2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe Latest: Sarandon Waits to Be Convinced to Back Clinton
Source: Associated Press
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS PHILADELPHIA Jul 26, 2016, 7:03 AM ET
The Latest on the Democratic National Convention (all times local):
6:25 a.m.
Susan Sarandon says she's waiting to be persuaded to support Hillary Clinton before giving her vote.
The actress is attending the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia and has been taking part in demonstrations with various groups.
Sarandon has been an outspoken supporter of Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders. In an interview with left-leaning website Democracy Now, she says she wants to see what Clinton's plans for are on issues such as fracking and the Trans-Pacific Partnership. She says she wants to be "convinced" by the likely Democratic nominee.
In a separate interview with left-wing online network, The Young Turks, Sarandon calls the leaked e-mails that show the Democratic National Committee and chairwoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz strongly backing Clinton for the party bid, "disgusting." But she adds, "it doesn't come as a surprise."
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/latest-clinton-ascends-nomination-make-history-40883032
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)So, not all that different from what most people are saying about them.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)we are here, for sure. But Sarandon's become awfully predictable. Wonder what forum she picked this "woo me" schtick up from? For all we know, maybe she hangs here.
I can't imagine signaling the world I can be placated with some schmoozing and an apology. If I was going to demand, it wouldn't be stroking my hurt feelings, it'd be specific: "If you want MY vote, contract to hang the Kochs up by their feet and shake them down, then deposit them in jail."
merrily
(45,251 posts)Let's be real. It's about which candidate Sarandon supported and which she is opposing.
On the other hand, I don't know how any candidate woos anyone who doesn't trust or believe him or her--and Trump and Hillary both have that issue.
I am a Sanders supporter (surprise!), but I, too, thought Sarandon could have chosen her words better on that one.
That said, what a celebrity says about a candidate doesn't affect my voting choices. They have a much bigger megaphone than I do, but that is not because they are political geniuses. It's fun when they say nice things or insightful things and pretty much irrelevant when they don't.
Sarandon is a beautiful, older woman and a good actress. She is also intelligent and I believe her intentions have always been good. My admiration for her outside that realm began when she spent her own money to make a TV commercial against invading Iraq, when our war drums started beating and before the vote.
There is so much important stuff that is off the rails. That Sarandon is not in love with Hillary is not important, nor does it make her a bad person. Plenty of other celebrities are. Seems to me having fun with what they say would be more fun that dissecting what Sarandon says. Your candidate is the nominee. Enjoy.
tonedevil
(3,022 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)in his or her beliefs, why can't the truth that matters to that person about each issue be sufficient explanation?
I think soaking up proven lies in order to vilify someone who disagrees with one's views is an indicator of major character flaws. But that's hardly a new insight.
Bearing false witness against others is actually listed as one of Christianity's 10 deadly sins, and no doubt right up there in the other major religions also. But, hey, can't really be so wrong if EVERYBODY does it, right?
Well, everybody doesn't do it.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Life is too short to keep obsess over a poor choice of words by a show biz celebrity, no matter whose candidate was involved.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)we're all on our own, aren't we? "But everyone did it!"
merrily
(45,251 posts)Strong support systems have been shown to help people live longer. (I don't recall if the study considered fellow posters and facebook friends a support system, even if they can't bring you chicken soup when you have the flu, but that would be interesting to know.)
After life as we know it, who knows?
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)hostility, stress, intense frustration and fear from imagining the forces of evil always win -- these not only shorten lives but end up re-forming the faces of people who live that way.
Back to the topic, I'm fine with Sarandon's supposed positions on issues -- good that she has some and cares about something. My big problem with her, a former major favorite, is that knowing this about her makes me unable to watch her movies without memories of her mean and dishonest idiocy getting in the way.
kerry-is-my-prez
(8,133 posts)gracing us with your support?? Attention-seeking ........
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)possible. When people can't be pleased, you do start wondering what their real, or at least other, agenda is. My general experience is the more (seemingly) unreasonably passionate people are the less likely they are to know themselves.
stopbush
(24,395 posts)I wouldn't waste any time or energy on that one.
I didn't realize Sarandon's vote was so precious.
It counts far more than the vote of a common person.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Hillary does NOT need her endorsement.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)LoverOfLiberty
(1,438 posts)most holdouts now simply don't believe that Clinton has adopted the platform she has. I suppose there is always 2020.
Cha
(297,120 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)MelSC
(256 posts)Susan S is a bad judge of character.
Cha
(297,120 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)I doubt Hillary is giving one second's thought to someone who needs to be convinced that Hillary is better than don the con. Anyone with a brain already knows that. For the record, I have NO respect for anyone that voted for nader.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)And she's nothing but a dilettante who plays at being a "progressive" between movies
obamanut2012
(26,064 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)This election will be about turn out. That's number 1.
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)Oh well...
rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)Damn her. Does anyone care what a washed up movie star limousine Marxist thinks?
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)Careful now...washed up is in the eye of the beholder.
rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)name her last major role in a hit movie.
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)mature women.
BTW
She is still very active in films:
2015 About Ray Dolly
2015 Kid Witness Detective Dottie Wheel
2015 The Other Side of the Lake the Purple Girl
2016 Mothers and Daughters Millie
TBA The Death and Life of John F. Donovan Grace Donovan Filming
rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)And I've never heard of any of those films.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)The important thing is you've never heard of them. Critical though at its finest!
rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)without proofreading.
My distaste for Sarandon is completely political. I have no opinion of her acting abilities other than to note that even her famous roles are in relatively minor films, and she hasn't been in anything commercially prominent in recent years.
Why she is washed up and just how washed up she may be are irrelevant to the point that her stardom doesn't make her a particularly credible political voice.
She lives a completely luxurious 1% life. She faces no real consequences if Trump prevails. Her arrogant claim to speak for the oppressed is belied by her petulant self-aggrandizing media presence.
Supporters like her hurt Bernie Sanders in the primary more than they helped. Her support is certainly irrelevant to Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign. Might even be good for Hillary to piss off a few prominent leftist loony birds like her.
RoBear
(1,188 posts)Makes Rocky Horror look like Shakespeare, doesn't it???
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Seems rational and objective to presume any and all commenting on this thread cares enough to comment on her thoughts, despite the tortured justifications coming shortly.
But the most important thing is your petulance in assigning pejoratives to someone who holds a different opinion than you, much as my nine year old nephew does.
I empathize.
JCanete
(5,272 posts)I mean damn, that's using their language and not even re-appropriating it.
rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)So I stand by it.
She travels around Manhattan from opening to fashion show in a limousine, yet believes in some idiotic "revolution" bulllshit.
JCanete
(5,272 posts)don't you just give away your money?" Its a really convenient way of attacking the person rather than the message, so congrats for that intellectual contribution.
rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)Sarandon is a rich woman who travels by limousine. She is also a play-Marxist who spouts radical doctrine in fine cashmere.
She is a limousine Marxist. She's a hypocrite. What I said had nothing *whatsoever* to do with taxes, although if she's such a radical you'd think she'd give away some of the limo and cashmere money.
You might as well be a republican, because you twist words and impute meanings to win arguments. Pffft.
Susan Sarandon is a creep. She has said she'll vote for Trump. She and her fellow limousine radicals like Cornell West (makes half a million a year giving speeches) actually harmed Bernie Sanders because most democratic voters could look at supporters like that and see they were rank hypocrites.
Good day.
JCanete
(5,272 posts)I'm using what is a damn fair example. Limousine liberal is exactly a term out of the Republican lexicon and you changing it to Marxist is keeping it in the same ballpark. Every rich person who has ever advocated for higher taxes has been pilloried by the right, for being hypocrites who aren't serious unless they just voluntarily give more of their money to the state. The point was not that you were talking about taxes, and holy shit that you would even miss something so obvious. The point was that you are doing the same thing by trashing Sarandon for having socialist leanings while being rich, as if that in itself proves her a hypocrite. That you can't see it is pretty astonishing. Hell, give some credit where credit is due.
Peacetrain
(22,874 posts)I think that is one vote we can skip.
rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)At this point I think it's better for Hillary if Ms. Sarandon endorses the ghost of Hugo Chavez and stops the play acting. Cashmere-clad Leninist wannabe airhead can get lost. Jill Stein deserves her and Cornell West, two people who are far more in love with themselves than with any cause.
Arkansas Granny
(31,513 posts)but there are some who will not. I just hope they don't vote for Trump.
rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)Ms. Sarandon is the queen of the stupid set. However, as a rich white lady who gets chauffeured around to fashion shows and radical rallies alike and who sent her kids to the best private schools, she likely stands to do very well under a President Trump (lower taxes on her millions for sure), or at least not to suffer much. She's far to useful an idiot for him to send her to Guantanamo anyway.
If you can vote for Trump out of spite or rage at the imperfections of the Democratic Party, you either are voting your actual interest (you're white and privileged, in other words) or you were never going to vote for a democrat not named Bernie, or you're an idiot or a person who lets emotion trump reason, both categories of voters I submit we are better off without and never had in the first place anyway.
The ideologically motivated far left has sabotaged the Democratic Party over and over for decades.
sarae
(3,284 posts)Arkansas Granny
(31,513 posts)joeybee12
(56,177 posts)Stick it acting, one day you may learn how to do it.
unitedwethrive
(1,997 posts)Orsino
(37,428 posts)I wouldn't blame her for holding out, but she's been nasty.
MineralMan
(146,284 posts)stonecutter357
(12,695 posts)Pretty baby is prime example of Susan Sarandon being a disgusting person.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)She has that right. I find it fascinating how much some care about what a celebrity thinks or who that celebrity votes for or doesn't. I don't spend much time worrying about Susan Sarandon. Great actress, imo, though.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)How in the world would any intelligent person not be totally prepared for what was coming? What did she think would happen?
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)it must be nice to live in such a world.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)They've followed politics for an entire year and are upset a two lotion did not come of it!
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)could not get over this. Her point was, how easy is your life if this is something you can sob over? not tear up, which is perfectly normal, literally sob on national television.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Many years of hard work people have been doing to better this country. They literally think their issues just started the moment they noticed them?
Voter disenfranchisement? It's happening mostly to HRCs voters and the GOP is behind it. But that's not sexy enough. Ugh. The ignorance
JI7
(89,244 posts)first of all , going last means you are THE main speaker for the day. it shows how much respect they have for him to be given that slot .
and then they said some other things which showed they were not informed at all.
and tonight while the mothers who lost their kids were speaking they walked out and held a candlelight vigil for themselves for how the democrats treated them horribly .
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I'm glad she is stating publicly she is open to voting for Clinton.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... who cares? Seriously ... Who the fuck cares what she thinks? She's a kook.
I wonder if she knows that John Edwards, whom she supported, also voted for the IWR. Why didn't it matter then? Why did it only matter when it comes to Hillary?
She's just another single minded, rabid and irrational Hillary Hater.
yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)and she is not stupid. Eventually she will have to decide who is best, Jill Stein or Hillary. Jill Stein will never win enough votes to beat the top pick. That leaves one left.
JaneQPublic
(7,113 posts)...she can also wait until someone gives a damn.
revmclaren
(2,511 posts)what a washed-up Naderite thinks. Way too many people slinking out of the fading spotlight trying to grab the last fleeting crumbs of importance before they are relegated to the ranks of the unimportant.
Cha
(297,120 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)katsy
(4,246 posts)We are awesome & our party will grow stronger with every grumpy pants we convert yay!!!!
Yavin4
(35,432 posts)Hillary won her neighborhood by double digits over Bernie in the primary.
carburyme
(146 posts)She won't matter either way!
Peigan68
(137 posts)Enough said.
DinahMoeHum
(21,783 posts)Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)walk off a short bridge into lava.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)Lol...
DemonGoddess
(4,640 posts)she's a Naderite.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)She has so much to lose under a Clinton presidency, like...
Oh wait, no she doesn't. She's fine no matter what happens come November. Must be nice to feel that way - so secure and warm in a privileged cocoon. I am wholly unable to relate.
Thrill
(19,178 posts)nothing is
DemonGoddess
(4,640 posts)she wants Trump to bring Revolution
Response to Thrill (Reply #50)
Name removed Message auto-removed
tallahasseedem
(6,716 posts)NOT me!
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)ronnykmarshall
(35,356 posts)Protalker
(418 posts)Perhaps while taking a drive in your convertible.
One of the 99
(2,280 posts)who didn't suffer under the Bush presidency and won't under a Trump presidency.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)OnDoutside
(19,952 posts)BainsBane
(53,029 posts)Who is she that we need to sit in wait for her vote?
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)to re-convince her?
I wonder what Trump had to do to get her attention and her vote?
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)She should stay as far away from Hillary's campaign as possible. She's a moron.
Paladin
(28,246 posts)asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)I am more concerned about an effin Russian hack...
LenaBaby61
(6,974 posts)My Susan Sarandon give-a-damn-o-meter:
1 ---------------------------------------------------10 HERE----------------------------------------->
LiberalLovinLug
(14,169 posts)The degree of arrogant juvenile assholishness in this thread is disgusting. She is only asking what any Democrat with any kind of principles would ask of a candidate that has been contradictory and/or vague on a couple of important issues.
My gawd the hatred of the "liberal Hollywood elite" in here rivals the dregs of uneducated baggerville.
Kali
(55,007 posts)We are going to have to convince a lot of voters, not just her. The kind of attitude displayed here is terrible and destructive. You don't get votes by saying fuck the voter - to any of them. So ugly!
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)MFM008
(19,804 posts)its when I liked you.
Lady_Chat
(561 posts)Kerry Washington, Elizabeth Banks, Eva Longoria, Katy Perry, Julianne Moore, Alicia Keys, Uzo Aduba, America Ferrera, Ellen DeGeneres, Deborah Messing, Rosie Perez, Demi Lovato, and Lady Gaga, and that's just to name a few, and that's not even the guys!
David__77
(23,367 posts)I can understand that.
kerry-is-my-prez
(8,133 posts)convince me to vote for them. You either agree more with Hillaries and the Democrats issues, or Trumps or not really think it's that big of a deal who wins.
David__77
(23,367 posts)...
BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)baldguy
(36,649 posts)The BoBs can go fuck themselves.
renie408
(9,854 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)I'm sure it's an agonizing decision for you, Ms. Sarandon. May you go with your conscience.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)She, like many BoB's, are not thinking with their heads. They are making decisions emotionally. Like creationists and climate deniers, you can't convince them with facts, so don't try.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)Lebam in LA
(1,344 posts)JCanete
(5,272 posts)is not uninformed. It would be a little higher level if people on these boards could discuss principled positions with a generous read as to the place they are coming from. You don't have to agree with everything Sarandon says, and you can believe she's flat out wrong, but as somebody who very publicly stood against Bush and the Iraq War, and has been on the right side of history more often than Clinton has, maybe people could try to remember the things they used to like about her.
Oh did she vote for Nader? Is this club only two moneyed parties and nobody else gets to play? You have reasons why she's wrong? Talk about those then and quit besmirching the fuck out of people. And yes, I've seen it on both sides, so Clinton fans aren't the only culprits.
glennward
(989 posts)still_one
(92,116 posts)be supporting the only dumb assed candidate in that race, Trump
now go back to one of your million dollar estates that won't be affected by whoever is the next president, while the grown ups work for Hillary to defeat Trump
obamanut2012
(26,064 posts)Let her write in Nader of Edwards again.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Meryl Streep.
Sid
Stuckinthebush
(10,843 posts)I'm betting her career has been seriously injured. The righties hate her and the Dems are disgusted with her. Her stock isn't exactly rising.
DemonGoddess
(4,640 posts)who thinks we need to "sell" them on Hillary because they didn't get their way can go to hell.
Blue Idaho
(5,045 posts)I have no time for self-indulgent movie stars.