Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

zenabby

(364 posts)
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 12:34 PM Jul 2016

Illegal Hacking

that does not show much. If we want to debate the merits and demerits, and if everyone is as pure as snow, let's open up bernie campaign's emails and Trump emails. Don't want to show your emails? Then probably should not talk about personal thoughts of personal people expressed in personal emails that were not supposed to be aired out aloud. However, if there were ANY actions, that were unfair (not ideas discussed), then they are fair game.

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Illegal Hacking (Original Post) zenabby Jul 2016 OP
Call for criticsm of others to offset criticism self... there's a defense HereSince1628 Jul 2016 #1
Not at all. zenabby Jul 2016 #13
Exactly - asiliveandbreathe Jul 2016 #2
"They do it too" is a lame defense. Scuba Jul 2016 #3
But... zenabby Jul 2016 #14
No, Bernie's team did not violate the DNC rules. Scuba Jul 2016 #16
👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼 katsy Jul 2016 #4
The only action that I see they violated was using DNC computers to send their e-mails. glennward Jul 2016 #6
They are idiots for putting this shit out there on record & should resign asap. katsy Jul 2016 #7
So you're equating DNC with candidates' campaigns' emails. aikoaiko Jul 2016 #5
I'm saying zenabby Jul 2016 #15
Since we're striving to be on the Up and Up with emails and such, should we throw in NorthCarolina Jul 2016 #8
Since you want to beat that dead horse some more .. how about at least 10 years tax returns too? n/t SFnomad Jul 2016 #9
Not beating a dead horse, just posing the question. Should NorthCarolina Jul 2016 #10
Where did I say all emails should be released from both camps? I await your retraction / apology n/t SFnomad Jul 2016 #11
Sorry, didn't check your name NorthCarolina Jul 2016 #17
For the past approx 40 years, releasing tax returns has been what Presidential candidates do SFnomad Jul 2016 #18
I already am NorthCarolina Jul 2016 #19
I've already stated I feel it was a fishing expedition ... that needed to be stopped. n/t SFnomad Jul 2016 #20
Yes, I agree zenabby Jul 2016 #12

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
1. Call for criticsm of others to offset criticism self... there's a defense
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 12:43 PM
Jul 2016

well suited to scoundrels only doing what -everyone- else does?

zenabby

(364 posts)
13. Not at all.
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 02:26 PM
Jul 2016

This is like a court of law where only one side is expected to show evidence, and not the other side. Since we are after truth, let's make it real. I have confidence in Hillary's character and Bernie's character. Wait, what are you suggesting? That Bernie side might have done something to be criticized or unfair?

asiliveandbreathe

(8,203 posts)
2. Exactly -
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 12:45 PM
Jul 2016

From zenabby -

However, if there were ANY actions, that were unfair (not ideas discussed), then they are fair game.....Case closed...




zenabby

(364 posts)
14. But...
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 02:28 PM
Jul 2016

did they do it too? Bernie's team I mean? Or who ever is criticizing...Isn't that the very definition of hypocrisy? Isn't that why evidence obtained by not the right means is not allowed to be presented in the court of law?

katsy

(4,246 posts)
4. 👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 01:16 PM
Jul 2016

No one cares what the SBS & HRC staff said about one another.

The dnc was supposed to be an honest broker. They failed at that.

Furthermore, what are voters of minority religions to think about the dnc, and by extention, the Democratic Party, when the dnc was going to use a candidate's beliefs or non-beliefs against them? Hypocrites maybe? Unethical for sure.

We are better than that.

 

glennward

(989 posts)
6. The only action that I see they violated was using DNC computers to send their e-mails.
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 01:22 PM
Jul 2016

Not ALL staffers did this and no actions were taken by anyone to DO anything unfair against Bernie. People have opinions and thoughts and feelings. Staffers don't become machines when they are working. The real issue is what, if anything did they do to act upon their feelings? As far as I can tell NOTHING!! Certainly nothing like gaining access to one campaign's contributor list and sharing it with the opposing team. If anything, it appears that DNC actual actions hurt the Hillary campaign more than the Sanders' campaign.

katsy

(4,246 posts)
7. They are idiots for putting this shit out there on record & should resign asap.
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 01:32 PM
Jul 2016

Bringing up a candidate's beliefs as a way to garner a couple of points in the polls is playing to people's bigotry. It is unethical, against dnc charter and not how we, as Democrats, operate. Full. Stop.

We are a big tent party. How can you even think this is ok? Maybe next election cycle we should alienate the jewish, native americans, eastern indians? What? This was monumentally insulting and stupid.

Making excuses for it is wrong.

aikoaiko

(34,169 posts)
5. So you're equating DNC with candidates' campaigns' emails.
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 01:17 PM
Jul 2016


You realize you just tacitly agreed that the DNC was acting as HRC's campaign, don't you?

You should think this line of thought through some more before pushing it.

zenabby

(364 posts)
15. I'm saying
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 02:30 PM
Jul 2016

that Hillary was a true democrat, and Bernie was independent-democrat. Hillary has years of relationship building with these people. There is no doubt they preferred her personally. However is there any proof of action that was biased and enabled Hillary to win? No.

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
8. Since we're striving to be on the Up and Up with emails and such, should we throw in
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 01:54 PM
Jul 2016

speeches to Wall Street too since we're talking about seeing how "pure as snow" our candidates are? Would seem like a good idea to me....a gesture of "see, I have nothing to hide". They are fair game...as you so eloquently put it.

 

SFnomad

(3,473 posts)
9. Since you want to beat that dead horse some more .. how about at least 10 years tax returns too? n/t
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 02:12 PM
Jul 2016
 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
10. Not beating a dead horse, just posing the question. Should
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 02:14 PM
Jul 2016

the transcripts be released in the vein of openness and honesty, or not? Since you believe all emails should be released for that purpose from both camps, why stop there?

 

SFnomad

(3,473 posts)
11. Where did I say all emails should be released from both camps? I await your retraction / apology n/t
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 02:17 PM
Jul 2016
 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
17. Sorry, didn't check your name
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 02:39 PM
Jul 2016

thought you were the OP poster. That being the case, why stop at just tax returns? To be honest with you I am far more interested, as a voter, in what the candidates said in high paid speeches to Wall Street, than I am in what their tax returns say....this being an anti-Wall St. election and all. Wass TPP offered to them in the form of a guarantee? Who knows...the voters sure as hell don't. What we need is full disclosure requirements for all of our candidates.

 

SFnomad

(3,473 posts)
18. For the past approx 40 years, releasing tax returns has been what Presidential candidates do
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 02:47 PM
Jul 2016

When Sanders didn't do it, it makes you wonder ... what is he hiding ... I feel the same way about tRump.

No candidate has EVER been required to release paid speeches. And if those speeches didn't reveal what her opponents wanted, they'd probably then reach for something else to be released. I feel it's best to stop the fishing expeditions right up front. Seeing that you want something done that has NEVER been asked before, but seem to have few issues with not releasing something that has become standard practice is highly partisan of you.

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
19. I already am
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 02:50 PM
Jul 2016

pretty confident the speeches contained guarantees for support of TPP and such so i probably really don't need to hear them to figure out what they contained. Aside from that though, the OP calls for transparency. Why not include the speeches/ If my assumptions are correct, don't you think that is pertinent information to voters before they head to the polls?

zenabby

(364 posts)
12. Yes, I agree
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 02:24 PM
Jul 2016

All DNC emails, all Bernie emails, all Hillary campaign emails, all tax returns, all campaign fund usage, all speeches ever given by Hillary and Bernie so far. Either that or nothing. Half truths, extrapolations and half exposures mean nothing.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Illegal Hacking