2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum"Did she lie under oath?"
I knew it I knew it I knew it... This is exactly what they did with Bill Clinton.
They look around for something -- anything -- to get them under oath. It doesn't have to be the issue they start with; they can come up with something else along the way.
If that doesn't work for them, they pore over testimony under oath. If Hillary Clinton said she had corn flakes for breakfast and she actually had rice krispies, POUNCE!! Then they drone on and on with, "It's not about the cereal. It's about the fact that she lied under oath! We are a nation of laws!! Who does she think she is?! She thought she could get away with this because she plays by different rules" etc. etc. etc...
So, they'll look at every word she said about Benghazi and her emails -- neither of which, of course, incriminate her of anything -- and they'll concoct a new "perjury" scandal.
It also lets them go on shouting that she's "under investigation" and therefore should not be elected president.
Deja vu all over again.
Vinca
(50,261 posts)spooky3
(34,438 posts)Fraud charges; etc.
Sparkly
(24,149 posts)No offense to clowns.
spooky3
(34,438 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)Sparkly
(24,149 posts)Let's hope this backfires on them.
DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)forgot to add this -
C_U_L8R
(44,998 posts)when republicans find out they've been fired.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Have they yet to figure out their ship is sinking during the process?