Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,195 posts)
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 04:41 PM Jun 2016

Wisconsin and Minnesota are case studies in the difference between Republican and Democratic rule.

Very good article.
WI has Gov Scott Walker-and MN has Mark Dayton. Night and Day.




 The GOP’s War on Voting Is Working
Wisconsin and Minnesota are case studies in the difference between Republican and Democratic rule.

https://www.thenation.com/article/the-gops-war-on-voting-is-working/

By Ari BermanTwitter
Today 7:00 am



................. In addition to the voter-ID law, since 2011, Wisconsin’s GOP-controlled legislature has cut the early-voting window from 30 days to 12, eliminated night and weekend voting, banned straight-ticket voting, made it more difficult both to register to vote and to cast an absentee ballot, and tightened residency requirements. It has also disbanded the widely respected nonpartisan agency that oversees state elections and was supposed to educate the public about the voter-ID law. University of Wisconsin political scientist Barry Burden calls it “death by a thousand cuts.”

Many GOP-controlled states have restricted access to the ballot following Barack Obama’s election, but Wisconsin is especially notable because, unlike Alabama or Texas, it has a long history of high voter turnout, pioneering election reforms, and commitment to good governance.

Indeed, in 2008 and 2012, Wisconsin trailed only one state—Minnesota—in voter turnout. The two states are practically twins, with nearly identical demographics, geography, and cultural history. Both states have a long-standing progressive tradition dating back more than a century, from Wisconsin Governor Robert “Fighting Bob” La Follette to Minnesota’s Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party. In the 1970s, they were also the first states to allow Election Day registration, which has significantly boosted turnout. “Demographers call it the ‘civic-responsibility belt,’” says Craig Gilbert, Washington bureau chief of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

But the two states have clashed sharply in recent years, becoming case studies in the difference between Democratic and Republican rule. Whereas Wisconsin elected Walker and a GOP legislature in 2010, Minnesota narrowly elected Mark Dayton, and two years later a Democratic legislature. Minnesota raised taxes on the wealthy, invested in public education, expanded health care, and boosted unions, while Wisconsin did the opposite. Now Minnesota is winning the border war, with faster job growth, higher wages, and lower unemployment. ...........................

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wisconsin and Minnesota are case studies in the difference between Republican and Democratic rule. (Original Post) riversedge Jun 2016 OP
California and Kansas are my favorite examples MattP Jun 2016 #1
What is really telling is, Wellstone ruled Jun 2016 #2
Yet, Wisconsin elected him again and again. merrily Jun 2016 #3

MattP

(3,304 posts)
1. California and Kansas are my favorite examples
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 04:49 PM
Jun 2016

Both are veto proof majority house senate and governor and look at the different outcomes

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
2. What is really telling is,
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 04:58 PM
Jun 2016

the enormous Brain Drain that has and is occurring,and,this is and will be devastating for Wisconsin. But, what the hay,we still got folks to work at Menards and ABC Building Centers,and we got them Casino's. Real money makers for the locals.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Wisconsin and Minnesota a...