Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumMy prediction on June 10 of the FBI report was not far off.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 12:47 PM
Preview of the FBI report.
-- Former SOS Clinton's personal email server was not appropriately secured for classified communications.
-- We found no direct evidence the server was compromised or broken into or hacked.
-- Use of a private server for her SOS communications wouldn't have been approved had she requested guidance.
-- There were numerous emails that contained classified information.
-- All of the emails that contained classified information were not marked as classified at the time.
-- There were messages the SOS should have known contained classified information even though not marked.
-- We found no evidence the SOS deliberately or knowingly sent or requested classified messages.
-- The SOS was negligent and broke rules and procedures regarding proper handling of classified information.
-- However we found no evidence there was gross negligence or that she did this knowingly or willingly.
-- Therefore we do not recommend any legal action against former SOS Clinton.
My take... not official.
Preview of the FBI report.
-- Former SOS Clinton's personal email server was not appropriately secured for classified communications.
-- We found no direct evidence the server was compromised or broken into or hacked.
-- Use of a private server for her SOS communications wouldn't have been approved had she requested guidance.
-- There were numerous emails that contained classified information.
-- All of the emails that contained classified information were not marked as classified at the time.
-- There were messages the SOS should have known contained classified information even though not marked.
-- We found no evidence the SOS deliberately or knowingly sent or requested classified messages.
-- The SOS was negligent and broke rules and procedures regarding proper handling of classified information.
-- However we found no evidence there was gross negligence or that she did this knowingly or willingly.
-- Therefore we do not recommend any legal action against former SOS Clinton.
My take... not official.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=2171118
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 503 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
My prediction on June 10 of the FBI report was not far off. (Original Post)
DCBob
Jul 2016
OP
PJMcK
(22,022 posts)1. Well done, DCBob! (n/t)
BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)2. What's your guess on Powerball numbers? Asking for a friend.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)3. I just bought two tickets tonight..
I never win so I dont think you want them!
underpants
(182,719 posts)4. Well done