2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhy don't millennials vote in the numbers they represent?
I pray that what happened with Brexit doesn't happen here. And it won't if the millennials GOTV for the Dems up and down ticket.
tonyt53
(5,737 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... and, if they don't get it, many assume that it's not worthwhile to vote, or assume that everything is "rigged".
(I was young once too.)
cwydro
(51,308 posts)No excuse not to vote imo.
I know a lot of millennials. Few of them seem to give a crap about voting. A shame.
akbacchus_BC
(5,704 posts)for Senator Obama, the young people! Who are more behind Mr. Sanders, the young people. You folks need to stop thinking that young people are only into posting on social media. They pay attention and they vote!
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)They might not find as many people as they would like who deserve the title "Democrat."
LonePirate
(13,417 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)LonePirate
(13,417 posts)Voters can choose from the limited choices on the menu or they can go without. Many millennials prefer to go without.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)non-existent buffet. Many would prefer candidates much further to the left than currently exist. I can't fault them for not voting if they choose not too. What I *can fault them for is not running for office, if they see the void there.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)It's called "Civic Duty".
It about responsibility and caring about things greater than ones self.
But perhaps those things come with age.
I'm not arguing with you, btw.
I've had jobs that I wasn't excited about but got up every day and did them. But it sure makes it easier when you do like your job.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)It's been that way pretty much from the beginning.
One reason given for lowering the voting age to 18 from 21 was that it would get young people to vote in greater numbers. While obviously, there are those who are between 18 and 21 who do vote, it's not in the large numbers originally predicted. But almost anyone who used to be young could have told you that.
It doesn't help that in this country simply getting registered to vote can be a huge hassle, even in states where the Republicans haven't subverted the registration and voting process.
As the Millennials get older, they will be more reliable and frequent voters.
Sancho
(9,067 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)BlueStater
(7,596 posts)This kind of comment is something I expect to see on Free Republic, not here.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Which is why so many people want election days to be work holidays. So we can go vote without endangering our jobs.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)Plus, a lot of businesses won't close anyway even if it was a holiday.
Where I live, we have early voting, and no excuse absentee voting. If somebody doesn't vote, it probably because they didn't want to.
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)....now if they could vote by phone....people would pay more attention to them as a voting block
JI7
(89,247 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)the important things that secure the integrity of the vote. Right now, we don't even have that with the electronic machines under corporate control.
JI7
(89,247 posts)It's not just a millenials thing
forjusticethunders
(1,151 posts)Less settled, more chaotic work schedules, yes part of it is maturity too.
name not needed
(11,660 posts)JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,339 posts)Except for that damned rap music.
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)Why can't politicians energize them to vote.
In regards to the primaries it would have meant pigeon holing themselves to a party and many don't want that.
It also makes them unable to vote then.
During the actual general elections many fail to see the difference between the parties as both tends to ask for votes while breaking promises, where all they expect sometimes is to at least fight for them.
I'm going to vote as I consider it a duty. Not everyone feels that way.
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)Their parents or grandparents as the people running the country. Very few young people run for office at any level. If more people in their later 20s ran for the House, we might actually see more younger people vote.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)He just turned 27. Maybe there are other young people who feel that way. I never read political news or did vote much in college. Once you are out in the world and see your place in the system, you connect the dots a little more.
forjusticethunders
(1,151 posts)But I just hit 27 too and this is the first time I'm thinking of taking a more boots on the ground activist role.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)I think looking at things like Brexit, where people were not educated about what their vote meant, shows that active outreach and not just leaving things to the chance people might just have an educated opinion, really matters.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)JI7
(89,247 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)My hair is too long and my girlfriend wears short sleeves, too.
akbacchus_BC
(5,704 posts)voters do not turn out. I would be angry if am blamed as a millennial for low voter turn out!
Am not a millennial by the way but I dislike the blame game!
hack89
(39,171 posts)While younger voters historically have the lowest voting rates.
Lord Magus
(1,999 posts)The UK is considerably less diverse than the US, and xenophobia has broader appeal there.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Just one of those things.
Just reading posts
(688 posts)retirement. They don't give due consideration to the long term.
Go Vols
(5,902 posts)I voted for Jimmy in '80 @ 18.
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)ps - I don't blame them
CobaltBlue
(1,122 posts)When I was following the 2016 Democratic presidential primaries, the two youngest voting-age groups of 17 [18] to 29 and 30 to 44 underperformed in participation. The youngest should have been about 18 to 20 percent the size of the vote. The 30 to 44 should have been about 30 percent. (In some cases, the 30 to 44, more so than the 17 [18] to 29, voters really did not turn out the vote.) Together, they combine for 50 percent normally for general elections making them even with the two oldest voting-age groups, 45 to 64 and 65+. A key reason why particular states carried for Hillary Clinton, over Bernie Sanders, by +5 or less percentage points was because the 60 percent (in some cases, 61 or 62 percent) size of a state's overall vote, specially by those 45 to 64 and 65+, delivered those eked-out wins to Hillary. So the lesson is: show up.
zenabby
(364 posts)is bothering me.. In Brexit as well as here, the younger generation (millennials) seem to think that older people who don't think their way are stupid, are going to die soon and are deciding for younger generation. I am against Brexit, but the younger generation don't realize the older people were younger too, and they have exactly the same right to vote and have their voices heard as much as the millennials. The older votes don't weigh less and it shouldn't. They have earned the right to vote. On Bill Maher yesterday, there was this 16 year old who said everyone was "crushing their voices" or something like that. Hey, you are not special because you are younger. You are not smarter or better. You may be the future, but I am the present. I've lived a bit longer, seen a bit more than you and am using my sane judgement. If you want your voices to be heard, then please go out and vote. Don't disparage the older voters.
And yes, if you lose by 48-52, it's still losing. The biggest success of democracy is the peaceful transfer of power and acceptance of losing. Al Gore peacefully accepted it even though he won the popular vote. That's what makes us great. Obama won 51.1% to Romney's 47.2%. Yes, almost 48% of the voters voted for Romney. But we don't get to have a Romney platform or republican presidency. That's how it works. Sorry.