HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » None of Hillary's Emails ...

Thu Jul 7, 2016, 07:17 PM

None of Hillary's Emails That She Received on Her Server Were Marked with a Classified Header

21 replies, 1158 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 21 replies Author Time Post
Reply None of Hillary's Emails That She Received on Her Server Were Marked with a Classified Header (Original post)
BlueStateLib Jul 2016 OP
bluedye33139 Jul 2016 #1
BlueNoMatterWho Jul 2016 #2
Gabi Hayes Jul 2016 #7
BlueNoMatterWho Jul 2016 #8
Gabi Hayes Jul 2016 #11
Johnny2X2X Jul 2016 #12
BlueNoMatterWho Jul 2016 #15
uponit7771 Jul 2016 #16
Johnny2X2X Jul 2016 #3
BlueStateLib Jul 2016 #5
Johnny2X2X Jul 2016 #10
stonecutter357 Jul 2016 #4
Bill USA Jul 2016 #6
joshcryer Jul 2016 #9
Native Jul 2016 #14
Jitter65 Jul 2016 #13
Her Sister Jul 2016 #17
Beantighe Jul 2016 #18
pnwmom Jul 2016 #19
Beantighe Jul 2016 #21
whistler162 Jul 2016 #20

Response to BlueStateLib (Original post)

Thu Jul 7, 2016, 07:20 PM

1. Facts!

Let's not let facts get in the way of a good scandal, lol

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlueStateLib (Original post)

Thu Jul 7, 2016, 07:24 PM

2. Yep! Only in the text.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlueNoMatterWho (Reply #2)

Thu Jul 7, 2016, 07:45 PM

7. funny how?

 

are you a clown?



try again

be specific; make your point more clearly

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gabi Hayes (Reply #7)

Thu Jul 7, 2016, 07:51 PM

8. Huh?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlueNoMatterWho (Reply #8)

Thu Jul 7, 2016, 08:02 PM

11. my response to your original post, as well

 

huh?

what was your point?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlueNoMatterWho (Reply #2)

Thu Jul 7, 2016, 08:20 PM

12. Nope

3 had (c) somewhere down in the email thread, but those have since been determined that the (c) was added erroneously. Literally zero emails were classified or had classified information at the time.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Johnny2X2X (Reply #12)

Thu Jul 7, 2016, 09:22 PM

15. This is what I was referring too...

 

JAMES COMEY: "No. There were three e-mails, the c was in the body, in the text, but there was no header on the email or in the text."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlueNoMatterWho (Reply #2)

Thu Jul 7, 2016, 09:41 PM

16. Then the SD has said even those were NOT classified

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlueStateLib (Original post)

Thu Jul 7, 2016, 07:25 PM

3. Says it all

Wish this was in YouTube format though.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Johnny2X2X (Reply #3)

Thu Jul 7, 2016, 07:38 PM

5. video is on youtube, right click over video and select copy url

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlueStateLib (Reply #5)

Thu Jul 7, 2016, 07:54 PM

10. I was on mobile

Got it now to share, thanks.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlueStateLib (Original post)

Thu Jul 7, 2016, 07:29 PM

4. K&R!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlueStateLib (Original post)

Thu Jul 7, 2016, 07:41 PM

6. Let not facts get in the way of a good hysteria!_GOP Guidebook on Disinformation & Dupes



Thanks for the post. recommended!


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlueStateLib (Original post)

Thu Jul 7, 2016, 07:52 PM

9. Cummings is a gem.

Brilliant man. Comey is so subdued.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to joshcryer (Reply #9)

Thu Jul 7, 2016, 08:34 PM

14. Love him!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlueStateLib (Original post)

Thu Jul 7, 2016, 08:29 PM

13. PERIOD!!! nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlueStateLib (Original post)

Thu Jul 7, 2016, 10:00 PM

17. Great to get the clarification on the news!

 

Thanks for posting the video!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlueStateLib (Original post)

Thu Jul 7, 2016, 10:25 PM

18. I feel a little stupid for this question but

I don't understand why the State Department is now conducting an internal review. I sat through the entire hearing today and what I took away from it was that Comey did a thorough and impartial investigation, and stands by his findings. What happens with an "internal review"? What is its purpose? Good grief, what is going to take to get these people to move on?

Clinton needs to be able to focus on her campaign. Geeze, what's it gonna take? This is making me angry! Be gentle. I've been a long time lurker here, but am new to posting.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Beantighe (Reply #18)

Fri Jul 8, 2016, 04:18 AM

19. I think it will put her actions into context. It came out this year that, for example,

the .gov system wasn't even set up to automatically save emails. So in 2013 they only preserved 61K emails -- out of a billion (.0006%).

And most of the "sensitive" emails on Hillary's server came from other state employees, using the .gov system. Reports are that there are lots of sensitive emails on the server, across State and in other departments.

I think an internal review, if the info is released, will show that Hillary didn't do anything out of the ordinary. The only thing different she did was to use a server that actually preserved her emails -- as she was supposed to do. If she'd used the .gov system, State would have had very little to provide in response to the FOIA request.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pnwmom (Reply #19)

Fri Jul 8, 2016, 08:51 AM

21. thank you

That makes sense.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlueStateLib (Original post)

Fri Jul 8, 2016, 05:38 AM

20. So Sec. Clinton and her staff where just

stupid not criminally stupid!

Stupid = Leaving a parked cars window open in a rain storm.

Criminally Stupid = Trying to rob a bar without making sure it isn't a cop bar.

I hope she and her staff learned from the situation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread