Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

politicaljunkie41910

(3,335 posts)
Tue Jul 5, 2016, 12:56 PM Jul 2016

What happened to the fact that the email investigation originated out of the claim that

Hillary had set up the private server in her home to evade the FOIA requirement. The FBI director did not mention anything about that issue. I'm not stating this to violate board rules about RW Talking Points. My point in raising this is that the RW continues to use the Justice Dept and the GOP Congress to conduct endless witchhunts against the Clintons and have done so since the Clintons first took the nation stage. How much longer will they be allowed to continue to use the FOIA as a tool to investigate the Clintons with the hope that they will eventually stumble upon something that will lead to something else, which ultimately leads to nothing when all is said and done.

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What happened to the fact that the email investigation originated out of the claim that (Original Post) politicaljunkie41910 Jul 2016 OP
FOIA isn't a criminal case. nt geek tragedy Jul 2016 #1
And the civil case continues tk2kewl Jul 2016 #4
yes, Judicial Watch will continue its ugly campaign of personal destruction nt geek tragedy Jul 2016 #5
Court: Officials can't use private email accounts to evade records laws tk2kewl Jul 2016 #6
the primary is over, get over it nt geek tragedy Jul 2016 #8
It is a CIVIL matter... Adrahil Jul 2016 #10
False claims bluedye33139 Jul 2016 #2
I never thought this was about a private server or any such thing. NCTraveler Jul 2016 #3
FBI was focused on handling of classified material. FOIA is the purview of the DOJ, I think. thesquanderer Jul 2016 #7
Judicial Watch is a right-wing organization. MineralMan Jul 2016 #9

bluedye33139

(1,474 posts)
2. False claims
Tue Jul 5, 2016, 01:00 PM
Jul 2016

A nearly infinite number of false claim for used to justify this investigation in the first place.

The original claim was that Hillary Clinton had written an email that would prove her complicity in Benghazi.

Eventually this was whittled down to the fact that she had a server in her home, and a false claim is made that this was criminal.

I look forward to 8 more years of this kind of nonsense. While the Republican party and Bernie Sanders attempted to spin this into a gigantic problem, Hillary Clinton quietly won the primary.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
3. I never thought this was about a private server or any such thing.
Tue Jul 5, 2016, 01:01 PM
Jul 2016

It always went back to it's origins for me. FOIA requests and the fact that right wing organizations were certain that if they got enough of her email out into the public it would destroy her. They have this image built up of her and thought her emails would mimic their preconceived notions. That is what this has all been about.

Can you imagine reading this many of Trump's emails? He wouldn't have made it to his first podium.

thesquanderer

(11,972 posts)
7. FBI was focused on handling of classified material. FOIA is the purview of the DOJ, I think.
Tue Jul 5, 2016, 01:54 PM
Jul 2016

The former could have resulted in some kind of criminal prosecution. I don't think that's true of the latter.

MineralMan

(146,262 posts)
9. Judicial Watch is a right-wing organization.
Tue Jul 5, 2016, 02:16 PM
Jul 2016

Why anyone pays any attention to that group is beyond me. It's hard to sink much lower than to rely on them for anything relating to the truth. For goodness' sake!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»What happened to the fact...