Sun Jul 24, 2016, 06:16 AM

So I am asking this about the leaded DNC e-mails...

Those leaked e-mails between and among DNC staffers (Hillary not involved) were they worse for the Sanders campaign than the stolen contributor data performed by the Sanders people?

It seems to me that staffers dissing Sanders in e-mails shows their sentiments about Sanders but had little affect on the outcome of the primary. However, the information that was stolen about contributors was much more damaging to the Hillary campaign. Also, super delegates just didn't come up under these backroom meetings, They were decided long before this election. Did the Sanders people forget their what they did and the number of FEC violations committed by them?

2 replies, 588 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

2 replies	Author	Time	Post
So I am asking this about the leaded DNC e-mails... (Original post)	glennward	Jul 2016	OP
Those particular emails were from May and by then it was too late to affect the final outcome.	pnwmom	Jul 2016	#1
Wondering what the RNC emails would say about Trump at that time! hmmm!?	Her Sister	Jul 2016	#2

Response to glennward (Original post)

Sun Jul 24, 2016, 06:59 AM

pnwmom (107,656 posts)

1. Those particular emails were from May and by then it was too late to affect the final outcome.

And after the way Bernie had attacked the DNC all year it's hard to blame them for being annoyed with him.

Also, by the Trump was the winner. Hillary was being disadvantaged having to fight on two fronts -- even though the outcome was already settled.

Reply to this post

Response to glennward (Original post)

Sun Jul 24, 2016, 07:07 AM

Her Sister (6,444 posts)

2. Wondering what the RNC emails would say about Trump at that time! hmmm!?

Reply to this post