope to the other side is worse, so I do not favor parental consent laws for abortion. That Kaine does, is problematic.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)and I have a sneaking suspicion that there will be a gesture to soothe white men. This is another white patriarchal "slap in the face" (for those who are defensive). If so, I am hoping there are some choices I like better who we aren't hearing about. I'd like to see someone who predictably has at least a good 16 yrs of high energy and good health ahead.
zenabby
(364 posts)Why is the other side worse? If there was incest shouldn't the parents know? I'm trying to think of scenarios where parental notification is bad, and I'm not able to come up with any..
Also there is a difference between parental consent and notification. Atleast a notification is a must?
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)is the most serious slippery slope problem for parental consent. How do you require a teenager to have to obtain her abuser's consent for an abortion? That makes no sense.
But in any case, I can see the arguments to both sides on this one.
I think if the abuser is the parent, then someone (child services?) needs to know about it somehow..Maybe not parental consent, but perhaps parental notification? also, there's a big difference between 13 and 17 - a girl who is 13 and getting abortion without the parent knowing about it? Scary!
I would actually be for parental notification + might be able to live with a ban after 32 weeks or so...but the second is really unnecessary..who wants to abort after 30 weeks? It would be so traumatic to the mom, and those cases would be sooo few that we should trust the mom and her doctor on those cases. So on second thought, just parental notification.
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)Roe v Wade does not allow abortion past viability, which for a normal pregnancy is around 24 weeks. Some states interpret that provision to allow abortion past 24 weeks where the fetus is not viable. There are extremely rare cases, which have to do with serious fetal abnormality, where abortion happens past 30 weeks. No one WANTS to abort at that stage, but there are tragic medical reasons why it might be needed.
MH1
(17,600 posts)is a brutal myth.
(I am agreeing with you, of course)
If someone waits that long it is for one of two reasons:
1) they had difficulty accessing contraception and/or abortion earlier in the process
2) severe issues have occurred with a desired pregnancy
a very very small number of cases may occur when there are other reasons that look more "optional" to someone outside the situation, but those are such a tiny number that it is not fair to cripple the process for the heartwrenching cases in reason 2. And reason 1 wouldn't happen very often either, if it weren't for the anti-abortion a-holes in this country.
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)Fact is that a 20 week fetus (which is actually 18 weeks old) is close to viability and resembles a baby, which makes the idea of a "casual" abortion at that time unthinkable to a lot of people. Hence the general support for late-term bans. But the fact is that there is nothing casual about abortion in general and particularly not about late-term abortions. Just read the heart-wrenching stories of families who faced termination for medical reasons for a wanted pregnancy, and even someone who leans pro-life should have some sympathy.
My Good Babushka
(2,710 posts)and has a lot of women's support for the reason of defending reproductive choice, Kaine would seem like an odd about-face to the campaign we've been seeing.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)Backing the parental notification laws and bans on late-term abortions cancels his eligibility for me.
Look, if a politician is personally against abortion, fine. But keep it personal and private. As a politician, I believe he should think about women who don't share his view to be able to make their own reproductive choices without government interfering.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)maybe Planned Parenthood is open to compromise too...
Maru Kitteh
(28,339 posts)whatsoever to back it up, and you dragged PP into the mix and asserted that perhaps the nominee will compromise on what regarding PP who endorsed her?
I would really like to see some proof of these assertions of yours, if this is meant to be helpful criticism. Please expand on your statements here, so that it doesn't just appear that you are making derogatory statements about the presumed nominee of the Democratic Party.
Thanks in advance for helping us understand your intention better, and for the factual information I hope to see you provide.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)not me.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/09/29/hillary_clinton_i_could_compromise_on_abortion_if_it_included_exceptions_for_mothers_health.html
"Again, I am where I have been, which is that if there's a way to structure some kind of constitutional restriction that take into account the life of the mother and her health, then I'm open to that."
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/03/hillary-clinton-late-term-abortions
"Clinton's answer was murkier. She began her response to moderator Bret Baier with a broad defense of a woman's right to an abortion, mentioning the current Supreme Court case involving Texas' anti-abortion regulations and the continued Republican attacks on Planned Parenthood. But Baier persisted on the matter of late-term abortions, asking, "Just to be clear, there's nowithout any exceptions?"
Clinton replied, "NoI have been on record in favor of a late-pregnancy regulation that would have exceptions for the life and health of the mother." "
Maru Kitteh
(28,339 posts)Nothingburger. Air enchilada.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,976 posts)La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)hamsterjill
(15,220 posts)Just no. We don't need someone with baggage like this when there are so many OTHER, more valuable options for Hillary. I think she will understand this, and I don't think she will choose Tim Kaine.
cynatnite
(31,011 posts)A nice guy, though. I met him a few years ago. I don't think he'd be a good pick.
merrily
(45,251 posts)mid-term elections. Before the elections, he went on the Daily Show to talk about that with Jon Stewart.
http://www.cc.com/video-clips/x3j2f8/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart-tim-kaine
Maru Kitteh
(28,339 posts)DemonGoddess
(4,640 posts)giving any real hints as to who her choice may end up as, or who her actual picks are, that people are just having a whole lot of angst over nothing right now. Consider that the latest "short list" was an anonymous source, yet again.
She will pick who she sees as best suited to working WITH her to push through her platform and agenda.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)Squinch
(50,949 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Not exactly the same, but similar.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/09/29/hillary_clinton_i_could_compromise_on_abortion_if_it_included_exceptions_for_mothers_health.html
^snip^
Hillary Clinton: I Could Compromise on Abortion If It Included Exceptions For Mother's Health
Again, I am where I have been, which is that if there's a way to structure some kind of constitutional restriction that take into account the life of the mother and her health, then I'm open to that. But I have yet to see the Republicans willing to actually do that, and that would be an area, where if they included health, you could see constitutional action.
Vote2016
(1,198 posts)I literally doubt there is a single voter on the entire planet who might possibly support Hillary-Kaine but who does not already support Hillary.
Choosing Kaine is as close as Hillary could come to choosing a modern equivalent to nonJewish Joe Lieberman (i.e., Kaine makes the ticket even less attractive to progressives without bringing any new supporters to the ticket.) Kaine = epic fail.
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I mean, I'm one.
Kaine is certainly not my first choice. Too far to the right, as noted here.
KitSileya
(4,035 posts)seeing how Sanders endorsed Kaptur, and I haven't seen them up in arms about that. Personally, as a Clinton supporter, I am not too enthused about Kaine as VP.