HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » "I need to improperly inf...

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 08:09 AM

 

"I need to improperly influence the AG. Why don't I do it on a tarmac in front of the media?"

Said no one ever.

This is all BS.

If the Clintons wanted to influence the Attorney General, they have all manner of ways to get to her. It wouldn't be Bill Clinton chatting her up at an FBO.

This was a spontaneous social chat. Period.

Of course, none of that matters anymore - this has taken on a life of its own, thanks to the bored media who need to cover something other than Trump's meltdown and love nothing more than smearing the Clintons.

74 replies, 4929 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 74 replies Author Time Post
Reply "I need to improperly influence the AG. Why don't I do it on a tarmac in front of the media?" (Original post)
EffieBlack Jul 2016 OP
Her Sister Jul 2016 #1
TheDebbieDee Jul 2016 #2
morningfog Jul 2016 #3
EffieBlack Jul 2016 #8
morningfog Jul 2016 #10
EffieBlack Jul 2016 #17
morningfog Jul 2016 #18
EffieBlack Jul 2016 #19
Yupster Jul 2016 #24
jberryhill Jul 2016 #40
JudyM Jul 2016 #42
840high Jul 2016 #52
okieinpain Jul 2016 #20
JudyM Jul 2016 #44
Armstead Jul 2016 #41
zonkers Jul 2016 #56
Hortensis Jul 2016 #4
sufrommich Jul 2016 #5
JudyM Jul 2016 #46
Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #6
joshcryer Jul 2016 #16
B2G Jul 2016 #38
joshcryer Jul 2016 #49
840high Jul 2016 #53
joshcryer Jul 2016 #59
PJMcK Jul 2016 #62
lumberjack_jeff Jul 2016 #22
840high Jul 2016 #60
SharonClark Jul 2016 #73
leftofcool Jul 2016 #7
yodermon Jul 2016 #9
EffieBlack Jul 2016 #12
NWCorona Jul 2016 #11
EffieBlack Jul 2016 #13
JustAnotherGen Jul 2016 #14
JoePhilly Jul 2016 #15
BobbyDrake Jul 2016 #55
JoePhilly Jul 2016 #58
Hekate Jul 2016 #64
NorthCarolina Jul 2016 #21
Maru Kitteh Jul 2016 #31
flamingdem Jul 2016 #23
Yupster Jul 2016 #27
flamingdem Jul 2016 #39
Yupster Jul 2016 #25
Orsino Jul 2016 #26
tk2kewl Jul 2016 #28
Else You Are Mad Jul 2016 #29
ChairmanAgnostic Jul 2016 #69
libodem Jul 2016 #30
DawgHouse Jul 2016 #32
merrily Jul 2016 #33
deathrind Jul 2016 #34
Separation Jul 2016 #66
still_one Jul 2016 #35
Armstead Jul 2016 #43
still_one Jul 2016 #45
Bodhi BloodWave Jul 2016 #74
radical noodle Jul 2016 #36
LexVegas Jul 2016 #37
Exilednight Jul 2016 #47
Surya Gayatri Jul 2016 #48
treestar Jul 2016 #50
Hiraeth Jul 2016 #51
840high Jul 2016 #54
zonkers Jul 2016 #57
AgadorSparticus Jul 2016 #61
R B Garr Jul 2016 #63
robbedvoter Jul 2016 #65
marshall Jul 2016 #67
EffieBlack Jul 2016 #68
marshall Jul 2016 #72
hobbit709 Jul 2016 #70
thesquanderer Jul 2016 #71

Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 08:10 AM

1. Ding Ding Ding!

 

Absolutely!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 08:12 AM

2. Like!

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 08:34 AM

3. Bill served it up on a platter. Thanks Bill.

 

The stories of his grandchildren were really important. Enough for him to wait for Lynch to land, board her plane unannounced and uninvited.

If he did attempt to discuss the FBI criminal investigation of the DOJ's participation, I am sure Lynch cut him off.

Thanks to Bill, Lynch has to make a statement today that a career prosecutor will follow the FBI recommendation to a T.

Bill made this story.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to morningfog (Reply #3)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 08:44 AM

8. What about Lynch?

 

Bill's a private citizen. She's the public official governed by ethics laws. I don't think either of them did anything wrong at all. But if blame is being cast, why is it limited to him?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Reply #8)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 08:46 AM

10. Lynch was broadsided. This is all on Bill.

 

He waited for her plane and boarded unannounced and uninvited.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to morningfog (Reply #10)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 09:07 AM

17. No one just "boards" the Attorney General's plane

 

She has security, staff, etc. You don't get on her plane unless you are invited on by her. If this was a problem, she or her staff - a bunch of lawyers - should have simply told Clinton that this would be inappropriate and could put the AG in a difficult position. Instead, they invited him aboard, obviously not thinking it was any big deal - because it wasn't. Until the press and Republicans made it one. And now Democrats are helping them feed the bullshit narrative. Nice.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Reply #17)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 09:08 AM

18. Former presidents do, apparently. You theory is not consistent with what Lynch said happened.

 

Are you suggesting she is lying?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to morningfog (Reply #18)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 09:09 AM

19. The Attorney General said that Bill Clinton ambushed her plane?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to morningfog (Reply #18)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 11:15 AM

24. What Lynch could have done

when an aide said the former President wanted to visit with her was to meet him at the bottom of the steps in public where reporters could be there listening as she pleasantly greeted him and they made small talk for a few minutes.

Even that wouldn't be great, but it would be better than meeting in private in her plane.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Yupster (Reply #24)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 12:09 PM

40. Do you know what the temperature at PHX has been?

 


There have been flights turned back from PHX because 118F is above the specified operating temperature of Embraer jets.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Yupster (Reply #24)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 12:15 PM

42. Exactly. And it should have been very, very brief.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Yupster (Reply #24)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 04:49 PM

52. yep

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Reply #17)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 10:20 AM

20. Lol you can if your former president. N/t.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to morningfog (Reply #10)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 12:18 PM

44. Despite his being the initiator, the clearer lapse of ethics, technically, is hers for not escorting

him mmediately to the door and saying goodbye. She is the one with a duty, legally.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Reply #8)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 12:12 PM

41. Because its a typical case of flouting the normal rules of behavior

 

For a supposedly smart guy, Bill Clinton dios some really muddleheaded things in his belief that the rules that normal people are expected to follow don;t apply to him.

This is not like they ran across each otehr in the terminal and stopped and had some chit chat.

Bill the Bull in the China Shop burst onto her place. My guess is that when she saw him Lynch did an inner

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to morningfog (Reply #3)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 05:22 PM

56. This post is exactly how I feel. Bill made this story. Either arrogant and boneheaded or crazy

 

like a fox.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 08:36 AM

4. Maybe they believe the "any press is good press" thing?

Ummm, probably not.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 08:37 AM

5. It's more grinned up outrage embraced by both the

right and left.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sufrommich (Reply #5)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 12:22 PM

46. It's actually a breach of legal ethics on her part. If it lasted 5 minutes instead of 30 it wouldn't

be of such concern, but it is most assuredly not ginned up if you look at her actual legal and ethical responsibilities. This is a crystal clear "appearance of impropriety" since she would have been (until she just declared otherwise) ruling on whether to prosecute his wife.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 08:41 AM

6. Because he believes he is above

 

Normal rules and does not care.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Duckhunter935 (Reply #6)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 09:06 AM

16. More that he knows the American people don't care.

And it provides a very nice distraction from everything else, over literally nothing controversial at all. Brilliant move, effectively making Comey the lead on the indictment which isn't happening.

But yeah, he knew exactly what he was doing and how it would play. But I would wager that he went on that plane thinking "you know, for once, this ought to not be a big fucking deal."

It worked perfectly for him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to joshcryer (Reply #16)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 12:05 PM

38. Yeah, utterly brilliant.

 

Cause Comey is such a Clinton fan.

You do know he was a Whitewater investigator and couldn't stand her even then, right?

Brilliant, I say.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to B2G (Reply #38)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 04:35 PM

49. Yep, just like Gowdy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to joshcryer (Reply #16)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 04:50 PM

53. I care. The

 

outrage on the net shows me people do care.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 840high (Reply #53)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 05:48 PM

59. People on the net get outraged about every little thing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to joshcryer (Reply #59)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 08:00 PM

62. No, we don't!!!

And I'm outraged that you would suggest such an outrage!!!

(wink)

Happy 4th of July.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Duckhunter935 (Reply #6)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 11:01 AM

22. He does care. He cares that the people know that they are above the normal rules. n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lumberjack_jeff (Reply #22)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 07:30 PM

60. .that^

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lumberjack_jeff (Reply #22)

Sun Jul 3, 2016, 11:03 AM

73. Don't think so...B Clinton is a social animal who has social skills and likes people

Some people, even a certain presidential candidate, simply doesn't get that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 08:41 AM

7. Winner!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 08:46 AM

9. I'm meeting some relatives this weekend. I will be sure to meet them in my private jet on a tarmac

at taxpayer expense.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to yodermon (Reply #9)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 08:58 AM

12. If you're already on the tarmac and they happen to be there as well, it certainly makes sense

 

Enjoy!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 08:46 AM

11. In full view of the media? Where were they?

The reporter that broke this story had a tip after the fact and nobody would have known otherwise.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NWCorona (Reply #11)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 09:01 AM

13. If that's the case, I stand corrected. But even if no media was present, WAS in full view of

 

numerous people not associated with either DOJ or the Clintons. This was not a secret or surreptitious meeting.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 09:01 AM

14. Thanks for this

Hence why I've trashed a "Poor judgment?" OP.

This is just more Republican fantasy and media ad buys.

Nonsense.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 09:03 AM

15. The kind of nonsense that whips the crazies into a frenzy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JoePhilly (Reply #15)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 04:58 PM

55. One of these "Ermagerd da FBI!" threads/comments is now grounds for an Ignore, in my book.

 

I'm not putting up with this shit all the way until the convention. Apparently it's the most right-wing talking point that can survive a jury vote these days, but that doesn't mean it's not still a right-wing talking point.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BobbyDrake (Reply #55)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 05:31 PM

58. + 1

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BobbyDrake (Reply #55)

Sat Jul 2, 2016, 01:58 AM

64. +2

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 10:48 AM

21. I don't believe he waited for her on the tarmac to "influence" her. I actually think it was more

 

about establishing cause for her recusal from the email case. He was probably successful in that regard.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NorthCarolina (Reply #21)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 11:22 AM

31. Well that will give the FOX news crowd

A convenient rationalization to cling to when then the indictment fairy never comes.





Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 11:05 AM

23. Silver lining could be that Bill is admonished

and gets his behavior under control. Our futures depend on this!!!!!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to flamingdem (Reply #23)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 11:18 AM

27. Yeah, one thing you can say about 70 year old men is

they are quick to change their behavior when people tell them they've done something inappropriate.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Yupster (Reply #27)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 12:08 PM

39. Hillary must be pissed today

but one must accept Bill with warts if one wants him to be a surrogate.

You are right, he probably cannot change his stripes

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 11:16 AM

25. Yeah but it wasn't on the tarmac, it was in her plane

and there was no media there.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 11:17 AM

26. And the MSM aren't talking about the aliens Bill met in the sky on his flight. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 11:21 AM

28. unless one's intention was to throw a wrench in the gears

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 11:21 AM

29. The problem isn't the substance of what was discussed...

The optics of it are awful and are damaging to the Dems. He is one of the most powerful people in America, he could have had a meeting with her anywhere at any time. This just adds fuel to the fire of the majority of Americans that believe that the Clintons abuse their power and are unethical liars. Bill Clinton should have known better.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Else You Are Mad (Reply #29)

Sat Jul 2, 2016, 08:44 AM

69. He does know better. He just doesn't care.

Yet again, one wonders if dep don he resents her running for "his" office.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 11:22 AM

30. Nothing like a rw conspiracy

To make me come home to mama. Those people are nutz.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 11:24 AM

32. I heard he stormed the plane like a pirate capturing a ship.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 11:26 AM

33. When was the last time Bill Clinton waited in his plane on the tarmac to schmooze an AG?

I have no clue what Bill Clinton intended by this meeting, but, according to reports, it was not spontaneous.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 11:34 AM

34. A rookie error...

By seasoned professionals. What was Lynch and BC's and their staff thinking.

SMH

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to deathrind (Reply #34)

Sat Jul 2, 2016, 07:36 AM

66. Probably the same thing Hillary Clinton thought

When she used her own email server.


It doesn't apply to me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 11:34 AM

35. wow, a post which actually involves critical thinking skills. Excellent!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to still_one (Reply #35)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 12:17 PM

43. I think you give Bill too much credit

 

He long ago lost touch with those quaint notions of propriety and self-restraint.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Armstead (Reply #43)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 12:20 PM

45. That is a different point than the one I was affirming. This was not a planned meeting

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to still_one (Reply #45)

Sun Jul 3, 2016, 12:39 PM

74. Actually, the moment Bill decided to wait for her plane to land it became planned(on his part)

rather then head whereever it was he was going as planned.

Had they actually met on the tarmac as one was heading to their plane and the other away from theirs i could agree with ya but its no longer unplanned the moment one party decides to wait in order to have a meeting(the major reason some people puts most blame on Bill for this.)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 11:49 AM

36. It's hotter than holy hell in Arizona

Of course they chatted in an air conditioned plane instead of on the tarmac. You're right, Clinton and Lynch undoubtedly know the way to have a "secret" meeting about something they shouldn't be discussing and it wouldn't be in full view of everyone like that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 12:00 PM

37. Yep. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 12:25 PM

47. I now wonder how much tax payer money is going to be wasted

On this boneheaded move by Clinton?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 01:36 PM

48. Absolutely spot on...

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 04:37 PM

50. Yeah if he were going to do that

He'd be smart enough to do it another way.

The media makes a soap opera of something as serious as our politics.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 04:48 PM

51. If it were me I wouldn't have given a chance for the question to

Be asked but, that's just me. Flame away.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hiraeth (Reply #51)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 04:52 PM

54. .+1

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 05:31 PM

57. Its actually so far out there, it is diabolically brilliant.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 07:36 PM

61. K&R. They are giddy at any chance to demonize the Clintons.

This is a non story fueled by desperation for something, anything to talk about.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2016, 09:27 PM

63. Thank you, and it's total BS. Actually, these talking points are exactly what Hannity was

promoting. Exactly. I got stuck in the car on an AM station with Hannity's show on a couple days ago, and this is exactly what he was saying. To see it here is just pure nonsense and smacks of an agenda.......

MSNBC was saying yesterday that Bill C. also did this with Ted Cruz. It is his style in general to be spontaneous in reaching out to all politicians and people he knows. Anyone who has seen him in person or listened to him knows he is verbose and long-winded and very outgoing.

I saw Bill in person at Ganesha High School in Pomona, CA a couple months ago. He went on at some length about the origin of the name Ganesha, so it was obvious he cared enough to educate himself about where he was speaking and tailored his words to his audience. I am not familiar with the high school, but I was impressed by how detailed his presentation was about the location. This is why he is such a popular politician.

Great thread, EffieBlack. It is nothing more than smear.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Sat Jul 2, 2016, 08:20 AM

67. Impossible now to meet in private

This type of meeting is what old style politics was made of--only it didn't have nosy reporters connected via technology to a 24 hour news cycle.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marshall (Reply #67)

Sat Jul 2, 2016, 08:32 AM

68. It was hardly private

 

If they had really wanted to meet in private, they could have done so and no one would ever have known.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Reply #68)

Sun Jul 3, 2016, 08:26 AM

72. That would be secret

Private meetings used to stay private, without becoming fodder for newscasters' speculations. That sort of privacy used to be respected. Privacy is no longer respected.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Sat Jul 2, 2016, 08:52 AM

70. One should avoid even the appearance of impropriety.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Original post)

Sat Jul 2, 2016, 09:33 AM

71. I question your premise about having "all manner of ways to get to her."

I could imagine Bill thinking, "I wish I could just get a few minutes of private time with her, to give her my perspective on things." Just how does even Bill Clinton arrange a private face-to-face off-the-record meeting with the attorney general who may have to decide about a case he is involved in? (Remember, there are questions not just about Hillary's emails, but also conceivably about his Clinton Foundation.)

If he had been thinking that way, this may be the best opportunity that presented itself.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread