Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
Fri Jul 22, 2016, 11:12 AM Jul 2016

I'm not thrilled about Kaine

possibly being the VP choice.

I don't agree with some of what he stands for.

But since we're overdosing on VP's and how important they are. I'll take Kaine's record over Pence's record all day long.

**If** we're really talking about how important Veeps are.

s/n let's not forget Trump says he plans to delegate a lot of duties to his Veep. Pence! No thank you!

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
4. Who said anything about a rock concert?..
Fri Jul 22, 2016, 11:16 AM
Jul 2016

there are things I don't agree with. I'm entitled to that.

You wanna be thrilled about it, have at it. I'm not.

I think there are others that are great in MANY ways & I agree with them more.

hamsterjill

(15,220 posts)
9. Well, our side understands that.
Fri Jul 22, 2016, 11:25 AM
Jul 2016

The other side? I'm not so sure. They are loving the reality television episode they call a campaign.

Hopefully, the ones in the middle, the independents and undecideds are smart enough to see that it is a presidency at stake.

I'm trying to warm to Kaine, but I have my concerns. I will certainly be voting for Hillary, but I just feel she had better options.

Maven

(10,533 posts)
13. I don't know why you seem to be allergic to the idea of picking someone that excites voters
Fri Jul 22, 2016, 11:58 AM
Jul 2016

What's wrong with that?

 

RonniePudding

(889 posts)
2. That's how I feel
Fri Jul 22, 2016, 11:15 AM
Jul 2016

And let's face it, Drumpf didn't exactly light the world on fire with Pence.

It's a missed opportunity IMO, but plenty more opportunities to come. You don't have to cash in on them all to win a presidential election.

He's a decent, competent guy. That works for me.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
3. There is no such thing as a perfect candidate. Even though Warren and Brown are my favorites...
Fri Jul 22, 2016, 11:16 AM
Jul 2016

They are not perfect on ALL issues.

Kaine makes sense and is the safest, most logical choice.

----

I had forgotten all the work that Kaine did in Hondoras, working on behalf of the poor.

I had forgotten that he speaks Spanish fluently.

I had forgotten that he is a Civil Rights attorney.

He was a mayor, a governor, and now a senator. DGA and DNC chairman.

He really isn't that controversial.

And as for the gay marriage issue, I'm willing to bet that he regrets his past stance. I can't see him not being for marriage equality NOW!

Squinch

(50,901 posts)
5. I'm not thrilled about him either, but I understand that in the real world his usefulness to us
Fri Jul 22, 2016, 11:17 AM
Jul 2016

might lie specifically in the fact that you and I don't particularly like him.

You and I are already on board. Maybe he'll get some people who are not, and getting those people via a VP position, where he can't do much and his replacement in Congress will be a Democrat, seems sensible.

StevieM

(10,500 posts)
12. I just think there are better choices. I would prefer Vilsack. Or better yet, Xavier Becerra. (eom)
Fri Jul 22, 2016, 11:57 AM
Jul 2016

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,574 posts)
7. Me either. But the importance of a running mate is often exaggerated.
Fri Jul 22, 2016, 11:20 AM
Jul 2016

VPs have no constitutional power except as backup for the president and breaking ties in the Senate, so the opinions and previous policies of the running mate are irrelevant. VPs don't make policy; as a member of the administration the VP is expected to go along with the administration's policies. A running mate can, however, add some excitement and enthusiasm to a ticket, and I think Kaine is lacking in those qualities, but the actual effect of the running mate on the outcome of an election is usually minimal, since voters vote for the top of the ticket. A really bad pick (*cough* Palin *cough*) can be damaging, of course; but just because the VP pick is from your state doesn't mean you're going to vote for the ticket if you didn't care for the presidential candidate in the first place. Kaine won't bring Virginia if Virginians aren't convinced by Hillary. But he also won't scare people like Palin did.

That said, I'd really prefer someone else - but Kaine isn't a deal-breaker for me, considering the weapons-grade awfulness of Trump and Pence.

 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
10. Personally speaking...
Fri Jul 22, 2016, 11:46 AM
Jul 2016

..the VIP to me in most cases represents the future of the party. Since in many cases (Obama being the exception since he needed to bring a little more experience to the fold) the VP will ideally run for Prez after the current 8 years (again, ideally) is up.

To me this says that HRC and the party leaders see someone like Kaine as the future of the party.

Hell, I don't like Booker at all but I would have been fine with that since at least it represents a continuation of the change to represent the true face of America.

Any enthusiasm I'd been gaining for Hillary will go right out the window if Kaine is her pick. It will formally signal to me that I'm done with the Democratic party as a supporter, donor, worker, and everything else other than maybe sometimes a vote if it's essential (as it is with HRC against Trump).

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I'm not thrilled about Ka...