2016 Postmortem

Recursion

(56,582 posts) Mon Jul 25, 2016, 10:56 PM Jul 2016

So he's not going to move for an acclamation?

Hmmm

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So he's not going to move for an acclamation? (Original Post) Recursion Jul 2016 OP

Yeah, he is still thinks he has a chance liberal N proud Jul 2016 #1

No, he realizes he has to let the deadenders have their moment. If he tried to push them tblue37 Jul 2016 #10

What! He just said he's planning on a roll call vote tomorrow. Does that mean he's going to procon Jul 2016 #2

No it means he is going to give his delegates a chance to get it out of their system. Joe the Revelator Jul 2016 #3

No, they want a chance to have their tallahasseedem Jul 2016 #5

So what is the goal? nt procon Jul 2016 #9

He has no goal. He is doing the worst. I again say, I'm disgusted. trueblue2007 Jul 2016 #11

Post removed Post removed Jul 2016 #4

I see nothing wrong in bound delegates voting for the candidate to whom they were pledged. David__77 Jul 2016 #7

I'm not sure if that's what he's saying Renew Deal Jul 2016 #6

We're not finished yet. auntpurl Jul 2016 #8

liberal N proud

(60,334 posts)

1. Yeah, he is still thinks he has a chance

Reply to Recursion (Original post)

Mon Jul 25, 2016, 10:58 PM

Jul 2016

tblue37

(65,336 posts)

10. No, he realizes he has to let the deadenders have their moment. If he tried to push them

Reply to liberal N proud (Reply #1)

Mon Jul 25, 2016, 11:21 PM

Jul 2016

without letting them cast their votes, they would go nuts and refuse to get on board. Better to let them have their say, because he knows it won't prevent her nomination.

It is a delicate high wire act, and he is doing a great job with it.

procon

(15,805 posts)

2. What! He just said he's planning on a roll call vote tomorrow. Does that mean he's going to

Reply to Recursion (Original post)

Mon Jul 25, 2016, 10:58 PM

Jul 2016

challenge Hillary???

Joe the Revelator

(14,915 posts)

3. No it means he is going to give his delegates a chance to get it out of their system.

Reply to procon (Reply #2)

Mon Jul 25, 2016, 11:01 PM

Jul 2016

tallahasseedem

(6,716 posts)

5. No, they want a chance to have their

Reply to procon (Reply #2)

Mon Jul 25, 2016, 11:02 PM

Jul 2016

voice heard. They were upset because they didn't think that they would be able to log the vote, but they are.

procon

(15,805 posts)

9. So what is the goal? nt

Reply to tallahasseedem (Reply #5)

Mon Jul 25, 2016, 11:04 PM

Jul 2016

trueblue2007

(17,209 posts)

11. He has no goal. He is doing the worst. I again say, I'm disgusted.

Reply to procon (Reply #9)

Mon Jul 25, 2016, 11:23 PM

Jul 2016

Response to Recursion (Original post)

Post removed

David__77

(23,372 posts)

7. I see nothing wrong in bound delegates voting for the candidate to whom they were pledged.

Reply to Post removed (Reply #4)

Mon Jul 25, 2016, 11:03 PM

Jul 2016

I can understand a candidate releasing them, or not.

Renew Deal

(81,856 posts)

6. I'm not sure if that's what he's saying

Reply to Recursion (Original post)

Mon Jul 25, 2016, 11:03 PM

Jul 2016

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)

8. We're not finished yet.

Reply to Recursion (Original post)

Mon Jul 25, 2016, 11:03 PM

Jul 2016

Let's see where he goes.

Not great at the unity thing so far.

Reply to this discussion