Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 07:54 PM Jul 2016

They should just have waited until AFTER Philly to announce DWS' place in the campaign.

Why couldn't they let that ride for another four days? What harm would it have done?

It's beginning to look as though the announcement was made Sunday, a day when there was no reason to make it, just to provoke something on the floor.

67 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
They should just have waited until AFTER Philly to announce DWS' place in the campaign. (Original Post) Ken Burch Jul 2016 OP
probably because they needed to dangle that to DWS to get her ass out of the chair nt geek tragedy Jul 2016 #1
I get that. But the announcement could still have been held off until after the convention. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #13
I think DWS forced their hand. She's turning out to have been even worse than feared nt geek tragedy Jul 2016 #23
You're saying you think DWS insisted on the timing of the announcement? That's disturbing Ken Burch Jul 2016 #38
excessive pride is a vice nt geek tragedy Jul 2016 #40
She wasn't hired into anything. She was named.. glennward Jul 2016 #2
named, then. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #6
Drop it. apcalc Jul 2016 #3
Why? David__77 Jul 2016 #10
because that certainly justified booing black speakers JI7 Jul 2016 #4
I didn't say that it did. I don't condone the booing of Rep. Cummings. n/t. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #8
reminds me of trump supporters. why should we do things to make racists happy ? JI7 Jul 2016 #15
While the booing of Rep. Cummings was wrong, it was not racist. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #43
he was talking about civil rights which they showed they have no concern for JI7 Jul 2016 #45
Their issue was TPP. They were inappropriate, but they weren't indifferent to racism. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #49
don't blame others for the actions of racists JI7 Jul 2016 #51
Why, because they're so thoughtful and concerned, Ken? elleng Jul 2016 #5
She wasn't hired by the Clinton campaign and no,no one is trying sufrommich Jul 2016 #7
Why couldn't they have just waited until next week is what I'm asking? Ken Burch Jul 2016 #11
They know that no matter what they do,the BoBs will find sufrommich Jul 2016 #16
Not true. The overwheming majority of Sanders people have come on board. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #24
maybe they did it just for your benefit. btw her position is honorary ie worth nothing nt msongs Jul 2016 #9
The intention of honorary positions is to honor someone, I believe. David__77 Jul 2016 #12
Given what we now know DWS should not be honored. avaistheone1 Jul 2016 #17
I didn't say they shouldn't have given her the honorary position. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #18
This is your 3rd post trying to justify the actions of those brats on the floor. SaschaHM Jul 2016 #14
I said I don't condone it. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #21
Cause that would've made them NOT boo most of the black speakers on stage? REALLY?!? uponit7771 Jul 2016 #19
I don't condone the booing...but it might have reduced the tensions in the room. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #22
More appeasment to people who's intentions are only fedd by appeasing them instead of telling them uponit7771 Jul 2016 #25
+1000. nt sufrommich Jul 2016 #27
Not appeasement. Just common sense. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #30
Ken, that's the point... ANYTHING sets these people off. Their conduct is NOT progressive at all... uponit7771 Jul 2016 #33
I agree that the booing shouldn't have happened. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #36
The "tensions" had nothing to do with DWS. Lord Magus Jul 2016 #50
Not Sanders delegates and not the Sanders campaign. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #52
Then why DIDN'T they? Lord Magus Jul 2016 #54
In Rep. Cummings case, it was over the TPP plank. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #56
Maybe because for any irritation at her mistakes Hortensis Jul 2016 #20
I could understand your loyalty if DWS had ever actually achieved anything in the job. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #26
I'm not loyal to her. I haven't read much about Hortensis Jul 2016 #42
Booing black speakers is so out of line that I find it impossible to take criticism of the former Agnosticsherbet Jul 2016 #28
I have said repeatedly that I don't condone the booing. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #32
Really, it's a complete coincidence that they only booed the black speakers? Lord Magus Jul 2016 #53
I think it was just the platform committee chair. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #55
That doesn't mean no Sanders supporters could ever be racist. Lord Magus Jul 2016 #57
As, potentially, could be some Clinton supporters. Or anybody else if you think about it. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #58
Stop blaming the behavior of the trolls with credentials on this nonsense. annavictorious Jul 2016 #29
Nobody is mad that a woman was nominated and you know it. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #34
DWS needed to go away ASAP bigwillq Jul 2016 #31
Yeah, and she is gone. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #35
Yeah. That would have done a lot. Lol NCTraveler Jul 2016 #37
They were wrong to boo the Congressman, but the issue was TPP, not race. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #44
You could have left out your "but" NCTraveler Jul 2016 #47
It's not racist simply to boo a person who happens to be black. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #63
Another absolute comment by you with nothing to back it up. NCTraveler Jul 2016 #64
I think that the announcement of DWS honorary appointment made the atmosphere worse. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #65
Agree. The shouldn't be acting this horrid. NCTraveler Jul 2016 #66
Obsess much? nt JTFrog Jul 2016 #39
If it wouldn't make a difference 4 days from now, why wait? If it's NBD, then act like it. nt BobbyDrake Jul 2016 #41
Four days later, the delegates would be flying home. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #46
It's July. In other words, the wrong weather for precious snowflakes. nt BobbyDrake Jul 2016 #48
No. It's a week when nothing should be done that would piss anybody off. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #62
You come across as the one most in need of your own advice. nt BobbyDrake Jul 2016 #67
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2016 #59
That's exactly what I'm saying. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #61
It wouldn't have mattered Bobbie Jo Jul 2016 #60
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
13. I get that. But the announcement could still have been held off until after the convention.
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 08:02 PM
Jul 2016

It's not as though she'd only have taken the figurehead position if it was announced the day the delegates arrived.

I don't condone the reaction of the Sanders delegates who did boo...but this is just bad politics.

It could have kept until Friday.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
38. You're saying you think DWS insisted on the timing of the announcement? That's disturbing
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 08:22 PM
Jul 2016

That suggests that she wouldn't go unless she got to stir up shit one last time.

If you are right(and I have no reason to doubt you), she just stabbed her own preferred candidate in the back.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
43. While the booing of Rep. Cummings was wrong, it was not racist.
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 08:42 PM
Jul 2016

The issue(and I agree that it wasn't HIS fault...Cummings was not being allowed to work under his own free will)was the neutrality about TPP in the platform. They'd have booed a white platform committee chair, too.

This isn't about race, or gender, or anything pertaining to identity.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
49. Their issue was TPP. They were inappropriate, but they weren't indifferent to racism.
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 08:48 PM
Jul 2016

The Clinton campaign should never had spread the meme that it's ONLY possible to fight racism if you DON'T work for economic justice.

They created that false division(prior to this year, economic justice and social justice advocates had always collaborated and worked together, and many people worked equally hard for both).

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
11. Why couldn't they have just waited until next week is what I'm asking?
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 08:00 PM
Jul 2016

They knew how this would read to some people.

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
16. They know that no matter what they do,the BoBs will find
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 08:03 PM
Jul 2016

a reason to be outraged and vow not to vote for her. Nothing would make me happier than to see the Clinton campaign start ignoring the temper tantrums ,nothing is going to be enough.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
24. Not true. The overwheming majority of Sanders people have come on board.
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 08:07 PM
Jul 2016

Nothing would have been lost if the announcement had been held until Friday.

David__77

(23,311 posts)
12. The intention of honorary positions is to honor someone, I believe.
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 08:00 PM
Jul 2016

So the Clinton campaign, I think, intended to honor Schultz at this time.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
18. I didn't say they shouldn't have given her the honorary position.
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 08:04 PM
Jul 2016

Just that the announcement should have been held off until Friday. What harm would have come of waiting four days?

It's not like she was only going to leave if it was announced the day the delegates showed up.

I want HRC to win in the fall. What I'm saying is, why piss off voters HRC has to have when there is no need to do that?

SaschaHM

(2,897 posts)
14. This is your 3rd post trying to justify the actions of those brats on the floor.
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 08:02 PM
Jul 2016

Stop. It's transparent.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
21. I said I don't condone it.
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 08:05 PM
Jul 2016

It's not justification to point out that there was a needless provocation to the stupid actions.

The Clinton-Kaine campaign had nothing to lose by holding off on the announcement until the delegates went home.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
22. I don't condone the booing...but it might have reduced the tensions in the room.
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 08:06 PM
Jul 2016

What harm would have come of not announcing it until Friday?

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
25. More appeasment to people who's intentions are only fedd by appeasing them instead of telling them
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 08:08 PM
Jul 2016

... to fuck of and keep out.

Fuck em... I'm disgusted, most of the black speakers were boo'd... fuck em

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
30. Not appeasement. Just common sense.
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 08:12 PM
Jul 2016

When you're in a national convention, you don't make big announcements that you know will set people off.

It's fine to appoint DWS to the title she will have...I'm just saying they should have held off the announcement until Friday.

Those who insisted on announcing it the day the delegates showed up knew they were rubbing salt in a wound.

Four days later and it wouldn't have mattered.

I still think we can pull this together and will work to do so.

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
33. Ken, that's the point... ANYTHING sets these people off. Their conduct is NOT progressive at all...
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 08:16 PM
Jul 2016

... and they're acting insatiable ... Turner bout said that during an interview with Maddow.

Kinda hard to see this objectively right now, I'll hold on but some of this shit is disgusting

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
36. I agree that the booing shouldn't have happened.
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 08:20 PM
Jul 2016

My basic take on any situation like this is, don't do anything that could rile people up.

I'd be saying the same thing if Bernie was about to be nominated and had announced that Dr. West was going to be the honorary chair of HIS fall campaign.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
52. Not Sanders delegates and not the Sanders campaign.
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 08:51 PM
Jul 2016

Those who booed were being immature...but they would have reacted exactly the same way to white speakers.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
56. In Rep. Cummings case, it was over the TPP plank.
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 08:56 PM
Jul 2016

He was chair of the platform committee. They'd have booed a white platform committee chair who oversaw the same thing.

Hopefully, HRC will say something in her acceptance speech like this:

"I respect the fact that President Obama supports TPP. That is his position. If TPP has not been ratified at the time I am sworn in, it will be withdrawn".

No one but a few bazillionaires would mind.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
20. Maybe because for any irritation at her mistakes
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 08:05 PM
Jul 2016

they still appreciate all her tremendous hard work and what she has done very right, because they appreciate what being the party's lightening rod has cost her, because a major concept their success is built on is "to have a friend, be a friend," and because they are the sort of brave and stalwart people who are happy to stand solid and help a friend in need.

Political realities may require them to act in the face of a witch-hunting mob, but neither of them is going to respect the mob.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
26. I could understand your loyalty if DWS had ever actually achieved anything in the job.
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 08:08 PM
Jul 2016

All she was good at was getting big donors.

She put the party on the side of corporations instead of the people.

She alienated millions of grassroots activists.

She led us to disaster in 2014.

Big donors are meaningless if you lose campaign workers and lose midterms.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
42. I'm not loyal to her. I haven't read much about
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 08:36 PM
Jul 2016

her record in Florida and don't care much--that is her constituents' concern. But I have never, ever liked seeing people target a victim for their hostility, or even worse be sicced on a target, and move in with clubs. I'm against them and their behavior in my gut and on principle. That includes the press.

In this case, imo the signs are unmistakable, whatever she's done merely the excuse. Nobody cared a flip about the 9 presidential candidates whose candidacies were completely blocked so they wouldn't siphon off interest. She's really just a Democrat being maneuvered out of the way, maybe, in a very nasty way by an unscrupulous fellow Democrat political opponent for political reasons.

Btw, Democrats just don't do that to each other, another reason I forgot to suggest may be behind the support she's getting from the top of the party. Maybe it should have the been first one, I don't know.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
28. Booing black speakers is so out of line that I find it impossible to take criticism of the former
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 08:10 PM
Jul 2016

head of the DNC seriously.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
32. I have said repeatedly that I don't condone the booing.
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 08:13 PM
Jul 2016

BTW, none of those speakers were being booed for their race or the topics of their speeches. They still should never have been booed, but it's important to be clear on that.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
55. I think it was just the platform committee chair.
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 08:53 PM
Jul 2016

Yes, I think it was coincidence.

The Sanders campaign never dismissed the need to fight racism, and we never stopped trying to get POC voters.

It's a myth that we thought we could get nominated on white votes alone. Nobody thought that.

Lord Magus

(1,999 posts)
57. That doesn't mean no Sanders supporters could ever be racist.
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 08:56 PM
Jul 2016

I think it's clear from the actions today that some of them are.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
58. As, potentially, could be some Clinton supporters. Or anybody else if you think about it.
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 08:59 PM
Jul 2016

My point is that race was not what drove what happened today.

And the Clinton campaign should never have launched the meme that social justice and economic justice were separate and opposed causes...OR that economic justice was somehow a whites-only thing(which implies that POC, in addition to being affected by racism, AREN'T affected by corporate control of the economy and the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few).

In truth, economic justice and social justice advocates have worked together(and often been the SAME people)for generations.

 

annavictorious

(934 posts)
29. Stop blaming the behavior of the trolls with credentials on this nonsense.
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 08:12 PM
Jul 2016

After all the booing of women and POC, everyone knows exactly what they're mad about.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
34. Nobody is mad that a woman was nominated and you know it.
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 08:16 PM
Jul 2016

It's only the right who insists the president has to be male and white.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
35. Yeah, and she is gone.
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 08:18 PM
Jul 2016

They were wrong to announce the figurehead appointment the day the delegates showed up...equally, it was wrong to boo people like Rep. Cummings.

None of this was HIS fault, and the anti-TPP language was kept out on HRC's orders. Cummings was blameless for that, and we gave the HRC people the visual of Sanders delegates booing a black man.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
37. Yeah. That would have done a lot. Lol
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 08:21 PM
Jul 2016

That isn't why these pieces of shit gave Cummings the treatment they did.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
44. They were wrong to boo the Congressman, but the issue was TPP, not race.
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 08:44 PM
Jul 2016

If you are on the left, you are antiracist. It's simply part of your DNA.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
47. You could have left out your "but"
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 08:47 PM
Jul 2016

and stopped short of excusing racist behavior. You make an absolute statement that they are on the left. You have zero proof. We are on the left. Clintons platform is on the left. These people you are excusing are dumb fucks.

Listen to what Cummings was talking about and then tell me what the issue was.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
63. It's not racist simply to boo a person who happens to be black.
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 09:36 PM
Jul 2016

They shouldn't have done it, but the issue was poor judgment, not racism.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
64. Another absolute comment by you with nothing to back it up.
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 09:44 PM
Jul 2016

I'm sure not all of them are racists. All of them are dirt bags.

It's funny you think they wouldn't have done it if it weren't for what you mentioned in your op.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
65. I think that the announcement of DWS honorary appointment made the atmosphere worse.
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 09:48 PM
Jul 2016

If they had done it quietly after the convention, I think this would have been a much quieter day.

I do NOT condone the booing of anyone today.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
66. Agree. The shouldn't be acting this horrid.
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 09:52 PM
Jul 2016

Numerous racists went beyond booing Cummings. Pathetic. They need to be marginalized and drummed out.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
46. Four days later, the delegates would be flying home.
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 08:46 PM
Jul 2016

It could just as easily have been announced quietly. DWS would still have saved face.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
62. No. It's a week when nothing should be done that would piss anybody off.
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 09:34 PM
Jul 2016

It would just have been common sense to wait until after the convention.

And to have stopped attacking Sanders supporters once Bernie endorsed HRC.

Response to Ken Burch (Original post)

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
61. That's exactly what I'm saying.
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 09:33 PM
Jul 2016

DWS would have saved just as much face if they'd announced this after the convention.

Bobbie Jo

(14,341 posts)
60. It wouldn't have mattered
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 09:04 PM
Jul 2016

if it wasn't this, it would have been something else.

This level of bitter runs deep.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»They should just have wai...